Connect with us

Utah

Can Utah ignore federal laws and regulations? Legal precedent says no, but legislators want to try.

Published

on

Can Utah ignore federal laws and regulations? Legal precedent says no, but legislators want to try.


The Utah Senate advanced a bill giving them the authority to declare federal actions unconstitutional.

(Leah Hogsten | The Salt Lake Tribune) Rep. Paul Ray, R-Clearfield, left and redistricting committee chairman Sen. Scott Sandall, R-Tremonton, right, in the House Building, Room 30, Nov. 8, 2021. Members of the public were against the newly drawn redistricting maps on Monday, the only public hearing for the map proposals.

On Thursday, the Utah Senate advanced a bill to create a process that allows the Legislature to ignore federal laws and regulations if they think those mandates are unconstitutional. However, the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that states do not have such authority.

Advertisement

SB 57 from Sen. Scott Sandall, R-Tremonton, allows the Legislature to pass a resolution declaring any federal action unconstitutional. State officials and agencies would then be directed to ignore or not comply unless a court determines the action complies with the Constitution. That’s the inverse of the current process where states sue the federal government to block a law or regulation.

“There are times when I believe that the state of Utah has been harmed, and the citizens have been harmed through actions that the federal government has placed on the states,” Sandall said.

States have attempted to nullify federal laws and regulations several times. Those efforts have been rejected by the Supreme Court, which has held individual states do not have the authority to declare federal actions unconstitutional because of the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause.

Sen. Todd Weiler, R-Woods Cross, a lawyer, acknowledged that history and legal precedent do not give Utah the authority to ignore the federal government, but he supports the bill anyway.

“I went to law school, a good law school, and I don’t believe that Utah has the power to override the Supremacy Clause. Under the Supremacy Clause, as I understand it, the federal law trumps Utah” Weiler said. “But there’s nothing that I like better, and there’s nothing Utah likes better than sticking it to the federal government. If that’s the intent of the bill, I guess I’m all in favor of it.”

Advertisement

We could see lawmakers use this new tool to push back against the federal government sooner rather than later. If Sandall’s bill passes both the House and Senate with a two-thirds majority, it will go into effect when Gov. Spencer Cox signs the legislation. Sandall acknowledged there are already a handful of federal regulations that the Legislature may target as soon as this legislative session.

“I know that in the air quality arena, the ozone level regulation that has been placed on the state of Utah, we can’t find a way or a lever to pull that would make us compliant with that simply because most of the ozone that comes into our state is not created here,” Sandall said. “I would be lying if I told you that I hadn’t thought of a few ideas that need to be vetted.”

Legislators said the process could be impacted and even rendered moot by the Supreme Court later this year. A concept called “Chevron deference,” named after the 1984 Supreme Court case Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, requires federal courts to defer to federal agencies on the interpretation and implementation of laws and regulations on everything from the environment to food and drug safety. The Supreme Court heard arguments earlier this week in a case that could overturn that precedent.

Several Senate Republicans are confident the Court is about to upend that standard, which has stood for 40 years.

“I do think the Chevron [deference] will be struck down in June by our Supreme Court,” Sen. Curt Bramble, R-Provo, said. “The problem that the Chevron [deference] created is it basically delegates to powerful federal bureaucrats the ability not only to interpret the law and enforce the law but, in some instances, to make the laws.”

Advertisement

SB 57 advanced on a straight party-line vote Thursday morning. It faces a final vote in the Senate before it heads to the House.



Source link

Utah

Utah midterms are set: Here’s where all the Republican incumbents are running

Published

on

Utah midterms are set: Here’s where all the Republican incumbents are running


SALT LAKE CITY — Utah Reps. Celeste Maloy and Mike Kennedy made their reelection bids official this week, announcing they will run for the new 3rd District and 4th District, respectively, under the state’s newly established congressional map.

The plans were first reported by the Deseret News after weeks of discussion among the Utah delegation about how to approach the November elections under the new boundaries. Rep. Blake Moore, R-Utah, will file in the new 2nd District, where he’s already begun gathering signatures.

“The conversations all along have been: What’s the best thing we can do to stand up for Utah, to stand up for representative government, to make sure that what’s happening is constitutional,” Maloy told the Deseret News in an interview. “But now that we’re out of options — we have to file to run next week — I’m going to run in the district that I’ve spent my adult life living in.”

The decisions come after Rep. Burgess Owens announced on Wednesday that he would not seek reelection, paving the way for Maloy and Kennedy to each choose one of the two remaining districts and avoid a messy incumbent-on-incumbent primary.

Advertisement

The new map reduced Republicans’ stronghold of four House seats down to three with one Democratic seat, sending the delegation into a scramble about who should run where in the new political landscape.

The redrawn boundaries especially complicated Maloy’s and Kennedy’s decisions as their two districts shifted significantly. Under the new lines, the pair both live in the new 3rd District.

But with Owens’ retirement leaving the new 4th District open, it gives room for Kennedy to run there, which leans Republican.

Kennedy to run in Utah’s 4th District

Kennedy highlighted his work in and representation of parts of the 4th District in his official announcement on Thursday.

“I’ve spent more than twenty years practicing medicine in communities throughout the Fourth District and ten years serving many of these communities in the Utah State Legislature,” Kennedy said. “I know these communities, I share their values, and I’m ready to keep fighting for Utah families in Congress.”

Advertisement

Kennedy and Maloy both praised Owens as he gets ready to exit Congress.

Rep. Mike Kennedy, R-Utah, speaks with members of the media at the Capitol in Salt Lake City on Monday, Nov. 3, 2025. (Photo: Kristin Murphy, Deseret News)

“(Owens) just did the ultimate team-player move, and people here don’t do that,” Maloy said. “I hate that this is a choice that he had to make this year, that he was forced to decide that. I have nothing but love and respect for him and how he makes his choices. … He does what’s best for the team every time, and I think he’s proving that with this decision as well.”

Kennedy said it was an “honor” to serve with Owens in Congress, adding he was “grateful for his service and his friendship.”

The reelection decisions bring an end to the monthslong game of musical chairs that garnered national attention as Democrats were given a rare pickup opportunity in the red state of Utah and the four GOP incumbents were squeezed into three seats.

Owens was long rumored to be considering a departure from public office at the end of 2026, but the Utah delegation kept its cards close to its chest until the new Utah district was solidified.

Advertisement

The delegation has engaged in talks with one another for months on how to proceed, with several of the incumbents telling the Deseret News that those conversations centered around what would be the best fit for the constituents in the new districts.

Still, Utah Republicans did not go down without a fight. Owens was one of two Republicans in the delegation, along with Maloy, to ask the federal courts to block the new Utah map from taking effect because it was selected by a Utah judge, not the legislature, but that request was denied.

Even with the cleared field, Maloy and Kennedy could still face primary challengers from elsewhere in the state. Republican candidates have said they will file in both the 3rd District, David Harris and Phil Lyman, and the 4th District, Stone Fonua.

Two Republican candidates have declared bids in the heavily Democratic 1st District in Salt Lake County: Riley Owen and Dave Robinson.

Candidate filings for federal races open next week and will be available from March 9-13. Primary elections will be held on June 23.

Advertisement

Maloy is gathering signatures to qualify for the ballot, she told the Deseret News. Since making her reelection news public, Maloy has gotten several calls from constituents back home to volunteer for signature-gathering efforts.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Utah Valley outlasts Utah Tech 104-101 in 2OT to win WAC regular-season title

Published

on

Utah Valley outlasts Utah Tech 104-101 in 2OT to win WAC regular-season title


ST. GEORGE, Utah (AP) Sherman Weatherspoon IV had 27 points, Jackson Holcombe scored 23 and Trevan Leonhardt added 21 to help Utah Valley outlast Utah Tech 104-101 in double overtime on Saturday night and win the Western Athletic Conference regular-season title.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

The audacious plan to refill the Great Salt Lake

Published

on

The audacious plan to refill the Great Salt Lake


Long-term drought played a role in the lake’s decline, but about 75% of the problem was human-caused, according to research published in 2022: People had simply been taking too much lake water for decades.

State officials got serious about intervention in 2022. Lawmakers created a $40 million water trust to boost water quality and quantity. They changed Utah water law to designate it a “beneficial use” for farmers to let their allotment flow to the lake, incentivizing donations and water transfers. (Before the change, unused water rights could be lost.)

State officials also raised a berm along a causeway separating the north and south arms of the lake to give them control over the flow of water and salt between the two. Then, fortuitously, twice as much snow fell in the mountains that winter as usual.

Together, those two factors “basically saved the lake” by lowering its salinity, said Kevin Perry, a University of Utah atmospheric scientist who researches the Great Salt Lake and its toxic dust.

Advertisement

“They filled up and diluted all the salt in the southern part of the lake with that huge snowpack,” he said.

Species returned.

“The flies this year were just robust,” Baxter said.

It was enough to avert crisis — at least temporarily.

“We have avoided that environmental nuclear bomb,” said Joel Ferry, director of the Utah Department of Natural Resources. “We have put the red button away.”

Advertisement

But the water levels have not returned to health, and this year’s dismal snowpack could renew the problems.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending