- Labour seeks to counter rise of populist Reform UK party
- Refugee wait for settlement to quadruple to 20 years
- Crackdown, inspired by Denmark’s policy, draws criticism from charities, rights groups
- Immigration has overtaken economy as voters’ top concern
World
South Korea’s President Yoon arrested: What happened and what’s next
Former South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol has been arrested after a dramatic and drawn-out showdown with law enforcement officials.
Police and corruption officers on Wednesday scaled the walls of his residential compound, where he had been holed up for nearly two weeks, evading arrest, after his short-lived declaration of martial law on December 3. The officers broke through the barbed wire and barricades his security personnel had erected.
Hundreds of officers pushed past Yoon’s small army of personal security to take the leader into custody after a court issued a warrant for his detention.
The former president’s imposition of martial law had rattled the country, and he was swiftly impeached and removed from his duties.
Now Yoon faces numerous criminal investigations for insurrection. Here’s everything to know about his arrest:
Who is Yoon Suk-yeol?
Yoon is a storied former prosecutor who led the conservative People Power Party (PPP) to election victory in 2022 despite a lack of political experience.
Before taking the country’s top job, Yoon was called “Mr Clean” for prosecuting an array of prominent businessmen and politicians, analysts told Al Jazeera at the time of his election.
The former leader with affluent roots shot to national fame in 2016 when, as the chief investigator probing then-President Park Geun-hye for corruption, he was asked if he was out for revenge and responded that prosecutors were not gangsters.
While in office, the former president faced challenges in advancing his agenda in an opposition-controlled parliament and was dogged by personal scandals as well as rifts within his own party.
What’s the latest?
After more than 3,000 police officers were mobilised to break into Yoon’s compound, the leader was arrested and taken in for questioning.
“I decided to respond to the CIO’s investigation, despite it being an illegal investigation, to prevent unsavoury bloodshed,” Yoon said in a pre-recorded video statement released shortly after his arrest. He referred to the Corruption Investigation Office for High-ranking Officials, which is heading the criminal probe.
According to Al Jazeera’s Patrick Fok, reporting from Seoul, this was the second attempt by investigators to bring him in after they tried to arrest him a week ago.
Yoon faces the charge of insurrection, the only one that South Korean presidents are not immune from. His arrest marks the first one of a sitting South Korean president.
What’s the impact of his arrest?
Despite polls showing that a majority of South Koreans disapprove of Yoon’s martial law declaration and support his impeachment, the political standoff has given oxygen to his supporters, and his PPP party has seen a revival in recent weeks.
Support for the PPP stood at 40.8 percent in the latest Realmeter poll, released on Monday, while the main opposition Democratic Party’s support stood at 42.2 percent, a difference that is within the poll’s margin of error and down from a gap of 10.8 percentage points last week.
The narrowed margin suggests that a presidential election could be close if Yoon is formally removed from office by the Constitutional Court examining the legality of his impeachment. Previously, in the days after the brief martial law declaration, the Democratic Party’s leader, Lee Jae-myung, was widely viewed as the firm favourite.
Beyond the political effects, the weeks-long government turmoil has rattled Asia’s fourth largest economy.
Some of Yoon’s supporters have also drawn parallels between him and United States President-elect Donald Trump, echoing claims by Trump that the former and incoming American president has been the target of a witch-hunt by elites who have long controlled the levers of power. South Korea is one of Washington’s key security partners in East Asia.
Who is in charge in South Korea?
South Korea currently has an acting president, Finance Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Choi Sang-mok.
Choi has been in the role since December 27 when the legislature voted to impeach Yoon’s initial successor, Han Duck-soo, over his refusal to immediately fill three vacancies on the Constitutional Court.
Han had been acting president since Yoon was impeached on December 14 over his martial law declaration and his presidential powers were suspended.
After Yoon was arrested, Choi met with diplomats from the Group of Seven nations, including the US, Japan, Britain and Germany, as well as a representative of the European Union to reassure them that the government was stable.
How are South Koreans reacting?
As local broadcasters reported that Yoon’s detention was imminent, the president’s supporters descended upon his residence, chanting, “Stop the steal!” and “”Illegal warrant!” and waving glow sticks alongside South Korean and US flags.
The “stop the steal” slogans referred to Yoon’s unsubstantiated claims of election fraud in April’s parliamentary elections, which the opposition won – one of the reasons Yoon gave to justify his martial law declaration. It was also used by Trump and his supporters as he falsely claimed he won the 2020 presidential election in the US.
“Police estimate as many as 6,500 supporters of [the former president] turned out overnight, urging their leader to keep fighting on,” Fok said.
Some of his supporters also lay on the ground outside the residential compound’s main gate.
“It is very sad to see our country falling apart,” Kim Woo-sub, a 70-year-old retiree protesting Yoon’s arrest outside his residence, told the Reuters news agency.
“I still have high expectations for Trump to support our president. Election fraud is something they have in common, but also the US needs South Korea to fight China,” he said.
Minor scuffles broke out between pro-Yoon protesters and police near the residence, according to a witness at the scene quoted by Reuters.
Many other South Koreans are angry and believe Yoon has “avoided facing responsibility for his failed martial law”, Fok said.
“I think it’s wrong for the leader of a rebellion to not face any legal consequences, and even though an arrest warrant has been issued, [he has] continue[d] to resist that,” Cho Sun-ah, an anti-Yoon protester told Al Jazeera.
The Democratic Party, meanwhile, hailed Yoon’s detention with a top official calling it “the first step” to restoring constitutional and legal order.
The country’s parliament speaker echoed those sentiments.
“We should concentrate our efforts on stabilising state affairs and restoring people’s livelihoods,” Woo Won-shik said.
What’s next?
Authorities now have 48 hours to question Yoon, after which they must seek a warrant to detain him on the charge of attempting a rebellion or he will be released.
If Yoon is formally arrested, investigators may extend his detention to 20 days before transferring the case to public prosecutors for indictment.
According to a CIO official, however, Yoon is refusing to talk and has not agreed to have interviews with investigators recorded on video.
Yoon’s lawyers have said his initial arrest warrant is illegal because it was issued by a court in the wrong jurisdiction and the team set up to investigate him had no legal mandate to do so.
Presidential guards were stationed on the CIO floor where Yoon is being questioned, a CIO official said, but he will likely be held at the Seoul Detention Center, where other high-profile South Korean figures, including former President Park and Samsung Electronics Chairman Jay Y Lee, have also spent time.
Yoon faces the death penalty or life in prison if found guilty of insurrection.
In a parallel investigation, the Constitutional Court on Tuesday launched a trial to rule on parliament’s impeachment of Yoon.
If the court endorses the impeachment, Yoon would finally lose the presidency, and an election would have to be held within 60 days.
The opening session of the trial was adjourned on Tuesday after only a brief hearing as Yoon declined to attend, but proceedings could last for months.
Continue Reading
World
Britain to make refugee status temporary under asylum overhaul
LONDON, Nov 15 (Reuters) – Britain said it would make refugee status temporary and the wait for permanent settlement would be quadrupled to 20 years under the country’s most sweeping overhaul of policy on asylum seekers in modern times.
The Labour government has been hardening its immigration policies, above all on illegal small-boat crossings from France, in efforts to stem the soaring popularity of the populist Reform UK party, which has driven the immigration agenda.
Sign up here.
The government said it would take inspiration from Denmark’s approach, one of the toughest in Europe – where growing anti-immigrant sentiment has led to increased restrictions in many countries – and widely criticised by rights groups.
TEMPORARY STATUS SUBJECT TO REVIEW
As part of the changes, the statutory duty to provide support to certain asylum seekers, including housing and weekly allowances, will be revoked, the Home Office (interior ministry) said in a statement issued late on Saturday.
The department, led by Shabana Mahmood, said the measures would apply to asylum seekers who can work but choose not to, and to those who break the law. It said that taxpayer-funded support would be prioritised for those contributing to the economy and local communities.
The Home Office also said that protection for refugees would “now be temporary, regularly reviewed and revoked” if the home country was deemed safe.
“Our system is particularly generous compared to other countries in Europe, where, after five years, you’re effectively automatically settled in this country. We will change that,” Mahmood told Sky News on Sunday.
She added that under the changes, a refugee’s status would be reviewed every two-and-a-half years, during “a much longer path to permanent settlement in this country of 20 years”.
Mahmood said she would provide further details of the changes on Monday, including an announcement on Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights.
The government has said it wants to stay in the ECHR but change how the Article 8 provision, covering the right to a family life, is interpreted.
Migrants walk along the beach before trying to board an inflatable dinghy leaving the coast of northern France in an attempt to cross the English Channel to reach Britain, from the beach of Petit-Fort-Philippe in Gravelines, near Calais, France, September 27, 2025. REUTERS/Abdul Saboor Purchase Licensing Rights
Mahmood said it was being “applied in a way that is designed to frustrate the removal of those that, under our immigration rules, would not have the right to be in this country.”
The government’s tougher approach has drawn criticism. More than 100 British charities wrote to Mahmood urging her to “end the scapegoating of migrants and performative policies that only cause harm”, saying such steps are fuelling racism and violence.
Polls suggest immigration has overtaken the economy as British voters’ top concern. Over the summer, protests took place outside hotels housing asylum seekers at public expense.
A total of 109,343 people claimed asylum in the UK in the year ending March 2025, a 17% rise on the previous year and 6% above the 2002 peak of 103,081.
Mahmood said the government would look to open more “safe and legal” routes for asylum seekers, as she believed Britain should play its part in helping those fleeing danger.
UK GOVERNMENT INSPIRED BY DENMARK, OTHER EUROPEAN COUNTRIES
The Home Office said its reforms would look to “match and in some areas exceed” the standards of Denmark and other European countries, where refugee status is temporary, support is conditional and integration in society is expected.
Asylum seekers are granted temporary residence permits under Denmark’s approach, usually for two years, and they must reapply when these expire. They can be repatriated if their home country is deemed safe, and the path to citizenship has also been lengthened.
The Home Office said Denmark’s more restrictive immigration policies had reduced asylum claims to a 40-year low and resulted in the deportation of 95% of rejected applicants.
Denmark’s reforms, implemented while it remains a signatory to the ECHR, have drawn sharp criticism. Rights groups say the measures foster a hostile climate for migrants, undermine protection and leave asylum seekers in prolonged limbo.
Britain’s Refugee Council said on X that refugees do not compare asylum systems while fleeing danger, and that they come to the UK because of family ties, some knowledge of English, or existing connections that help them start anew safely.
Reporting by Catarina Demony and Alistair Smout; editing by Mark Heinrich
Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
World
Britain announces sweeping asylum policy shift to cut protections for refugees
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
Drastic changes are coming to Great Britain’s asylum policy, including longer wait times for permanent residency and a forced return to the person’s home country once it is deemed safe.
The shift represents the largest overhaul of policy on asylum seekers in modern times. It was inspired by Denmark, which has one of the toughest policies in Europe and has been widely scrutinized by rights groups.
Britain’s Labor government has been toughening its stance on immigration, as it seeks to address the surging popularity of the populist Reform U.K. party, which has taken a strict approach to immigration.
The new changes include revoking the statutory duty to provide housing and financial support to certain asylum seekers, the Home Office said in a statement.
REFORM UK PROPOSES DEPORTING 600,000 ASYLUM SEEKERS IN SWEEPING NEW IMMIGRATION CRACKDOWN
Migrants on the beach of Petit-Fort-Philippe in Gravelines, near Calais, France, before attempting to cross the English Channel in an inflatable dinghy to reach Britain, Sept. 27, 2025. (Reuters)
It also said refugees would have to wait 20 years to apply for permanent residency instead of the current five years, the period of initial refugee status would be cut from five years to two and a half, rules around family reunions would be stricter, and refugees would be encouraged or forced to return to their home country once it is considered safe.
The department said the measures would apply to asylum seekers who can work but choose not to, as well as those who break the law. Taxpayer-funded support would be prioritized for people contributing to the economy and local communities.
TRUMP PRAISES STARMER ON TURNING AROUND MIGRANT BOATS: ‘FANTASTIC THING’
Migrants hoping to cross the English Channel to Britain gather on the beach in northern France, Aug. 25, 2025. (Reuters)
The Home Office said the changes aim to make the U.K. less attractive to illegal migrants and make it easier to remove people whose claims are denied.
“This country has a proud tradition of welcoming those fleeing danger, but our generosity is drawing illegal migrants across the Channel,” Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said. “The pace and scale of migration is placing immense pressure on communities.”
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood said the changes aim to make the U.K. less attractive to illegal migrants and make it easier to remove people whose claims are denied. (Getty Images)
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP
More than 100 British charities called on Mahmood to “end the scapegoating of migrants and performative policies that only cause harm,” arguing that the measures are fueling racism and violence.
Britain’s Refugee Council said on X that refugees do not compare asylum systems when attempting to flee danger. It said they aim for the U.K. because of family ties, some knowledge of English or connections that can help them start over safely.
Reuters contributed to this report.
World
Photos: Thousands march in Brazil town hosting COP30 for climate justice
Published On 16 Nov 2025
Tens of thousands of people have thronged the streets of an Amazonian city hosting the COP30 talks, dancing to pounding speakers in the first large-scale protest at a United Nations climate summit in years.
As the first week of climate negotiations limped to a close with nations deadlocked, Indigenous people and activists sang, chanted, and rolled a giant beach ball of Earth through Belem under a searing sun.
Others held a mock funeral procession for fossil fuels, dressed in black and posing as grieving widows as they carried three coffins marked with the words “coal”, “oil” and “gas”.
It was the first major protest outside the annual climate talks since COP26 four years ago in Glasgow, as the last three gatherings had been held in locations with little tolerance for demonstrations – Egypt, the United Arab Emirates, and Azerbaijan.
Called the “Great People’s March” by the organisers, the Belem rally came at the halfway point of difficult negotiations and followed two Indigenous-led protests that disrupted proceedings earlier in the week.
“Today we are witnessing a massacre as our forest is being destroyed,” said Benedito Huni Kuin, a 50-year-old member of the Huni Kuin Indigenous group from western Brazil.
“We want to make our voices heard from the Amazon and demand results,” he added. “We need more Indigenous representatives at COP to defend our rights.”
Their demands include “reparations” for damages caused by corporations and governments, particularly to marginalised communities.
After a 4.5km (2.8-mile) march through the city, the demonstration halted a few blocks from the COP30 venue, where authorities deployed soldiers to protect the site.
Inside the venue, COP30 President Andre Correa do Lago admitted that the first exhaustive week of negotiations had failed to yield a breakthrough and urged diplomats not to run down the clock with time-wasting manoeuvres.
Countries remained at odds over trade measures and weak climate targets, while a showdown looms over demands that wealthy nations triple the finance they provide to poorer states to adapt to a warming world.
-
Nebraska1 week agoWhere to watch Nebraska vs UCLA today: Time, TV channel for Week 11 game
-
Hawaii1 week agoMissing Kapolei man found in Waipio, attorney says
-
Vermont5 days agoNorthern Lights to dazzle skies across these US states tonight – from Washington to Vermont to Maine | Today News
-
Southwest1 week agoTexas launches effort to install TPUSA in every high school and college
-
New Jersey7 days agoPolice investigate car collision, shooting in Orange, New Jersey
-
West Virginia5 days ago
Search for coal miner trapped in flooded West Virginia mine continues for third day
-
Seattle, WA1 week agoSoundgarden Enlist Jim Carrey and Seattle All-Stars for Rock Hall 2025 Ceremony
-
Detroit, MI1 week agoHere’s the snow forecast for Metro Detroit heading into next week