Connect with us

World

Q&A: UN rep on opium surge in Southeast Asia’s ‘Golden Triangle’

Published

on

Q&A: UN rep on opium surge in Southeast Asia’s ‘Golden Triangle’

Bangkok, Thailand – The Golden Triangle – a area the place the jungle borders of Thailand, Laos and Myanmar meet – has lengthy been infamous because the centre of an unlawful drug commerce operated, managed and guarded by warlord-like army leaders allied with regional organised crime figures.

Artificial medicine produced within the Golden Triangle have flooded regional markets. In 2021 alone, greater than a billion methamphetamine tablets had been seized by authorities in Southeast and East Asia, in line with the United Nations.

Organised crime syndicates and armed teams had joined forces within the Golden Triangle, with their expanded drug manufacturing exploiting the dual vulnerabilities of the latest pandemic and political instability in Myanmar, the UN stated final 12 months, resulting in a medication commerce described as “staggering” in scale.

New knowledge launched final month by the UN Workplace on Medication and Crime (UNODC) additionally confirmed that opium poppy cultivation has surged by 33 % within the Golden Triangle and opium yields have the potential to burgeon by 88 %.

Final 12 months, 40,000 hectares (99,000 acres) of opium poppies had been cultivated in Myanmar, with an estimated potential opium yield of virtually 800 metric tonnes.

Advertisement

Myanmar’s total illicit opiate economic system is now estimated to be price $2bn whereas the regional marketplace for heroin is valued at a staggering $10bn, in line with the UN.

The resurgence of opium manufacturing within the highlands of the Golden Triangle will reverberate all the best way all the way down to the “wider drug economic system centred across the decrease Mekong area” and much past, the UN warned.

To know the forces at play within the Golden Triangle drug commerce, Al Jazeera spoke with Jeremy Douglas, UNODC’s regional consultant for Southeast Asia and the Pacific.

Al Jazeera: On the latest launch of the UNODC report on opium poppy cultivation in Myanmar, a key theme was that the Golden Triangle is again. Are you able to please develop on that?

Advertisement

Douglas: The Golden Triangle has at all times been there however what we’ve seen over latest years is a extremely stark shift from opium and heroin in the direction of methamphetamine and just lately some ketamine.

That change was extraordinarily profound and it began as we noticed a migration of main organised crime into the Golden Triangle to provide artificial medicine in late 2013.

The state of affairs that has taken maintain after February ’21 [when the military seized power in Myanmar] is that the dynamic within the Triangle has modified but once more. We’ve seen an extra scale-up of artificial medicine however we’ve additionally seen a extreme financial contraction within the nation and a return of the opposite facet of the Golden Triangle – the normal opium, [and] the heroin that follows – in a profound approach.

So we’re seeing the Golden Triangle return to its roots to some extent, and on the identical time, the artificial drug economic system stays outsized.

Al Jazeera: Why had opium manufacturing dropped off within the Golden Triangle?

Advertisement

Douglas: Quite a lot of elements. There was the large provide that was popping out of Afghanistan … which was feeding world markets. After which round 2014, 2015, we began seeing an enormous surge of artificial medicine following the migration of main crime teams’ operations into the Triangle and the availability beginning to drive demand, drive the regional market, and a major improve in artificial drug use throughout the area.

On the identical time, there was one other phenomenon that came about in 2014 when Myanmar opened and overseas funding flooded in. The economic system contained in the nation profoundly modified. Lots of people who would have had no different selection however to have interaction in opium farming … had different [opportunities]. There have been different types of earnings being generated within the nation which they may profit from.

And we had been working some programmes that are actually good to assist farmers transition out of opium in the direction of crops like high-value espresso and tea.

UNODC workers gather knowledge on opium cultivation in Myanmar in 2022 [Courtesy of UNODC]

Al Jazeera: The UN notes the regional impression that the rise in opium manufacturing within the Golden Triangle could have. Are you able to converse to that?

Douglas: The rise in opium that has taken place over the previous 12 months will lead to a rise in heroin provide. A rise which is able to feed into the regional market – a all of a sudden extra numerous drug market. And this extra problem has a profound well being impression.

Advertisement

Heroin is an injectable drug which brings with it well being and societal impacts. It’s going to additionally generate additional wealth for traffickers, which goes to … contain a spread of different illicit actions like cash laundering and precursor trafficking, which can be already a problem for the area to take care of.

So after we say regional impression, we imply there’s the instant well being points that I’ve touched on and the very fact is that the nations of this area are going to expertise the brunt of this, like they’re experiencing the brunt of the methamphetamine, the ketamine.

Al Jazeera: Are we going to see opium poppy cultivation proceed to extend within the Golden Triangle?

Douglas:  Proper now, we’re gathering and verifying within the discipline, however preliminary experiences from the groups are that we’re taking a look at additional improve. The query is the magnitude of it, we merely don’t know.

Al Jazeera: The state of affairs with the drug commerce in Myanmar seems to be inextricably linked to the political state of affairs in Myanmar. That one needs to be solved to resolve the opposite.

Advertisement

Douglas: You can’t separate economics from politics, safety and stability in any nation. And when you’ve got a political disaster of this nature and a pre-existing illicit economic system that was sizeable – and you’ve got a contraction in the true economic system to the extent that it has occurred – after all, the illicit economic system will step in and fill the void.

Essentially, there needs to be a candid, sincere dialogue concerning the convergence of politics, economics, safety and the drug commerce within the nation – illicit economies – and it’s, the truth is, a regionalised illicit economic system. The borderlands of Thailand and Laos are profoundly impacted and they are going to be more and more impacted within the years forward.

However the impression cascades throughout East and Southeast Asia and addressing it would require political engagement by neighbouring nations, but in addition by the ASEAN group and China along with Myanmar.

Geremy Douglas, Regional Representative from UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime) for Southeast Asia, delivers a speech at a ministerial meeting on anti-narcotics cooperation between Mekong sub-region countries in Hanoi on May 21, 2015. The 3-day conference gathers officials from Cambodia, China, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, Vietnam and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime for Southeast Asia . AFP PHOTO / HOANG DINH Nam
Jeremy Douglas, Southeast Asia and the Pacific regional consultant for the United Nations Workplace on Medication and Crime [File:  Hoang Dinh Nam/AFP]

Al Jazeera: You may have stated that corruption greases the wheels of the drug commerce. How systematic and organised is the corruption across the drug commerce within the Golden Triangle?

Douglas: Corruption is inbuilt within the drug commerce. For the heroin to maneuver from the labs of northern Shan [state] to Thailand, there must be pre-arranged fee agreed. Funds would even be made when it will get to the Thai border the place the value per kg escalates. If authorities tasked with interdiction on the Thai border aren’t profitable, medicine get by means of. However, on the identical time, there’s at all times the potential for corruption on the border.

In essence, what I’m describing is the chain: from supply proper by means of to export and finish market includes corruption.

Advertisement

Al Jazeera: You may have additionally talked about the function of cash laundering. Income are so huge within the drug commerce that these earnings should go someplace.

Douglas: More and more massive drug earnings have needed to transfer someplace and casinos have performed a particular function lately. As produce other cash-based companies that constructed up round them, a number of the resorts, a number of the leisure companies. They will absorb money which is then pushed by means of their books and which may find yourself in banks.

So, it will be important for the on line casino trade to be rigorously monitored and presumably labored with to assist handle the laundering. As properly, banks which can be banking on behalf of casinos within the Mekong [region] should remember that a lot or a number of the cash going by means of them is related to the drug commerce and it leads to the regional banking system.

Al Jazeera: Might you converse to your description of opium farming as an employer of final resort?

Advertisement

Douglas: I’d say our understanding from the farmers – and we’ve talked to them for years and years – is that they’re prepared to surrender opium. They flip to opium after they don’t produce other choices. And as they lose choices or they don’t produce other alternatives, they return to it. So in a way, once I say final resort, I imply it’s like an employer of final resort. It’s the outdated standby in a approach … And particularly now as they’re being incentivised and helped to return into it by brokers which can be representatives of heroin producers, and with out different choices, they return to it.

Al Jazeera: Heroin producers encourage farmers to provide opium. Is there additionally a level of intimidation there as properly?

Douglas: So what we have now been knowledgeable of by individuals from throughout the opium-producing areas is that representatives that purchase opium have come into the territories, inspired farmers to return to it, offered seeds, fertilisers, and in some elements irrigation and sprinkler tools.

They finance sure prices after which come again and purchase their crop again from them and gather cash for what they helped them get began with – the beginning supplies. It’s virtually like a contract farming sort association such as you see with different crops or agricultural merchandise within the area. However I ought to say as properly that they’re not nice to take care of, is what we’re advised by the farmers. They’re being suggested to enter this. However, the strategies which can be used will be “We wish you to return and do opium farming”, if you realize what I imply.

And it’s a troublesome proposition to say no to when you’ve got somebody come to you who’s representing highly effective pursuits. How does a poor farmer or village say no to these highly effective pursuits?

Advertisement

Al Jazeera: What of the function of ethnic armed organisations on this? Do they rationalise what they do behind a philosophy of incomes earnings from opium that enables them to purchase weapons to combat for his or her freedom?

Douglas: I feel there was that component of it and I feel perhaps that’s nonetheless there. However I feel we must always not romanticise the involvement in drug trafficking and the partnerships with organised crime. Traffickers are enterprise individuals. Heroin and methamphetamine traffickers are basically ruthless enterprise individuals.

They’re within the drug commerce to make some huge cash. So whereas there may be cash from the enterprise that funds teams and armed resistance, there are others together with some main traffickers that disingenuously put on a uniform as a result of it provides them a sure stage of legitimacy. However on the finish of the day, they’re traffickers, they’re organised crime figures.

An opium poppy field in flower in Myanmar's Shan State in December 2022 [Courtesy of UNODC]
An opium poppy discipline in flower in Myanmar’s Shan state, December 2022 [Courtesy of UNODC]

Al Jazeera: What’s the relationship between the Myanmar authorities and a number of the ethnic armed teams which can be cultivating opium?

Douglas: There are teams which can be underneath the umbrella of the safety companies of Myanmar and there are others which aren’t underneath that umbrella, that are impartial and advocating for his or her autonomy. Those underneath the umbrella have a formalised relationship, and so they have their territory and so they’re roughly left alone.

It’s onerous to imagine that they don’t know what’s happening in territory of the border guard or individuals’s militia forces, which we all know, and the Thais know, and everybody appears to know, are concerned. However then there’s the others, which aren’t underneath that umbrella, and lots of are producing and trafficking as properly. And so it’s an especially advanced panorama of who’s producing and who’s not.

Advertisement

Al Jazeera: With a civil battle in Myanmar, armed teams and medicines, how will you be hopeful in a state of affairs like that?

Douglas: I feel there are some, occasionally, indicators of hope. Given what we’ve described, although, by way of the artificial drug economic system and now opium and heroin, the associated criminality, these are actually troublesome occasions for the nation and the area. However once more, that’s why we have now to redouble efforts, fairly frankly, and why we’re saying to the area it’s time to have a political and strategic dialogue about this.

The area can’t police its approach out of this. It’s not going to work. So whereas it isn’t an optimistic state of affairs, it’s a state of affairs that needs to be handled and we’ve acquired to get to that time, of candidly getting management to say it’s time now to do one thing totally different right here.

A police officer from the Narcotics Control Board guards bags of methamphetamine pills during a Destruction of Confiscated Narcotics ceremony in Ayutthaya province, north of Bangkok, Thailand, June 26, 2015. About 7,340 kg (16,182 lbs) of drugs, among them methamphetamine, marijuana, heroin and opium worth more than 22 billion baht ($651,000,000), were destroyed during the anti-drug campaign, according to the Public Health Ministry. REUTERS/Athit Perawongmetha
A police officer from the Workplace of the Narcotics Management Board guards baggage of methamphetamine tablets throughout a destruction ceremony in Ayutthaya province, north of Bangkok, Thailand, 2015 [File: Athit Perawongmetha/Reuters]

Al Jazeera: Drug interdiction and policing alone aren’t an answer?

Douglas: The drug coverage of this area is closely tilted in a sure route, which clearly hasn’t actually labored properly.

It’s been many years of making an attempt to grab extra medicine, and it’s extra medicine yearly. Let’s be sincere, it’s not working. And we’ve been saying it for years. Handle demand. Stop the expansion in demand, and handle the well being and societal impacts. But additionally modify regulation enforcement technique. You can’t seize your approach out of this, significantly with artificial medicine, that are infinite.

Advertisement

It’s a must to transform your method. It’s a must to dismantle the enterprise mannequin of organised crime. Disrupt their banking, disrupt their chemical commerce, disrupt the facilitators of their enterprise, their attorneys, their cash launderers. They should be handled.

The issue is the area continues to chase the drug provide and make seizures and measure their success by seizures. Clearly, that’s not working.

We hope that regional leaders will begin prioritising this past policing as a result of proper now it’s nonetheless a police dialogue. So we have now to get past that and it needs to be modified at a coverage stage.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Israel keeping its ‘eyes open’ for Iranian attacks during Trump transition period, ambassador says

Published

on

Israel keeping its ‘eyes open’ for Iranian attacks during Trump transition period, ambassador says

Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon tells Fox News Digital that his country is keeping its “eyes open” for any potential aggression from Iran during the Trump transition period, adding it would be a “mistake” for the Islamic Republic to carry out an attack. 

The comments come after Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi vowed earlier this week that Iran would retaliate against Israel for the strategic airstrikes it carried out against Tehran on Oct. 26. Araghchi was quoted in Iranian media saying “we have not given up our right to react, and we will react in our time and in the way we see fit.” 

“I would advise him not to challenge us. We have already shown our capabilities. We have proved that they are vulnerable. We can actually target any location in Iran. They know that,” Danon told Fox News Digital. 

“So I would advise them not to make that mistake. If they think that now, because of the transition period, they can take advantage of it, they are wrong,” he added. “We are keeping our eyes open and we are ready for all scenarios.” 

ICC REJECTS ISRAELI APPEALS, ISSUES ARREST WARRANTS FOR BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, YOAV GALLANT 

Advertisement

Israel’s U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon tells Fox News Digital that his country is “ready for all scenarios” coming from Iran during the Trump transition period. (Fox News)

Danon says he believes one of the most important challenges for the incoming Trump administration will be the way the U.S. deals with Iran. 

“Regarding the new administration, I think the most important challenge will be the way you challenge Iran, the aggression, the threat of the Iranian regime. I believe that the U.S. will have to go back to a leading position on this issue,” he told Fox News Digital. 

“We are fighting the same enemies, the enemies of the United States of America. When you look at the Iranians, the Houthis, Hezbollah, Hamas, all those bad actors that are coming against Israel… that is the enemy of the United States. So I think every American should support us and understand what we are doing now,” Danon also said. 

IRAN HIDING MISSILE, DRONE PROGRAMS UNDER GUISE OF COMMERCIAL FRONT TO EVADE SANCTIONS 

Advertisement
House Speaker Mike Johnson and Rep. Elise Stefanik

Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., is acknowledged by President-elect Donald Trump alongside Speaker of the House Mike Johnson during a meeting with House Republicans at the Hyatt Regency hotel in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 13, 2024. Stefanik has been chosen by President-elect Donald Trump as the next U.S. ambassador to the United Nations. (Allison Robbert/Pool via REUTERS)

Danon spoke as the U.S. vetoed a draft resolution against Israel at the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday. 

The resolution, which was overseen by Algeria, sought an “immediate, unconditional and permanent cease-fire” to be imposed on Israel. The resolution did not guarantee the release of the hostages still being held by Hamas within Gaza. 

Israeli military planes

Israeli Air Force planes departing for the strikes in Iran on Oct. 26. (IDF Spokesman’s Unit)

 

“It was a shameful resolution because… it didn’t have the linkage between the cease-fire and the call [for] the release of the hostages. And I want to thank the United States for taking a strong position and vetoing this resolution,” Danon said. “I think it sent a very clear message that the U.S. stands with its strongest ally with Israel. And, you know, it was shameful, too, to hear the voices of so many ambassadors speaking about a cease-fire but abandoning the 101 hostages. We will not forget them. We will never abandon them. We will continue to fight until we bring all of them back home.” 

Fox News’ Benjamin Weinthal contributed to this report. 

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

Fact-check: What do we know about Russia’s nuclear arsenal?

Published

on

Fact-check: What do we know about Russia’s nuclear arsenal?

Moscow has lowered the bar for using nuclear weapons and fired a missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead into Ukraine, heightening tensions with the West.

ADVERTISEMENT

Russia’s nuclear arsenal is under fresh scrutiny after an intermediate-range ballistic missile capable of carrying an atomic warhead was fired into Ukrainian territory.

President Vladimir Putin says the unprecedented attack using the so-called “Oreshnik” missile is a direct response to Ukraine’s use of US and UK-made missiles to strike targets deep in Russian territory.

He has also warned that the military facilities of Western countries allowing Ukraine to use their weapons to strike Russia could become targets.

The escalation comes days after the Russian President approved small but significant changes to his country’s nuclear doctrine, which would allow a nuclear response to a conventional, non-nuclear attack on Russian territory.

While Western officials, including US defence secretary Lloyd Austin, have dismissed the notion that Moscow’s use of nuclear weapons is imminent, experts warn that recent developments could increase the possibility of nuclear weapons use.

Advertisement

Here’s what we know about Russia’s inventory of atomic weapons.

How big is Russia’s nuclear arsenal?

Russia holds more nuclear warheads than any other nation at an estimated 5,580, which amounts to 47% of global stockpiles, according to data from the Federation of American Scientists (FAS).

But only an estimated 1,710 of those weapons are deployed, a fraction more than the 1,670 deployed by the US. 

Both nations have the necessary nuclear might to destroy each other several times over, and considerably more atomic warheads than the world’s seven other nuclear nations: China, France, India, Israel, North Korea, Pakistan and the United Kingdom.

Of Moscow’s deployed weapons, an estimated 870 are on land-based ballistic missiles, 640 on submarine-launched ballistic missiles, and potentially 200 at heavy bomber bases.

Advertisement

According to FAS, there are no signs Russia is significantly scaling up its nuclear arsenal, but the federation does warn of a potential surge in the future as the country replaces single-warhead missiles with those capable of carrying multiple warheads.

Russia is also steadily modernising its nuclear arsenal.

What could trigger a Russian nuclear response?

Moscow’s previous 2020 doctrine stated that its nuclear weapons could be used in response to an attack using nuclear or other weapons of mass destruction “when the very existence of the state is put under threat.”

Now, the conditions under which a nuclear response could be launched have changed in three crucial ways:

  1. Russia will consider using nuclear weapons in the case of a strike on its territory using conventional weapons, such as cruise missiles, drones and tactical aircraft.
  2. It could launch a nuclear attack in response to an aggression by a non-nuclear state acting “with the participation or support of a nuclear state”, as is the case for Ukraine.
  3. Moscow will also apply the same conditions to an attack on Belarus’ territory, in agreement with President Lukashenko.

Is there a rising nuclear threat?

The size of the world’s nuclear stockpiles has rapidly decreased amid the post-Cold War détente. The Soviet Union had some 40,000 warheads, and the US around 30,000, when stockpiles peaked during the 1960s and 70s.

ADVERTISEMENT

But FAS warns that while the overall number is still in decline, operational warheads are on the rise once again. More countries are also upgrading their missiles to deploy multiple warheads.

“In nearly all of the nuclear-armed states there are either plans or a significant push to increase nuclear forces,” Hans M. Kristensen, Director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists (FAS), said in June this year.

Advertisement

Is the West reacting?

When Putin approved the updated nuclear protocol last week, many Western leaders dismissed it as sabre rattling.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock said Germany and its partners would “not be intimidated” and accused Putin of “playing with our fear.”

ADVERTISEMENT

But since Russia used a hypersonic ballistic missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead in an attack on Dnipro, European leaders have raised the alarm.

“The last few dozen hours have shown that the threat is serious and real when it comes to global conflict,” Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on Friday.

According to Dutch media reports, NATO’s secretary-general Mark Rutte is in Florida to urgently meet President-elect Donald Trump, potentially to discuss the recent escalation.

NATO and Ukraine will hold an extraordinary meeting in Brussels next Tuesday to discuss the situation and the possible allied reaction, according to Euronews sources.

Advertisement
ADVERTISEMENT
Continue Reading

World

Rental home investors poised to benefit as mortgage rates, high home prices sideline buyers in 2025

Published

on

Rental home investors poised to benefit as mortgage rates, high home prices sideline buyers in 2025

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Rental homes will remain an attractive option next year to would-be homebuyers sidelined by high mortgage rates and rising home prices, analysts say.

American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes are two big real estate investment trusts poised to benefit from the trend, say analysts at Mizuho Securities USA and Raymond James & Associates.

Their outlooks boil down to a simple thesis: Many Americans will continue to have a difficult time finding a single-family home that they can afford to buy, which will make renting a house an attractive alternative.

It starts with mortgage rates. While the average rate on a 30-year mortgage fell to a two-year low of 6.08% in late September, it’s been mostly rising since then, echoing moves in the 10-year Treasury yield, which lenders use as a guide to pricing home loans.

The yield, which has hovered around 4.4% this week, surged after the presidential election, reflecting expectations among investors that President-elect Donald Trump’s proposed economic policies may widen the federal deficit and crank up inflation.

Advertisement

Analysts at Raymond James and Associates say they see mortgage rates remaining “higher for longer,” given the outcome of the election. Last week, they reiterated their “Outperform” ratings on American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes, noting “we are increasingly confident in the longer-term outlook for single-family rental fundamentals and the industry’s growth prospects.”

They also believe the two companies will continue to benefit from “outsized demographic demand for suburban homes,” and the monthly payment gap between renting and owning a home, which they estimate can be as much as 30% less to rent.

Analysts at Mizuho also expect that homeownership affordability hurdles will maintain “a supportive backdrop” and stoke demand for rental houses, helping American Homes 4 Rent and Invitation Homes to maintain their tenant retention rates.

The companies are averaging higher new and renewal tenant lease rates when compared to several of the largest U.S. apartment owners, including AvalonBay, Equity Residential and Camden Property Trust, according to Mizuho. It has an “Outperform” rating on American Homes 4 Rent and a “Neutral” rating on Invitation Homes.

Shares in Invitation Homes are down 1.2% so far this year, while American Homes 4 Rent is up 4.4%. That’s well below the S&P 500’s 24% gain in the same period.

Advertisement

While individual homeowners and mom-and-pop investors still account for the vast majority of single-family rental homes, homebuilders have stepped up construction of new houses planned for rental communities.

In the third quarter, builders broke ground on about 24,000 single-family homes slated to become rentals. That’s up from 17,000 a year earlier. In the second quarter, single-family rental starts climbed to 25,000, the highest quarterly total going back to at least 1990, according to an analysis of U.S. Census data by the National Association of Home Builders.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending