Connect with us

Maine

Affordable housing stock expected to increase in Maine, but high costs are still straining owners, renters

Published

on

Affordable housing stock expected to increase in Maine, but high costs are still straining owners, renters


A new house under construction on Dylan Drive in Scarborough in October 2023. Derek Davis/Portland Press Herald, file

Construction of affordable housing in Maine is expected to rise this year, and while the cost of building remains high, it is starting to level off, the state’s housing authority reported Wednesday.

It also warned that higher home prices could continue to limit access to home ownership while renters, too, face a budget squeeze.

In the “first edition of what is intended to be an annual summary of the state of the housing and housing-related issues in Maine,” MaineHousing showed a mixed picture of statistics and trends affecting the state’s economy, industry, homebuyers and homeless people. The scope of the report is broader than others the agency has released and incorporates more national context.

Advertisement

Inflation and growth in wages and employment — economic indicators that are the basis for industrial activity — are “expected to be consistent with stable economic growth in the coming years,” the 19-page report said. Construction employment in the state grew by 7.3% between 2023 and 2024 and new housing starts in the northeastern states sharply increased between July 1 and Sept. 30, 2024, exceeding recent quarterly averages by nearly 50%.

The per-unit development costs related to MaineHousing-financed units more than doubled from $150,000 to over than $300,000 between 2019 and 2024, though data from last year could change.

Home buyers face daunting financial challenges. Rising home prices “continue to be a primary concern for homeownership access in Maine,” the report said. From 2020 to 2024, the median home price in Maine grew by more than 50% while Mainers’ wages and salaries grew by less than 33.3%, it said.

The Maine Association of Realtors reported in January that the annual median sale price of a home in Maine was $390,200 in 2024, up a little over 8% from the 2023 median — and previous record — of $360,000. The median is the price at which half of the homes sell for more and half sell for less.

Citing Census data, MaineHousing said that from 2020 through 2023, the median home price in Maine increased by 43.5%, while the U.S. median price increased 39.1%.

Advertisement

Financial burdens weigh heavily on renters, too. The proportion of households in the $20,000-$34,999 income range that spent more than 30% of their income on housing — considered “cost burdened” — increased to about 80% in 2023 from about 65% in 2013. The increase was even greater for those in the income range of $35,000 and $49,999 — more than half were cost burdened in 2023, up from 30% 10 years earlier.

The picture was brighter for home construction. MaineHousing said it completed 775 affordable housing units in 2024 and another 1,005 units are in progress, with 727 expected to be completed this year. But MaineHousing’s average cost per unit increased in 2024 for a third consecutive, though currently financed projects indicate that costs are “leveling off.”

And foreclosures have fallen. Since July 2022, a monthly average of 1,225 notices of default were issued in Maine, 40% lower than the monthly average before the COVID-19 pandemic, according to MaineHousing.

In addition, evictions are down, with annual statewide eviction filings falling to 4,290 in 2024, from 5,977 in 2023, a 28% drop. It was the first year that fewer evictions were served since the eviction moratorium in 2020.

Although the average length of stay in homeless shelters increased to 11.6 days in 2024, up 38% from the previous year, the average number of people who reentered the homeless services system fell 43% after having exited to a permanent housing solution less than 12 months earlier. The number of people in shelters, unsheltered and in transitional housing increased to more than 2,300 last year, from fewer than 1,700.

Advertisement



Source link

Maine

There’s Something in the Air in South Portland, Maine – Inside Climate News

Published

on

There’s Something in the Air in South Portland, Maine – Inside Climate News


SOUTH PORTLAND—It’s one of Maine’s most desirable locations—home to a vibrant and diverse community, nearby beaches, and close proximity to Portland’s downtown. But for years, residents in South Portland have wondered: With 120 massive petroleum storage tanks dotting the shore and knitted into some neighborhoods here, is the air safe to breathe?

Now the first answers are in, thanks to a year of emissions monitoring along the fencelines of the city’s tank farms. At two of those locations, in particular, the results showed levels of benzene—a known carcinogen—well above the state’s limit.

“We’re about 300 feet from those tanks,” said Ted Reiner, whose home is surrounded by three of the city’s tank farms. It’s where he and his wife raised their two daughters, now 38 and 28. Around Christmas, Reiner had surgery for bladder cancer. Now he’s undergoing immunotherapy, and he can’t help but wonder whether his environment is contributing to his health woes.

“You just don’t know what the cumulative effect is,” he said. “I think about it a lot.”

Advertisement

Reiner lives closest to the Citgo South Portland Terminal, in a part of South Portland known as Turner Island. The tanks there primarily hold gasoline, while others in the city contain an array of petroleum products, including heating oil and asphalt. He and his family are among the more than 12,600 people who live within a mile of the tank farm, according to EPA data.

According to data collected by Maine’s Department of Environmental Protection, the CITGO terminal is one of two tank farms in the city where emissions exceed the state limit. Average benzene levels were measured at 2.18 micrograms per cubic meter, well above Maine’s allowed limit of 1.28 micrograms.

The highest levels in the city—3.05 micrograms—were measured at South Portland Terminal LLC owned by Buckeye Partners, which, unlike Citgo’s tanks, does not have people living nearby. A tank farm owned by Sunoco, meanwhile, had measurements just below the state guideline.

Long-term inhalation of benzene can damage bone marrow and blood-forming cells, suppress the immune system, and increase the risk of leukemia. According to the World Health Organization, there is “no safe level of exposure.”

Each reported number from the state is the average of a two-week continuous sample. Citgo’s final number for the year is the average of all those two-week samples. When examining a year’s worth of data, higher emissions levels get masked. But levels spike: For one two-week period in particular, the average benzene level recorded near the Citgo facility was 11.8 micrograms per cubic meter, nearly 10 times the state limit.

Advertisement

Those shorter-lived “burst emissions” can be dangerous in their own right.

One to 14 days of exposure to higher levels of benzene can cause headaches and breathing issues for sensitive individuals, such as children, older adults, or people with preexisting health conditions. The risk level for short-term exposure for benzene is 30 micrograms per cubic meter. What’s not clear in the state’s data is whether benzene levels get high enough to trigger those responses.

Rich Johnson, a spokesman for Citgo, said the company takes the concerns of South Portland residents seriously and is continuing to work with state regulators. “We believe it is important that any study of air monitoring results support accurate, representative conclusions about community-level air quality,” Johnson said.

Buckeye Partners did not respond to multiple emails requesting comment.

Petroleum companies and oil terminal owners use various technologies to eliminate emissions, but they still happen. Most often, chemicals escape from tank vents, equipment leaks and loading rack operations.

Anna O’Sullivan, a 42-year-old artist and therapist, thinks about all of this. She worries when her 7-year-old son, Henry, plays in the yard. “Is he just, like, absorbing what’s in the air?” she wonders.

Advertisement

This story is funded by readers like you.

Our nonprofit newsroom provides award-winning climate coverage free of charge and advertising. We rely on donations from readers like you to keep going. Please donate now to support our work.

Donate Now

She’s hesitant to eat anything grown in the soil there. She’s concerned that staying put means poisoning them both.

But she’s also stuck. O’Sullivan bought her three-bedroom cape, built in 1904, with a big backyard for $190,000 in 2017—a charming and impossible find in the market today.

Advertisement

“I can see the tanks from my house,” she said. The feeling is: “I need to move. I can’t raise my kids in an area where it’s just, like, poisonous air.”

But also: “I like my house. … It’s hard to move, it’s hard to buy a house.”

The science supports these emotions.

The readings are high enough “to merit serious attention,” said Drew Michanowicz, a senior scientist at Physicians, Scientists, and Engineers for Healthy Energy, an independent scientific research institute that brings science to energy policy.

Across South Portland, most people don’t live immediately next to the tanks, which lessens their exposure because emissions are quickly dispersed. But especially around the Citgo facility, some live quite close.

Advertisement

Until last fall, when she had to move following a house fire, Jacky Gerry was living near the Citgo tanks. “Did I ever think we were safe? Probably not,” she said. “But did a lot of people have a choice as to where you live? No.”

People in South Portland first became concerned about the tanks in 2019, after the EPA announced consent decrees, a resolution of a dispute without an admission of guilt, with two companies with tanks here—Global Partners LLC and Sprague Energy. In both cases, heated petroleum storage tanks containing asphalt and a thick fuel oil were emitting what are known as volatile organic compounds—chemicals that include benzene—in violation of their state permits. That issue was specific to tanks containing asphalt and number 6 fuel oil, which were previously thought to have no emissions, and is not the situation with the Citgo tanks.

As a result of the consent decrees, the operators installed systems to capture emissions that appear to have worked. In the most recent testing, emissions levels around both tank farms were below Maine’s threshold.

The consent decrees also helped put the tanks on the radar of lawmakers. In 2021, a newly passed law mandated that all petroleum tank farms in the state begin fenceline monitoring for chemicals including benzene. That monitoring began in August 2024, and the first results were released late last year.

Residents here have long taken the fight against industrial emissions into their own hands, including in a high-profile—and successful—fight to keep oil from Canadian tar sands from being piped into the city in 2018.

It was in that spirit that South Portland resident Tom Mikulka, a retired chemist with a Ph.D. in biochemistry from Cornell, opted to analyze the state results so residents would be able to start understanding the implications.

Advertisement

“I wouldn’t want to go to sleep knowing there’s high benzene levels that close to my home,” said Mikulka, referring to the houses that stand just feet from a fenceline monitor mounted along the Citgo property. “While there is diffusion, I can’t imagine the data is much different just a few feet away.”

The state findings validate the concerns he’s had all along. Mikulka first began testing emissions in the neighborhood back in 2020, when he used COVID relief checks to purchase air monitoring equipment. He hung one of the monitors on Reiner’s property, near the swing his grandkids like to play on.

Now, six years later, with official data in hand, Mikulka hopes the findings will be harder for regulators to dismiss.

That’s Jacky Gerry’s hope, too.

“Now that we have these answers, who’s stepping up to the plate to say, ‘Let’s try to fix that?’” she said. “Is it a city problem? An oil company problem? Where does it fall?”

Advertisement

About This Story

Perhaps you noticed: This story, like all the news we publish, is free to read. That’s because Inside Climate News is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. We do not charge a subscription fee, lock our news behind a paywall, or clutter our website with ads. We make our news on climate and the environment freely available to you and anyone who wants it.

That’s not all. We also share our news for free with scores of other media organizations around the country. Many of them can’t afford to do environmental journalism of their own. We’ve built bureaus from coast to coast to report local stories, collaborate with local newsrooms and co-publish articles so that this vital work is shared as widely as possible.

Two of us launched ICN in 2007. Six years later we earned a Pulitzer Prize for National Reporting, and now we run the oldest and largest dedicated climate newsroom in the nation. We tell the story in all its complexity. We hold polluters accountable. We expose environmental injustice. We debunk misinformation. We scrutinize solutions and inspire action.

Donations from readers like you fund every aspect of what we do. If you don’t already, will you support our ongoing work, our reporting on the biggest crisis facing our planet, and help us reach even more readers in more places?

Please take a moment to make a tax-deductible donation. Every one of them makes a difference.

Advertisement

Thank you,

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

Lawmakers advance bill to provide death benefits after two DOT workers killed on the job

Published

on

Lawmakers advance bill to provide death benefits after two DOT workers killed on the job


After a fatal car crash in Waterville killed two Maine Department of Transportation employees in January, state lawmakers are backing a bill to expand death benefits to the families of DOT workers killed on the job.  The Labor Committee unanimously voted Tuesday to advance LD 669, which will make DOT employees eligible for the same […]



Source link

Continue Reading

Maine

Maine man accused of lighting bed on fire after fight with girlfriend

Published

on

Maine man accused of lighting bed on fire after fight with girlfriend


WISCASSET, Maine (WMTW) – A Maine man has been arrested after police say he intentionally set a bed on fire after a dispute with his girlfriend, while they were still in it.

Police responded Monday, March 9, to a report of a fire that had been intentionally set inside a home on Beechnut Hill Road, according to the Wiscasset Police Department.

Investigators say the homeowner, Terry Couture, 41, set the bed on fire following an argument while both he and his girlfriend were in it. Authorities said the fire was extinguished and no serious injuries were reported.

Couture was arrested and charged with attempted murder, arson, aggravated criminal mischief, and domestic violence criminal threatening with a dangerous weapon.

Advertisement

The investigation is ongoing.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending