North Dakota
North Dakota leaders react to Trump's address to Congress
FARGO – In the late evening hours of Tuesday, March 4,
President Donald Trump addressed the United States Congress for the first time
since taking office earlier this year.
After his speech, those representing the state of North Dakota were quick to weigh in on the president’s priorities for the next four years.
Anna Paige / The Forum
Trump’s “vision for the future of the United States” will bring more energy independence and border security, North Dakota
Congresswoman Julie Fedorchak, R-N.D., said in a statement late on Tuesday.
“I am proud to stand with President Trump in turning the page on the disastrous policies of the previous administration and deliver on a new era of American exceptionalism. From unleashing American energy to securing our border, the President laid out a clear road map to a stronger America and peace around the world,” Fedorchak said.
Under the Trump administration, unlawful border crossings in the north and south are predicted to hit the lowest number seen in years,
according to NPR factcheckers.
However, the U.S. was producing “record amounts of oil and natural gas” under the Biden administration,
NPR reported,
and set a natural gas record in 2023.

Chris Flynn / The Forum
The country will get “back on track” under Trump, Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., said in a release on Tuesday.
“After being in office just over a month, the Trump administration has already put in place policies that are stopping the flow of illegal immigration, helping to build U.S. energy dominance and showing that America is back open for business to grow our economy,” Hoeven said. “At the same time, the President has made clear that we need to rebuild our military to keep our nation safe, support our veterans, make government work better and support our small businesses, including our farmers and ranchers. We look forward to continuing to work with President Trump on these priorities to build a better future for the American people.”
Over the last six weeks, a flurry of changes from the Trump administration have left North Dakota farmers, veterans advocates, victim service shelters, tourism industry leaders and federal workers concerned that the budget cuts, federal layoffs and new tariffs will harm the state’s economy, veterans health care and more.
Even North Dakota’s governor weighed in on Tuesday.

Tanner Ecker / The Bismarck Tribune
Since taking office in January, Trump has made “significant progress” by “bringing common sense back to America,”
Gov. Kelly Armstrong said in a release.
“Illegal immigration is down, investment in U.S. manufacturing is up, and North Dakota is among the states that stand to benefit most from the president’s focus on American innovation, common-sense regulations and government efficiency,” Armstrong, a Republican, said.
Members of the North Dakota Democratic-NPL were less enthusiastic following the address.

Mike McFeely / The Forum
Under Trump’s administration, health care costs will go up as will household prices for working families, the
North Dakota Democratic-NPL chair Adam Goldwyn said online prior to Trump’s address.
“Whether it’s the price of eggs to housing, Trump’s policies are already making life more unaffordable for North Dakotans, and this will only get worse,” Goldwyn said in the release. “They’re going to steal from you and your grandma to pay for tax cuts for out-of-state billionaires.”
The price of eggs was rising under the previous administration as well.
During his Tuesday address, Trump blamed the skyrocketing price of eggs on former President Joe Biden.
However, the rising cost of eggs is largely due to an ongoing avian flu epidemic that is running rampant amongst crowded chicken factories,
NPR factcheckers reported on Tuesday,
leading to the slaughter of tens of millions of chickens that were producing America’s eggs.
In addition, the Minnesota DFL Party released a statement following Trump’s address that was critical of the administration’s agenda.
Trump’s policies will also harm Minnesotans, according to Minnesota DFL Executive Director Heidi Kraus Kaplan.
“As he pushes forward with a budget plan that would rip health insurance away from thousands of Minnesotans who rely on Medicaid and a trade war that will raise the cost of everything from food to electricity, Donald Trump is showing Minnesota his true colors,” Minnesota DFL Executive Director Heidi Kraus Kaplan said in the release. “Minnesota Republicans will be held accountable for rubberstamping Donald Trump’s plans to cut taxes for the ultra-rich while shredding programs that support working-class Minnesotans.”
Some Democrats left the chamber in protest during Trump’s address, according to Reuters, while others applauded Trump at times throughout his speech.
U.S. Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., condemned the actions of some House Democrats on Tuesday in a release.
“Democrats in the Chamber sneered, heckled and booed,” Cramer said in the release. “You don’t have to hate America because you hate President Trump, and you don’t have to love Trump because you love America.”
North Dakota
North Dakota approves $30.4M for water infrastructure projects
BISMARCK, N.D. (Valley News Live) North Dakota communities will receive more than $30 million to upgrade aging water systems and expand infrastructure to meet growing demand.
The $30.4 million in cost-share funding will support municipal and rural water supply improvements, flood protection, and data collection initiatives. The State Water Commission approved these projects on Tuesday, Dec. 16.
“State investment in projects like these ensures our communities will have the reliable water supplies, flood protection, and other critical infrastructure needed to support existing users and accommodate future growth, all while reducing the local cost burden,” Lt. Gov. Michelle Strinden said.
The East Central Rural Water District received the largest share of funding with two projects totaling more than $25 million. The district will use $15.9 million to expand its Hillsboro Area Water Treatment Plant and $9.5 million for supply, transmission and distribution improvements. The treatment plant expansion also leverages more than $12 million in federal loan forgiveness.
Valley City will receive $2.5 million to replace its Northwest Standpipe.
Other projects include water system expansions in Ramsey and Cass County, a regionalization project connecting Parshall to White Shield, and improvements to low-head dams in Ward County.
The commission also approved $550,000 for the Department of Water Resources to launch Phase 1 of a 3D Hydrography Program for North Dakota.
The funding comes from North Dakota’s Resources Trust Fund, which receives 20.5% of the state’s oil extraction tax revenue.
Copyright 2025 KVLY. All rights reserved.
North Dakota
North Dakota’s delicate electricity price balance faces challenges
BISMARCK — As an energy exporter blessed with abundant supply, North Dakota consistently ranks among the cheapest states in the country when it comes to residential, commercial and industrial electricity rates.
Exploding costs of transmission, the build out and replacement of transmission infrastructure and the increase in energy load have helped push residential electricity prices modestly higher in recent years, however.
Average residential per kilowatt-hour of power increased by nearly 30% in the state between 2020 and 2024.
A recent study by Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory showed North Dakota actually had the largest decrease in average retail industrial and commercial electricity prices in the country over that span, with flat or slightly lower rates for residential users, when adjusted for inflation.
Most of the real cost rise is due to the increased expense of transmission as well as materials, build outs, generation and transportation needed to keep up with energy demand and to replace aging systems.
Take transformers for example: they cost 70-100% more now than five years ago, according to International Energy Agency data. Aluminum and copper wiring is up to 50% more costly. Labor costs have also increased by around 20-40%.
“Four or five years ago, it was $400,000 a mile to build a transmission line. Now it’s $2 million a mile,” said Josh Kramer, executive vice president and general manager at North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives. “Generation used to cost about $800 a kilowatt. Now it’s $2,700 a kilowatt.”
The cost of nearly every input into the energy transmission and maintenance system rose, on average, as much as 50%, he said.
State Sen. Dale Patten, R-Watford City, said replacement and upgrade costs of infrastructure are also one key component, particularly to improve resilience against severe weather events in rural areas.
“A lot of the existing infrastructure is old, 50-, 60-, 70-years-old in some cases, and the cost of replacing it is not cheap,” said Patten, who chairs the Legislature’s Energy and Natural Resources Committee.
Contributed / North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives
Population growth and shifts in that growth toward the main cities in the state are also a driver, he said.
“You have to build the infrastructure to support that population growth and that corresponding economic growth,” Patten said.
Another major driver is transmission costs.
“As we look at the regulated utilities when they come in for rate cases, it seems like one of the areas where their costs are exploding the most is transmission,” said Public Service Commission commissioner Randy Christmann. “Transmission costs are exploding.”
Christmann said some of the blame goes to build out of remote renewables projects in the wider region, as well as the closure of coal fired power plants around the county leading to increased load on North Dakota power providers as regional transmission organizations spread costs around.
In 2024, North Dakota exported around 32% of generated electricity and exported 85% of natural gas extracted, according to the Department of Commerce.
Adding large loads onto the grid across the country at the same time as all of these other cost increases has spiked energy prices in most other locations.
So far, North Dakota has dodged that for the most part, even as its lower electricity rates are attractive to industrial operations looking to add large loads in the system.
Large loads can include everything from operations like data centers, to oil refineries, to agricultural processing facilities and even the capital complex in Bismarck. Currently, there are 23 larger data centers in North Dakota.
When it comes to data centers, North Dakota has managed to add those large loads without jacking up electricity prices for consumers.
There are concerns about whether that can continue to be the case.
“I have seen them have very adverse impacts and very positive impacts,” said Christmann. “It depends on the details of the specific data center.”
Managing that going forward will be a challenge for the commission and legislators.
State Rep. Anna Novak, R-Hazen, is currently leading the Legislature’s interim Energy Development and Transmission Committee to study large loads such as data centers and try to find a way to balance attracting those projects without overburdening other electricity consumers.
“We need to strike a balance of making sure that we’re open for business, but that we have a strong vetting process,” Novak said. “I think that the vetting process is getting better.”
Besides cheaper electricity prices and available power, the policy and regulatory climate in the state is also attractive for tech companies looking to site a data center.
Chris Flynn / The Forum
Data centers are also attracted to North Dakota’s readily available water supply and cooler temperatures, which cut operating costs.
Novak said cost savings for data centers choosing to locate here can amount to the billions.
“We are certainly a desirable place to put a data center,” Novak said.
The most well-known data center in the state, Applied Digital’s facilities near Ellendale, has become a case study for how to add a large load while keeping the local impact minimal and also providing benefits across the state.
By tapping into stranded power that was not being adequately used and making the capital investments on that instead of passing it to the utilities, the project has been able to actually decrease electricity rates for Montana-Dakota Utilities consumers across the state.
“We had involvement in that, in making sure that this big additional load was not only going to just not be detrimental to customers, but actually be very beneficial.” Christmann. “Every single MDU customer in North Dakota is benefiting because of that facility on their electric rate.”
Contributed / North Dakota Association of Rural Electric Cooperatives
Darcy Neigum, vice president of electric supply for Montana-Dakota Utilities, said that customers saved around $70 last year because of the facility, and once it is fully built out, savings could come out to around $250 per year per customer.
“We’re very aware of the rates we’re charging to our customers and the rate impacts,” Neigum said. “The approach that we took (with the Ellendale facility) was to try to find some way to create value instead of just putting costs on customers.”
Insulating consumers from costs
Investor-owned utilities like MDU as well as electric cooperatives like Basin Electric Power and Minnkota are all trying to figure out how to manage large loads going forward.
Basin Electric adopted a large load program in June as a way to minimize rate impacts for cooperative members and reduce the risk of stranded assets that come with single projects looking for 50, 100 or more megawatts of power in the future. Minnkota Power Cooperative has also adopted a similar policy.
“So, when we have those inquiries coming in, whether it’s a large tech company or a large industrial load, we’re saying we want to serve you, but to do that you’re going to have to bear the costs associated with it,” Kramer said. “That goes for if they need to add more infrastructure or generation or engineering studies.”
MDU’s Neigum said the company doesn’t have a formal policy yet, but the uptick in interest in adding large loads may necessitate one.
“We do have a process we go through, and we’re kind of formalizing some of that, because there are just so many requests,” Neigum said.
One delicate aspect in all of this is putting into place policies that protect consumers or co-op members from additional costs without scaring quality projects away from the state.
Kramer said that’s not necessarily a bad thing.
“It’s probably helped separate the wheat from the chaff a bit,” Kramer said.
The North Dakota News Cooperative is a non-profit news organization providing reliable and independent reporting on issues and events that impact the lives of North Dakotans. The organization increases the public’s access to quality journalism and advances news literacy across the state. For more information about NDNC or to make a charitable contribution, please visit newscoopnd.org.
This story was originally published on NewsCoopND.org.
____________________________________
This story was written by one of our partner news agencies. Forum Communications Company uses content from agencies such as Reuters, Kaiser Health News, Tribune News Service and others to provide a wider range of news to our readers. Learn more about the news services FCC uses here.
North Dakota
As ACA tax credits expire, a North Dakota rural hospital braces for 2026
BISMARCK, N.D. (KFYR) – With federal health care tax credits set to expire, rural hospitals in the state warn the ripple effect could strain their budgets while they are already operating on thin margins.
The Emergency Department at Jamestown Regional Medical Center is gearing up for more patients to come into their doors, uninsured, starting Jan. 1.
“We could be affected as early as January of the coming year. So it would happen very, very quickly. And nobody really knows what’s going to happen,” said Mike Delfs, the CEO of Jamestown Regional Medical Center.
Many rural residents are on the Affordable Care Act marketplace. Since premiums are predicted to spike significantly, some people will drop insurance, and they will be forced to go to the ER when they get sick. Hospitals cannot refuse emergency patients, and will have to shoulder the cost on thin margins.
“We would be looking at anticipated bad debt, but to what degree we don’t even know, and it is kind of scary to think about,” said Delfs.
Hospital leadership and staff say that the uncertainty is wearing on them, on top of the common stressors rural providers have to deal with.
As of now, they say their best bet is to hope that Congress can put aside partisan differences and come up with a solution.
“We have real people who are either going to lose their insurance or its going to get so expensive they literally can’t afford it. And the downstream effect of that is now you are endangering hospitals in rural locations just by their mere viability,” said Delfs.
According to hospital leadership, without congressional action in 2026, the end of the year could leave the hospital with nearly one million dollars in unpaid medical bills.
North Dakota’s Republican congressional delegation says the Rural Health Transformation Fund will greatly benefit rural hospitals and blames democrats for voting against their healthcare plan.
Copyright 2025 KFYR. All rights reserved.
-
Iowa2 days agoAddy Brown motivated to step up in Audi Crooks’ absence vs. UNI
-
Washington1 week agoLIVE UPDATES: Mudslide, road closures across Western Washington
-
Iowa1 week agoMatt Campbell reportedly bringing longtime Iowa State staffer to Penn State as 1st hire
-
Iowa4 days agoHow much snow did Iowa get? See Iowa’s latest snowfall totals
-
Cleveland, OH1 week agoMan shot, killed at downtown Cleveland nightclub: EMS
-
World1 week ago
Chiefs’ offensive line woes deepen as Wanya Morris exits with knee injury against Texans
-
Maine22 hours agoElementary-aged student killed in school bus crash in southern Maine
-
Technology6 days agoThe Game Awards are losing their luster