Connect with us

Washington

‘The Piano Lesson’ Review: A Promising Debut for Malcolm Washington Leans on the Acting Prowess of Its Star-Studded Cast

Published

on

‘The Piano Lesson’ Review: A Promising Debut for Malcolm Washington Leans on the Acting Prowess of Its Star-Studded Cast


“The Piano Lesson” is the latest in a string of recent adaptations of August Wilson’s 10-play American Century Cycle, after 2016’s “Fences” and 2020’s “Ma Rainey’s Black Bottom.” Denzel Washington starred in and directed the former and he produces his son Malcolm Washington’s feature directorial debut here. Denzel’s other son (Malcolm’s brother) John David Washington stars in the ensemble piece, Malcolm’s older sister Katia Washington executive produces, and rounding out the firmly family affair, the film is dedicated to Washington family matriarch, actress Pauletta Washington, with a “for mama” on screen dedication.

'Casa Bonita Mi Amor'

“The Piano Lesson” opens in 1911 Mississippi, as Fourth of July fireworks bathe a wordless heist in red and blue flashes. A group of unnamed Black men break into an empty house to steal a piano. Early the next morning, some white men on horses burn a remote cottage down in retribution, but the thieves escape. 

It’s a stark opening, one that indicates this adaptation might not be as beholden to the single-location setting of its source material. Unfortunately, Malcolm’s adaptation is largely faithful to Wilson’s play and is likewise grounded in one location. 

It all kicks off 25 years after that heist when Boy Willie (John David Washington) and his friend Lymon (Ray Fisher) arrive unannounced to Willie’s uncle Doaker (Samuel L. Jackson) and his sister Berniece’s (Danielle Deadwyler) Pittsburgh home, a truckful of watermelon in tow. Their arrival comes with a plan, one the loudmouth Boy Willie shares freely with whoever will listen. Cash from selling these watermelons to Northerners along with some money he’s saved up will make up two-thirds the amount needed to buy some property back in Mississippi. It’s this final third that drives “The Piano Lesson:” Boy Willie wants to sell the family heirloom – the beautiful hand-carved piano at the center of the opening heist — which now sits in Berniece and Doaker’s living room in Pittsburgh. Hand carved engravings seen in quick glimpses in the dark in the opening are now visible in great detail — this piano is quite exquisite and a testament to the work of production designer David Bomba.

This piano represents a heavy history for the family and each member has a different way of dealing with this pain. Berniece won’t consider selling it — there’s been too much family bloodshed spilled around it — namely that her and Boy Willie’s father was killed the morning after the heist — to just unload it. Treating it with a reference bordering on fear, she even refuses to play it. Boy Willie is more cavalier, seeing it as a valuable asset that can help him move up in the world, a key to granting him the invaluable title of property owner. This opportunity doesn’t come around often for a Black man, especially in the South in 1936, and he’s eager to seize on it. “The Piano Lesson” becomes a potent story surrounding generational trauma and the different ways in which people confront, ignore, or run from it. It also looks at how class and race are deeply intertwined throughout America’s history.

Advertisement

Malcolm adapted Wilson’s Pulitzer-winning play with Virgil Williams, a veteran TV writer with credits on “24”, “ER” and “Criminal Minds”. Aided by Wilson’s foundational prose, the script trades bravura speeches with smaller moments illustrating how people with deep familial bonds interact. While Deadwyler’s Berniece who can come across as a bit of a killjoy at times, you understand her annoyance at the chaos these unannounced relatives bring into her home. She has a child to take care of, keeps seeing an ominous ghost upstairs, and simply doesn’t have time for the tom foolery these men bring. 

Malcolm’s knack is in staging the men hanging out. In the film’s most powerful sequence, Boy Willie, Lymon and Wining Boy (Michael Potts as Doaker’s brother who just arrived from Kansas City) begin singing a work song from their farming days back in Mississippi. Doaker is reluctant to join in — uninterested in recalling a time in his life firmly in the rearview mirror. But he can’t resist, and the four men combine to create a powerful kitchen choir, supplemented with banging on the table and clapping, and different solos allotted to each man. The extended sequence is breathtaking, one that highlights Malcolm’s confidence — this is not a set piece many first time directors would dare stage. This kid Malcolm has guts. 

Samuel L. Jackson shines as Doaker, a man content to spend his later days up North, sitting on the porch smoking during the day and drinking whiskey with his brother and nephew at night. Jackson, who can dial it up when called upon, is more subdued here, embodying a man worn out from all he experienced down south, and seeks a quieter existence miles away from all of that. That being said, he can appreciate that his nephew Boy Willie hasn’t lost his spark, his anger, his ambition. As such, his patience for his obnoxious nephew contrasts Berniece who simply doesn’t have it in her to tolerate him.

In contrast, John David Washington’s performance as the brash Boy Willie, reads as the closest to a performer reciting monologues from a play. His lengthy speeches and performative body language arrive out of step with the other performances — which favor a straddling of theatrics and subtlety — and derail the film’s emotional core at key times.

Ray Fisher as Lymon is the reserve to Boy Willie’s cocky. He may be dim but certainly knows what he’s doing when he utilizes his lumbering frame and slow speech to casually woo ladies, including Berniece in a lengthy seduction — one of the film’s finer moments. Here, Malcolm proves he can handle the delicacies of staging a slow romancing, alongside the more boisterous familial arguments and late night drinking sessions. 

Advertisement

Alexandre Desplat’s score is expectedly lush, if not a little overbearing in spots, often working with the sound design to allude to the film’s supernatural elements ahead of them taking center stage later. The story approaches outright horror territory for the climax. It’s a bold choice, to toe the line of genre, and it ultimately hijacks the narrative and makes the emotional catharsis ring as less resonant. For all of his confidence in directing star actors playing off one another, Malcolm shrinks from the opportunity to tackle an emotional climax in a straightforward, head-on way. Cinematographer Mike Gioulakis’ camerawork marries classic technique with a more contemporary showiness. Like the rest of the movie, it’s polished and sturdy — seeking to ground the performances without being either too boring or attention-grabbing. 

With Wilson’s source material full of appropriately weighty topics to mine, Malcolm Washington’s adaptation of “The Piano Lesson” is referential, often overly so, and while this version contains its fair share of standout sequences along with Oscar-ready performances, the film never fully coalesces into an effective, singular, emotional narrative. The reasons behind can be hard to single out, subtle as they can often be. The supernatural component lingering throughout takes center stage in the final act, and this pivot hews a little too closely to the contemporary “elevated horror” trend involving facing one’s trauma as the only way to dispelling malevolent spirits. John David Washington’s performance exasperates instead of complementing his co-stars, and the largely single-setting fails to realize the scope of how cinema can move beyond the stage in both visual and narrative terms. However, there’s enough promise here to mark this an impressive debut for Malcolm Washington and point to a newcomer to track.

Grade: C+

“The Piano Lesson” premiered at the 2024 Telluride Film Festival. Netflix will release it in select theaters on Friday, November 8, followed by its streaming premiere on Friday, November 22.

Want to stay up to date on IndieWire’s film reviews and critical thoughts? Subscribe here to our newly launched newsletter, In Review by David Ehrlich, in which our Chief Film Critic and Head Reviews Editor rounds up the best reviews, streaming picks, and offers some new musings, all only available to subscribers.



Source link

Advertisement

Washington

Trump’s proposed 250ft Washington arch clears key planning hurdle

Published

on

Trump’s proposed 250ft Washington arch clears key planning hurdle


Donald Trump’s plans to build a skyline-altering arch in the nation’s capital won initial approval Thursday from a key federal commission, but its members put off a decision on whether a federal law that limits building heights should be applied to this project.

Despite overwhelming public opposition, the National Capital Planning Commission voted to approve preliminary site and building plans for the 250ft (76m) arch the Republican president wants to build on a traffic circle at the Virginia end of the Memorial Bridge from Washington.

The project, one of several being pursued by Trump in his quest to reshape parts of the nation’s capital to his liking, moved a step closer to reality with the vote.

Staff had recommended in its report on the project that the commission grant such approval and request a series of changes so the arch would comply with the Height of Buildings Act. The suggested changes included redistributing the heights among the main structure of the arch, the habitable roof, where an observation deck is planned, and the statues that would top it.

Advertisement

But commissioners, led by chair Will Scharf, voted to continue deliberations on whether the law indeed applies.

The staff report said the commission has long applied the law in its approval process. Scharf said the applicant, which is the interior department, had, as requested, provided a legal analysis that he said makes a “compelling argument” that the law “is not binding on the federal government”.

The interior department oversees the federal land where the arch would be built.

Eight of the 12 commissioners, including Scharf and two others appointed by Trump, voted for preliminary approval. One was against, and the remaining three commissioners voted present.

“This is a complex project,” Scharf said before the vote. He said a vote on final approval could come at the agency’s next meeting, in September.

Advertisement

All 12 commissioners listened to a summary of the staff report and its recommendations, and heard from several dozen people who had signed up to testify about the project.

As the commissioners met, construction continued at the White House on a $400m ballroom Trump is building there and crews draped tarps over the stone columns at the north entrance to the mansion, where work is being done to scrape off layers of paint.

Some of those who testified against Trump’s project opposed building a celebratory arch so close to Arlington national cemetery. Others suggested it would be more appropriate for a neighborhood near the Capitol and sporting venues.

Opponents say the arch is too big and would disrupt the carefully designed view between the Lincoln Memorial and Arlington national cemetery that was meant to symbolize the reunification of the north and the south after the civil war.

The arch would be more than twice as tall as the Lincoln Memorial, which is 99ft (30m) tall, and close to half the height of the Washington Monument, at about 555ft (169m) tall.

Advertisement

Concerns about vehicular traffic and pedestrian safety also were expressed on Thursday. Others insisted that Congress must approve the arch – a position Trump disagrees with.

The US Commission of Fine Arts, a separate federal agency, approved the design for the arch in May. The National Capital Planning Commission oversees construction on federal land in the city and began reviewing the arch plan in June.

Trump had said last year that the arch could be paid for with unused funds from the hundreds of millions of dollars he said he has raised from corporations, donors and other wealthy people to pay to build a new $400m ballroom at the White House.

But, as it turns out, some public money will be used for the ballroom project, as well as the arch. The White House has not released a cost estimate for the arch.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Washington Commanders are retiring Hall of Famer John Riggins’ No. 44

Published

on

Washington Commanders are retiring Hall of Famer John Riggins’ No. 44


The Washington Commanders are retiring John Riggins’ No. 44 during the upcoming NFL season, the team announced Thursday.

The Hall of Fame running back will be honored in a ceremony at halftime of the team’s game against the Los Angeles Rams on Nov. 8.

“There are certain players whose impact goes far beyond statistics, championships and accolades: They become woven into the identity of a franchise,” controlling owner Josh Harris said in a statement. “John Riggins is one of those players. …Our fans not only admired him, they identified with him. He is authentic, unapologetically himself and deeply connected to the people around him. John has meant so much to this franchise, our fans and the game of football.”

Riggins is the organization’s all-time leading rusher with 7,472 yards and 79 touchdowns on 1,988 carries and helped the team win the Super Bowl in the 1982 season.

Advertisement

The fan favorite nicknamed “Riggo” was the MVP of that Super Bowl for his performance best known for his memorable 43-yard TD run in the fourth quarter that put Washington ahead of the Miami Dolphins. He was inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame in 1992.

Riggins is the seventh player to have his number retired by the team, joining Sammy Baugh, Bobby Mitchell, Sean Taylor, Sonny Jurgensen, Darrell Green and Art Monk. Green, Monk and Riggins have all happened since Harris’ group took over from longtime owner Dan Snyder.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Washington

Future uncertain for site of former Mount Washington church destroyed in massive fire

Published

on

Future uncertain for site of former Mount Washington church destroyed in massive fire






Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending