Connect with us

World

What to know about France’s nationwide strike over pension reform

Published

on

What to know about France’s nationwide strike over pension reform

France’s commerce unions have joined forces to name for a mass mobilisation on Thursday in opposition to the federal government’s pension reform plan.

Greater than 200 protests are anticipated throughout the nation, in line with one of many foremost commerce unions, with a nationwide strike that’s anticipated to closely affect the general public sector.

This is what it is advisable know in regards to the scenario.

Who’s going on strike in France?

France’s eight foremost commerce unions have united in opposition to the federal government’s retirement reform plan unveiled final week and known as for protests throughout the nation, with many denouncing the plan as unfair.

Strikes have been known as in a number of sectors with lecturers, nurses, railway and police unions all calling for staff to affix the motion. Some power and refinery staff are anticipated to strike as effectively.

Advertisement

Geoffroy Roux de Bézieux, president of the employers’ union, stated that whereas he couldn’t predict how many individuals would strike, he anticipated the motion to be sturdy within the public sector however not essentially massive inside non-public corporations.

What’s the authorities’s proposed plan for pension reform?

Emmanuel Macron’s authorities has proposed to lift the authorized retirement age from 62 to 64 by 2030, with a brand new legislation to enter into power in September 2023.

With a purpose to obtain a full pension, the federal government’s proposal says it is going to be essential to work for a minimum of 43 years. By age 67, staff who have not been lively that lengthy will nonetheless obtain a full pension.

Those that began to work earlier will be capable of retire earlier, whereas disabled staff will be capable of retire early. Injured staff may also be allowed to retire early, the proposal says.

The present particular retirement plans for some public staff will now not be relevant for brand new recruits however the brand new proposal would increase the minimal pension by €100 monthly.

Advertisement

That is the second retirement proposal throughout Macron’s presidency. The primary venture tried to create a common factors system however confronted heavy opposition and protests earlier than being suspended in March 2020 as the federal government imposed restrictions because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

With out an absolute majority in parliament, the federal government, led by Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne, would wish some right-wing Les Républicains MPs to vote with them with a view to go the legislation by means of the decrease home of parliament.

In any other case, they might doubtless should resort to a constitutional loophole to go the legislation with no vote.

Why do commerce unions and leftist events say the plan is unfair?

The nation’s commerce unions and left-wing events say that the proposed adjustments will not be wanted with a view to fund France’s pension system. Some have argued as an alternative for larger worker and employer contributions and a crackdown on tax evasion.

They declare that the plan will penalise those that are most susceptible and enhance inequalities.

Advertisement

Jean-Luc Mélenchon, a leftist who got here third within the nation’s presidential elections final yr, had argued in favour of lowering the retirement age, saying that the nation would save on unemployment advantages for older people.

Critics of the proposal additionally say that almost all French individuals are in opposition to the reform. Certainly, a latest ballot by IFOP printed by the JDD (Sunday newspaper) discovered that 68% of French folks had been in opposition to the federal government’s plan.

Douglas Webber, an emeritus professor of political science on the INSEAD enterprise faculty, identified that this isn’t the primary time there was a strike in opposition to retirement reform.

“Each try by French governments to reform the pension system, particularly by elevating the retirement age, has provoked comparable sorts of protests,” stated Webber.

“The strikes or protests are extremely disruptive as a result of they’re closely concentrated within the public providers, particularly public transport, however they’re usually pretty temporary.”

Advertisement

Socialist President François Mitterand adopted a legislation bringing the retirement age all the way down to 60 years of age from 65 again in 1982, a social measure to which the left has been “hooked up” ever since, Webber explains.

He added that the final time unions compelled the federal government to again down utterly on reforming the retirement system was in 1995.

However the retirement age was raised to 62 in 2010, when Nicolas Sarkozy was president, within the aftermath of the monetary disaster.

Since then, there was a big enhance within the variety of folks over the age of 60 looking for employment in France.

How will France be impacted by the strikes?

Travelling in France can be troublesome on Thursday with many trains cancelled and public transport disrupted.

Advertisement

In Paris, solely two automated metro strains will function usually, whereas most metro and bus strains can have lowered service. On common, two out of three buses can be circulating.

Public transport in different main cities similar to Lyon and Marseille can be set to be largely impacted by the strikes.

French every day newspaper Le Parisien reported, in the meantime, that greater than 500 trains can be cancelled by the nationwide public railway firm.

“The strike will trigger very sturdy disruption on Thursday in buses, metros, trains; flight cancellations are anticipated at Orly (airport). When doable, we are going to cancel or postpone our journeys,” tweeted Clément Beaune, France’s transport minister.

French inside minister Gérald Darmanin stated that greater than 10,000 police can be mobilised throughout the nation in the course of the protests.

Advertisement

“Historically, relations between the federal government, employers and commerce unions have additionally been extra antagonistic in France than in most different European international locations,” says Webber, including that pension reform tends to be unpopular in lots of international locations.

He stated that usually adjustments to France’s welfare state are enacted or defeated “solely after a trial of energy between the 2 sides involving strikes, protests and demonstrations.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Justin Baldoni Lawsuit Alleges Blake Lively Used Taylor Swift to Pressure Him Amid ‘It Ends With Us’ Fight

Published

on

Justin Baldoni Lawsuit Alleges Blake Lively Used Taylor Swift to Pressure Him Amid ‘It Ends With Us’ Fight

The legal battle between Justin Baldoni and Blake Lively in the aftermath of “It Ends With Us” expanded its blast zone Thursday morning, with a new lawsuit by Baldoni including text messages between Lively and Baldoni, her co-star and director. In the texts, Lively seemingly alludes to Taylor Swift as “one of her dragons.” The superstar is a friend of Lively.

In the lawsuit, filed against Lively and her husband, actor-producer Ryan Reynolds, on Thursday morning, Baldoni alleges that the couple hijacked the film “It Ends With Us,” and sought to wreck his public reputation with false allegations of sexual harassment. Baldoni is seeking $400 million in damages. Swift is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit, nor is her name mentioned in the filing beyond a reference to “Taylor” in a text message sent by Baldoni to Lively.

Swift’s representatives did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In text messages between Baldoni and Lively that are included on pages 23-25 of the 179-page filing, Baldoni discusses a rooftop scene in the film that Lively had allegedly reworked in the script. Baldoni’s lawyers claim that their client “felt obliged to text Lively to say that he had liked her pages and hadn’t needed Reynolds and her megacelebrity friend to pressure him.”

The suit alleges that Lively, along with Reynolds, gradually asserted control over “It Ends With Us” during production, including the rooftop scene in which Lively and Baldoni’s characters first meet. According to the filing, Lively summoned Baldoni to her penthouse in New York, where Reynolds and a “megacelebrity friend” — who appears to be Swift — both praised Lively’s version of the scene.

Advertisement

“Also was working on rooftop scene today, I really love what you did. It really does hep a lot,” Baldoni wrote in the text message. “Makes it so much more fun and interesting. (And I would have felt that way without Ryan and Taylor) You really are a talent across the board. Really excited nd grateful to do this together.”

In a later text from Lively, according to the complaint, the star references Reynolds and another person (whose name is redacted) as being “absolute titans as writers and storytellers outside of their primary gig.” Lively continues, “They also know I’m not always as good at making sure I’m seen and utilized for fear of threatening egos, or fear of affecting the ease of the process. They don’t give a shit about that. And because of that, everyone listens to them with immense respect and enthusiasm. So I guess I have to stop worrying about people liking me.”

The lengthy message closes with Lively comparing herself to Khaleesi, the dragon-controlling queen played by Emilia Clarke on “Game of Thrones,” and alluded to powerful forces that she has in her corner. Lively wrote: “If you ever get around to watching Game of Thrones, you’ll appreciate that I’m Khaleesi, and like her, I happen to have a few dragons. For better or worse, but usually for better. Because my dragons also protect those I fight for. So really we all benefit from those gorgeous monsters of mine. You will too, I can promise you.”

Baldoni’s complaint asserts that this was Lively’s way of exerting pressure on Baldoni.

“The message could not have been clearer,” the complaint states. “Baldoni was not just dealing with Lively. He was also facing Lively’s ‘dragons,’ two of the most influential and wealthy celebrities in the world, who were not afraid to make things very difficult for him.”

Advertisement

Lively filed her own lawsuit against Baldoni, producer Jamey Heath and publicists Melissa Nathan and Jennifer Abel on Dec. 31, 10 days after an initial complaint against them with the California Civil Rights Department. The actor accused Baldoni and others of orchestrating a clandestine media smear campaign against her, in retaliation for her complaints about facing alleged sexual harassment on the set of the film. In response, Baldoni first sued the New York Times — which was the first outlet to report on Lively’s complaint — alleging that the paper had worked with Lively’s team, taking the text messages out of context in order to defame him. At the time, Baldoni’s lawyer, Bryan Freedman, promised that more lawsuits would follow.

Continue Reading

World

Israel, Hamas cease-fire held up over renewed debate over Philadelphi security corridor, terrorist exchange

Published

on

Israel, Hamas cease-fire held up over renewed debate over Philadelphi security corridor, terrorist exchange

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

Disputes over the now infamous Philadelphi security corridor are once again plaguing efforts to secure a cease-fire between Israel and Hamas, an Israeli spokesman for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Fox News Digital on Thursday. 

Hopes of cease-fire and hostage exchange deal first confirmed by the U.S. and Qatar on Wednesday appeared to be quelled by the time Americans were waking up on Thursday morning.

Advertisement

“The terrorist organization Hamas repeatedly raises new demands at the last minute, even though everything has already been agreed upon with the mediators, including the U.S.,” spokesman for the prime minister Omer Dostri said, echoing comments made by Netanyahu in which he accused Hamas of “creating a last-minute crisis” and “backing out” of terms negotiated by the mediators. 

KIRBY ‘CONFIDENT’ AMERICANS IN GAZA WILL BE FREED SUNDAY AMID REPORTS OF ISRAEL, HAMAS DEAL HOLDUP

Netanyahu said on Thursday that Israel “will exact a very high price for any act of aggression against us from any quarter whatsoever.” (Ma’ayan Toaf (GPO))

When pressed by Fox News Digital for specifics on what issues have once again apparently stalled the deal set to be implemented on Sunday, Dostri pointed to renewed disagreements over the security corridor that runs between the Gaza Strip and Egypt.

“[Hamas is calling for] changing the deployment of Israeli military forces in the Philadelphia corridor,” Dostri said without expanding on what deployment disagreements have occurred.  

Advertisement

The passage of land has repeatedly proved to be a sticking point in negotiations and may have contributed to the collapse of a July deal in which American-Israeli Hersh Golberg-Polin was slated to be freed, but which never came to fruition. Golberg-Polin and five other hostages were then killed one month later in a tunnel in Gaza. 

Jerusalem has claimed this corridor is vital for its national security interests as Hamas could use it to re-group by relying on smuggling efforts and connections with Jihadi groups in Egypt’s North Sinai region.

Israeli combat engineers search for Hamas tunnels in the Philadelphi Corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border. 

Israeli combat engineers search for Hamas tunnels in the Philadelphi Corridor along the Gaza-Egypt border.  (TPS-IL)

In response to Fox News Digital, White House National Security Communications Advisor John Kirby said, “We’re aware of these issues and we are working through them with the Israeli government, as well as other partners in the region. We are confident these implementing details can be hammered out and that the deal will move forward this weekend.”

Secretary of State Antony Blinken echoed this sentiment and told reporters in a press briefing that the deal will be “implemented on Sunday.”

IDF soldiers are battling terrorists in the vital Netzarim Corridor in Gaza.

IDF soldiers are battling terrorists in the vital Netzarim Corridor in Gaza. (IDF Spokesman’s Unit)

A part of the deal believed to have been agreed to this week said that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) would remain in the Gaza Strip until the last hostage was freed. But Israel also agreed to begin withdrawing its forces to a security zone surrounding the communities on the Gaza border, reported the Times of Israel.

Advertisement

ISRAEL-HAMAS CEASE-FIRE DEAL HANGS IN BALANCE AS KEY VOTE IS DELAYED

It is unclear what specifics regarding the Philadelphi corridor were agreed under the deal, though a senior diplomatic official told The Times of Israel that Israeli soldiers were intended to remain in the security corridor through the entirety of the first phase of the cease-fire. 

But Ruby Chen, father of Itay Chen – an IDF soldier who is believed to have been killed during the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks and whose body was taken into Gaza by Hamas – believes it is the security demands by the far-right in Israel that could once again pose a threat to the hostage deal. 

Chen pointed to right-wing government members like National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich who have repeatedly rejected any deal that does not include continued IDF presence in the Gaza Strip. 

Hamas terrorists in Gaza

File showing Hamas terrorists during a military parade in the Bani Suheila district on July 20, 2017, in Gaza City, Gaza.  (Chris McGrath/Getty Images)

“The coalition members of Bibi, are giving him a very hard time. And you know, he might be looking to get out of it,” Chen said. “It’s easy to blame the other side.”

Advertisement

Another issue that has allegedly popped up, according to Netanyahu’s spokesman, is Hamas’ demands over the release of certain terrorist members currently held by Israel, though Fox News Digital was unable to confirm exactly what new demands have been levied. 

In exchange for the hostages still held in Gaza, Israel has agreed to release dozens of Palestinian prisoners in the initial phase of the deal set to last 42 days. During that period, 33 hostages who fall under “humanitarian categories” including any possible children, women, the elderly and the sick will be freed first.

The second phase, which will be negotiated on the 16th day of the cease-fire, will then involve the release of soldiers held by Hamas, both living and dead. Some reports have suggested that Israel could release more than 1,000 prisoners by the time the exchanges are through. 

American hostage families

Family members of Americans who were taken hostage by Hamas during the terrorist attacks in Israel on October 7, including (R-L) Ronen Neutra, Ruby Chen, Jonathan Dekel-Chen, Liz Naftali, Adi Alexander, Orna Neutra, and Yael Alexander talk to reporters outside the West Wing of the White House on December 13, 2023, in Washington, DC. The families were invited to a private meeting with U.S. President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Antony Blinken.  ( Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

Chen has arduously pushed for the release of all the hostages, including the deceased, and argued that the plan to release soldiers and the deceased in a separate stage was no longer good enough.

Advertisement

“[That] was maybe needed seven months ago, when the framework was put in place,” Chen said. “Since then, everybody is humanitarian – including the deceased. 

“The only thing that you can predict about the Middle East is that it is unpredictable,” Chen added. “The Middle East is always a match-light away from blowing up.”

Continue Reading

World

Russia hands jail sentences to three Navalny lawyers

Published

on

Russia hands jail sentences to three Navalny lawyers

Lawyers face up to five years in jail on charges of links to Navalny’s groups, which the Kremlin deems ‘extremist’.

A Russian court has sentenced three lawyers who had defended the late opposition leader Alexey Navalny to several years in prison.

Friday’s sentences come as Russia, amid a massive crackdown during its war on Ukraine, seeks to punish Navalny’s associates since his unexplained death in an Arctic prison colony in February 2024.

Igor Sergunin, Alexei Liptser and Vadim Kobzev were handed sentences ranging from three and a half years to five years by a court in the town of Petushki, about 100km (60 miles) east of Moscow for bringing messages from the late opposition leader from prison to the outside world.

The independent Russian newspaper Novaya Gazeta reported that Kobzev said in his final statement in court on January 10 that “we are being tried for transmitting Navalny’s thoughts to other people”.

Advertisement

They were arrested in October 2023 on charges of involvement with “extremist” groups, as Navalny’s networks were deemed by authorities.

The case was widely seen as a way to increase pressure on the opposition to discourage defence lawyers from taking political cases.

At the time, Navalny was serving a 19-year prison term on several criminal convictions, including extremism, which he has vehemently denied.

Navalny’s networks were deemed extremist following a 2021 ruling that outlawed his organisations – the Anti-Corruption Foundation and a network of regional offices – as extremist groups.

That ruling, which exposed anyone involved with the organisations to prosecution, was condemned by Kremlin critics as politically motivated and designed to stifle Navalny’s activities.

Advertisement

According to Navalny’s allies, authorities accused the lawyers of using their position to pass information from him to his team.

Navalny, an anticorruption campaigner and outspoken opponent of President Vladimir Putin, was arrested in 2021 upon his return from Germany, where he was recuperating from a nerve agent poisoning he blamed on the Kremlin.

In December 2023, Navalny was moved from a penal colony in the Vladimir region east of Moscow to one above the Arctic Circle, where he died the following February at the age of 47 under still-unexplained circumstances.

On Friday, his widow issued a statement calling for the three lawyers to be freed “immediately”, describing them as “political prisoners”.

Two other lawyers, Olga Mikhailova and Alexander Fedulov, are on a wanted list but no longer live in Russia.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending