Connect with us

Oregon

Donald Trump makes emergency appeal against Oregon National Guard block

Published

on

Donald Trump makes emergency appeal against Oregon National Guard block


The Trump administration’s use of federal law to take control of state National Guard units and deploy them to Oregon and Illinois has triggered a wave of legal challenges that now test the limits of presidential authority in domestic security.

In Oregon, U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut permanently blocked the deployment to Portland, finding after a three-day hearing that the administration failed to meet the statutory requirements of § 12406 and violated the Tenth Amendment.

Newsweek contacted the DOJ and the office of the governors of Illinois and Oregon for comment via email outside of normal office hours on Monday.

Why It Matters

The escalating court battles over President Trump’s federalization of National Guard units in Illinois and Oregon matter because they will determine how far a president can go in deploying military forces inside the United States without state consent.

Advertisement

At stake are the limits of presidential authority under 10 U.S.C. § 12406, the ability of states to control their own Guard units and the degree to which courts can review a president’s judgment in domestic security matters.

The outcomes will set precedent not just for these disputes, but for how future administrations respond to protests, unrest and conflicts with state governments.

What To Know

Oregon At The Center Of The Fight

Oregon is now the central battleground in the fight over President Trump’s authority to federalize and deploy National Guard units under 10 U.S.C. § 12406.

After a three-day hearing, U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut permanently enjoined the administration from deploying any federalized Guard troops to Portland, holding that the President’s actions violated both § 12406 and the Tenth Amendment.

Advertisement

In the government’s emergency stay request now before the Ninth Circuit, federal officials portray Portland as a sustained security crisis, asserting that immigration facilities had “come under coordinated assault by violent groups intent on obstructing lawful federal enforcement action,” and arguing that “violence and threats of violence recurred more-or-less continuously,” including incidents where protesters “started fires,” “assaulted officers” and “hurled mortars at the facility.”

Oregon officials sharply dispute that rationale.

Oregon Governor, Tina Kotek is on record as saying: “I think it’s incredibly dangerous to take our citizen soldiers and to deploy them in our streets, without a real reason. The facts on the ground… do not warrant [this]. There’s not an insurrection. This is not a rebellion. This is not a national security threat,”

She added: “This is a fundamental issue for our democracy, about what the control and authority of the president is, and what the court says it is. The rule of law has to hold,” saying: “This is not a factual need on the ground in Oregon… This is an unlawful militarization of our troops here.”

However, Attorney General Dan Rayfield welcomed the ruling, saying, as per Statesman Journal: “From the start, this case has been about making sure that facts—not political whims—guide how the law is applied,” and insisting that the decision “made it clear that this administration must be accountable to the truth and to the rule of law.”

Advertisement

National Guard In Limbo As States Push Back

Even after the injunction, the Guard remains caught between state and federal authority.

About 200 members of the Oregon National Guard will remain under federal control, as reported by Oregon Capital Chronicle, but cannot yet be deployed to Portland, “…the effect of granting an administrative stay preserves the status quo in which National Guard members have been federalized but not deployed,” the judges wrote.

The Oregon standoff, however, has also drawn national scrutiny.

In an October 7 letter to Texas Governor Greg Abbott, members of Congress warned that cross-state deployments for domestic policing “violate the rule of law” and “set a dangerous precedent that states can police one another’s communities.”

Advertisement

Illinois Case Echoes Oregon—But On Narrower Grounds

Illinois faces a similar but narrower dispute. Unlike Oregon—where the administration attempted to bring in out-of-state Guard units—the Illinois case involves only the attempted federalization of the Illinois National Guard.

The Seventh Circuit is reviewing the administration’s appeal after a district court temporarily blocked federalization of the Illinois National Guard, finding “insufficient evidence of rebellion or a danger of a rebellion” and insufficient evidence that the President was “unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.”

The court of appeals wrote that “the facts do not justify the President’s actions in Illinois under § 12406.”

Illinois has also presented evidence that local police effectively managed protests near an ICE facility, including an ICE official’s email noting that agents “had not needed to interact with any protesters at all” because state and local officers “were handling everything.”

Advertisement

Across both states, the administration continues to argue that the President’s determinations under § 12406 deserve extraordinary judicial deference.

In a November 10 supplemental brief to the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General’s office asserted that the term “regular forces” refers to “the civilian forces with whom the President regularly executes the relevant laws,” and insisted that courts cannot “second-guess the Commander in Chief’s judgment.”

With appellate proceedings active and the Supreme Court weighing the meaning of “regular forces,” the legal boundaries of presidential power in domestic military deployment remain unsettled and consequential, according to Washington Examiner.

What People Are Saying

Donald Trump/the White House said, as per Military Times: “I am also authorizing Full Force, if necessary.”

Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield said in a statement: “From the start, this case has been about making sure that facts—not political whims—guide how the law is applied,” adding “The district court’s ruling made it clear that this administration must be accountable to the truth and to the rule of law.”

Advertisement

J.B. Pritzker. Governor of Illinois, October 4, 2025, said: “For Donald Trump, this has never been about safety. This is about control.”

What Happens Next

Appellate courts in the Seventh and Ninth Circuits—and likely the Supreme Court—must now decide whether President Trump can continue federalizing and deploying National Guard units over state objections, leaving troops in a suspended status while states pursue additional legal challenges and the administration presses its argument for broad presidential discretion under 10 U.S.C. §12406.

The outcomes will determine if deployments resume, remain blocked or trigger a broader constitutional ruling on the limits of federal power in domestic security.



Source link

Advertisement

Oregon

New Data Shows Oregon E-Scooter Injuries on the Rise

Published

on

New Data Shows Oregon E-Scooter Injuries on the Rise


Data released by the Oregon Health Authority this week suggests Oregonians are getting hurt on electric scooters more every year.

In recent years, according to OHA, an “e-scooter-specific code” was developed for health care tracking purposes.

From 2021 to 2024, annual injury reports under this code from Oregon hospitals and emergency departments jumped from 211 to 418.

And in just the first nine months of 2025, there had been 509 such reports.

Advertisement

“These injuries are not minor scrapes,” said Dagan Wright, an OHA epidemiologist, in a written statement. “They often involve head injuries, broken bones, and other serious trauma that requires emergency or inpatient care.”

The city of Portland signed contracts with three e-scooter rental companies in 2018, as the transportation craze spread across the country. But e-scooter injury diagnosis codes are relatively new in health care reporting, Wright said in the OHA statement.

“While the overall numbers remain smaller than for other transportation-related injuries, the rapid increase over a short period of time is a clear safety signal,” OHA added.

The agency highlighted the story of Portland e-scooter commuter Daniel Pflieger, who it says was riding a scooter home when he reportedly slid on ice. He bruised several ribs.

Sometimes outcomes are worse. OHA identified 17 deaths linked to electric or motorized scooters since 2018, and seven of those occurred in 2025.

Advertisement

OHA says that e-bikes raise many similar safety concerns as e-scooters. The first full year for which e-bike injuries were coded for reporting was 2023. State data shows 392 reported e-bike injuries that year, 683 in 2024, and 760 in the first nine months of 2025.

“Injuries involving e-bikes and e-scooters share common risk factors—speed, lack of helmet use, roadway design, and interactions with motor vehicles,” Wright said.

Oregon E-Scooter Injuries on the Rise (Source: Oregon Health Authority)

Willamette Week’s reporting has concrete impacts that change laws, force action from civic leaders, and drive compromised politicians from public office.

Support WW





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Oregon

Oregon women’s basketball playing for March Madness seeding vs. Purdue

Published

on

Oregon women’s basketball playing for March Madness seeding vs. Purdue


play

At times, the Oregon women’s basketball team has certainly made things much harder on themselves than it needs to be. The team has also produced some miraculous comeback victories, putting itself in position to make women’s March Madness for the second straight season.

March 1, in their final regular season game, the Ducks (20-11, 8-10 Big Ten) finished on the wrong end of yet another tight game to Washington, 70-69. It’s the second time this season Oregon has come back from a double-digit deficit, but ended up losing to the Huskies (20-9, 10-8).

Advertisement

Those aren’t the only times Oregon has come back from a double-digit deficit, like it did in wins vs. Nebraska and USC. The No. 11-seed Ducks are hoping they won’t need heroics in a Big Ten tournament first-round game against No. 14 Purdue this Wednesday.

Watch Oregon basketball on Peacock

“I think our biggest weakness this year has been our inconsistency,” coach Kelly Graves said, “something we’ve battled all year. The great thing is our kids know, regardless of the score, we’ve got a chance. We’ll make it a game at some point. As a coach, it drives you nuts. Hopefully we can figure it out and play more consistent basketball.”

Oregon’s volatility has seen it earn three double-digit comeback wins this year, but also blow several games in the final moments.

Advertisement

Against Wisconsin, the Ducks held a 6-point lead with less than a minute remaining, but lost in overtime. Against Illinois, Oregon held a 21-point lead at halftime, blew it in the third quarter, trailed by eight with minutes to play and somehow eked out a win.

That makes UO somewhat of a wild card heading into the conference tournament this week at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis.

“It’s definitely (been) a rollercoaster,” guard Katie Fiso said. “A lot of highs and a lot of lows. But one thing that I try to see through all games is our grittiness and our toughness. One thing that stays consistent throughout the season is our toughness and our grittiness. The game isn’t over until the last bell rings.”

The Ducks will be taking on a Boilermakers (13-16, 5-13) team that has struggled against most of the top competition in the league, but played Oregon tight in a Feb. 25 Ducks win.

Advertisement

Graves said when the Ducks went throughout the postgame handshake line after, the Boilermakers felt like their season would end after the regular season. Thanks to some upsets, Purdue is in the Big Ten Tournament as the No. 14 seed.

“We’re playing a team that probably feels like it’s playing with house money,” Graves said. “We’ve got to pick ourselves back up and get it done.”

What channel is Oregon vs. Purdue on today in Big Ten tournament?

Oregon will tip off vs. Purdue on Peacock, with no TV option to watch the game.

Oregon vs. Purdue start time in Big Ten tournament

  • Date: Wednesday, March 4
  • Time: Around 5:30 p.m. PT

Oregon and Purdue will play around 5:30 p.m. PT at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. The first game of the day begins at 12:30 p.m. PT, with the next game 25 minutes after the first game ends, and so on. The Ducks play in the third game of the day, so no official tip time is listed.

Oregon women’s basketball schedule 2025-26

Below are the past five games of Oregon’s 2025-26 basketball season. For the full schedule, click here.

Advertisement
Feb. 15 Washington 51, Oregon 43
Feb. 19 Oregon 80, Nebraska 76
Feb. 22 Indiana 72, Oregon 65
Feb. 25 Oregon 71, Purdue 65
March 1 Washington 70, Oregon 69
March 4 Oregon vs. Purdue (Big Ten tournament)

Purdue women’s basketball schedule 2025-26

Below are the past five games of Purdue’s 2025-26 basketball season. For the full schedule, click here.

Feb. 14 Purdue 72, Rutgers 57
Feb. 19 Iowa 83, Purdue 74
Feb. 22 Maryland 99, Purdue 66
Feb. 25 Oregon 71, Purdue 65
March 1 Purdue 67, Northwestern 62
March 4 Oregon vs. Purdue (Big Ten tournament)

Alec Dietz covers University of Oregon football and women’s basketball for The Register-Guard. You may reach him at adietz@registerguard.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Oregon lawmakers advance one-year moratorium on tax breaks for data centers

Published

on

Oregon lawmakers advance one-year moratorium on tax breaks for data centers


Written by Alma McCarty & KGW:

SALEM, Oregon — In the final week of Oregon’s legislative short session, lawmakers in Salem discussed regulating data centers — specifically, placing a one-year moratorium on certain tax breaks.

Governor Tina Kotek has been looking to expand the state’s enterprise zone program, which is intended to grow Oregon companies and attract new ones. Businesses that locate or expand within designated zones can qualify for property tax exemptions on new investments if they meet eligibility requirements.

However, some advocates argue that extending incentives to data centers may not be sustainable long term.

Advertisement

“Data centers have been around for a while,” said Kelly Campbell, policy director for Columbia Riverkeeper. “Data centers are getting bigger and bigger. Some of these new AI hyperscale data centers are exponentially bigger than those tiny ones. They’re really just using a lot of energy, a lot of water.”

However, some advocates argue that extending incentives to data centers may not be sustainable long term.

“Data centers have been around for a while,” said Kelly Campbell, policy director for Columbia Riverkeeper. “Data centers are getting bigger and bigger. Some of these new AI hyperscale data centers are exponentially bigger than those tiny ones. They’re really just using a lot of energy, a lot of water.”

Last week, Columbia Riverkeeper released a report examining data centers operating or planned along the Columbia River in Oregon and Washington.

“I think the question becomes, do we want to stick to our climate goals of getting to 100% renewable? Or do we want to have these big, mega data centers owned by big tech companies — some of the wealthiest corporations in the world — getting to use whatever energy they want? We would say, no, that’s not OK,” Campbell said.

Advertisement

On Monday, lawmakers amended an economic incentives bill to block new data centers from qualifying for certain tax breaks for one year.

“I think this moratorium is a pretty short pause to give the advisory council time and space to do their work,” said Rep. Nancy Nathanson, D-Eugene, during a subcommittee meeting Monday morning.

The Data Center Advisory Committee, convened by Kotek, held its first meeting Friday. The group’s goal is to develop policy recommendations addressing the rapid growth of data centers.

“There are some businesses that will need them, but freestanding data centers, the way we’ve been growing in the state, is not sustainable,” the Governor told reporters during a press conference last week. 

On Monday, her office sent KGW a statement regarding the moratorium:

Advertisement

The moratorium will address immediate concerns and also allow for the Governor’s Data Center Advisory Committee to develop recommendations to strategically pursue economic development opportunities while ensuring utility costs, infrastructure investments, and environmental impacts remain sustainable and equitable for all residents.”

Supporters of data center growth, particularly in rural communities, also spoke during work sessions.

“This moratorium will have a disparate impact on communities east of the Cascades — communities like Prineville, Hermiston and Redmond that have leveraged enterprise zones and data centers to bring hundreds of living-wage jobs to their communities,” said Alexandra Ring, a lobbyist for the League of Oregon Cities.

“While data centers may be seen as a nuisance or inconvenient in Washington County, they are not in Crook County. They are not in Morrow County, in Umatilla County,” said Sen. Mark McLane, who represents several Eastern Oregon counties, including Baker, Crook, Grant and Harney.

Even if the House and Senate ultimately approve the moratorium, it would apply only to new data centers — not those that already receive tax breaks or projects currently underway.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending