Kansas
Critics of Kansas bills blocking transgender medical care to minors tossed from House hearing • Kansas Reflector
TOPEKA — Kansas House Rep. Brenda Landwehr kicked the first person out of Thursday’s hearing on anti-transgender legislation for cradling a protest sign in the room.
Landwehr, a Wichita Republican and chair of the House Health and Human Services Committee, bounced someone from the second row about 45 minutes later during questioning of proponents of legislation sharply restricting access by minors to gender-affirming medical care.
At the outset, she had warned the standing-room-only crowd that outbursts of any kind would be unacceptable and offenders would be asked to leave or be escorted out by uniformed officers of the Capitol Police.
“I said no talking, no disruption, and I meant it,” Landwehr said. “I think I was pretty plain.”
During questioning of a teacher opposed to intrusion of legislators into personal lives of school children, Landwehr warned the witness not to speak over her because “if you’re talking, you’re not listening.” Near conclusion of the day’s proceedings, Landwehr slapped her gavel to declare Lawrence transgender activist Iridescent Riffel out of order for asserting a vote in favor of anti-transgender bills meant the blood of children would “be on your hands.”
Landwehr didn’t hesitate to issue the expulsion order: “Please leave the room or we will escort you out.”
Mingled with those moments during the 100-minute hearing were insights from proponents and opponents of House legislation designed to curtail access by under-18 Kansans to transgender health services and medical interventions. The committee didn’t take action on the two bills subject to the House hearing.
A companion hearing on transgender legislation was conducted Thursday in the Senate Public Health and Welfare Committee. Eudora Republican Sen. Beverly Gossage, who serves as chair of the committee, said her desire was to “protect the children” in Kansas from medical professionals extending gender-affirming care to people under 18. Access to treatment, even if supported by parents, should be denied until the patient was an adult, she said.
Unjustifiable ‘harm’
Retired Nebraska physician Ivan Abdouch treated transgender individuals from Midwest states for 30 years. He said he typically didn’t appreciate government regulation of medicine, but intervention was required to protect young Kansans from gender-affirming care.
He urged the House committee to get behind legislation that would deny gender-affirming medical care for anyone under 18. House Bill 2791 would characterize treatment of minor patients whose gender identity was inconsistent with sex at birth as a form of child abuse. It would authorize lawsuits against doctors or nurses who violated the proposed statute, which must still run the gauntlet in the House and Senate and deal with a likely veto by Gov. Laura Kelly.
“How can we determine with certainty the gender trajectory of a child or adolescent for their lifetime? We can’t. No one can,”‘ Abdouch said. “What are potential consequences of erroneous medical or surgical treatment? Unjustifiable, irreversible harm with lifelong effects.”
To the contrary, Wichita marriage and family therapist Asher Wickell said he was alarmed by consideration of a bill denying health care to minors. He said it was an outrage to stop state-funded insurance from covering such care and to set the stage for medical providers to be sued for caring for all their patients. He said the legislation conflicted with standards and recommendations of major medical and mental health professional associations.
“Its sweeping, intrusive demands are reckless and dangerous in their disregard for the safety and well-being of Kansas’ children and families,” Wickell said. “Simultaneously, the bill creates unresolvable legal and ethical dilemmas for mental health providers, threatening to exacerbate the profound mental health shortfalls already impacting our state.”
Texas doctor, Kansas bill
The majority of people offering testimony to the House committee on HB 2791 were opposed to the legislation introduced by Rep. Ron Bryce, a Coffeyville Republican and physician licensed to practice medicine in Texas but not in Kansas.
Bryce, who compared transgender surgery to the practice of treating depression by performing a lobotomy, told the House committee it was imperative the state forbid tax dollars from be used for “futile and unsafe gender-transition of children.” He said it was important state statute prohibit health professionals from advocating medical or surgical transitioning of a child at facilities receiving state support for treatment of psychological disorders.
He said Kansas should “move forward with what other civilized western cultures are doing” and forbid psychological treatment with “disturbing side effects” or medical intervention leaving individuals “barren or with permanently disfigured genitalia.”
Kansas Catholic Conference policy specialist Lucrecia Nold, speaking on behalf of Catholic bishops in Kansas, said the act of manipulating distinctions between men and women interfered with God’s will. Christians find identity in God through Scripture and tradition, she said. She said “divine gifts” of differences between males and females had to be nurtured in children and not subjected to assaults by those touting gender ideology.
“Allowing a person, especially a child, to participate in gender reassignment surgery or gender altering medication would be a disserve to them,” Nold said.
Walk in my shoes
Jaelynn Abegg, a transgender woman from Wichita, and Anthony Alvarez, a 19-year-old transgender man and honor student at the University of Kansas, opposed the bill. Both urged legislators to consider benefits of gender-affirming care for the estimated 2,100 transgender children aged 13 to 17 in Kansas.
Their testimony made clear young Kansans would suffer or thrive based on decisions on a bill undermining the right of patients to make their own medical choices. Under the House measure, state lawmakers would weaken the concept of informed consent — an essential part of health care decisions that should be in the hands of patients, parents or guardians and physicians.
“Bills like HB 2791 clearly communicate this committee’s message that transgender people are not welcome here,” Abegg said. “As anti-trans bill after anti-trans bill works its way through the Legislature and to the governor’s desk, Kansas has earned a negative, high-risk or unsafe rating for gender identity policy.”
Alvarez, who has lived in Kansas for a decade, said he struggled as a child with intense anger and depression. He said that at age 15 he was was able to put a name — transgender — to discomfort that overshadowed his life. His parents were skeptical and felt out of their depth, he said. They all sought guidance from medical professionals, Alvarez said. That guidance led at age 16 to his transition as a minor in the state of Kansas.
“I was fortunate to have open-minded parents and an accepting school surrounding me when I began this process and, since then, I have grown into a young man my parents and I are proud of,” Alvarez said. “It pains me to think that the support systems that made me who I am today could be denied to other young Kansans by bills like this one. I used to believe that I would never be happy, but now I wake up every day excited and can see my future clearly — a future I hope is in the state of Kansas.”
The ACLU of Kansas raised questions about the bill’s potential violation of the Kansas Constitution, particularly the state Bill of Rights’ provision on bodily autonomy relied upon by the Kansas Supreme Court to affirm constitutional protection of abortion rights in Kansas.
No minor surgery
Landwehr, the chairwoman of the House health committee, included in the Thursday agenda a brief hearing on a separate bill that would prohibit gender transition surgery for minors in Kansas.
Landwehr, who introduced House Bill 2792, said Kansas should make violation of the proposed ban of transgender surgery on minors an ethics infraction under the Kansas Board of Healing Arts, which could place professional licenses in jeopardy.
Her bill would require transgender care services and treatments in Kansas be conducted according to clinical practice guidelines specified in Wylie Hembree, a physician who died in 2022 after authoring the guide on gender care.
Kristen Satterwhite, an Overland Park mother of a 15-year-old transgender boy, said her son came out as transgender at 13. She opposed legislation forbidding gender transition surgery on minors because those decisions should be made by professionals in the field and the family involved.
“No one else,” she said. “I honestly resent that I had to take time away from my family and my responsibilities today to share my child’s private medical history with all of you, but I am very concerned that this bill will disrupt the care that we have worked so hard to secure.”
The state of Kansas had no business mandating transgender care follow guidelines published in 2017 and making it illegal for physicians to provide patients the most up-to-date care available, she said.
Kansas
Kansas law revoked their right to drive and threatens their right to exist, transgender residents say
Some 1,700 Kansans had their driver’s licenses invalidated last month. It wasn’t for racking up speeding tickets or a DUI charge, but because they are transgender.
Kansas is one of five states to prohibit trans people from changing the gender marker on their licenses, but it is the first to pass a law that retroactively cancels licenses that were already changed. The law also invalidated birth certificates for those who updated their gender markers.
Hundreds of trans drivers already received letters from the state informing them their documents were “invalid immediately” and they “may be subject to additional penalties” if they continue to drive, unless they surrender the license to the Kansas Division of Vehicles and receive a new one with their birth sex.
“I’m pretty heartbroken,” said Jaelynn Abegg, a 41-year-old trans woman living in Wichita who received a letter. She said she will not turn in her license and plans to move this month to another state.
“It is a continuation of the message that the Legislature has been sending out for years now, and that is that transgender people are not welcome in Kansas,” she said.
Two anonymous trans residents sued Kansas last month, arguing that the law violates state protections for personal autonomy, privacy, equality, due process and freedom of speech. On Tuesday, Douglas County District Judge James McCabria declined to grant a temporary restraining order against the law while the case proceeds.
McCabria wrote in his decision that there isn’t enough evidence to show that trans people will face harassment and discrimination if they have to use bathrooms or show IDs that conflict with their gender identities.
Kansas law was years in the making
Kansas had allowed trans people to update the gender markers on their IDs since 2007. Then in 2023, it changed its legal definition of sex to be male or female and assigned at birth.
Fifteen other states have made a similar change in the past few years — and President Donald Trump issued an executive order declaring that there are only two unchangeable sexes. The State Department now prohibits trans people from changing the gender markers on their passports.
Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach sued the state, arguing that allowing people to update their gender markers violated the 2023 law. Last year, the Kansas Supreme Court affirmed an appeals court decision and allowed gender marker changes to resume.
In January, Kobach backed the new bill he said would “correct an error” by the courts. The state Senate added a provision prohibiting trans people from using bathrooms that align with their gender identities in government-owned buildings. It was passed without public comment. The penalties for violating the provision can be $1,000 for individuals and up to $125,000 for government entities with more than one infraction.
Last month, Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly vetoed the bill, saying the Legislature “should stay out of the business of telling Kansans how to go to the bathroom and instead stay focused on how to make life more affordable for Kansans.” Days later, the Republican-held state Legislature overrode her veto.
Kansas House Speaker Daniel Hawkins, a Republican, said in a statement at the time that the law’s purpose was to protect women. “This isn’t about scoring political points, but doing what’s right for women and girls across our communities,” he said, according to the Kansas Reflector. Hawkins did not respond to NBC News’ request for comment.
State Rep. Mark Schreiber, the only Republican to vote against the bill, told NBC News he agreed with the appeals court that Kobach could not show how allowing trans people to change the gender markers on their licenses caused harm to the state.
“I don’t have any trans folks in my family, but I know trans people,” he said, adding that they aren’t looking for special privileges and just want to live their lives. “And we seem to keep passing laws that keep getting in the way of that.”
Harper Seldin, one of the ACLU attorneys involved in the lawsuit, said during court arguments Friday that the Kansas Legislature singled out trans Kansans “for unique social stigma.”
“They were suddenly required, with no notice or opportunity to be heard, to present themselves to the DMV to obtain driver’s licenses that announced to everyone — the teller at the bank, the clerk at the hotel, the poll worker on election day — that they are transgender,” Seldin said.
Trans people have long reported facing more harassment and discrimination while using IDs that don’t align with their gender identity or expression, and many trans Kansans said they fear that their daily risk of facing such harassment would only increase as a result of the law.
‘There was no plan whatsoever’
Over the last five years, dozens of states have considered bills targeting transgender people, but the majority of those have targeted people’s ability to play on school sports teams that align with their gender identities and minors’ access to transition-related care. In the last few years, state and federal policies have shifted to focus on changing legal definitions of sex and restricting access to updated identity documents.
Logan Casey, director of policy research at the Movement Advancement Project, an LGBTQ think tank that tracks legislation, described these broader laws as “gender regulation laws” that attack the fundamental rights and identity of trans people.
“The point all along for the people pushing these bills and these attacks has been to single out transgender people and create a license to discriminate against transgender people and remove them from public life,” he said. “In effect, trying to get them to stop being transgender.”
Kansas’ law took effect immediately after it was published in the register Feb. 26. A spokesperson for the Kansas Department of Revenue told the Kansas Reflector that the law invalidated about 1,700 licenses. The department did not respond to a request for comment. During the court hearing Friday, Kobach said the department had so far sent letters to 275 Kansans and 138 had received new licenses.
Andrea Ellis, a 34-year-old trans woman living in Wellington, said she received a letter Wednesday even though she never changed the gender marker on her license — she only legally changed her name on it in December. She drove to the DMV the next day, where she said staff were confused about what to do and said her license had a “flag” on it.
They cut the corner off her license and gave her a temporary one. But later that day, they called her and said she had to return to the DMV because they made an error. When she went back, she said they gave her another temporary license that looked the same as the first.
“They claim that it was thought out, and everything else, but there was no grace period unlike any other kind of rollout program,” Ellis said. “There was no plan whatsoever.”
Some trans residents, like Matthew Neumann, said they still haven’t received any notification regarding their licenses. Neumann, who is the executive director of the LGBTQ Foundation of Kansas, said he’s been checking the validity of his license every day on the Kansas Department of Revenue website, and it’s still valid as of Friday.
Neumann said his organization has raised funds to help trans Kansans pay to update their licenses. Getting a license with an updated gender marker costs $8.75, while receiving a new ID is $26.
Neumann has lived in Larned, Kansas, for 20 years and said he will never leave. He said he’s been threatened over his restroom use, and he fears he could face more harassment under the new law.
“I’m just disappointed and frustrated,” he said. “I’m just hoping that maybe this is the wake up call we need,” he said.
Kansas
Farmer receives support from community after Kansas wildfire destroys home
KISMET, Kan. (KWCH) – Last month, wildfires in southern Kansas raged, destroying farmer Randall Thorp’s property, tools and 960 acres of land.
As he handles the massive cleanup project, he knows he is not alone.
“It’s about the greatest show of love I’ve ever seen,” Thorpe said. “I didn’t realize that I would have all this support in my greatest time of need.”
The two main contributors to Thorp’s optimism are the community around him and his faith.
“I’ve seen a lot of darkness that, because of my faith in Jesus, I can see the light in my heart,” Thorp said. “And that’s what keeps me going.”
Throughout the past few weeks, friends, family and neighbors have come to his property to help sort out and clean up the debris.
“I come out here and I’m by myself and I find it hard to do anything, but when a group of people all shows up and they’re wanting to work, then I’m ready to get to work with them, and they’re all ready to help me,” Thorp said.
Even with all the uncertainty following the fire, Thorp has been able to feed the 150 cattle he has, a number that is now growing since it is calving season. Friendly helpers are providing free hay for his animals to eat.
There’s a long way until things will be back to normal, but Thorp is determined to get there.
“You know, I can see some light at the end of the tunnel, but I’ve got to stay strong and keep it going and make it through,” Thorp said.
The powerful show of dependability from fellow Kansans is something he will never forget.
“I’ve been shown lots of love,” Thorp said.
You can still donate to Thorp’s GoFundMe here.
Copyright 2026 KWCH. All rights reserved. To report a correction or typo, please email news@kwch.com
Kansas
Kansas City International Airport reopens after ‘threat’ prompts FBI, cops to swarm terminal
Kansas City International Airport in Missouri was partly evacuated over a “threat” Sunday afternoon but has since resumed “normal operations,” officials said.
“The security incident at [Kansas City International Airport] is now clear and normal operations are resuming,” Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy wrote on X.
“I want to thank law enforcement including the FBI for their timely response. The safety of our passengers, airport staff, and crew members is always our number one priority.”
Airport representative Jackson Overstreet told The Associated Press in an email that the threat was reported at 11:50 a.m. local time, at which point an entire terminal was evacuated.
He said planes that landed after the threat were being held on the taxiway until it could be fully investigated.
FBI rep Dixon Land said the bureau was “aware of the incident” and worked with “law enforcement officials to determine the credibility of a threat.”
Passenger Logan Hawley, 29, told the outlet he was getting ready to board a flight to Texas when he saw police and K-9 units swarming the terminal.
“Suddenly there was an airport worker saying ‘immediately evacuate,’ people got up fast and rushed out of there,” Hawley said.
Roughly 2,000 people were ushered out of the terminal and onto the tarmac, he said.
Photos and video from the airport circulating online show large groups of passengers being led onto the tarmac or funneling out of the terminal.
With Post Wires
-
Wisconsin1 week agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Detroit, MI5 days agoU.S. Postal Service could run out of money within a year
-
Pennsylvania6 days agoPa. man found guilty of raping teen girl who he took to Mexico
-
Miami, FL7 days agoCity of Miami celebrates reopening of Flagler Street as part of beautification project
-
Sports7 days agoKeith Olbermann under fire for calling Lou Holtz a ‘scumbag’ after legendary coach’s death
-
Virginia7 days agoGiants will hold 2026 training camp in West Virginia
-
Michigan2 days agoOperation BBQ Relief helping with Southwest Michigan tornado recovery
