Connect with us

World

U.K. Labour Leader Pledges to Resign if Police Find He Broke Covid Rules

Published

on

U.K. Labour Leader Pledges to Resign if Police Find He Broke Covid Rules

LONDON — The scandal over lockdown-breaking events that has ensnared Prime Minister Boris Johnson of Britain took a brand new activate Monday when his rival, the opposition chief Keir Starmer, promised to resign if police determine that he additionally broke coronavirus legal guidelines.

The assertion adopted days of hypothesis about whether or not Mr. Starmer was in breach of the nation’s strict Covid-19 rules when he was pictured ingesting a beer as he ate takeout Indian meals throughout a marketing campaign assembly within the northern metropolis of Durham final yr.

And whereas Mr. Starmer’s promise represents a hanging gamble, it additionally raises the strain on Mr. Johnson, who has already been fined for attending a birthday celebration at Downing Road, however has refused to give up.

“I’m completely clear that no legal guidelines had been damaged, they had been adopted always,” mentioned Mr. Starmer, who’s a former chief prosecutor. “But when the police determine to challenge me with a hard and fast penalty discover, I’d after all do the correct factor and step down,” he added, referring to the mechanism utilized by police to high-quality these deemed to have damaged the regulation.

In current days, the drama swirling round Mr. Starmer, dubbed “beergate” within the British media, has delivered a major setback to the opposition chief, overshadowing the progress his opposition Labour Get together made in native elections final week. Labour is forward of Mr. Johnson’s Conservatives within the opinion polls and, if the lean towards his occasion was to be replicated on the subsequent common election, Mr. Starmer would stand an affordable probability of turning into the nation’s subsequent prime minister.

Advertisement

Mr. Starmer insists he didn’t break the principles, and that was additionally the official verdict of an preliminary police investigation. However on Friday, following a succession of media stories and after receiving a brand new criticism, Durham police mentioned they might reopen the investigation, citing new proof.

Since then Labour has been on the defensive, regardless of its robust efficiency in native elections, whereas making an attempt to dismiss the furor as a smear. However Mr. Starmer has known as on Mr. Johnson to give up over the lockdown-breaking events at Downing Road.

In addition to demanding Mr. Johnson’s resignation, Mr. Starmer has additionally mentioned that Rishi Sunak, the chancellor of the Exchequer, ought to resign after he was fined by police for his transient attendance at a celebration for the prime minister’s birthday at Downing Road.

Conservative-supporting newspapers have accused Mr. Starmer of hypocrisy, and he seems to have calculated that, if the police high-quality him, his place can be untenable anyway.

It’s nonetheless unclear whether or not Mr. Starmer’s actions in Durham broke the regulation.

Advertisement

Adam Wagner, a lawyer and professional on the coronavirus guidelines, wrote on Twitter that he thought it was “absurd” that the police may criminally penalize the chief of the opposition for assembly, for an hour, with an area lawmaker “and having dinner late within the night — days earlier than an election in that space.”

Labour argues that the occasion passed off at a time when many eating places had been closed however work conferences and political campaigning had been permitted, and that Mr. Starmer and his aides had no different however to order a takeout meal. The occasion’s story modified in a single respect, nonetheless, when it admitted that its deputy chief, Angela Rayner, was additionally on the assembly, contradicting earlier denials.

A police investigation into a number of allegations of lawbreaking at Downing Road remains to be persevering with. And as soon as it’s accomplished, the federal government is dedicated to publishing an inside report, a preliminary model of which was vital sufficient to immediate the police investigation.

There are indicators that a few of the prime minister’s allies have gotten involved that the “beergate” saga may need spiraled uncontrolled.

Requested on Sunday whether or not Mr. Starmer ought to give up if he’s fined, one senior cupboard minister, Jacob Rees-Mogg, mentioned he shouldn’t. “I believe he ought to pay a high-quality after which speak in regards to the problems with nice significance to the nation,” he instructed Channel 4.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension

Published

on

Meta agrees to pay  million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension

WASHINGTON (AP) — Meta has agreed to pay $25 million to settle a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump against the company after it suspended his accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, according to three people familiar with the matter.

It’s the latest instance of a large corporation settling litigation with the president, who has threatened retribution on his critics and rivals, and comes as Meta and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, have joined other large technology companies in trying to ingratiate themselves with the new Trump administration.

The people familiar with the matter spoke on the condition of anonymity Wednesday to discuss the agreement. Two people said that terms of the agreement include $22 million going to the nonprofit that will become Trump’s future presidential library and the balance going to legal fees and other litigants.

Zuckerberg visited Trump in November at his private Florida club as part of a series of technology, business and government officials to make a pilgrimage to Palm Beach to try to mend fences with the incoming president. At the dinner, Trump brought up the litigation and suggested they try to resolve it, kickstarting two months of negotiations between the parties, the people said.

Meta also made a $1 million donation to Trump’s inaugural committee and Zuckerberg was among several billionaires granted prime seating during Trump’s swearing-in last week in the Capitol Rotunda, along with Google’s Sundar Pichai, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, who now owns the platform X, formerly known as Twitter.

Advertisement

Ahead of Trump’s inauguration, Meta also announced that it was dropping fact-checking on its platform — a longtime priority of Trump and his allies.

Trump filed the suit months after leaving office, calling the action by the social media companies “illegal, shameful censorship of the American people.”

Twitter, Facebook and Google are all private companies, and users must agree to their terms of service to use their products. Under Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, social media platforms are allowed to moderate their services by removing posts that, for instance, are obscene or violate the services’ own standards, so long as they are acting in “good faith.” The law also generally exempts internet companies from liability for the material that users post.

But Trump and some other politicians have long argued that X, formerly known as Twitter, Facebook and other social media platforms, have abused that protection and should lose their immunity — or at least have it curtailed.

The Meta settlement comes after ABC News agreed last month to pay $15 million toward Trump’s presidential library to settle a defamation lawsuit over anchor George Stephanopoulos’ inaccurate on-air assertion that the president-elect had been found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll.

Advertisement

The network also agreed to pay $1 million in legal fees to the law firm of Trump’s attorney, Alejandro Brito.

The settlement agreement describes ABC’s presidential library payment as a “charitable contribution,” with the money earmarked for a non-profit organization that is being established in connection with the yet-to-be-built library.

The Wall Street Journal was first to report on the settlement.

About nine months after being expelled from the major social media platforms, Trump in October 2021 announced the launch of his own new media company with its own social media platform.

Trump says his goal in launching the Trump Media & Technology Group and its “Truth Social” app was to create a rival to the Big Tech companies that have shut him out and denied him the megaphone that was paramount to his national rise.

Advertisement

While he often first posts policy announcements, memes and varied insights on Truth Social, he has relied on his return to X and Facebook to amplify those messages to the platform’s far wide audiences.

___

Advertisement
Continue Reading

World

Passenger plane catches fire at South Korean airport; all 176 people on board are evacuated

Published

on

Passenger plane catches fire at South Korean airport; all 176 people on board are evacuated

A passenger plane caught fire before takeoff at an airport in South Korea late Tuesday, but all 176 people on board were safely evacuated, authorities said.

The Airbus plane operated by South Korean airline Air Busan was preparing to leave for Hong Kong when its rear parts caught fire at Gimhae International Airport in the southeast, the Transport Ministry said in a statement.

AIRLINER’S FINAL 4 MINUTES OF RECORDINGS ARE MISSING AFTER CRASH THAT KILLED 179: INVESTIGATORS

The plane’s 169 passengers, six crewmembers and one engineer were evacuated using an escape slide, the ministry said.

The National Fire Agency said in a release that three people suffered minor injuries during the evacuation. The fire agency said the fire was completely put out at 11:31 p.m., about one hour after it deployed firefighters and fire trucks at the scene.

Advertisement

Mayor of Busan Park Heong-joon and other officials visit the site where an Air Busan airplane caught fire at Gimhae International Airport in Busan, South Korea, Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2025.  (Son Hyung-joo/Yonhap via AP)

The cause of the fire wasn’t immediately known. The Transport Ministry said the plane is an A321 model.

Tuesday’s incident came a month after a Jeju Air passenger plane crashed at Muan International Airport in southern South Korea, killing all but two of the 181 people on board. It was one of the deadliest disasters in South Korea’s aviation history.

CLICK TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The Boeing 737-800 skidded off the airport’s runaway on Dec. 29 after its landing gear failed to deploy, slamming into a concrete structure and bursting into flames. The flight was returning from Bangkok and all of the victims were South Koreans except for two Thai nationals.

Advertisement

The first report on the crash released Monday said authorities have confirmed traces of bird strikes in the plane’s engines, though officials haven’t determined the cause of the accident.

Continue Reading

World

European Parliament approves new HQ for border force despite pushback

Published

on

European Parliament approves new HQ for border force despite pushback

The Budget Committee greenlit the construction of a new building for €250 million, though leftist MEPs don’t agree

ADVERTISEMENT

The Budget Committee of the European Parliament approved on Wednesday a €250 million plan for a new headquarters for Frontex in Warsaw. Polish capital already hosts the agency in three different buildings at two different locations across the city. 

The decision was taken with 23 votes in favour, five against and 10 abstentions. Representatives from the European People’s Party, the European Conservatives and Reformists and Renew Europe voted in favour, the Socialists and democrats (S&D) abstained, while the Greens/EFA and The Left voted against. 

The investment will be partially financed by a loan, described as “financially more advantageous” by Frontex, though this sparked criticism from some MEPs.

“While we recognize the agency’s crucial work and do not oppose a new HQ, we have serious concerns about the funding model, especially loan financing, which could create legal uncertainty,” the S&D group posted on X following the vote.

Even the right-wing Patriots for Europe group, which broadly favours enhancing Frontex’s role to counter illegal migration and beefing up the agency’s resources, was divided on the point.

Advertisement

All of its MEPs voted in favour except for the Hungarian Tamás Deutsch and the Dutch Auke Zijlstra. “Today’s vote was not about border protection, but about the construction of a 6,000 square metre luxury headquarter for EU bureaucrats, which would be financed by the EU on credit, in contravention of EU budgetary rules,” a note from the Fidesz-KDNP delegation in the European Parliament read. 

Continue Reading

Trending