Connect with us

Movie Reviews

The Rule of Jenny Pen (2025) – Movie Review

Published

on

The Rule of Jenny Pen (2025) – Movie Review

The Rule of Jenny Pen, 2025.

Directed by James Ashcroft.
Starring Geoffrey Rush, John Lithgow, George Henare, Nathaniel Lees, Thomas Sainsbury, Maaka Pohatu, Irene Wood, Ian Mune, Bruce Phillips, Holly Shanahan, Paolo Rotondo, Yvette Parsons, Rashmi Pilapitiya, Ginette McDonald, Semu Filipo, Hannah Lynch, Anapela Polataivao, Hilary Norris, Richard Chapman, Nick Blake, Jane Waddell, Lutz Halbhubner, Ariadne Baltazar, Fiona Collins, and Sam Carter.

SYNOPSIS:

Confined to a secluded rest home and trapped within his stroke-ridden body, a former Judge must stop an elderly psychopath who employs a child’s puppet to abuse the home’s residents with deadly consequences.

Advertisement

While the idea of a crazed, sociopathic John Lithgow running around and using a baby puppet to torture fellow nursing home residents is appealing on a demented scale, director James Ashcroft’s (also co-writing the screenplay alongside Eli Kent, based on the short story from Owen Marshall) The Rule of Jenny Pen, no exaggeration, never involves beyond that and rarely even tries to. What starts as amusingly twisted quickly has nowhere to go, stretched out long beyond the breaking point at roughly 104 minutes in what amounts to nothing more than older warfare between Geoffrey Rush and John Lithgow. As nutty as it sounds, even that needs something else behind it to keep the material from becoming repetitive and flat-out irritating.

The former is a judge named Stefan Mortensen who suffers a stroke while reading off a verdict. The case appears to involve a sexual predator of minors (not Drake this time) receiving due punishment, except Stefan is a no-nonsense curmudgeon refusing thanks from the mother of the victims, asserting that she put her children in danger. He then goes on to spout a philosophical statement that hyenas rule the land where there are no lions. Unsurprisingly, it’s a metaphor that’s about to become painstakingly visualized on-screen once that stroke immobilizes him, relegates him to a wheelchair, and keeps him inside the previously mentioned nursing home.

Initially, Stefan isn’t too bothered by the behavior he sees from Dave Crealy (John Lithgow, sporting a creepy smile and veering between catatonic and sinister), which generally comes down to finding unorthodox ways to hurt other residents or emotionally battering them physically. At that point, he flips the puppet around and tells his target to “lick its ass”, which is his hand. Other examples of his mischief include encouraging a dementia-stricken woman to head outside after hours, lying that her family has returned for her. For something more physical, Dave twists around a catheter until a man acknowledges the rule of Jenny Pen.

As uncomfortably and entertainingly dark as some of this begins, the film repeats itself without ever following through on any teased character development or reveals. Far more maddening is that this is the most unbelievably incompetent nursing home staff put to screen in ages. The only reason Dave continuously gets away with any of this has less to do with any damning statement on this line of work and more to do with eye-rolling contrivances that keep this movie going on seemingly endlessly in the face of strained credibility.

Some of this is frustrating, considering that John Lithgow is committed to this lunacy. In contrast, the stone-hearted Stefan becomes empathetic through Geoffrey Rush’s performance, especially as the character gradually realizes that his greatest horror might not be Dave but the reality that his mobility might never come back, meaning he will be stuck here forever. One also has to commend Geoffrey Rush for his electronic wheelchair maneuverability game, backing out of doors like he is reversing a car. Unfortunately for them, The Rule of Jenny Pen has stranded them inside nearly insufferable material that threatens never to end.

Advertisement

Flickering Myth Rating – Film: ★ / Movie: ★ ★

Robert Kojder is a member of the Chicago Film Critics Association, Critics Choice Association, and Online Film Critics Society. He is also the Flickering Myth Reviews Editor. Check here for new reviews and follow my BlueSky or Letterboxd 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=embed/playlist

 

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Movie Reviews

Adam MacDonald’s ‘THIS IS NOT A TEST’ (2026) – Movie Review – PopHorror

Published

on

Adam MacDonald’s ‘THIS IS NOT A TEST’ (2026) – Movie Review – PopHorror

By and large, the zombie subgenre has bitten off more than it can chew in modern times. Between George Romero survival films and camp comedies, the well has become pretty infected. But once in a while, along comes a movie like This Is Not A Test.

Let’s sink our teeth into this new release and see how it stacks up against the classics.

This Is Not A Test was directed by Adam MacDonald (Pyewacket 2017, read our review here), and written by MacDonald and Courtney Summers (in their debut credit). It stars Olivia Holt (Heart Eyes 2025) as Sloane and Froy Gutierrez (The Strangers: Chapter 1 2024) as Rhys. This is a standard zombie outbreak faire that sees a girl on the verge of ending her life, suddenly join a group of kids that are striving to survive a zombie apocalypse.

The tone and tenor of this film represent the classic survival movies like Night Of The Living Dead. But the thing that grabs the audience about This Is Not A Test is the trauma of the characters. Holt shines as a withdrawn survivor of an abusive home, trying to cut through the wreckage to reunite with her sister. Each of the main characters have standout traits, and they bathe in strongly acted moments as the stress of the situation changes who they are.

The gore in This Is Not A Test is pretty strong. The attacks spring quickly and when they do, the special effects team does a good job showcasing the battle scars. The camera work is also frenetic in a good way, because the chaos of the chase scenes puts the viewers in a first-person perspective. This film lets you feel like a part of the survivors, so their journeys are interactive.

Advertisement

Longtime fans may say that there’s nothing new in This Is Not A Test, and maybe they’re right. There’s no fresh take on the monsters here, no crazy origin, nothing that we haven’t seen in the past fifty-eight years. But the pacing nails a great balance between getting to know the characters and getting the zombie splatter fest. The mental meltdowns of the characters feel well earned, and the arc of Sloane and her sister brings a lot of heart and investment to the story. Even the most jaded zombie horror fans will find something to appreciate here, even as a background movie.

Adam MacDonald has made another intense hit here, and This Is Not A Test is currently available to stream on Shudder.

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Film Review: “The Odyssey” – MediaMikes

Published

on

Film Review: “The Odyssey” – MediaMikes

 

  • THE ODYSSEY
  • Starring:  Matt Damon, Tom Holland and Anne Hathaway
  • Directed by:  Christopher Nolan
  • Rated:  R
  • Running time:  2 hrs 45 mins
  • Universal

 

Our score:  4.5 out of 5

 

EPIC.  If I was asked to describe Christopher Nolan’s latest film, that is the word I would use.  He has mounted a film that rivals the greatest achievements of filmmakers like Cecil B. DeMille or David Lean.  And, like the films of those mentioned, it’s runs a tad too long.

Advertisement

 

I was shocked, but pleased, to see that my 12-year-old granddaughter recently did a school paper on King Agamemnon.  Thank goodness they’re still teaching History in our schools.  Based on Homer’s “The Odyssey,” the film tells the story of King Odysseus (Damon) and his adventures which, if you’ve read “The Odyssey,” include the Trojan Horse, the Cyclops and assorted angry Greek gods.  The film covers each of these adventures in great detail, sparing nothing in the production design department.  While Odysseus is away – and he’s gone for a l-o-n-g time, his wife Penelope (Hathaway) has to endure a never ending string of “suitors,” men lining up in the hopes of replacing the King should he not return.  The men are nothing more then scavengers, taking advantage of the law of Zeus, which decrees no one should be turned away.  This angers the Queen’s son, Telemachus (Holland), who must control his temper when the men try to bait him into a fight, the idea being if Telemachus is killed, the new husband would become the King.  It’s all very interesting and complicated.  And long.

 

Director Nolan is one of the rare filmmakers who, in my opinion, has never made a bad film.  From “Memento” to the “Dark Knight” trilogy to the Oscar-winning “Oppenheimer,” he has proven himself a true master of cinema.  “The Odyssey” only adds to that distinguished resume’

 

Advertisement

The cast is a tribute to Nolan himself who, like Woody Allen, can pretty much get anyone he wants for his films because, as an actor, why wouldn’t you want a credit in one of his films.  Besides the three stars named above, the cast includes Robert Pattinson, John Leguizamo, Zendaya, James Remar, Jon Bernthal, Oscar nominees Samantha Morton and Elliot Page as well as Oscar winners Charlize Theron and  Lupita Nyongo.  As MGM used to advertise, “more stars than there are in heaven.”

 

The script and story are pretty faithful to the source material, though for some reason it bothered me whenever Telemacus referred to Odysseus as “dad.”  Never father.  The weird things you notice.  Visual.y the film is stunning and the Trojan Horse and battle of Troy are worth the price of admission alone.  I will add that I did see the film in 70 mm and, if that format is playing in your town, I urge you to see it in that format.

 

On a scale of zero to five, “The Odyssey” receives ★★ ½

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Movie Reviews

Saari Review: Memory, Betrayal and Identity Converge at River Valley Film Festival – Hollywood Times

Published

on

Saari Review: Memory, Betrayal and Identity Converge at River Valley Film Festival – Hollywood Times

Premiering at the 2026 River Valley Film Festival, Saari uses fragmented memories, Finnish landscapes and restrained performances to explore betrayal, identity and reconciliation.

By Valerie Milano

Palm Springs, CA (The Hollywood Times) 7/14/26 – In the visually striking short film Saari—Finnish for “island”, a peaceful family retreat becomes the setting for the slow collapse of a relationship.

Co-written by Justin Seegmueller, Corey L’Esperance and Suvi Härkönen, the film follows Daniel, played by Seegmueller, as he reflects on the choices that damaged his relationship with Liina, portrayed by Ilona Karppanen. Told through fragments of the past, present and future, Saari gradually reveals how secrecy and betrayal can transform a place of safety into one of emotional confinement.

Advertisement

The nonlinear structure was not simply a stylistic choice. The project was developed and filmed over more than a decade, with footage captured in Finland, Boston and the desert. L’Esperance explained that the filmmakers divided the story into “past, present and future,” allowing audiences to experience the relationship from both characters’ perspectives.

Click below for our exclusive interview: 

He described Daniel and Liina as two people who are “stuck in these moments in time,” making the fragmented narrative especially appropriate.

Seegmueller said Daniel’s internal struggle is rooted in the questions, “Am I that person? Am I still that person?” His restrained performance captures a man attempting to reconcile his current identity with the damage caused by earlier decisions.

Advertisement

For Seegmueller, the film is fundamentally about choice.

“It’s all about decision-making,” he said. “Are you an accumulation of all your decisions?”

Finland’s lush island scenery contrasts sharply with Daniel’s later isolation in the barren desert. Seegmueller described the progression as “lush and then dead,” a simple but effective visual representation of a relationship moving from intimacy and possibility to emotional aftermath.

For Liina, the island represents family history, comfort and security. By inviting Daniel there, she welcomes him into her sanctuary. His secrets, however, begin to contaminate that protected space.

“You let me into your life,” Seegmueller explained, “and now I’m here almost ruining your sense of security.”

Advertisement

Because the couple reaches the island by rowboat, the setting also creates a sense of entrapment as suspicion and resentment begin to surface. L’Esperance noted that once they are there, “there’s not really anywhere you can go.”

The film’s cross-cultural perspective was strengthened by the collaboration between American co-director L’Esperance and Finnish co-director Härkönen. Their responsibilities shifted according to which character dominated a scene. L’Esperance generally led sequences centered on Daniel, while Härkönen took a stronger role when Liina’s experience was at the emotional forefront.

That approach helps prevent Liina from existing only as a reaction to Daniel’s behavior. Her journey eventually becomes more compelling than his guilt.

Karppanen traveled to the United States for the first time to film the Boston scenes, which were completed approximately three years after the original Finland footage. Seegmueller said the friendship they developed during production can be seen in the warmth between their characters during the relationship’s happier moments.

The filmmakers deliberately avoid explaining every detail of Daniel’s betrayal. Earlier edits revealed even less, but test audiences needed additional narrative guidance.

“We do need to have some breadcrumbs,” L’Esperance said, explaining that without them, the story became “a little too lost on the audience.”

Advertisement

The challenge was to provide enough information while maintaining the film’s quiet, interpretive tone. L’Esperance said they wanted to leave room for viewers to “fill in some of the blanks.”

The lengthy production process also changed how the filmmakers viewed Daniel. L’Esperance acknowledged that they initially saw him as “this hero,” but over time recognized that “he is kind of a bad guy in some of these aspects.”

That evolving perspective gives the film greater moral complexity. Daniel is not granted an easy redemption, and his introspection does not erase the harm he caused.

Karppanen brings strength and emotional restraint to Liina, who emerges from the experience as what L’Esperance called “a completely different person.” A final city scene suggests that she is beginning to reclaim her identity and imagine a future beyond Daniel and the relationship that betrayed her.

Subtle, atmospheric and open to interpretation, Saari asks whether people are defined by their worst decisions, and what reconciliation means when the damage cannot simply be undone.

After more than 10 years of work, the film’s world premiere at the River Valley Film Festival is especially meaningful. Both L’Esperance and Seegmueller attended film school in Philadelphia, making the Pennsylvania premiere a return to the state where their filmmaking journeys began.

Advertisement

Seegmueller hopes the film encourages audiences to examine their own choices and personal histories.

“What does that say about you?” he asked. “What does that say about your story and your own narrative?”

Saari will have its world premiere at the 2026 River Valley Film Festival. Seegmueller will attend the premiere in person, while members of L’Esperance’s family are expected to represent him at the festival.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending