Connect with us

Vermont

More than 20 skiers had to be rescued from the Killington, Vt., backcountry. But how did they all get lost? – The Boston Globe

Published

on

More than 20 skiers had to be rescued from the Killington, Vt., backcountry. But how did they all get lost? – The Boston Globe


As they walked through the wooded area crisscrossed with skiers’ trails, the trio soon realized they weren’t the only people lost on the mountain. First they ran into a couple, then a larger group, then others who had also wandered off the marked trails at the 1,500-acre resort. The group included a half-dozen members of a high school ski club and one of the resort’s ski instructors, who was with two students, both about 5 years old.

By that night, after a five-hour, multi-agency rescue effort conducted during sub-freezing temperatures, Campanella, 22, along with 19 other resort guests and the ski instructor, were found and brought to safety. More than a dozen team members hiked, snowshoed, and skied uphill for about 5 miles in the frigid weather to reach the lost skiers and snowboarders, police said. No one was injured.

Days later the question remains: How did so many skiers get lost in the woods on a snowy evening?

Backcountry skiing — leaving marked trails for pristine slopes in the wilderness — is growing in popularity in the Northeast as winters shorten and climate change makes snow quality less predictable.

Advertisement

But Campanella said none of the skiers or snowboarders he spoke with left the property on purpose.

“They make it seem like we intentionally ducked some ropes and ignored some signs, and they say that we came down from the Snowshed peak, but that’s not at all what happened with us, at least,” he said. “I can’t speak for everyone, but for us, I never saw signs, never saw a rope or anything.”

The Killington resort is known as “The Beast of the East” because of its size and diverse terrain, which includes steep mogul runs, according to the skiing website On the Snow. It has seven mountain areas, including Killington Peak, which is the second-highest point in Vermont, at 4,241 feet, and has the biggest vertical drop in New England, at 3,050 feet, according to the resort.

An unlimited winter access pass at Killington can go for as $1,699, while a year round Beast 365 pass can cost more than $1,900.

It was about 2:30 p.m. when Killington police launched the recovery effort.

Advertisement

Authorities soon grew more alarmed as they realized how large the number of lost skiers had grown. As the sun dipped below the horizon and the darkness set in that early evening, the temperatures dropped even lower, according to the National Weather Service office in Burlington, Vt.

Law enforcement officials and rescue leaders declined to discuss the search effort.

More than 20 skiers needed to be rescued from Killington after getting lost.Christopher Campanella

“A special thanks should be given to all the volunteers who responded and worked this call,” the police department said in a Facebook post after the effort.

Killington police chief Whit Montgomery told the Rutland Herald the search was fairly manageable, but the weather required a quick response.

Advertisement

“One of the ways it becomes so dangerous is you get in there on fresh snow, it can be deep, it can be up to your waist or higher, with ski boots on or snow boots on … you start to sweat, you get wet, the temperatures drop more, hypothermia can set it; it gets pretty dangerous pretty quickly,” he said.

Kristel Killary, a spokesperson for Killington Ski Resort, said “several groups of skiers and riders,” had gone under a rope and left the resort’s perimeter on Saturday, “in violation of Killington’s policy.”

“Two of the skiers were minors and under the care of a ski instructor and that instructor was immediately terminated,” Killary said in an email.

The resort is working with Killington Search and Rescue to identify the guests who were among those lost on that Saturday so that it can revoke their ski passes, she said.

Before they got lost, Campanella said he and his friends were making the most of their day on the slopes, jumping in and out of woods and marked trails. They’d snowboarded down from Killington Peak on the Great Northern Trail and were somewhere near the junction with Killington Trail when they realized they were lost.

Advertisement

They soon learned they weren’t alone.

It was about 2 p.m., Campanella said in an interview Wednesday. Within to five to 10 minutes, they encountered another couple who were lost. Then four more people came hiking up the trail.

“About 20 minutes after that, we ran into another nine people,” he said.

Campanella said he thought he and his friends could have gotten out of the woods on their own, but there was concern about getting the two young children and the teenagers to safety quickly. That’s when members of the group called 911 for help.

Campanella said he was surprised to see that the ski instructor, who told Campanella she had worked for the resort for six years, was also lost.

Advertisement

“I was a little confused, but it kind of made me feel like it must not be that hard to end up on the wrong side and accidentally go down somewhere you’re not supposed to, because she didn’t intend to, and I don’t think she was purposely ducking ropes and not listening to signs,” Campanella said.

Dave Coppock, a member of Rescue Inc., a rural emergency medical service based in Brattleboro, Vt., happened to be in Killington cross-country skiing with his wife, Clare Coppock, when the call for help went out.

He received an emergency alert from Rescue Inc. on his cellphone while he was about 1 1/2 to 2 miles from the lost group, he said. He and four other members of the service responded, he said.

Aware that Saturday’s ideal conditions on the mountain could lead to lost skiers, Coppock was carrying a roughly 25-pound “ready pack” containing headlamps, a GPS device, maps, a compass, food and water, extra layers of clothing, a first aid kit, and other emergency supplies, he said.

Coppock, 68, who has been skiing Killington since the 1980s, made his way to the spot at the bottom of a ravine near the Buckland trailhead rescuers believed the lost people would emerge, and within a few moments of his arrival, the 18 lost skiers and snowboarders began to walk out of the woods one by one, he said.

Advertisement

“They were skiing in more or less the same area and kind of converged on one spot, which is a gully,” Coppock said. “It’s a brook that forms . . . almost a steep canyon, and the snow in there gets very deep.”

A large group of skiers and snowboarders were rescued after they became lost in the Vermont backcountry on Jan. 20, 2024, officials said.Killington Police Department

Coppock and his wife, Clare, helped everyone across the creek, then offered them water and food before the hike out.

Coppock said it is “unprecedented to rescue that many people at one time,” but skiers leave the designated area at Killington “all the time,” leading to many rescues, and many others who find their way out with help from the ski patrol or on their own.

“It looks like part of the ski area; it looks like they’re just going off the trail,” he said. “They see tracks . . . they think that, ‘OK, I’ll ski into the woods, but I know that if there’s tracks back there, it must mean that it’s going to lead me to the bottom of another chair lift.’”

Coppock said its nearly impossible for the resort to keep all ski areas clearly marked because wind, snow, and wildlife will knock lines over or cover them up.

Advertisement

“I absolutely don’t blame the resort on this,” he said.

As they descended the trail, the Coppocks and the lost skiers were joined by members of the Killington Search and Rescue team, he said. By 7:30 p.m., everyone was accounted for.

Molly Mahar, president of Ski Vermont, said the search and rescue fell during National Skiing Safety Awareness Month and highlighted the danger of leaving marked recreational areas.

“This situation provides an opportunity to remind skiers and riders to stay inbounds unless they have planned for a safe backcountry experience, which includes proper training, clothing, equipment, knowledge, and weather assessment,” Mahar said in a statement.

“Backcountry skiing is very different than skiing inbounds, and a minor mishap can quickly turn serious or even fatal,” the statement continued. “Skiers should not venture into terrain that is unknown to them without a knowledgeable guide and proper planning. If skiers require rescue, they put their rescuers’ safety at risk, too.”

Advertisement

Others said they too have gotten lost while skiing at Killington.

One day before the massive rescue effort, Darcy Morris, a 30-year-old musician and mother of three who lives in central Virginia, said she became disoriented while skiing Killington for her birthday.

She had been skiing the North Ridge with her husband, brother-in-law, and her husband’s two best friends when they realized the tracks they’d followed had led them astray. she said.

Morris and her group called the resort, and with guidance over the phone from its ski patrol and police, they were able to walk out of the woods on their own, she said.

“We didn’t cross under any boundary that we could recognize,” Morris said. “You know, I’ll celebrate my 30th trying to just have some fun — I’m not looking for extreme rebellion or adventure or anything like that. So to accidentally do that was like, ‘Oh, man, what did I do?’”

Advertisement

Jeremy C. Fox can be reached at jeremy.fox@globe.com. Follow him @jeremycfox.





Source link

Vermont

Commentary | Afonso-Rojas: Who pays when businesses ignore risks?

Published

on

Commentary | Afonso-Rojas: Who pays when businesses ignore risks?


In 2024, when Vermont passed the nation’s first Climate Superfund law (Act 47), it did something unusual; it sent a bill. After catastrophic flooding that turned roads into rivers, damaged homes and businesses, and strained public budgets, our little green state moved to require major fossil fuel companies, such as ExxonMobil, Chevron, Shell USA, and BP America, to help pay for the costs of climate damage. It was a striking moment for policy innovation and corporate accountability. Implicit in the law is a simple idea: these costs were predictable, and someone chose not to plan for them.

For community members across Vermont, and in similar towns nationwide, Vermont’s decision is a call to action. When major companies avoid managing environmental risks, local residents pay the price through higher taxes, damaged homes, disrupted livelihoods, and strained public services. “Good” business should mean safeguarding the communities they rely on, not shifting costs onto neighbors and taxpayers. Every time companies ignore these risks, the burden lands on local taxpayers and community budgets, not just corporate balance sheets.

Thus, community benefit must be proactively built into business models from the start. They must choose prevention over mitigation. Vermont’s Climate Superfund law makes clear that when companies fail to invest in local resilience, the burden shifts to taxpayers and neighbors. Too often, companies take from communities without investing in their strength. When disaster strikes, the community pays first, while corporate donations often arrive too late or are motivated more by public relations than genuine support.

Advertisement

This is inadequate and inefficient, leaving communities vulnerable and weary. Companies that prioritize local hiring, invest in regional supply chains, and partner with community organizations create stronger, more resilient neighborhoods and consumers. Local procurement reduces supply chain disruptions, and partnerships with governments and nonprofits ensure investments address real needs. Embedding community benefit is not charity; it is smart risk management that protects both businesses and residents.

However, purpose without power is empty. Many companies continue to fall into the trap of confusing “purpose” with performance, as mission statements and sustainability pledges have become synonymous with largely symbolic changes. Executives continue to be rewarded for short-term financial gains rather than long-term resilience or community impact. This results in sustainability commitments often being sidelined when they conflict with quarterly targets. If companies are serious about sustainability, they must collaborate, employ, and invest locally to reduce long-term risks and improve communities’ well-being.

Some critics of Act 47 may argue that requiring businesses to invest in sustainability and community resilience imposes unnecessary costs. But these costs do not vanish. When companies fail to manage environmental risks, families pay higher taxes, local governments stretch their budgets, and communities face lasting hardships. Vermont’s Climate Superfund law puts the responsibility back on those who caused the harm, rather than allowing community members to bear the weight.

Addressing these challenges requires companies to work directly with their stakeholders. Multi-stakeholder solutions and collaborations between businesses, governments, NGOs, and labor groups are essential for achieving meaningful impact. For example, working with local governments can improve infrastructure planning, while collaboration with community organizations ensures that projects address real needs. These partnerships transform sustainability from a corporate initiative into a collective effort with broader and more lasting benefits.

Vermont’s Climate Superfund law is, in many ways, a response to communities being left to bear the consequences of unmanaged risks. Companies must embed community benefit into their operations, align incentives with long-term outcomes, and engage in partnerships that extend beyond their own walls. Because when the bill for unmanaged risk comes due, it lands squarely on the community.

Advertisement

Vi Afonso-Rojas is an Honors student at the University of Rhode Island, double-majoring in Supply Chain Management and Environmental and Natural Resource Economics. The opinions expressed by columnists do not necessarily reflect the views of Vermont News & Media.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

VT Lottery Pick 3, Pick 3 Evening results for May 10, 2026

Published

on


Powerball, Mega Millions jackpots: What to know in case you win

Here’s what to know in case you win the Powerball or Mega Millions jackpot.

Just the FAQs, USA TODAY

The Vermont Lottery offers several draw games for those willing to make a bet to win big.

Advertisement

Those who want to play can enter the MegaBucks and Lucky for Life games as well as the national Powerball and Mega Millions games. Vermont also partners with New Hampshire and Maine for the Tri-State Lottery, which includes the Mega Bucks, Gimme 5 as well as the Pick 3 and Pick 4.

Drawings are held at regular days and times, check the end of this story to see the schedule.

Here’s a look at May 10, 2026, results for each game:

Winning Pick 3 numbers from May 10 drawing

Day: 3-7-1

Evening: 7-1-8

Advertisement

Check Pick 3 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Pick 4 numbers from May 10 drawing

Day: 5-6-1-9

Evening: 1-7-2-0

Check Pick 4 payouts and previous drawings here.

Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from May 10 drawing

01-03-20-35-46, Bonus: 05

Advertisement

Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.

Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results

Are you a winner? Here’s how to claim your lottery prize

For Vermont Lottery prizes up to $499, winners can claim their prize at any authorized Vermont Lottery retailer or at the Vermont Lottery Headquarters by presenting the signed winning ticket for validation. Prizes between $500 and $5,000 can be claimed at any M&T Bank location in Vermont during the Vermont Lottery Office’s business hours, which are 8a.m.-4p.m. Monday through Friday, except state holidays.

For prizes over $5,000, claims must be made in person at the Vermont Lottery headquarters. In addition to signing your ticket, you will need to bring a government-issued photo ID, and a completed claim form.

All prize claims must be submitted within one year of the drawing date. For more information on prize claims or to download a Vermont Lottery Claim Form, visit the Vermont Lottery’s FAQ page or contact their customer service line at (802) 479-5686.

Advertisement

Vermont Lottery Headquarters

1311 US Route 302, Suite 100

Barre, VT

05641

When are the Vermont Lottery drawings held?

  • Powerball: 10:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
  • Mega Millions: 11 p.m. Tuesday and Friday.
  • Gimme 5: 6:55 p.m. Monday through Friday.
  • Lucky for Life: 10:38 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Day: 1:10 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 3 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Pick 4 Evening: 6:55 p.m. daily.
  • Megabucks: 7:59 p.m. Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
  • Millionaire for Life: 11:15 p.m. daily

What is Vermont Lottery Second Chance?

Vermont’s 2nd Chance lottery lets players enter eligible non-winning instant scratch tickets into a drawing to win cash and/or other prizes. Players must register through the state’s official Lottery website or app. The drawings are held quarterly or are part of an additional promotion, and are done at Pollard Banknote Limited in Winnipeg, MB, Canada.

Advertisement

This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Vermont editor. You can send feedback using this form.



Source link

Continue Reading

Vermont

Vermont State Police investigating suspicious death

Published

on

Vermont State Police investigating suspicious death


Vermont State Police are investigating a suspicious death in the eastern part of the state.

The investigation began around 10 a.m. Saturday when police received a report of a dead woman at a property at 48 Douglas Hill Road in Norwich. First responders located a woman dead inside the residence.

State police said their initial investigation indicates the woman’s death occurred under “potentially suspicious circumstances.” Everyone associated with the matter is accounted for, and they said there is no danger to the public.

The victim’s body will be brought to the Chief Medical Examiner’s Office in Burlington for an autopsy to determine cause and manner of death. State police said they will release the woman’s identity following further investigation and notification of family members.

Advertisement

No further details have been released.

Anyone with information that could assist investigators is being asked to call 802-234-9933 or submit an anonymous tip online at https://vsp.vermont.gov/tipsubmit.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending