State Rep. Sarah Penn, R-Riverton, wants to protect women and children by expanding Wyoming’s obscenity laws on creating and distributing pornography.
Penn is proposing a bill that, if passed, would expand the state’s obscenity laws by addressing specific types of pornography and penalties for scenarios where children have been exposed to it on the internet.
The production and dissemination of pornography as a whole is already illegal in Wyoming, aside from publications of “literary, artistic, political or scientific value,” or applications performed in the course of law enforcement and judicial activities.
Penn’s bill, titled “Pornography and Obscentity-Crimes and Penalties,” would specifically add “visual depictions of rape or sexual abuse” to what is considered “obscene material” under the law.
Advertisement
Currently, obscene sexual conduct in Wyoming is limited to depictions people will likely find “patently offensive.”
Penn said the addictive nature of porn transfers the images of these acts portrayed on a screen into people’s real lives.
“This industry lines its pockets when it leaves this content up and they hook minors,” Penn said. “This bill attempts to help them feel the effects of their decisions by way of their pocketbooks.”
And sometimes these pornographic acts are not staged. Productions of rape and child pornography continue to be a growing problem, with many websites allowing users to submit their own content, then making little effort to remove it.
Penn said she is bringing her bill as a way to decrease the rate of this type of content being available on internet porn sites.
Advertisement
“We need to protect our children and those victims of abuse who may continue to be victimized when these images are uploaded,” she said.
Perception
To most people, a depiction of rape or sexual abuse would likely already qualify as obscene material, but that’s not enough, Penn said.
Sitting through a few Wyoming library board meetings recently, Penn said she heard some people defend books containing graphic written and visual descriptions of these types of acts as not being offensive.
“These things are obscene, whether written or visual, and I believe Wyoming should make that statement,” Penn said in an email. “Let it be black and white, no questions.”
Penn’s bill would only pertain to content published to a website and would have no impact on school library books, a topic that was addressed in similar legislation in 2023.
Advertisement
Increased Penalties
The bill also increases penalties for people convicted of publishing obscene material on the internet.
Current law states that if pornography produced or disseminated in Wyoming is viewed by an adult, the person found guilty of producing or disseminating it can receive up to a year in prison and $1,000 in fines. If that pornography is accessed by a child in Wyoming, the penalty is a fine of up to $6,000 and a year in prison.
Penn’s bill greatly increases those punishments, with a fine of up to $1,000 for each day the material is accessible on the internet, and $6,000 for each day it was actually accessed by a child.
The legislation also directs the Wyoming attorney general to provide a way for people to report internet porn, which the state attorney general can then pass off to the U.S. Department of Justice as federal violations of child exploitation and obscenity.
Under the new bill, a person who publishes material to minors on an internet website where more than a third of the content is considered harmful to minors shall be found guilty unless they use reasonable age verification methods to verify the age of the person trying to access the material.
Advertisement
What is considered reasonable age verification are methods that use government-issued identification or any other procedure that reasonably relies on public or private data to verify the age of a user.
Any site found guilty of retaining personal identification material shall be found guilty of a misdemeanor carrying up to a $1,000 fine.
Leo Wolfson can be reached at Leo@CowboyStateDaily.com.
GLENROCK, Wyo. — A 55-year-old Wyoming man died Monday night after his vehicle went over a bridge rail and caught fire on Interstate 25 near Glenrock.
Gavin Stanek was traveling north in a Cadillac Escalade around 9:13 p.m. when the vehicle drifted into the median near milepost 156, according to a Wyoming Highway Patrol report. The vehicle continued through the median until it struck a bridge retaining wall.
The driver’s side of the Escalade scraped along the rail before the vehicle went over the edge toward the river. The Cadillac rolled toward the passenger side and landed on its roof on the river embankment, where it was engulfed in flames, the report states.
The Wyoming Highway Patrol identified driver fatigue or the driver falling asleep as a possible contributing factor in the crash. Road conditions were dry and the weather was clear at the time of the incident.
Advertisement
This story contains preliminary information as provided by the Wyoming Highway Patrol via the Wyoming Department of Transportation Fatal Crash Summary map. The agency advises that information may be subject to change.
As a plaintiff in the 2022 lawsuit that kicked off years of legal sparring over Wyoming abortion rights, Dr. Giovannina Anthony had waited a long time for Tuesday’s Supreme Court decision on the state’s abortion bans.
“It has been a long road,” she said. One with ups and downs, drawbacks and delays. And even though the high court ruled against the state’s abortion bans, she’s not under the illusion that the fight for abortion access is over.
“But at least today, we can claim a victory and say, it was really worth it,” said Anthony, a Jackson obstetrician. “It was worth it to go four years and keep it up and keep raising money and keep the awareness going. I’m really proud of our team. I’m really proud of what we accomplished.”
In reading the Supreme Court’s decision siding with plaintiffs, Anthony said, “Clearly, this is a court that holds a lot of respect for our constitution.”
Advertisement
That’s because much of the decision hinged on constitutional language.
Anthony and other plaintiffs argued that abortion is enshrined in the “right of health care access” in Article 1, Section 38 of the Wyoming Constitution. The clause states, “Each competent adult shall have the right to make his or her own health care decisions.”
The state’s attorneys, meanwhile, countered that abortion isn’t health care.
But in deciding what that language means in this case, “all five Wyoming Supreme Court justices agreed that the decision whether to terminate or continue a pregnancy is a woman’s own health care decision protected by Article 1, Section 38,” the court’s summary stated.
As abortion rights activists in Wyoming and beyond celebrated the decision, the anti-abortion camp decried it and called for legislative action.
Advertisement
“This ruling is profoundly unfortunate and sadly serves to only prolong the ultimate proper resolution of this issue,” Gov. Mark Gordon said in a statement. While the ruling may settle a legal question for the time being, Gordon said, “it does not settle the moral one, nor does it reflect where many Wyoming citizens stand, including myself.”
Anti-abortion activists in the silent March for Life in Cheyenne in January 2020. (Nadav Soroker, Wyoming Tribune Eagle/Wyoming News Exchange)
Gordon asked the Attorney General’s office to file a petition for rehearing the decision, which it will file within 15 days.
The voters of Wyoming should settle the matter once and for all, Gordon argued. “A constitutional amendment taken to the people of Wyoming would trump any and all judicial decisions.”
He called on the Legislature to pass such an amendment during the upcoming session and deliver it to his desk. A constitutional amendment requires a two-thirds vote in both the House and Senate to appear on the ballot in the following general election.
Gordon may get his wish during the Legislature’s 2026 budget session, which convenes Feb. 9.
Advertisement
State lawmakers are already preparing a bill to modify the Wyoming Constitution and clear a path for another attempted abortion ban. Speaker of the House Chip Neiman, a Republican from Hulett, said that he’s been workshopping language with Torrington Republican Sen. Cheri Steinmetz.
“I’ve got to run it by a lot of other people,” Neiman said.
Reps. Rachel Rodriguez-Williams and Chip Neiman listen during a 2023 hearing on their request to defend Wyoming’s abortion ban. (Brad Boner/Jackson Hole News&Guide/Pool)
Ideally, he added, a single constitutional amendment would be considered, although the legislative strategy is still up for discussion.
“We’ve got a little over a month before we have to be in session,” Neiman said. “That’ll give us time to kind of see which is maybe the best plan of action.”
A constitutional amendment would have to navigate the legislative process in a 20-day session geared toward passing Wyoming’s budget. Then, in the 2026 general election, more than half of Wyoming voters who cast a ballot would have to agree to the constitutional change.
Neiman struck an optimistic tone about an amendment’s prospects of passing the first hurdle during the session in Cheyenne.
Advertisement
“I can’t speak for the other chamber,” he said, “but in my chamber I’ve got a lot of phone calls and a lot of texts from a lot of my legislators who are just beside themselves at what happened.”
Senate President Bo Biteman did not return a phone call before this story published.
Victorious
Chelsea’s Fund, an organization that helps pay for abortion services, was another of the plaintiffs that challenged Wyoming’s abortion bans. Executive Director Janean Forsyth said Tuesday’s decision affirms what her organization has long known: “that abortion is essential health care, and Wyoming women have a constitutional right and the freedom to make their own health care decisions, and that should be without government interference.”
Forsyth was flooded with messages and calls Tuesday, she said, especially from the community of reproductive rights organizations.
“I think that [the news is] a beacon of hope for, not only Wyoming communities and families, but also nationwide,” she said.
Advertisement
Christine Lichtenfels was Chelsea’s Fund executive director when the original suit was filed and throughout much of the legal battle. Relief wasn’t quite the word to describe how she felt Tuesday, she said.
“In reading the decision, there is just a sense that, ‘Oh, there is reason in the world,” she said. “It makes me think that, yes, Wyoming is the Equality State. We can say that now without cringing.”
(Disclosure: Lichtenfels is currently working with WyoFile on an unrelated legal matter.)
The Wellspring Health Access clinic in Casper is pictured in December 2022, and shows signs of May 2022 arson, including boarded up windows. (Dustin Bleizeffer/WyoFile)
Wyoming’s only abortion clinic, Wellspring Health Access in Casper, was also a plaintiff in the lawsuit. Knowing the decision would directly impact the facility’s fate, Clinic President Julie Burkhart was nervous when she opened it. Reading quickly dispelled her fears, she said, as it dawned on her that the justices sided with the plaintiffs’ legal team.
“We are delighted,” she told WyoFile.
Many people questioned her 2021 decision to open an abortion clinic in such a conservative state, she said. The court decision solidifies an intuition she felt back then about Wyoming residents’ sense of what’s fair and right.
Advertisement
Burkhart and colleagues expect future challenges to arise, however.
“While we celebrate today’s ruling, we know that anti-abortion politicians will continue their push to restrict access to health care in Wyoming with new, harmful proposals in the state legislature,” Burkart said in a statement. “Patients should not have to live in fear that their health care decisions will be suddenly upended at the whim of a judge or lawmaker.”
Across the state in Jackson, Dr. Anthony anticipates the Wyoming Freedom Caucus will attempt to pass laws that impose targeted restrictions against abortion providers — such as forcing patients to hear a fetal heartbeat or wait a certain time period before the procedure.
“Unfortunately, the fight’s not over,” Anthony said, “but this is a great moment for us.”
Heartache
Abortion opponents expressed sadness Tuesday and vehemently disagreed with the court’s opinion.
Advertisement
State Rep. Rachel Rodriguez Williams was lead sponsor of one of the abortion bans. The Cody Republican and chair of the Wyoming Freedom Caucus did not respond to a request for comment, but posted about the decision on X.
“My heart aches for Wyoming today,” Rodriguez Williams posted. “Thanks to the decision of four unelected, unchecked attorneys, it’s open season in Wyoming for innocent, preborn babies. Make no mistake: courts can get things wrong, and they sure did get this wrong. I’ll never stop fighting to protect life.”
Anti-abortion billboards can be seen along some Wyoming highways. (Tennessee Watson/WyoFile)
Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray also protested the decision, which he called “outrageously wrong” and “a leftwing activist decision totally out of touch with the Wyoming Constitution.”
Natrona County anti-abortion activist Bob Brechtel, a former Wyoming House member, also expressed frustration with the courts, criticizing the nearly two-year-long wait for a decision and saying he was “ashamed” of the outcome from the high court.
In 2011, Brechtel co-sponsored the bill authorizing a later-successful constitutional amendment ballot measure that now protects individuals’ rights to make their own health care decisions. Born out of opposition to the Obama-era Affordable Care Act, what became Article 1, Section 38 caused some lawmakers to worry about potential unintended consequences.
Fifteen years later, one unintended consequence came to fruition. Reached Tuesday, Brechtel confirmed that he did not intend to protect women’s right to have an abortion in Wyoming.
Advertisement
“There was nothing in the legislation about killing innocent human beings,” he said. “This whole thing has been completely regenerated into something that it was never intended to be.”
It is Week 4 in the 2026 Wyoming High School boys’ swimming and diving season. It features several medium-sized competitions. After a dual in Douglas on Tuesday, Friday and Saturday are packed with meets. Jackson hosts its two-day invitational with four teams heading to Teton County. There are three-team events in Casper, Gillette, and Sheridan on Friday, plus two five-team meets at Cody and Rock Springs.
WYOPREPS BOYS SWIMMING AND DIVING WEEK 4 SCHEDULE 2026
Saturday also has swim invites at Evanston, Powell, and Sheridan. The schedule for Week 4 of the prep boys’ swimming and diving season in the Cowboy State is below. The schedule is subject to change.
RAWLINS AT DOUGLAS – dual
Advertisement
Read More Boys Swim News from WyoPreps
WyoPreps Week 3 Boys Swim Scoreboard 2026
WyoPreps Week 2 Boys Swim Scoreboard 2026
WyoPreps Week 1 Boys Swim Scoreboard & Season Outlook 2026
Nominate a Boys Swimmer/Diver For WyoPreps Athlete of the Week
Advertisement
3A Boys State Championship Recap 2025
4A Boys State Championship Recap 2025
3A Diving Champ Bryson Laing in 2025
4A Swim Champ Cy Gallion in 2025
4A Diving Champ Brady Benne in 2025
Advertisement
4A Swim Champ Ben Forsythe in 2025
Kemmerer’s Malachi Villarreal Reacts to Record Weekend in 2025
CASPER TRI at NCHS – Cheyenne East, Kelly Walsh, Natrona County.
