Connect with us

Fitness

Building the No Neck Army: The Army’s Holistic Health and Fitness Program – Modern War Institute

Published

on

Building the No Neck Army: The Army’s Holistic Health and Fitness Program – Modern War Institute

Editor’s note: This article is the seventh in an eight-part series led by retired General James Mingus, the thirty-ninth vice chief of staff of the Army, on transforming the Army to meet the challenges of tomorrow’s battlefield. You can read other articles in the series here.


The battlefield in America’s next war will offer no sanctuary. The war won’t be fought from forward operating bases equipped with elaborate gyms, contractor-provided dining facilities, or coffee shops. The battlefield will be austere, harsh, and unrelentingly violent, with victory only possible by combining physical strength, endurance, and a will to prepare.

The Army’s Holistic Health and Fitness (H2F) program is the bedrock upon which this preparation begins. Winning America’s next war requires an Army that can get to the fight, win the fight, and get home from the fight—a mission profile that demands not just fit soldiers built for endurance, but warrior athletes built for endurance and able to leverage strength, speed, and power, and grounded in sound sleep and nutrition.

Culture Shift Begins with Mindset Shift

For the last several decades, the Army took pride in fielding formations rooted in a physical fitness culture relying heavily on push-ups, sit-ups, and miles of running and ruck marching. Physical training began predictably after saluting the flag at 0630 and ended promptly when the basic exercises, calisthenics, and formation run were complete. It was one-dimensional, unimaginative, boring, and, ironically, lazy. Army fitness during this period was solely focused on physical endurance.

Advertisement

In the early 2000s, however, Army fitness began to change, led by special operations units like the 75th Ranger Regiment, which began experimenting with trending fitness regimens like Gym Jones, CrossFit, and Mountain Athlete. By combining emerging principles from several of these programs, special operations units began designing their own programs, such as the Ranger Athlete Warrior program. The rest of the active Army quickly started to model these programs, and the first H2F pilot kicked off in 2018.

Advances in exercise science and twenty years of war helped reframe the Army’s fitness mindset to encompass mental, physical, nutritional, and sleep dimensions. This mindset shift forms the basis of the H2F culture, changing how we train and care for soldiers. The focus is now on building strength and resilience like professional athletes—or more fittingly, warrior athletes. Where mission endurance was the goal before, tactical athleticism is now the goal, with an emphasis on strength, speed, power, and agility.

You Can’t Fake Results

A key part of any fitness program is the ability to measure its effectiveness, and in only a few short years, the return on investment for the H2F program has been profound. Currently sixty-six brigades have an H2F performance team, which consists of twenty-two professionals: a program director, dietitian, physical therapist, and occupational therapist; seven strength and conditioning coaches; four athletic trainers; one cognitive performance specialist; and six military personnel. By 2029, the program will expand to cover the entire active Army, as well as four states of Army National Guard and two Army Reserve commands.

According to analysis from the US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, if H2F had been implemented across the entire Army, over a five-year period it would have added 1,080 deployable soldiers to the fighting force. If that’s not compelling enough, also consider these complementary H2F data points compiled by the Center for Initial Military Training Research and Analysis team after analyzing data from 2019 to 2023:

Advertisement
  • 61 percent decrease in musculoskeletal injury referrals
  • 44 percent decrease in behavioral health profiles
  • 79 percent decrease in substance abuse cases
  • 22 percent decrease in fitness test failures
  • 33 percent increase in expert rifle marksmanship qualification

Expanding the Tools

As part of continuous transformation, the Army is looking for unique ways to leverage technology to enhance the H2F program. Several units are experimenting with wearables like rings and watches that measure sleep efficiency, heart rate variability, and blood oxygen saturation—providing rich data to inform approaches to physical, nutritional, and sleep aspects of fitness. Today, entire Army divisions are turning physiological data into leader decision-making information. A company commander who knows his or her soldiers’ sleep scores, for example, is equipped with data to combine with other information to help select the most well-rested platoon to lead a dangerous mission. Individual soldiers will also learn the correlations that exist between their fueling, recovery, and performance habits, which will help in multiple facets of their personal lives.

The Army is also continually working to improve facilities and services that support H2F. Most units now have access to twenty-four-hour functional fitness gyms on post and many units utilize fitness containers—effectively, gyms in a box. Plans are also in place to build additional facilities to ensure soldiers at every post have adequate equipment to train. To improve nutrition, the Army is experimenting with campus-style dining facilities that will supplement, and in some cases replace, traditional dining facilities—affording soldiers a myriad of quick, 24/7 accessible healthy food options. A no excuse not to work out and no excuse not to eat healthy mentality now abounds across the Army.

Soldiering has no offseason and no time-outs, and wars wait on no one. When America calls, the Army responds. Unlike professional athletes who can vary training volume, intensity, and specific exercises over planned cycles or offseasons, a practice known as performance periodization, soldiers have no such luxury. Tactical athleticism via compound periodization is the goal for soldiers—ensuring peak performance at all times by developing key physical attributes (e.g., strength, endurance, and power) year-round to maximize efficiency, prevent burnout, and improve overall warfighting readiness. The H2F tools highlighted above aid in measuring and maximizing this readiness.

What’s Next?

Imagine two Army squads ascending Colorado’s Pikes Peak carrying fifty-pound fighting loads. Squad A trained to get to the top through push-ups, sit-ups, and miles of running. The soldiers of Squad B are warrior athletes who took the H2F approach. When Squad A’s soldiers finally struggle to the top, they’re just happy to be mission complete and they flop on the ground. The soldiers of Squad B assault the mountain, and when they get to the top, they still have enough juice to rip the arms off their adversaries and steamroll into the next mission. In their post-hike squad photo, they’re all standing tall—straight backs, satisfied smiles, and trap muscles extending inches above their shoulders so they almost appear to have no necks. For them the mission is just getting started, and their smirks seem to say, “Is that it? What’s next?”

Advertisement

Welcome to the No Neck Army.

Retired General James Mingus served as the thirty-ninth vice chief of staff of the Army.

Colonel Graham White is an infantry officer and the executive officer to the vice chief of staff of the Army.

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the United States Military Academy, Department of the Army, or Department of Defense.

Image credit: KCpl. GeonWoo Park, US Army

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Fitness

The method that will help you burn fat exactly where you want | The Jerusalem Post

Published

on

The method that will help you burn fat exactly where you want | The Jerusalem Post

In an ideal world, we could precisely control where we want to “burn” fat. According to an article published on the Men’s Fitness website, for most men this refers to the abdominal area, the obliques, and the lower back, meaning the entire core region. The idea of burning fat in a specific area is called “spot reduction”, and a new study reveals that this dream may be possible.

Fat loss is a systemic process in which fatty acids are released from fat tissue, travel through the bloodstream, and are oxidized, meaning “burned”. This is different from how the body burns carbohydrates, which is indeed “specific” to a certain area. Carbohydrates are stored in the muscles in the form of glycogen. When performing bicep curls, mainly glycogen stored in the arm muscles is burned. When performing a leg exercise, mainly glycogen from the leg muscles is burned.

Since fat is not burned locally like carbohydrates, many believe that spot fat reduction is not possible. In practice, the body reduces fat according to its own patterns, and stubborn areas, of course, tend to be the last to shrink.

A new study presents a slightly more complex picture

In a study from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, men were divided into two groups: One group performed abdominal exercises together with aerobic training, and the second performed only aerobic training. Using a DEXA scan, it was found that the group that combined abdominal exercises lost more fat in the trunk area. One might think that this group simply burned more calories, but the study was designed so that caloric expenditure was identical between the groups. In addition, DEXA scans are considered one of the most accurate methods for measuring body fat.

Another study from the University of Padua strengthened the findings. One group in the study performed exercises for the abdominal and arm muscles as part of a circuit aerobic workout, meaning it alternated between targeted exercises and aerobic activity. The second group in the study performed the same exercises, at the same volume and intensity, but in a standard structure of aerobic training followed by strength training. The result – the group that combined the two lost more fat in the abdominal area.

Advertisement

The findings indicate that training structure also matters. A combination of work on specific muscles and aerobic activity may increase blood flow to the active area, and this is probably one of the mechanisms that helps local fat breakdown. Studies show that fat breakdown is linked to increased blood flow in fat tissue, therefore it can be concluded that when working a specific muscle, blood flow and the release of fatty acids increase in the nearby area.

A combination of work on specific muscles and aerobic activity may increase blood flow to the active area, and this is probably one of the mechanisms that helps local fat breakdown (credit: SHUTTERSTOCK)

How can you “burn” more abdominal fat?

Based on this, if the goal is to reduce abdominal fat, it is recommended to perform abdominal exercises before aerobic training, and at high intensity. They should be treated like any other muscle group and not be limited to a few repetitions at the end of the workout. It is recommended to perform between ten and twenty sets that work the abdominal muscles from different angles, and then move on to aerobic training or integrate the exercises within a circuit aerobic workout.

It is important to emphasize that this is not a substitute for a caloric deficit and not a magic solution. However, it is a small adjustment in training structure that may influence how the body uses fat stores.

So is it possible to influence the area from which fat is lost? Possibly, to some extent. This is also physiologically logical. In the abdominal area there is usually more fat and relatively less blood flow, and it is also tended to be trained less and at lower intensity compared to other muscle groups. Therefore, increasing activity in this area may influence the fat loss process there.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Fitness

Only have light weights? This 15-minute workout will help you build strength and improve your fitness

Published

on

Only have light weights? This 15-minute workout will help you build strength and improve your fitness

Light dumbbells are one of the most convenient pieces of home workout equipment, but you may feel like you quickly outgrow them.

However, there are plenty of ways to use light weights so they still pose a challenge, such as this workout by Pilates instructor Bianca Wise, who recently launched a workout series on ALO Wellness Club.

Continue Reading

Fitness

Are Upright Rows Bad for Shoulders? How to Build Bigger Delts Without Injury – Muscle & Fitness

Published

on

Are Upright Rows Bad for Shoulders? How to Build Bigger Delts Without Injury – Muscle & Fitness

The upright row, depending on your perspective, is either the best exercise for your delts and traps or a flat-out shoulder wrecker. It’s an exercise with a bad-boy reputation.

People base its reputation on the standard barbell version, where lifters raise their elbows high above shoulder level and internally rotate the shoulders. This position increases the risk of subacromial impingement, the painful compression, irritation, or rubbing of the rotator cuff tendons and bursa within the shoulder joint.

But that’s only part of the story, because the arguments focus on the barbell version of it: too much height, too narrow a grip, and not enough control. That matters because research doesn’t support scrapping the upright row.

The real issue isn’t good vs. bad—it’s whether we’re judging this lift fairly. Here, with the help of a few of my coaching friends, we’ll explore one of the more misunderstood lifts in the weight room.

Advertisement

How the Upright Row Earned Its Reputation

When the elbows rise past shoulder height, the shoulder complex is placed in a compromised position, raising concerns about subacromial impingement. That’s why it gets its fair share of criticism. “From a biomechanical standpoint,” explains Matt Wenning from Wenning Strength. “You’re combining shoulder abduction with internal rotation under load. That position reduces subacromial space and increases compressive stress on the supraspinatus tendon and subacromial bursa.”

Here’s the flip side. The upright row’s reputation comes from one variation. That label is then applied to every version of it, even though research suggests the issue stems from excessive elevation, internal rotation, and poor execution. That is how the lift became hated: One version became the whole story.

Why Upright Rows Get a Bad Reputation

No exercise is perfect, and most carry a certain amount of risk, and the upright row is no different.

  • Shoulder Risky Business: The arms rise while the shoulders stay internally rotated. That can become a problem because the shoulder needs to externally rotate to keep the movement smooth and give the shoulder structures enough room. When that doesn’t happen, the mechanics can get messy, especially as the elbows keep rising.
  • Increases Subacromial Impingement Risk: The concern becomes more serious when the elbows reach or exceed shoulder height. According to this study, the ranges in which the greatest degree of impingement occurs overlap with the ranges in which many lifters perform the upright row. The classic “pull it high” coaching cue pushes the movement into the exact zone where some shoulders start to complain.
  • There Are Simpler Alternatives: If your goal is to build the delts and traps, there are easier ways to get there. According to Wenning, “You can get the same or better hypertrophy stimulus with face pulls, high pulls, cable lateral variations, or movements that allow the scapula to upwardly rotate without being forced into internal rotation under load.”

That makes the upright row feel optional, and honestly, it is. But optional does not mean worthless. Let’s see what the research says.

Are Upright Rows Actually Dangerous? (Science Explained)

The research-based answer is more nuanced than the internet’s usual “good exercise” or “bad exercise” debate. This NSCA study does not support throwing the upright row away. The barbell version becomes problematic when you pull your elbows too high while your shoulders remain internally rotated. The study also shows that the upright row remains safe and effective—if you use proper precautions.

“If I program it at all,” explains Wenning, “I modify it with a wider grip to reduce internal rotation demand, pull height limited to lower chest or sternum, with a controlled tempo, and with a lower volume and load.” Based on the details of McAllister et al.’s study, a wider grip increases deltoid and trapezius activity while reducing biceps involvement. That matters because it suggests the upright row is not a single fixed exercise. Small setup changes can alter the training effect. So, if the goal is to get more deltoid and trapezius stimulus, a wide-grip version makes more sense than the narrow-grip style many lifters default to.

Advertisement

Other studies suggest people have exaggerated the risk of shoulder impingement. “Shoulder impingement doesn’t seem to be a real problem,” according to Dr. Allan Bacon, owner of Maui Athletics. “A study by Giphart et al. used fluoroscopy to observe what happens inside healthy shoulders during arm elevation. They found that the tendon most people worry about had already moved out of the ‘danger zone’ before the arm even reached shoulder height.”

Here’s the main takeaway: Range of motion matters. Stop the pull at or just below shoulder height, rather than raising the elbows well above it. For lifters with a history of shoulder issues, the advice is even more conservative: Shorten the range to a pain-free zone or skip the lift altogether. That gives us a much smarter takeaway than “never do upright rows.”

Upright Row Benefits

So far, you’ve heard why you shouldn’t do them, but here’s why you should.

Exercise Efficiency

Advertisement

Upright row trains the lateral delts and upper traps together, which gives you a lot of muscle-building value from one movement. When performed with a wider grip, you’ll get plenty of muscle-building action in both muscles.

Ability to Train The Lateral Delts Heavy

Most delt work is either isolation-heavy, like lateral raises, or more pressing-dominant, where the front delts are the emphasis. The upright row sits in a useful middle ground, allowing you to train the shoulders and traps together without performing the overhead press or endless sets of raises.

Changing Muscle Emphasis

The barbell locks you into a specific range of motion, but you can adjust the grip width. A wider grip increases activity in the deltoids and trapezius while decreasing biceps engagement, placing the shoulder joint in a less compromised position.

Advertisement

Exercise Flexibility

You have options regarding the upright row. Grip width, range of motion, and tool choice can all change how the lift feels. A straight bar, EZ-bar, cable, rope, or dumbbells can create different movement paths and levels of comfort.” I absolutely love dumbbell single-arm high pulls,” says Bo Babenko, DPT at Fit Care Physio. “Think the ‘faster up, controlled down’ concept is key, and the wider range of motion a unilateral variation allows is beneficial for the shoulder joint.”

Who Should Avoid Upright Rows?

When you shake off the good-or-bad mindset about exercise, it’s about whether it’s a good fit or not.

  • If you want bigger delts and traps but the movement doesn’t bother you, go for it. It fits best as an accessory exercise for intermediate and advanced lifters who have enough shoulder awareness to control the bar path, stop at the right height, and avoid ego taking over.
  • The upright row isn’t an all-or-nothing exercise. If you’re willing to modify rather than force the standard version, then give it a shot. That means using a grip width that feels good to you, keeping the bar close, or using a different tool altogether. For these lifters, the upright row can be a productive tool, not a shoulder trap waiting to happen.
  • But if you have a history of shoulder impingement or rotator cuff issues, or if the movement gives you pinching, pain, or an ache during or after the set, don’t do it. Beginners who do not yet have the awareness to control their shoulder position are also better off using an alternative that Wenning suggested.
  • If lateral raises, cable variations, shrugs, or carries train your delts and traps better with less risk and less hassle, there is no medal for performing upright rows.

Programming Upright Rows for Muscle Growth

The upright row works best as an accessory lift because it’s a muscle-building exercise that rewards control, not chaos. This lift doesn’t reward ego lifting, ugly reps, or chasing numbers. Be honest about load, and progress only when the weight feels easy.

For Muscular Endurance: 2-3 sets of 12-20 reps.

For Strength & Muscle: 3-5 sets 6-12 reps.

Advertisement

Upright Row: Risk vs Reward Breakdown

The upright row lives in the yellow-light category. The risk is real because:

  1. The barbell version can place the shoulder in a less forgiving position, especially when lifters pull the elbows too high, use a narrow grip, or pile on load without enough control.
  2. The margin for error is smaller than in many other shoulder exercises, which is why it has drawn more suspicion than a lateral raise or shrug.

But the rewards are there, too. It trains the delts and upper traps hard; it may fill a unique multijoint role for the middle deltoid, and a wider grip increases involvement of the delts and traps. That makes it a good option for lifters who tolerate it well.

The real risk-versus-reward verdict is this: the upright row offers moderate risk and moderate-to-high reward. If you can perform it pain-free, use a sensible grip, and use a pain-free range of motion, the reward can outweigh the risk. If every rep feels like a no, the cost is too high, and another variation is warranted.

Final Verdict

The upright row is not all bad for your shoulders, but it is not idiot-proof either, because thinking that more is better is a bad long-term move. The risk to your shoulders is real, and pretending otherwise is dangerous.

But that doesn’t mean you should scrap it. Use a controlled range of motion, a sensible grip, and a moderate load to make this lift an effective delt and upper trap builder. The upright row is neither the villain it’s made out to be nor a bolder shoulder hero. Whatever your choice, choose wisely.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending