Connect with us

Maine

As the state looks to harness Gulf of Maine winds, a big question looms: How much will utility customers pay?

Published

on

As the state looks to harness Gulf of Maine winds, a big question looms: How much will utility customers pay?


Offshore Wind First Power

The first operating South Fork Wind farm turbine stands east of Montauk Point, N.Y., in Dec. 2023. It is the first commercial-scale offshore wind farm in the country. Wind energy in the U.S. has grown significantly since 2000, to about 434 billion kilowatt-hours in 2022 from 6 billion kWh, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Julia Nikhinson/Associated Press

Maine’s offshore wind research project in the Gulf of Maine is the subject of negotiations that are picking up speed among state regulators, the project’s developers and the Public Advocate, who are trying to determine how much the zero-carbon energy will ultimately cost utility customers.

The PUC on July 11 ordered that the price – or how it’s structured for the project in a contract between the developer, Pine Tree Offshore Wind, and CMP or Versant – should be “sufficiently defined and certain” to allow regulators to determine whether the cost to ratepayers is the lowest reasonable amount to finance, build and operate the project. The low-cost provision is required by state law, which mandated that the PUC execute a long-term offshore wind contract between a utility of no less than 20 years.

The project is “intended to be a ‘kick-starter’ for an offshore wind industry in the Gulf of Maine,” regulators said. But it’s still years away from going online.

Advertisement

Jack Shapiro, climate and clean energy director of the Natural Resources Council of Maine, called the research project the “tip of the spear,” helping developers of future commercial wind power determine pricing and other factors.

Federal officials in May offered Maine a lease to research offshore wind turbines in the Gulf of Maine. The site is 15.2 square miles, a fraction of the 2 million-acre location selected in March for a commercial floating offshore wind project. That site is off the coasts of Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire.

Up to 12 wind turbines in the Maine Research Array in the Gulf of Maine would generate 144 megawatts of electricity, enough to power more than 100,000 homes. Among the areas being researched, according to Pine Tree Offshore Wind, is how to reduce conflict with other ocean uses, such as fisheries; support education and the development of a workforce and supply chain; maintain coastal community culture and heritage; monitor changes in the ecosystem; and advance floating wind technology and reduce the cost of offshore wind energy.

Power from the research array would not flow for at least another six or seven years, and talks that began in May 2023, a year after Pine Tree Offshore Wind filed its case to the PUC, have been slow, said Tony Buxton, the lawyer for Pine Tree Offshore Wind.

He said his client will put up $1.5 billion to build and deploy wind turbines 40 miles from Maine if it has a power contract with Central Maine Power and Versant Power.

Advertisement

“What we’re doing is a lot more difficult than sticking poles in the ground. We’re sticking poles into the water,” Buxton said.

“We certainly could have been doing more negotiations prior to this time,” he said. “It appears the (Public Utilities Commission) is intent on completing our negotiations now. It’s now proceeding more intently.”

Details being negotiated are confidential, Public Advocate William Harwood said. “Numbers are being floated around with caps and formulas,” he said.

The price and terms for what is reasonable will be based on the PUC’s analysis of the economics of developing an offshore wind project in a “fluctuating financial market” and based on meeting public policy goals, the Office of the Public Advocate told regulators.

ADVOCATE: ENVIRONMENTAL BENEFITS ALSO COUNT 

Advertisement

Shapiro said that as the PUC considers the project’s cost to ratepayers, it should not lose sight of the project’s environmental benefits. State law requires greenhouse gas emissions to be cut at least 45% from 1990 levels by 2030 and 80% by 2050, and advocates of wind power say it’s among the most effective tools to achieve those goals.

The Maine Research Array says the project would remove about 978 million pounds of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere each year, the equivalent of taking about 105,000 gas-powered cars off the road. The project also would spur job creation in construction, manufacturing and transportation, according to a June report prepared for Pine Tree Offshore Wind.

In a filing with regulators, CMP said negotiations in December, January, February and March generally reached agreement on non-pricing terms. But the utility reported a ” lack of agreement” on pricing terms and a pricing framework. PUC staff and Pine Tree Offshore Wind exchanged additional proposed pricing terms and frameworks, but the issues remain unresolved, CMP said. The utility would not provide details in its documents.

CMP and Versant are at the table as Pine Tree Power and state regulators negotiate a deal. The utilities will ultimately pass on to ratepayers the costs of wind power determined by the PUC.

PUC Chairman Philip Bartlett said at a recent meeting with Harwood and representatives of the Governor’s Energy Office, CMP and Versant that participants “seem like we’re a long way from having any real certainty” on determining the project’s costs.

Advertisement

But Dan Burgess, director of the Governor’s Energy Office, said at the PUC meeting that “significant progress has been made over the last year and a half, two years.” He cited the offer in late May by federal officials for a lease to research offshore wind turbines in the Gulf of Maine. He and Buxton believe the parties will agree on key terms of a contract by the end of the year.

Harwood said in an interview his office is in a “tough spot.”

“I’m not sure we can afford offshore wind,” he said. “I’m not sure we can afford not to with our climate goals.”

“The simple fact that these things float miles offshore and somehow electrons get back to the mainland has never been done in this part of the world,” he said. “What do you do with that uncertainty?”

“One of the things we’re trying to figure out is how to end up with an agreement with enough certainty . . . (that) ratepayers are not paying through the nose, but gives developers enough flexibility.”

Advertisement

WIND TURBINES OR A PORT: WHAT COMES FIRST?

One potential problem is balancing a timeline for wind turbine assembly and installation with construction of a wind energy port. The administration of Gov. Janet Mills is seeking $456 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation to build a port on Sears Island. Which comes first – an agreement on the cost of selling wind power or construction of a wind port – is among the unknowns, Harwood said.

“It’s a classic chicken and egg problem,” Harwood said. “If we don’t have a project, why stir up everyone at Sears Island? If we don’t have Sears Island, why set up turbines in the Gulf of Maine?”

The selection of Sears Island as the state’s preferred site for a terminal to accept and dispatch ships with wind turbine components that are assembled on site has divided environmentalists. They support wind power, but disagree on siting the terminal on Sears Island; many instead urge that it be built at nearby Mack Point. 

A beach on the northwestern side of Sears Island shows the proximity to Mack Point, right, on May 2. The selection of Sears Island as the state’s preferred site for a terminal to accept and dispatch ships with wind turbine components that are assembled on site has divided environmentalists. Ben McCanna/Staff Photographer

Advertisement

Buxton said Pine Tree Offshore Wind expects it would not make a profit on 80% of the project that is competitively bid, such as construction of the offshore platforms, the towers and turbines. Where it would make a profit is on the rate of return for the project’s operation. That must be negotiated with the PUC.

In addition, the developer can save money by selling tax credits, such as energy investment tax credits available in the federal Inflation Reduction Act that has made available hundreds of billions of dollars for clean energy programs, Buxton said.

Wind energy has grown significantly since 2000, to about 434 billion kilowatt-hours in 2022 from 6 billion kWh, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. Wind turbines were the source of about 10.3% of U.S. utility-scale electricity generation in 2022, the government said.

Still, wind power projects are buffeted by economic factors that blow hot and cold. The first commercial-scale offshore wind farm in the U.S. opened in March with Danish wind energy developer Ørsted and Eversource building a 12-turbine wind farm, South Fork Wind, 35 miles east of New York’s Long Island. A month later, New York state officials announced that final agreements could not be reached with three other projects that had received provisional awards in October 2023.

Shapiro warned that in Maine, the “downside of a contract falling apart is significant.” He cited the collapse last December of a proposed transmission line that would have brought wind power from northern Maine to the New England grid.

Advertisement

“If this falls apart, it will send a message that Maine is not the place you want to invest,” he said.

« Previous

People on the move



Source link

Maine

Rangeley Heritage Trust creates Friends of Western Maine Dark Sky

Published

on

Rangeley Heritage Trust creates Friends of Western Maine Dark Sky


The ‘Friends of Western Maine Dark Sky’ group meets March 3 at the Rangeley Lakes Heritage Trust office in Rangeley. They discussed the formation of the group as well as the process for designating the town as a dark sky community. (Quentin Blais/Staff Writer)

Looking up at the night sky in northern and rural Maine, it is a sight to behold, almost unique in today’s lit-up world. The Rangeley region is one of the last areas in the Northeast largely untouched by light pollution.

It is also a draw for many tourists and stargazers who come to the region for the clear view of the night sky.

A new group called Friends of the Western Maine Dark Sky hopes that by limiting the amount of light pollution, those views will be preserved for generations to come.

Advertisement

The group gathered at the Rangeley Lakes Heritage Trust on March 3 to talk about ways to educate the community on the importance of dark skies to the region.

One of their primary efforts is to try to designate Rangeley as an official Dark Sky community.

The designation will require a few steps. First, an application will be submitted to DarkSky International expressing an interest. Then, the town of Rangeley will need to adopt a new lighting ordinance at the June town meeting.

A new state law taking effect in October will require publicly funded outdoor lighting across the state to be dimmed at night to protect wildlife and dark skies. This includes using warm, yellow-toned bulbs, dimming or turning off nonessential lights and shielding lights so they don’t shine upward into the sky.

The town ordinance would create guidelines similar to the state laws on the kinds of lights used in town, as well as restrict some signs, such as LED message boards. Existing boards would be allowed to remain in place.

Advertisement

“The fact that the existing signage is grandfathered in perhaps bodes well for getting an approval of the town meeting,” said Linda Dexter, Dark Sky community certification coordinator at the Rangeley Lakes Heritage Trust, who is leading the effort. “It’s going to impact businesses in the town … right out of the gate, folks will tend to not vote for it.”

Even if an ordinance passes, change would likely be slow. Most of the group’s efforts will be on community education, such as informing seasonal residents to turn off the lights at their camps while they are gone for the winter. Also, the application may not be approved for up to six months after it is submitted, Dexter said.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

This Classic New England-Style Cottage in Maine Has 200 Feet of Atlantic Ocean Frontage

Published

on

This Classic New England-Style Cottage in Maine Has 200 Feet of Atlantic Ocean Frontage


A waterfront home with open ocean views on the coast of Maine came to market Tuesday asking $4 million. 

Built in 1978, the three-bedroom cottage is at the southern point of Cape Elizabeth, less than 10 miles from downtown Portland. The 1.1-acre property on Sunny Bank Road features 200 feet of south-facing water frontage on the wide open Atlantic. 

It is bordered by a rocky sea wall that’s about 28 feet high, according to listing agent Sam Michaud Legacy Properties Sotheby’s International Realty

“The views are like a Monet painting,” he said via email. “The water sparkles and the waves are endless.”

Advertisement

MORE: Laid-Back Costa Rica Is Getting a $7 Million Mega-Penthouse

The 3,364-square-foot home was built in classic New England style, with shingle siding, a single sloped roofline and large windows—complemented by white-washed walls, exposed-beam ceilings and wide-plank flooring on the interiors. 

Advertisement – Scroll to Continue

The main common area features cathedral ceilings with a step-down between the living and dining room, and a partial wall divides the dining room from the kitchen. There is also a wood-paneled family room off the kitchen, a gym and a covered porch. 

The sellers purchased the property in 2010 for $1.562 million, according to property records accessed through PropertyShark. They could not immediately be reached for comment. 

Advertisement

“I have received quite a few inquiries since hitting the market two days ago,” Michaud said. “Buyers understand that this is a golden opportunity to own over an acre with 200 feet of bold oceanfront in Cape Elizabeth.”

MORE: Iranian Strikes on Dubai Put the City’s Roaring Real Estate Market to the Test

There are currently just seven three-bedroom homes available for sale in Cape Elizabeth and fewer than five waterfront properties, according to Sotheby’s and Zillow data. It is also the most expensive listing in the town, with another waterfront property on a tiny lot just south of Portland coming in a close second, according to Zillow. 

Michaud sold the former Cape Elizabeth home of Bette Davis this past summer for $13.4 million, the priciest sale on the cape in at least a decade—and even those views can’t compare. They’re “just magical,” he said. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Maine

NECEC conservation plan will not protect Maine’s mature forests | Opinion

Published

on

NECEC conservation plan will not protect Maine’s mature forests | Opinion


Robert Bryan is a licensed forester from Harpswell and author or co-author of numerous publications on managing forests for wildlife. Paul Larrivee is a licensed forester from New Gloucester who manages both private and public lands, and a former Maine Forest Service forester.

In November 2025, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) approved a conservation plan and forest management plan as mitigation for impacts from the NECEC transmission corridor that runs from the Quebec border 53 miles to central Maine.

As professional foresters, we were astonished by the lack of scientific credibility in the definition of “mature forest habitat” that was approved by DEP, and the business-as-usual commercial forestry proposed for over 80% of the conservation area.

The DEP’s approval requires NECEC to establish and protect 50,000 acres to be managed for mature-forest wildlife species and wildlife travel corridors along riparian areas and between mature forest habitats. The conservation plan will establish an area adjacent to the new transmission corridor to be protected under a conservation easement held by the state. Under this plan, 50% of the area will be managed as mature forest habitat.

Advertisement

Under the forest management plan, a typical even-aged stand will qualify as “mature forest habitat” once 50 feet tall, which is only about 50 years old. These stands will lack large trees that provide wildlife denning and nesting sites, multiple vegetation layers that mature-forest birds use for nesting and feeding habitats and large decaying trees and downed logs that provide habitat for insects, fungi and small mammals, which in turn benefit larger predators.

Another major concern is that contrary to the earlier DEP order, the final approval allows standard sustainable forestry operations on the 84% of the forest located outside the stream buffers and special habitats. These stands may be harvested as soon as they achieve the “mature forest habitat” definition, as long as 50% of the conserved land is maintained as “mature.”

After the mature forest goal is reached, clearcutting or other heavy harvesting could occur on thousands of acres every 10 years. Because the landowner — Weyerhaeuser — owns several hundred thousand acres in the vicinity, any reductions in harvesting within the conservation area can simply be offset by cutting more heavily nearby. As a result, the net
mature-forest benefit of the conservation area will be close to zero.

Third, because some mature stands will be cut before the 50% mature forest goal is reached, it will take 40 years — longer than necessary — to reach the goal.

In the near future the Board of Environmental Protection (BEP) will consider an appeal from environmental organizations of the plan approval. To ensure that ecologically mature forest develops in a manner that meets the intent of the DEP/BEP orders, several things need to change.

Advertisement

First and most important, to ensure that characteristics of mature forest habitat have time to develop it is critical that the definition include clear requirements for the minimum number of large-diameter (hence more mature) trees, adjusted by forest type. At least half the stocking of an area of mature forest habitat should be in trees at least 10 inches in diameter, and at least 20% of stands beyond the riparian buffers should have half the stocking in trees greater than or equal to 16 inches in diameter.

Current research as well as guidelines for defining ecologically mature forests, such as those in Maine Audubon’s Forestry for Maine Birds, should be followed.

Second, limits should be placed on the size and distribution of clearcut or “shelterwood” harvest patches so that even-aged harvests are similar in size to those created by typical natural forest disturbance patterns. These changes will help ensure that the mature-forest block and connectivity requirements of the orders are met.

Third, because the forest impacts have already occurred, no cutting should be allowed in the few stands that meet or exceed the DEP-approved definition — which needs to be revised as described above — until the 50% or greater mature-forest goal is reached.

If allowed to stand, the definitions and management described in the forest management plan would set a terrible precedent for conserving mature forests in Maine. The BEP should uphold the appeal and establish standards for truly mature forest habitat.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending