Connect with us

Montana

Report: Montana is sitting on millions in funds to combat the opioid crisis

Published

on

Report: Montana is sitting on millions in funds to combat the opioid crisis


Millions of dollars have flowed into Montana over the last year to help combat the opioid crisis, but the vast majority remains unspent. That’s according to reporting from KFF Health News, which found some states are off to a slow start in distributing settlement money paid by opioid manufacturers and sellers. Reporter Katheryn Houghton joined Montana Public Radio’s Austin Amestoy with the details.

AUSTIN AMESTOY: Katheryn, help put this into context for us. How much money has Montana received from these settlements at this point, and how much has actually been distributed so far?

KATHERYN HOUGHTON: So, at this point, we know there’s more than $13 million that has arrived in Montana, and the biggest share of that remains untouched. So, most of Montana’s settlement dollars — 70% — are going into an opioid abatement trust. And, the goal behind that trust is that local governments or organizations can request funding through it. So, there’s actually a grant portal where they submit their ideas of ways to respond to the crisis and how this money could get used. At this point, that trust is only met once, and it was to really define their basic rules of operation. They’re not due to meet again until April, so we’ve still got a couple of months. And, we’re now looking more than a year in, but we’ve still got a couple of months before any of this money would actually make it out into the communities.

AUSTIN AMESTOY: And, $13 million over the course of a year — I mean, that’s a lot of money. But, how much more are we talking about, and how long is that expected to be rolling in to the state?

Advertisement

KATHERYN HOUGHTON: Montana’s due to receive $80 million over the next, roughly, two decades. So, it’s a pretty slow process. The money is coming in very gradually, and I should say that there are small slices of the pie that are being sent directly to local governments, but that funding is not being tracked. And then, another slice that’s going directly to a state fund. But, when I talked to officials by the end of November, they had yet to touch their share as well.

AUSTIN AMESTOY: I mean, that’s a pretty substantial amount of money. And, we know from your reporting this is coming from settlements with opioid sellers, manufacturers — what do we know about the scale of the actual opioid crisis in Montana at this point?

KATHERYN HOUGHTON: So, we know that these drugs are getting stronger and less expensive. So, they’re getting the hands of more people and they’re more deadly. So, in Montana, we’ve actually seen a large jump in the number of people who are hospitalized because of an overdose. And with that, we’ve also seen an increase of people who are actually dying from an overdose. So, in 2021, we saw 200 people die of an overdose. And when you’re talking about a state of a little more than a million, that’s a pretty big impact.

AUSTIN AMESTOY: It’s pretty apparent that the crisis is not unwinding on its own, which is part of what this pool of settlement money is intended to help solve. I am curious, though – what’s the holdup in Montana with distributing those funds? And, have other states been issuing their dollars up to this point?

KATHERYN HOUGHTON: The the biggest reason I’ve gotten from those in charge of doling out this money is that, you know, “This is a lot of money over a long time. We need to make sure to set up the system well, so that it’s done right; so that we make sure this money is going to be used in a way that’s actually going to help curb this problem.” We know that Montana isn’t alone. There are a few states that have really taken their time in setting up systems. That means they haven’t actually touched the lion’s share of their funding. But, we did find other states that have been distributing this funding for months.

Advertisement

AUSTIN AMESTOY: It’s actually very reminiscent of COVID-19 relief dollars in some ways. And, I think with that, you know, the urgency felt very built-in and present, given it being a pandemic-scale event. But, the opioid overdose epidemic is similar in a lot of ways. I think it’s just a little bit more behind-the-scenes than something like COVID-19 was. I just think that comparison there is kind of interesting.

KATHERYN HOUGHTON: No, I think that is interesting, because you are talking about, like, unprecedented pools of money coming into Montana like you were with the pandemic. So, one of the things that I heard from somebody who’s on the board of the trust, who is also working in, kind of, local efforts in a rural county in eastern Montana, was that, you don’t get a chance to right a wrong like this very often with this big of a backing, with this many resources. And so, you want to make sure you don’t mess it up.

AUSTIN AMESTOY: Well, on that note, are the health care providers that you spoke with in Montana confident that, once all this money’s paid out to the state, once it’s in the hands of people who can make change — are they confident the money can be successful in, sort of, reversing the trends we’ve seen with the opioid crisis?

KATHERYN HOUGHTON: Well, yes. First off, more money is always a good thing when you’re trying to increase access to services or treatment, especially in a broad, rural state like Montana, where everything’s really far-scattered at this point. I will say, there’s a lot of questions on how this money’s going to be used, but I talked to behavioral health and addiction treatment providers who are frustrated that this money hasn’t been tapped into yet. They’re seeing a workforce shortage, they’re seeing waitlists for their services, they’re seeing too few resources for people once they’re discharged from their services. And, they say that money now, even if it’s just from this initial pool of funding, would be really helpful if they could start getting that cash.

AUSTIN AMESTOY: Reporter Katheryn Houghton with KFF Health News. Katheryn, thank you so much for sharing your reporting with us.

Advertisement

KATHERYN HOUGHTON: Thank you so much for the time.





Source link

Montana

University of Montana president job draws high interest • Daily Montanan

Published

on

University of Montana president job draws high interest • Daily Montanan


The search for a new University of Montana president has drawn more than 60 applicants, according to a spokesperson for the Office of the Commissioner of Higher Education.

“We do not have an exact count at this time, as several applications are still being completed and additional submissions are expected,” said spokesperson and Deputy Commissioner Galen Hollenbaugh in an email earlier this week.

In January, then-UM-President Seth Bodnar announced his resignation to pursue other public service. Wednesday, the final day of filing, he announced he was running as an independent for the U.S. Senate to try to unseat Republican incumbent Steve Daines.

Commissioner of Higher Education Clayton Christian earlier said that with the advice of AGB Search, a firm that’s helped the Montana University System conduct other executive searches, he would undertake an expedited process to appoint a new president.

Advertisement

Christian has been providing brief updates on a website dedicated to the search. Last week, he said he and AGB Search are reviewing applications, and the pool of candidates was “strong and diverse.”

The commissioner also announced he was convening a small working group to assist in the search, members who “represent a variety of perspectives to assist in vetting and narrowing this field of exceptional candidates.”

In an email this week, Hollenbaugh identified the members of the working group who are assisting Christian with application review as:

  • Community member and former Regent Joyce Dombrouski
  • Faculty Senate Chairperson Valerie Moody
  • Staff Senate President Dominic Beccari
  • Administration Representative John DeBoer (Vice President of Academic Affairs)
  • ASUM (Associated Students of the University of Montana) President Buddy Wilson

Hollenbaugh declined to comment on the way the rest of the process would unfold or the role the working group members would play.

Christian earlier said he anticipated an appointment within one to three months, or as soon as early this month.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Montana Supreme Court allows ballot measure on initiative process to move forward

Published

on

Montana Supreme Court allows ballot measure on initiative process to move forward


HELENA — The Montana Supreme Court has ruled in favor of a proposed ballot measure intended to simplify the process for introducing ballot measures in the future.

Justices ruled 5-2 that the measure, currently called Ballot Issue #8, did not violate state requirements that a single constitutional amendment can’t make multiple separate changes to the Montana Constitution.

“We’re very grateful to the Montana Supreme Court for agreeing with us that the attorney general’s finding of legal insufficiency for Ballot Issue #8 was incorrect,” said SK Rossi, a spokesperson for Montanans Decide, the group sponsoring the measure.

Montanans Decide argues the Montana Legislature has passed laws making it harder for the public to propose and pass ballot issues. The Montana Constitution already guarantees the people the right to pass laws and amendments through ballot measures, but Ballot Issue #8 would expand that to include a right to “impartial, predictable, transparent, and expeditious processes” for proposing those measures. It would seek to prevent “interference from the government or the use of government resources to support or oppose the ballot issue.”

Advertisement

Attorney General Austin Knudsen’s office argued the measure “implicitly amended” multiple provisions in the state constitution, including by limiting the “power and authority of public officials to speak officially on ballot issues that affect those officials’ public duties” and by putting restrictions on judges and on the Legislature. Montanans Decide, the group sponsoring Ballot Issue #8, disagreed – and the majority of justices sided with them.

“Its provisions operate together to define and protect a single constitutional right—the people’s exercise of initiative and referendum,” wrote Justice Katherine Bidegaray in the majority opinion. “They are closely related components of one constitutional design.”

Bidegaray’s majority opinion was joined by Justices Jim Shea, Laurie McKinnon, Beth Baker and Ingrid Gustafson.

Chief Justice Cory Swanson and Justice Jim Rice each wrote dissenting opinions, saying they would have upheld Knudsen’s decision to disallow Ballot Issue #8. Rice said the language restricting government interference with a ballot issue was not closely related and should have been a separate vote. Swanson agreed with Rice and said the measure’s attempt to fix a timeline for legal cases surrounding ballot measures was also a separate substantial change.

In a statement, Chase Scheuer, a spokesperson for Knudsen’s office, reacted to the decision.

Advertisement

“This decision only further muddies the courts’ jurisprudence on ballot issue questions,” he said. “This initiative would violate the separate vote requirement by amending multiple parts of the Montana Constitution, but the court contradicted its prior rulings. Attorney General Knudsen will continue to neutrally apply the separate vote requirement in his review of ballot initiatives.”

The court’s decision means that Knudsen’s office will now need to approve ballot language for Ballot Issue #8. Once that language is finalized, Montanans Decide could begin gathering signatures to qualify the measure for the November ballot.

However, last year, sponsors of another initiative went to the Supreme Court to argue that the ballot statements Knudsen prepared were misleading. If Montanans Decide object to their ballot statements, that could further delay signature gathering while the case plays out in court.

“Regardless, we’re going to push as hard as we can to get those petitions into the hands of voters and let them sign and support if they so choose,” said Rossi.

Rossi said the legal battle this measure has gone through – and the possibility of more to come – shows why Ballot Issue #8 is needed.

Advertisement

“The state Legislature, and also statewide elected officials, have taken every opportunity to create burdens and hurdles and rigamarole for campaigns to get through in order to just get to the signature gathering phase, and then to get through the signature gathering phase onto the ballot, and then get through the election phase,” said Rossi. “The reason we filed this initiative is just to make sure that the process is simple, that the timeline is clear, and that Montanans can have their will heard when they want to propose and pass laws that they deem worthy.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Montana

Christi Jacobsen enters race for Western House seat

Published

on

Christi Jacobsen enters race for Western House seat


Montana Secretary of State Christi Jacobsen is running for Montana’s Western Congressional District seat, entering the race a day after U.S. Rep. Ryan Zinke announced he would not seek reelection.

Jacobsen’s announcement sets up a new contest for the open seat after Zinke, a Republican, said he would seek reelection.

Comment with Bubbles

BE THE FIRST TO COMMENT

Advertisement

“As your Secretary of State, I’ve stood up to Washington overreach, defended election integrity, and delivered real results for Montanans. In 2020, voters gave me a mandate to clean up our elections, grow Montana business, and push back against radical liberal special interests. I delivered. Now it’s time to take that same results-driven, America First leadership to Congress.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending