Culture
Weekend NHL rankings: The Wild, the Canadiens and the 10 teams we haven’t ranked yet
With the calendar about to flip over to April, we’re down to three weeks left in the regular season. And that means we don’t have many of these columns left. The finish line is in sight.
It’s safe to assume the last few weeks will be dedicated to breaking down the various playoff races, unless every bubble team in the East just voluntarily folds their franchise to avoid landing a spot it’s clear nobody wants. But in this semi-calm before the storm, a few of you have pointed out we’ve yet to visit an annual tradition around here: recognizing the teams that made it through the entire season without ever landing in either the top or bottom five.
This is the true middle of the pack, although as you’ll see, they come in some very different flavors. And this year, the numbers reinforce that in a pleasingly symmetrical way: 11 different teams showed up in the top five, and 11 more had at least one appearance in the bottom five. That leaves us with an even 10 teams that didn’t appear on either list all season long. Let’s divide them into categories.
Bonus Five: The teams that haven’t made the top or bottom five all year
5. The good teams that could still theoretically find the top five: It’s tough to crack either list for the first time this late in the season, but two teams have been good enough to be in top five consideration at a few points during the year and could theoretically still make it.
That would be the Lightning and the Maple Leafs, two teams battling with the Panthers for first in the Atlantic. The Panthers have been in the top five for much of the season despite having a similar record, which I think is fair given all their recent playoff success. But first place and a matchup with a wild-card is looming large, so if either the Leafs or Lightning got red-hot and ran away with the division down the stretch, they’d have a top-five case. For now, though, they’ve been just short.
4. The teams that weren’t close to the top five but are still happy with their season: I’ll put four teams in this category. The first is the Kings, a classic case of a team that’s been consistently good with occasional gusts up to great, but never all that close to top-five status. I’ll also include the Senators and Blues, two teams that have had their ups and downs but look like playoff teams down the stretch. And then there’s the Flames, a nice story that seems to be fading down the stretch. I’m not sure that finishing 10th in the West would feel like a major success, but this is a team a lot of us wrote off before the season even started, and they spent most of the year proving us wrong.
3. The true mushy middle teams: This would be the Islanders and Utah, two teams that spent the year plugging away, hanging right around the playoff mix without ever looking especially threatening. I’m not sure there was a single week all year in which either team even occurred to me as a legitimate contender for either list. They’re fine.
That leaves us with two teams, each of whom deserves its own category.
2. The disaster: That would be the Bruins. They started slow, fired the coach, never got more than a couple of games over fake .500, faded in the second half, sold at the deadline and are now cratering their way to a miserable finish. They’re actually closer to the bottom of the standings than I’d realized, so there’s a small but non-zero chance they could actually find the bottom five by the end of things. What a mess.
1. The mystery: That leaves us with the one team I still can’t figure out. Yes, it’s the Canucks, a team whose season has fallen well short of expectations but is still in the playoff hunt, if only barely, despite a firehose of drama, trading away one of their best players, key injuries and a coach who looks like he wants to strangle someone at all times. Every game these guys play is a roller coaster. I know they’re not among the five best or worst teams in the league, but that’s just about all I’ve been able to nail down.
On that note … Wow, this game:
The 2024-25 Vancouver Canucks: A lot of things, but definitely not boring.
A bonus note: We managed to avoid the dreaded “team that showed up on both lists” this year. Well done, everyone, we cleared the lowest possible bar there is. On to this week’s rankings …
Road to the Cup
The five teams with the best chances of winning the Stanley Cup.
Nope, still doesn’t look right in that uniform.
No Panthers in the top five this time, as I stay clear of the Atlantic for the second straight week. We’ll figure this out eventually, but when you’ve got time, use it.
5. Carolina Hurricanes (45-24-4, +44 true goals differential*) — They look good, the Devils do not, and Thursday’s meeting with the Capitals feels a lot like a second-round preview.
Also: We have a trade to announce?
4. Vegas Golden Knights (45-20-8, +57) — Six straight wins, all in regulation and by a combined score of 28-11, suggests a team hitting its stride at exactly the right time. Home games against the Oilers tomorrow and Jets on Thursday will be great tests.
3. Washington Capitals (47-17-9, +72) — Three straight losses, including one to the first-in-conference Jets and another to the last-in-conference Sabres, isn’t enough to have us panicking. These are the long-term rankings, and Caps fans had to wait for us to get on board, so we’re not going to bail now after a bad week. But let’s get it back on track tomorrow in Boston, OK?
2. Dallas Stars (48-21-4, +63) — I’m nervous about the first-round matchup, I’m nervous about the Miro Heiskanen injury and I’m nervous about having two teams in the same division in the top spots. But they just keep winning, so …
1. Winnipeg Jets (51-19-4, +83) — This absolutely has to happen, and when it does it’s Murat’s fault:
Connor Hellebuyck’s shutout song is Gangnam Style. @WPGMurat asked Hellebuyck after the game about that choice…
“I do know the dance, so maybe one day I’ll do the dance out there.” 😅
🎥: #NHLJets pic.twitter.com/90bR9LldT0
— Connor Hrabchak (@ConnorHrabchak1) March 29, 2025
*Goals differential without counting shootout decisions like the NHL does for some reason.
Not ranked: Minnesota Wild — Wait, is this now the playoff spot that’s up for grabs in the West?
It sure looks like it. The Wild begin the week in the seventh spot, tied with the Blues at 87 points but with an edge in points percentage thanks to a game in hand. But the switch almost feels like a formality, with the Blues remaining red-hot while the Wild spin their wheels. Saturday’s loss to the Devils was their third in their last four, essentially undoing the gains from a three-game mini-streak the week before. Meanwhile, the Blues have won nine straight, wiping out Minnesota’s eight-point lead in just two weeks.
Getting passed for seventh place isn’t ideal, but it’s far from an emergency. It probably means playing the Jets instead of the Golden Knights in Round 1, and that’s not necessarily a huge jump in degree of difficulty. The bigger question is whether dropping to eighth could be the precursor to dropping even further. And that’s where things get scary for the Wild.
Scary, mind you, but not terrifying. They were still sitting at 90 percent odds in yesterday’s projections, and that will go up with the Canucks losing. They’re six points up on Vancouver with the same number of games played, and seven up on the Flames, who have two in hand. They’ll likely hold the regulation wins tiebreaker over the Blues, and would definitely hold it over the Canucks or Flames. They’re in good shape.
But good shape still feels scary when you were a lock not that long ago. It’s really only been in the last few days that the alarm bells have started ringing, but the slump has been longer than that. After finishing the first half at an impressive 26-11-4, the Wild have gone just 15-17-1 since then, a 77-point pace. Maybe the bigger question than whether they can make the playoffs is whether they should bother, since they don’t seem like much of a threat right now.
They’ve got a three-game road trip against the Devils, Rangers and Islanders this week before returning home to face the Stars and Sharks. Then comes the last road trip of the regular season, a two-game swing against the Flames and Canucks that could be crucial. Or it could be meaningless, if the Wild can bank enough points this week to put this thing away before scary turns into terrifying.
The bottom five
The five teams headed toward dead last and the best lottery odds for a top pick that could be James Hagens, Matthew Schaefer, or someone else.
Pierre had an update on coaching hot seats, which will be of interest to a few of the teams that regularly grace this section.
5. Buffalo Sabres (31-36-6, -24) — Sabres fans, how are we feeling about this recent warm streak with nothing left to play for? Good sign for the future, or infuriating draft pick sabotage? (For the record, there is a right answer here.)
If you missed it, be sure to check out Matthew’s deep dive into just how much misery a fan base can be expected to handle.
4. Philadelphia Flyers (30-36-9, -49) — They made the big headline this week, firing John Tortorella after a weird stretch that included two blowout losses, some strange postgame comments and an apparent altercation with Cam York. Kevin has been all over it, reporting on what exactly happened behind the scenes, just what the deal is with York and the contenders for the full-time job (including three big names currently employed elsewhere).
3. Nashville Predators (27-38-8, -51) — If you missed it, be sure to read Pierre’s chat with Barry Trotz on how they start to dig out of this mess.
2. Chicago Blackhawks (21-44-9, -69) — There’s nothing left to play for, but Hawks fans will get a look at 2023 first-rounder Oliver Moore as well as 2022 first Sam Rinzel down the stretch. Both have signed out of college and made their NHL debuts in yesterday’s loss to Utah.
1. San Jose Sharks (20-44-9, -90) — There hasn’t been much in the way of good news for the Sharks this year, but fans who could use some optimism and/or a reminder about the big picture will enjoy this podcast.
(Also, while interpreting The Code is always dicey, I’m pretty sure somebody needs to fight the Rangers’ team bus.)
Not ranked: Montreal Canadiens — The losing streak is over. Everybody breathe.
Less than two weeks ago, the Habs were the hottest team in the league, winning eight of 11 immediately after the 4 Nations break. That stretch allowed them to push past the stagnant Eastern bubble field, looking a lot like the only team that actually wanted to be the conference’s eight-seed. After beating the Senators on March 18, the Habs were alone in the final wild-card spot and even seemed to have a potential path to catch Ottawa. But they followed that game by losing five straight while giving up 25 goals, including a high-profile matchup with the Blues earlier in the week that saw them get stomped. They were blowing it.
That’s the bad news, and well, it’s pretty bad. But step back, and the picture gets brighter. They might be blowing it, yes, but let’s remember that the “it” here is a playoff spot nobody really thought they had a shot at this year. The realistic goal heading into the season was to play meaningful games (with apologies to Tortorella) and stay close enough to the race that they could shock the world. Now it feels like a failure that they haven’t been able to lock up a spot with 10 games still left to play. It’s easy to forget how much the expectations have shifted in a relatively short amount of time.
Still, beating a good Panthers team on the road was exactly the sort of win this team needed, especially with a rematch coming tomorrow in Montreal. And it was another reminder that writing this team off has been a bad move pretty much all year long.
Will any of that matter if this team ends up coughing up a playoff spot that was there for the taking? I think it should. That doesn’t mean it won’t sting, because of course it would. But if the season was about progress, it’s already been an inarguable success, one that’s seen the Habs drive past teams like the Sabres and Red Wings who were supposed to be years ahead of them. What more could a reasonable fan want?
A playoff spot, sure. You can’t get this close without locking in on the prize. And that’s where the other half of the good news kicks in: They’re still in this thing. They get the Panthers again tomorrow, which is tough, but the rest of the season-ending schedule is reasonably friendly. The Bruins, Flyers and Predators are up next, three teams that are all but flatlining down the stretch. From there it’s Detroit, Ottawa and a Saturday night showdown with the Leafs, followed by the lowly Hawks and then a playoff-bound Hurricanes team with nothing to play for.
The path is there. None of those games are guaranteed, but they’re winnable. And at the very least, they’re damn sure meaningful.
(Photo of Marcus Foligno and Arber Xhekaj: Matt Blewett / Imagn Images)
Culture
Try This Quiz and See How Much You Know About Jane Austen
“Window seat with garden view / A perfect nook to read a book / I’m lost in my Jane Austen…” sings Kristin Chenoweth in “The Girl in 14G” — what could be more ideal? Well, perhaps showing off your literary knowledge and getting a perfect score on this week’s super-size Book Review Quiz Bowl honoring the life, work and global influence of Jane Austen, who turns 250 today. In the 12 questions below, tap or click your answers to the questions. And no matter how you do, scroll on to the end, where you’ll find links to free e-book versions of her novels — and more.
Culture
Revisiting Jane Austen’s Cultural Impact for Her 250th Birthday
On Dec. 16, 1775, a girl was born in Steventon, England — the seventh of eight children — to a clergyman and his wife. She was an avid reader, never married and died in 1817, at the age of 41. But in just those few decades, Jane Austen changed the world.
Her novels have had an outsize influence in the centuries since her death. Not only are the books themselves beloved — as sharply observed portraits of British society, revolutionary narrative projects and deliciously satisfying romances — but the stories she created have so permeated culture that people around the world care deeply about Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy, even if they’ve never actually read “Pride and Prejudice.”
With her 250th birthday this year, the Austen Industrial Complex has kicked into high gear with festivals, parades, museum exhibits, concerts and all manner of merch, ranging from the classily apt to the flamboyantly absurd. The words “Jane mania” have been used; so has “exh-Aust-ion.”
How to capture this brief life, and the blazing impact that has spread across the globe in her wake? Without further ado: a mere sampling of the wealth, wonder and weirdness Austen has brought to our lives. After all, your semiquincentennial doesn’t come around every day.
By ‘A Lady’
Austen published just four novels in her lifetime: “Sense and Sensibility” (1811), “Pride and Prejudice” (1813), “Mansfield Park” (1814) and “Emma” (1815). All of them were published anonymously, with the author credited simply as “A Lady.” (If you’re in New York, you can see this first edition for yourself at the Grolier Club through Feb. 14.)
Where the Magic Happened
Placed near a window for light, this diminutive walnut table was, according to family lore, where the author did much of her writing. It is now in the possession of the Jane Austen Society.
An Iconic Accessory
Few of Austen’s personal artifacts remain, contributing to the author’s mystique. One of them is this turquoise ring, which passed to her sister-in-law and then her niece after her death. In 2012, the ring was put up for auction and bought by the “American Idol” champion Kelly Clarkson. This caused quite a stir in England; British officials were loath to let such an important cultural artifact leave the country’s borders. Jane Austen’s House, the museum now based in the writer’s Hampshire home, launched a crowdfunding campaign to Bring the Ring Home and bought the piece from Clarkson. The real ring now lives at the museum; the singer has a replica.
Austen Onscreen
Since 1940, when Austen had a bit of a moment and Greer Garson and Laurence Olivier starred in MGM’s rather liberally reinterpreted “Pride and Prejudice,” there have been more than 20 international adaptations of Austen’s work made for film and TV (to say nothing of radio). From the sublime (Emma Thompson’s Oscar-winning “Sense and Sensibility”) to the ridiculous (the wholly gratuitous 2022 remake of “Persuasion”), the high waists, flickering firelight and double weddings continue to provide an endless stream of debate fodder — and work for a queen’s regiment of British stars.
Jane Goes X-Rated
The rumors are true: XXX Austen is a thing. “Jane Austen Kama Sutra,” “Pride and Promiscuity: The Lost Sex Scenes of Jane Austen” and enough slash fic and amateur porn to fill Bath’s Assembly Rooms are just the start. Purists may never recover.
A Lady Unmasked
Austen’s final two completed novels, “Northanger Abbey” and “Persuasion,” were published after her death. Her brother Henry, who oversaw their publication, took the opportunity to give his sister the recognition he felt she deserved, revealing the true identity of the “Lady” behind “Pride and Prejudice,” “Emma,” etc. in a biographical note. “The following pages are the production of a pen which has already contributed in no small degree to the entertainment of the public,” he wrote, extolling his sister’s imagination, good humor and love of dancing. Still, “no accumulation of fame would have induced her, had she lived, to affix her name to any productions of her pen.”
Wearable Tributes
It is a truth universally acknowledged that a Jane Austen fan wants to find other Jane Austen fans, and what better way to advertise your membership in that all-inclusive club than with a bit of merch — from the subtle and classy to the gloriously obscene.
The Austen Literary Universe
On the page, there is no end to the adventures Austen and her characters have been on. There are Jane Austen mysteries, Jane Austen vampire series, Jane Austen fantasy adventures, Jane Austen Y.A. novels and, of course, Jane Austen romances, which transpose her plots to a remote Maine inn, a Greenwich Village penthouse and the Bay Area Indian American community, to name just a few. You can read about Austen-inspired zombie hunters, time-traveling hockey players, Long Island matchmakers and reality TV stars, or imagine further adventures for some of your favorite characters. (Even the obsequious Mr. Collins gets his day in the sun.)
A Botanical Homage
Created in 2017 to mark the 200th anniversary of Austen’s death, the “Jane Austen” rose is characterized by its intense orange color and light, sweet perfume. It is bushy, healthy and easy to grow.
Aunt Jane
Hoping to cement his beloved aunt’s legacy, Austen’s nephew James Edward Austen-Leigh published this biography — a rather rosy portrait based on interviews with family members — five decades after her death. The book is notable not only as the source (biased though it may be) of many of the scant facts we know about her life, but also for the watercolor portrait by James Andrews that serves as its frontispiece. Based on a sketch by Cassandra, this depiction of Jane is softer and far more winsome than the original: Whether that is due to a lack of skill on her sister’s part or overly enthusiastic artistic license on Andrews’s, this is the version of Austen most familiar to people today.
Cultural Currency
In 2017, the Bank of England released a new 10-pound note featuring Andrews’s portrait of Austen, as well as a line from “Pride and Prejudice”: “I declare after all there is no enjoyment like reading!” Austen is the third woman — other than the queen — to be featured on British currency, and the only one currently in circulation.
In the Trenches
During World War I and World War II, British soldiers were given copies of Austen’s works. In his 1924 story “The Janeites,” Rudyard Kipling invoked the grotesque contrasts — and the strange comfort — to be found in escaping to Austen’s well-ordered world amid the horrors of trench warfare. As one character observes, “There’s no one to touch Jane when you’re in a tight place.”
Baby Janes
You’re never too young to learn to love Austen — or that one’s good opinion, once lost, may be lost forever.
The Austen Industrial Complex
Maybe you’ve not so much as seen a Jane Austen meme, let alone read one of her novels. No matter! Need a Jane Austen finger puppet? Lego? Magnetic poetry set? Lingerie? Nameplate necklace? Plush book pillow? License plate frame? Bath bomb? Socks? Dog sweater? Whiskey glass? Tarot deck? Of course you do! And you’re in luck: What a time to be alive.
Around the Globe
Austen’s novels have been translated into more than 40 languages, including Polish, Finnish, Chinese and Farsi. There are active chapters of the Jane Austen Society, her 21st-century fan club, throughout the world.
Playable Persuasions
In Austen’s era, no afternoon tea was complete without a rousing round of whist, a trick-taking card game played in two teams of two. But should you not be up on your Regency amusements, you can find plenty of contemporary puzzles and games with which to fill a few pleasant hours, whether you’re piecing together her most beloved characters or using your cunning and wiles to land your very own Mr. Darcy.
#SoJaneAusten
The wild power of the internet means that many Austen moments have taken on lives of their own, from Colin Firth’s sopping wet shirt and Matthew Macfadyen’s flexing hand to Mr. Collins’s ode to superlative spuds and Mr. Knightley’s dramatic floor flop. The memes are fun, yes, but they also speak to the universality of Austen’s writing: More than two centuries after her books were published, the characters and stories she created are as relatable as ever.
Bonnets Fit for a Bennett
For this summer’s Grand Regency Costumed Promenade in Bath, England — as well as the myriad picnics, balls, house parties, dinners, luncheons, teas and fetes that marked the anniversary — seamstresses, milliners, mantua makers and costume warehouses did a brisk business, attiring the faithful in authentic Regency finery. And that’s a commitment: A bespoke, historically accurate bonnet can easily run to hundreds of dollars.
Most Ardently, Jane
Austen was prolific correspondent, believed to have written thousands of letters in her lifetime, many to her sister, Cassandra. But in an act that has frustrated biographers for centuries, upon Jane’s death, Cassandra protected her sister’s privacy — and reputation? — by burning almost all of them, leaving only about 160 intact, many heavily redacted. But what survives is filled with pithy one-liners. To wit: “I do not want people to be very agreeable, as it saves me the trouble of liking them a great deal.”
Stage and Sensibility
Austen’s works have been adapted numerous times for the stage. Some plays (and musicals) hew closely to the original text, while others — such as Emily Breeze’s comedic riff on “Pride and Prejudice,” “Are the Bennet Girls OK?”, which is running at New York City’s West End Theater through Dec. 21 — use creative license to explore ideas of gender, romance and rage through a contemporary lens.
Austen 101
Austen remains a reliable fount of academic scholarship; recent conference papers have focused on the author’s enduring global reach, the work’s relationship to modern intersectionality, digital humanities and “Jane Austen on the Cheap.” And as one professor told our colleague Sarah Lyall of the Austen amateur scholarship hive, “Woe betide the academic who doesn’t take them seriously.”
W.W.J.D.
When facing problems — of etiquette, romance, domestic or professional turmoil — sometimes the only thing to do is ask: What would Jane do?
Culture
I Think This Poem Is Kind of Into You
A famous poet once observed that it is difficult to get the news from poems. The weather is a different story. April showers, summer sunshine and — maybe especially — the chill of winter provide an endless supply of moods and metaphors. Poets like to practice a double meteorology, looking out at the water and up at the sky for evidence of interior conditions of feeling.
The inner and outer forecasts don’t always match up. This short poem by Louise Glück starts out cold and stays that way for most of its 11 lines.
And then it bursts into flame.
“Early December in Croton-on-Hudson” comes from Glück’s debut collection, “Firstborn,” which was published in 1968. She wrote the poems in it between the ages of 18 and 23, but they bear many of the hallmarks of her mature style, including an approach to personal matters — sex, love, illness, family life — that is at once uncompromising and elusive. She doesn’t flinch. She also doesn’t explain.
Here, for example, Glück assembles fragments of experience that imply — but also obscure — a larger narrative. It’s almost as if a short story, or even a novel, had been smashed like a glass Christmas ornament, leaving the reader to infer the sphere from the shards.
We know there was a couple with a flat tire, and that a year later at least one of them still has feelings for the other. It’s hard not to wonder if they’re still together, or where they were going with those Christmas presents.
To some extent, those questions can be addressed with the help of biographical clues. The version of “Early December in Croton-on-Hudson” that appeared in The Atlantic in 1967 was dedicated to Charles Hertz, a Columbia University graduate student who was Glück’s first husband. They divorced a few years later. Glück, who died in 2023, was never shy about putting her life into her work.
But the poem we are reading now is not just the record of a passion that has long since cooled. More than 50 years after “Firstborn,” on the occasion of receiving the Nobel Prize for literature, Glück celebrated the “intimate, seductive, often furtive or clandestine” relations between poets and their readers. Recalling her childhood discovery of William Blake and Emily Dickinson, she declared her lifelong ardor for “poems to which the listener or reader makes an essential contribution, as recipient of a confidence or an outcry, sometimes as co-conspirator.”
That’s the kind of poem she wrote.
“Confidence” can have two meanings, both of which apply to “Early December in Croton-on-Hudson.” Reading it, you are privy to a secret, something meant for your ears only. You are also in the presence of an assertive, self-possessed voice.
Where there is power, there’s also risk. To give voice to desire — to whisper or cry “I want you” — is to issue a challenge and admit vulnerability. It’s a declaration of conquest and a promise of surrender.
What happens next? That’s up to you.
-
Iowa2 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Washington1 week agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa1 week agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Iowa4 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World1 week ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans
-
Maine21 hours agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Technology6 days agoThe Game Awards are losing their luster