Connect with us

Connecticut

Rampant Neglect and Abuse at Connecticut Mental Health Center Disputed by Agency Spokesman

Published

on

Rampant Neglect and Abuse at Connecticut Mental Health Center Disputed by Agency Spokesman


NEW HAVEN — An investigation by Disability Rights Connecticut has found that the Connecticut Mental Health Center failed to investigate sexual assault claims, restrained or secluded patients without proper documentation or monitoring, and allowed mice to infest its facility. 

The center, run by the Yale School of Medicine and the state’s Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, is a 20-bed facility for patients suffering from serious mental illnesses like schizophrenia and post-traumatic stress disorder, sometimes combined with substance abuse. 

“DRCT’s systemic findings uncovered a pervasive culture of DMHAS’ and CMHC’s failure to adequately protect and treat patients under its care,” the report reads.  

The investigation outlined in the report spanned nearly three years — from April 2021 to February 2024. The organization looked at the records of 14 patients at the facility, visited six times and interviewed staff and patients.

Advertisement

Rachel Mirsky, the supervisory attorney at Disability Rights Connecticut, told CT Examiner that the organization decided to investigate the center after receiving multiple complaints about the conditions there. 

Abuse incidents 

The report describes an incident where a 25-year-old woman was sexually assaulted by a male patient on two different occasions in the spring and summer of 2021. The facility allegedly failed to investigate the assaults. The woman, who had been diagnosed with chronic post-traumatic stress disorder as well as having a borderline intellectual disability, left the facility after three months. 

Another woman, 23, who came into the facility with post-traumatic stress disorder from childhood sexual abuse, was allegedly assaulted three times by a male patient over the course of six months. None of the instances were investigated, the report claims. When it was time for her to leave the facility, the report states she was discharged to her family despite having told her treatment team that she had been abused by her brother, who also lived there. She returned to the center a week later after relapsing into substance abuse, and was alleged to have been sexually harassed on a number of occasions over the following six months. None of those allegations were reported or investigated, according to the report.

The report also found that a number of patients were denied essential care, including the lack of assigned psychologists and the absence of plans to support positive behavior. The report noted that the 23-year-old woman was prescribed emergency psychotropic drugs — chemical restraints — 14 times and was physically restrained on one occasion, but never received a psychological assessment or behavior plan. 

The center is also accused of failing to consistently document the use of restraint and seclusion on patients, which is meant to be used only when the person or others in the vicinity are in immediate physical danger, and requires a doctor to sign a form indicating that restraints are necessary. According to the report, this documentation was regularly missing.  

Advertisement

A 31-year-old man diagnosed with schizophrenia was admitted to the center in 2019. After about a year in the facility, he was discharged to a group home, where it is alleged that he attacked a staff person and another resident. He was sent to the emergency room and then returned to the center. 

“The [center] social worker documented that shortly after his readmission to [the center], the father of John Doe #1 asked the social worker what would be different about his treatment this time and stated that John Doe #1’s previous stay with [the center] had lasted for one year and that he was discharged unchanged,” the report read.  

During the 32 weeks he remained at the center, the man was physically restrained 14 times, chemically restrained 16 times and placed in seclusion six times, according to the report. The documentation required for these restraints and seclusions was allegedly incomplete or missing in all of these instances. 

According to the report, the man was sexually abusive toward staff and other patients at least 50 times during his stay, but none of those instances triggered an investigation. 

Over reliance of restraints on psychiatric patients rather than treatment was also reported in a 2019 investigation that Disability Rights Connecticut conducted on Whiting Forensic Hospital in Middletown.

Advertisement

In addition to unreported abuse and instances of restraints, the report on the Connecticut Mental Health Center found that certain patients were also regularly missing their clinical groups.

The report also criticized the facility itself, which had been beset by a mouse infestation. In September 2022, the housekeeping staff said 25 mice were captured in traps over one weekend. 

“Documentation indicated that mice were present in the kitchen/dining area, lounges, and patient bedrooms. On February 21, 2024, staff reported that even though the exterminator visited the facility three times a week, they continue to see mice in patient living areas, especially at nighttime. More is needed to address this chronic and unsanitary situation,” the report noted. 

The building also contains 63,000 square feet of asbestos under the floor tiles which has not yet been remediated. 

State response 

Chris McClure, spokesperson for the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, told CT Examiner in a statement that the Connecticut Mental Health Center and all its facilities meet the “exacting and precise objective standards of care” required by the Joint Commission, and that client care was their highest concern. 

Advertisement

“While we appreciate the hard work and input of DRCT, and while we continue to review their report, the agency has numerous concerns with DRCT’s findings and recommendations; which include subjective criteria, calls for systems change when robust risk management, quality assurance, and critical incident reporting are already in place, and citation of isolated events that have since been remedied,” McClure said. 

But Mirsky told CT Examiner that, while the department says it has oversight from the Joint Commission, which accredits and sets standards for these facilities, she questions the quality of the Joint Commission’s assessments.  

“We have looked at reports from the Joint Commission and there we have found things that they did not find,” Mirsky said.  

McClure noted that the department disagreed with the organization’s findings and said senior leadership was “made available to DRTC throughout to discuss the material.”

But Disability Rights Connecticut is now asking for an outside agency to oversee the center and other facilities run by the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services. 

Advertisement

Of the six inpatient psychiatric hospitals that the Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services runs in Connecticut, only one — Whiting Hospital — has independent oversight from the Department of Public Health, Mirsky explained.

“If [the Department of Public Health] or a similarly situated agency went in on a regular basis … people would have the ability to file complaints with them at any time,” Mirsky said. “If they get complaints, they can say, alright, we’re going to go in, we’re going to investigate. That’s not happening. We went in to investigate because no one else really is.” 

The organization is also asking for the creation of a system to monitor reporting and investigations of abuse and neglect claims, a system to monitor quality of care and require reviews of restraints and seclusions. 

“CMHC and its staff remain focused on the safety and care of their patients, engaging in ongoing monitoring and quality improvement for the clinical care they deliver. The center takes all feedback seriously and employs it in its ongoing efforts to improve the care that it delivers,” Yale said in a statement. 

Maureen Lyons, of the Joint Commission, told CT Examiner that the commission reviews complaints. Although the commission works with organizations like CMHC to “identify potential risks to patient safety and improve quality of care,” only a “governmental entity” can require a facility to shut down, she said.

Advertisement





Source link

Connecticut

Body recovered after Bloomfield house fire and explosion

Published

on

Body recovered after Bloomfield house fire and explosion


A body was recovered after a house explosion resulting in a house fire in the area of Banbury Lane on Monday night.

Fire Marshal Roger Nelson says they recovered a body around 1:15 on Tuesday morning. The identity of the body found will not be released at this time.

When officers arrived around 6:11 p.m. they encountered the house fully in flames, police said.

According to police, the fire department was able to extinguish the fire, but the house sustained devastating damage.

Advertisement

There are no criminal aspects related to this incident at this time.

The incident was contained to the one house.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Exclusive | Ex-CBS anchor Josh Elliott back on Connecticut dating scene after ugly Liz Cho split

Published

on

Exclusive | Ex-CBS anchor Josh Elliott back on Connecticut dating scene after ugly Liz Cho split


Ex-CBS host Josh Elliott is looking for love eight months after he filed for divorce from “Eyewitness News” anchor Liz Cho.

“Josh is out and about on the dating scene in Fairfield County,” a spy exclusively tells Page Six. “He’s been seen at the bars in the area where middle-aged singles congregate.” 

A second source tells Page Six, “Josh isn’t dating anyone, but he is open to meeting people. His daughter is his priority.”

Page Six can also reveal that Elliott moved out of his and Cho’s estimated $4.2 million Connecticut marital home in January.

Advertisement
Josh Elliott (pictured above back in July) is “open” to dating eight months after filing for divorce from Liz Cho. FOX Image Collection via Getty Images
The former CBS anchor (seen here in 2016 with his estranged wife) has been on the dating scene in Connecticut. Kristina Bumphrey/Starpix / Shutterstock

In court papers dated Jan. 29 and obtained by Page Six, Cho revealed Elliott moved out of their home and into a new residence without her knowledge.

Cho claimed she was notified by Optimum on Jan. 21, regarding her ex installing internet at his new home.

“The Defendant learned for the first time from said communication that on or about January 15, 2026, the Plaintiff secured an unfurnished rental residence located in Southport, Connecticut,” the filing read.

“It is now clear that the Plaintiff surreptitiously entered a new lease…” the court papers continued.

A rep for Elliott did not respond to Page Six’s request for comment.

Advertisement
Elliott moved out of the Connecticut home he shared with Cho earlier this year. Getty Images
The former “Good Morning America” anchor divorced from Cho in June after a decade of marriage. Getty Images

Page Six broke the ousted CBS anchor filed for divorce from Cho after a decade of marriage on June 20, 2025.

“The marriage of the parties has broken down irretrievably,” the court papers read. Elliott asked for a “dissolution of the marriage” and for “an equitable distribution of all property, both real and personal.”

Cho responded to her estranged husband’s complaint on Nov. 6 and filed a cross-complaint against him. She also stated their marriage “has broken down irretrievably.”

The divorce became messy when Cho requested “copies of written correspondence, emails, cards, WeChat messages, Facebook messages, social media messaging, instant messaging, telephonic text messages, transcribed voicemail messages or any written forms of communication” between Elliott and “any person, other than the defendant, with whom [Elliott] have or have had a romantic and/or sexual relationship, from July 11, 2015, to the present.”

Elliott objected the request on the “grounds that the time frame of the request for production is unreasonable, unnecessary, harassing and not likely to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence.”

Advertisement

Cho also requested “monies spent for the benefit of any person with whom you have had a romantic and/or sexual relationship, other than the defendant,” “property given or transferred by you to any person with whom you have had a romantic and/or sexual relationship, other than the defendant,” “monies spent for your benefit by any person with whom you have had a romantic and/or sexual relationship with, other than the defendant.”

The TV personality in addition requested financial records, documentation proving Elliott’s search for employment — as he was ousted from CBS in 2017 — travel invoices, and more. Elliott objected to the requests.

A source close to the couple previously told Page Six, “This is standard in a divorce. Her lawyer is doing a thorough document request. The documents she is requesting are standard.” The insider also insisted there is no evidence Elliott had a relationship with anyone outside the marriage.

As Page Six reported, Cho requested documentation from Elliott, including financial. Kristina Bumphrey/Starpix / Shutterstock
He objected her requests, as their divorce proceedings have turned nasty. Cindy Ord

Also in the Jan. 29 court filing, Cho filed a motion for contempt against Elliott regarding their jointly owned marital Connecticut mansion.

Cho claimed Elliott arranged for a moving truck to come to the marital residence while she was on vacation with her daughter on Jan. 19.

Advertisement

Cho claimed Elliott moved a “significant amount of furniture and furnishings from the marital residence,” and their “two Portuguese water dogs,” which she alleged at the time of the filing were not returned.

The court docs continued to allege, “On Tuesday, January 6, 2026, [Cho] realized that she was missing a valuable watch and earrings from her jewelry bag. As [Elliott] is the only other person who had access to the missing watch and jewelry, [Cho] believes [Elliott] is in possession of such personal property.”

She claimed his alleged actions are a “willful violation” of the court’s orders.

The insider alleged Elliott was the one to take care of the dogs and that he took “a small amount of furniture.”

In Elliott’s response to her filing, he objected to her request and claimed her allegations are “false and inflammatory.”

Advertisement

He claimed in court papers, “[Cho] alleges [Elliott] ‘ransacked’ and ‘abandoned’ the marital residence — claims that are patently false and intended to annoy, harass and intimidate [Elliott].

“[Elliott] did not ransack the marital home. He did not damage the property. He did not render the residence uninhabitable. He removed limited personal property and furnishings so he would have a safe haven from [Cho’s] escalating and erratic behavior direct at not only [Elliott], but his minor child as well.”

Cho accused Elliott (seen in 2019) of taking their two dogs. Getty Images
She also accused him of taking her earrings — claims he denied in court papers. GC Images

In a separate filing, he continued to defend his actions by alleging, “[Elliott] removed only limited furniture items and furnishings, many from the basement, solely to furnish a new residence after removing himself and his child from a hostile environment created by [Cho]. All property remains intact and subject to equitable distribution.”

In regard to the jewelry claim, Elliott said, “Perhaps most egregious is [Cho’s] baseless accusation that [Elliott] stole her jewelry. This allegation is made without evidence, without corroboration and without even a good-faith attempt to verify the truth.”

He then accused her of “monitoring and listening to [Elliott’s] private phone calls; rifling through [Elliott’s] personal belongings and closet; leaving the marital residence for extended periods without communication despite the presence of two dogs requiring daily care” and more claims.

Advertisement

He is requesting that the court deny her motion for contempt and they are due in court on March 20.

Lawyers for Cho and Elliott did not respond to Page Six’s request for comment regarding the divorce.

Elliott accused his estranged wife of escalating and erratic behavior. Lawyers for Cho did not respond to Page Six’s request for comment. Jamie McCarthy
Elliott is in talks to return to television to join Gayle King and Nate Burleson on “CBS Mornings.” Brian Ach

Elliott, 54, and Cho, 55, met while working for ABC and got married in July 2015.

This was the second marriage for both, as they each share a daughter from their previous relationships.

Cho has been with ABC on “Eyewitness News” since 2003, while Elliott was with ABC’s “Good Morning America” from 2011 to 2014.

Advertisement

After a brief stint with NBC, he joined CBSN as lead daytime anchor in March 2016. Nearly a year later, he was let go from the company.

Elliott has been out of the spotlight in recent years, but is now in talks to join Gayle King and Nate Burleson on “CBS Mornings,” Awful Announcing reported.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Connecticut

Man charged with murder in Hartford

Published

on

Man charged with murder in Hartford


A man was charged with murder and interfering with police on Sunday night.

According to police, officers were dispatched to an apartment on Washington Street for a wellness check of a woman who was reportedly unconscious and not breathing.

When officers arrived, they made contact with a man in the apartment who refused to cooperate and would not allow officers access. They then had to force entry into the apartment where they located the victim suffering from severe head trauma as well as the aggressive male, police said.

The man was secured and transported to the Hartford Police Detention Facility and is being held on a million-dollar bond.

Advertisement

The victim was revealed to be 76-year-old Linda Anthony and was pronounced deceased on scene.

The Hartford Police Major Crimes and Crime Scene Divisions responded to the scene and assumed the investigation.  



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending