Connect with us

Missouri

Outrage in small Missouri town as cop shoots and kills tiny blind, deaf dog Teddy that he was called to help after ‘mistaking it for a stray that needed to be put down’

Published

on

Outrage in small Missouri town as cop shoots and kills tiny blind, deaf dog Teddy that he was called to help after ‘mistaking it for a stray that needed to be put down’


A small Missouri town is up in arms after a local cop fatally shot a blind and deaf dog after he mistook is for a stray. 

Tiny 13-pound Shih Tzu mix Teddy was tragically gunned down in Sturgeon, a town of just 900 people, on Sunday, leaving its owner Nick Hunter enraged. 

In footage from KOMU of Hunter confronting police officer Myron Woodson, the emotional pet lover said: ‘Was my dog a threat to you or anyone else?’ 

Woodson had reportedly been called to the scene to help Teddy after the dog got lost, and initially told Hunter that he believed the pooch was an injured stray that needed to be put down. 

Advertisement

But in a statement from the City of Sturgeon, the story appeared to change, as it was said that Woodson also feared Teddy was infected with rabies and shot the pet to avoid being bitten. 

Teddy, a tiny 13-pound Shih Tzu mix, was tragically gunned down in Sturgeon, Missouri on Sunday after a police officer mistook her for a stray that needed to be put down 

Sturgeon police officer Myron Woodson was seen on footage explaining that he shot the disabled dog because of its behavior, which the city admitted it 'later learned' was because Teddy was blind

Sturgeon police officer Myron Woodson was seen on footage explaining that he shot the disabled dog because of its behavior, which the city admitted it ‘later learned’ was because Teddy was blind 

The shooting unfolded after Teddy reportedly ran into a neighbor’s yard, with the neighbor saying that the dog spent around 45 minutes laying in the sun and licking her hand. 

The neighbor, who has remained anonymous, called the police to eventually remove the dog from her yard and find its owner. 

But within minutes of Officer Woodson arriving, the cop shot the dog twice, killing the beloved pet on the spot. 

Hunter told the Washington Post that he found out his five-year-old dog was dead through a phone call, which he said left him in ‘disbelief.’ 

Advertisement

‘I was shaken, in tears, trying to figure out if it was really my dog that an officer had shot or if a mistake had been made,’ he said. 

The owner added that after meeting the disabled pooch, he ‘instantly fell in love with his bubbly and playful personality’, adding: ‘He was so small you could hold him in one hand.’  

Hunter told the outlet that he was considering taking legal action over the shooting, and was seen in footage confronting Woodson. 

‘Was my dog a threat to you or anyone else?’ he said in a shaky voice, bewildered how the tiny deaf, blind dog could have triggered the response. 

Woodson responded: ‘I see a dog that is walking around blindly – I don’t know the dog is blind.’

Advertisement

As he reportedly said he believed Teddy needed to be put down, Hunter questioned: ‘So you’re putting him out of his misery?’

‘What Am I supposed to do?’ Woodson responded, noting that the tiny Missouri town doesn’t have animal control. 

‘I don’t enjoy shooting dogs,’ the officer added. 

Owner Nick Hunter said he was in 'disbelief, shaken and in tears' after finding out his beloved dog had been shot

Owner Nick Hunter said he was in ‘disbelief, shaken and in tears’ after finding out his beloved dog had been shot 

Woodson apologized to Hunter as he was confronted, and insisted: 'I don't enjoy shooting dogs'

Woodson apologized to Hunter as he was confronted, and insisted: ‘I don’t enjoy shooting dogs’ 

Amid outrage from Sturgeon residents, the city released two statements, including one where they insisted that the officer ‘acted within his authority’ after reviewing body camera footage. 

But locals say they remain disturbed by the shooting on a residential street, with the owner of the yard where Teddy was shot sending a letter to the city demanding Woodson is removed from his duties. 

Advertisement

The letter also stressed that the dog was not posing any kind of threat, and that Woodson fired his weapon multiple times with ‘neighboring children (in) the side yards playing and my family within close perimeter.’ 

The resident added that their 17-year-old daughter witnessed the dog being killed by Woodson. 

In its initial statement the day after the shooting, the City of Sturgeon claimed that Woodson believed Teddy was rabid and feared he may be bitten, despite the officer reportedly not making these claims at the scene. 

‘The SPD Officer also noticed the animal did not have a collar or tags. The SPD Officer made numerous attempts to capture the dog using the catch pole,’ the statement added.  

‘Based on the behavior exhibited by the dog, believing the dog to be severely injured or infected with rabies, and as the officer feared being bitten and being infected with rabies, the SPD officer felt that his only option was to put the animal down.’ 

Advertisement

The city admitted that it was ‘later learned’ that Teddy’s behavior was because he was blind, and that the ‘animal’s lack of a collar or tags influenced the SPD Officer’s decision to put the animal down due to his belief that the animal was injured, sick and abandoned.’ 

Teddy's owner added that after meeting the disabled pooch, he 'instantly fell in love with his bubbly and playful personality'

Teddy’s owner added that after meeting the disabled pooch, he ‘instantly fell in love with his bubbly and playful personality’ 

Local resident Regina Adams-Miller said she was outraged after hearing of the incident, and was particularly disturbed by the officer firing his weapon on the quiet residential street

Local resident Regina Adams-Miller said she was outraged after hearing of the incident, and was particularly disturbed by the officer firing his weapon on the quiet residential street

In a follow-up statement on Thursday, the city said it reviewed Woodson’s body cam footage and found that he ‘acted within his authority based on the information available to him at the time to protect against possible injury to citizens’. 

‘In order to better equip officers for future animal at large call outs, the City will be sending all officers to Boone County Animal Control for training and education, in hopes that this unfortunate situation does not occur again,’ the city added. 

Local resident Regina Adams-Miller told KOMU that she was outraged after hearing of the incident, and was particularly disturbed by the officer firing his weapon on the quiet residential street. 

‘What if we had, you know, kids playing outside?’ Adams-Miller said. 

Advertisement

‘It’s scary, I don’t think the community feels very safe with him. And I think I can honestly speak for most of the community, not everyone, but most.’ 

She continued: ‘If [the officer] is scared of a little blind and deaf, 13-pound dog, or 12-pound dog, what is he going to do, you know, to our community, to our kids.’ 



Source link

Missouri

Missouri Lottery Pick 3, Pick 4 winning numbers for March 5, 2026

Published

on


The Missouri Lottery offers several draw games for those aiming to win big.

Here’s a look at March 5, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Pick 3 numbers from March 5 drawing

Midday: 5-5-1

Midday Wild: 7

Advertisement

Evening: 4-7-3

Evening Wild: 1

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from March 5 drawing

Midday: 9-4-6-3

Midday Wild: 1

Advertisement

Evening: 9-3-6-3

Evening Wild: 9

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Cash Pop numbers from March 5 drawing

Early Bird: 10

Morning: 14

Advertisement

Matinee: 14

Prime Time: 10

Night Owl: 09

Check Cash Pop payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Show Me Cash numbers from March 5 drawing

10-17-22-24-30

Advertisement

Check Show Me Cash payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

All Missouri Lottery retailers can redeem prizes up to $600. For prizes over $600, winners have the option to submit their claim by mail or in person at one of Missouri Lottery’s regional offices, by appointment only.

To claim by mail, complete a Missouri Lottery winner claim form, sign your winning ticket, and include a copy of your government-issued photo ID along with a completed IRS Form W-9. Ensure your name, address, telephone number and signature are on the back of your ticket. Claims should be mailed to:

Ticket Redemption

Advertisement

Missouri Lottery

P.O. Box 7777

Jefferson City, MO 65102-7777

For in-person claims, visit the Missouri Lottery Headquarters in Jefferson City or one of the regional offices in Kansas City, Springfield or St. Louis. Be sure to call ahead to verify hours and check if an appointment is required.

For additional instructions or to download the claim form, visit the Missouri Lottery prize claim page.

Advertisement

When are the Missouri Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 10 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Pick 3: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Pick 4: 12:45 p.m. (Midday) and 8:59 p.m. (Evening) daily.
  • Cash4Life: 8 p.m. daily.
  • Cash Pop: 8 a.m. (Early Bird), 11 a.m. (Late Morning), 3 p.m. (Matinee), 7 p.m. (Prime Time) and 11 p.m. (Night Owl) daily.
  • Show Me Cash: 8:59 p.m. daily.
  • Lotto: 8:59 p.m. Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Powerball Double Play: 9:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Missouri editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Missouri Supreme Court reviews airport property tax deduction

Published

on

Missouri Supreme Court reviews airport property tax deduction


Summary:
  • Missouri Supreme Court heard arguments on constitutionality of airport property tax valuation statute.
  • Case involves valuation of Marriott hotel at Kansas City International Airport.
  • Platte County assessor argues statute creates special tax advantage for airport properties.
  • Missouri State Tax Commission reduced hotel’s valuation from $13.45 million to about $6.14 million.

The Missouri Supreme Court heard arguments Feb. 10 in a case challenging how a hotel at Kansas City International Airport was valued for property tax purposes and whether a state statute allowing deductions for airport property improvements is constitutional.

The dispute centers on the valuation of the Marriott Hotel located at Kansas City International Airport and whether a provision in Section 137.115.1 of state law improperly reduces the taxable value of certain airport properties.

At issue is a challenge by the Platte County assessor and the Park Hill School District to a decision by the Missouri State Tax Commission that resulted in a lower valuation for the 2016 tax year.

Advertisement

The assessor was represented during arguments by Stephen E. Magers, an attorney for Platte County in Platte City; Grady Hotel Investments was represented by Peter A. Corsale of McCarthy, Leonard & Kaemmerer in Town & Country.

Magers argued the statute effectively creates a special class of property that receives favorable tax treatment.

“This case concerns a truly novel item of the Missouri statutes,” he said. “It stands alone as the only statute within the entirety of the Missouri framework that gives a certain set of taxpayers a tax advantage of having real property located within an airport receive a deduction for new construction and improvements.”

The property at issue is a Marriott hotel located on land owned by Kansas City within the boundaries of Kansas City International Airport. The city leases the land to a private operator.

In 2015, Grady Hotel Investments purchased the prior operator’s interest in the property for about $8.5 million. As part of the transaction, Grady entered into an amended lease and concession agreement with the city and committed to making capital improvements to repair and renovate the property.

Advertisement

For the 2016 tax year, the Platte County assessor valued Grady’s interest in the hotel at approximately $13.45 million. After the county board of equalization upheld that valuation, Grady appealed to the Missouri State Tax Commission.

The commission initially set the hotel’s assessed value at zero using the “bonus value” methodology for leasehold interests, but the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District later reversed that ruling and remanded the case. On remand, the commission ultimately determined the hotel’s “true value in money” was about $6.14 million. The commission reached that figure after deducting the value of personal property included in the purchase and approximately $1.2 million in costs paid toward new construction and improvements made after 2008, as permitted under Section 137.115.1.

Magers argued that the statute operates as an unconstitutional tax break for properties located within airport boundaries.

“At its core, what the statute does is create a special kind of property that receives a reduction to its value based on new construction and improvements spent toward such possessory interests in real property,” said Magers.

He also said the provision treats airport properties differently from other commercial properties.

Advertisement

“A homeowner doesn’t get a reduction to their value when they get a new roof on their property,” he said. “But for property that is located within an airport boundary that undertakes new construction or improvements, there is a deduction to that value that the statute mandates.”

Corsale countered that the statute does not create a tax exemption but instead establishes a permissible method for valuing certain types of property.

“To me the answer is no. This is a method of valuation,” he said, arguing that the Missouri Constitution gives the legislature authority to determine how property is valued for tax purposes.

Judge Mary R. Russell questioned whether the deduction could potentially reduce a property’s value to zero if improvements continue over time.

“But couldn’t it be, at some point, a perpetual exemption,” she said, noting the statute allows deductions regardless of when improvement costs were incurred.

Advertisement

Corsale said the improvements ultimately revert to the city when the lease ends.

“What we are dealing with is a private company improving public land that eventually reverts back to the public,” he said. “At the conclusion of the lease, the public gets the benefit of whatever money they put into this property.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Missouri

Fact Finders: Can tow trucks run red lights in Missouri?

Published

on

Fact Finders: Can tow trucks run red lights in Missouri?


SPRINGFIELD, Mo. (KY3) – A viewer named Donna asked KY3’s Fact Finders whether it is legal for tow trucks with emergency lights to run through a red light. The answer is yes, but with conditions.

Missouri law states that any wrecker or tow truck may proceed past a red stop signal or stop sign, but only after slowing down as necessary for safe operation.

What the law requires

Three conditions must be met for a tow truck driver to proceed through a red light legally: the driver must be responding to an emergency call, must slow down or stop to confirm the intersection can be crossed safely, and must have at least one lighted lamp displaying a red light visible from 500 feet to the front of the vehicle while also sounding an audible signal such as a siren or bell.

Terry Harden of Terry’s Towing said tow truck drivers can legally be treated the same as other emergency vehicles.

Advertisement

“You really could be treated just like a police car, fire truck, ambulance,” Harden said.

Not every call warrants running a red light

Harden said he uses judgment when deciding whether to exercise that legal right.

“If you call me for a jump start, don’t mean I’m going to run red lights and sirens to get to your jump start,” Harden said.

Dispatchers sometimes instruct drivers to respond quickly to emergency crash scenes, Harden said.

“They want you to be there faster than fast. It says, expedite, expedite. And that’s fine. I will expedite it,” Harden said.

Advertisement

Have a question for Fact Finders? Visit KY3.com, go to the menu, select Fact Finders, and click Contact Fact Finders.

To report a correction or typo, please email digitalnews@ky3.com. Please include the article info in the subject line of the email.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending