Connect with us

World

Kansas abortion vote: Why recount with such a large margin?

Published

on

Kansas abortion vote: Why recount with such a large margin?

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas on Tuesday started a partial hand recount of this month’s decisive statewide vote in favor of abortion rights, a transfer pressured by two Republican activists despite the fact that the margin was so massive that the recount received’t change the result.

9 of the state’s 105 counties are doing the recount on the request of Melissa Leavitt, of Colby, in far northwestern Kansas, who has pushed for tighter election legal guidelines. A longtime anti-abortion activist, Mark Gietzen, of Wichita, is overlaying a lot of the prices.

A bigger than anticipated turnout of voters on Aug. 2 rejected a poll measure that might have eliminated protections for abortion rights from the Kansas Structure and given to the Legislature the appropriate to additional prohibit abortion or ban it. It failed by 18 proportion factors, or 165,000 votes statewide.

It drew broad consideration as a result of it was the primary state referendum on abortion for the reason that U.S. Supreme Court docket overturned Roe v. Wade in June.

WHY DO A RECOUNT IF IT WON’T CHANGE THE OUTCOME?

Advertisement

Gietzen and Leavitt have each advised there may need been issues with out pointing to any precise examples or proof. Gietzen acknowledged in an interview that he could be stunned if the Kansas recount modified the outcomes, however that he desires “the system fastened.” He pointed to potential issues that would have gone incorrect, corresponding to malicious software program, inaccurate voter rolls and voting regulation violations, despite the fact that there isn’t a proof that occurred.

Recounts more and more are instruments to encourage supporters of a candidate or trigger to consider an election was stolen fairly than misplaced. A wave of candidates who’ve echoed former President Donald Trump’s lie that the 2020 election was rigged have known as for recounts after dropping their very own Republican primaries.

In Nevada, legal professional Joey Gilbert raised cash to pay for a $190,000 recount that also confirmed him dropping the GOP nomination for governor by 26,000 votes. In Colorado, county clerk Tina Peters raised $256,000 to pay for a recount that confirmed she gained 13 votes complete in her bid for the get together nomination for secretary of state, however nonetheless misplaced by greater than 88,000 votes. Each candidates continued to assert they’d truly received the election at the same time as recounts confirmed they got here nowhere shut.

The refusal of candidates or campaigns to consider they may ever be defeated in an election is a harmful improvement for American democracy, mentioned Tammy Patrick, a former Arizona voting official who’s now a senior adviser to Democracy Fund.

“What we see now could be folks simply don’t consider they misplaced as a result of they’re consistently being fed these lies in regards to the legitimacy of the method,” Patrick mentioned. The decision for recounts “retains their base engaged, ginned up and donating,” she added.

Advertisement

Deb Otis of the nonprofit group Honest Vote wrote a report that discovered about two recounts occurred a yr in statewide elections between 2000 and 2019, and in solely three did the outcomes change after the recounts uncovered tiny however vital flaws within the preliminary depend.

“Voters will begin dropping observe of when these claims are legit and when a state ought to pay for a recount,” Otis mentioned.

Kansas regulation requires a recount if those that ask for it show they will cowl the counties’ prices. The counties pay provided that the result adjustments.

WHAT’S THE PROCESS?

Kansas regulation says counties have 5 days following a request to finish a recount. The clock for the recount on the abortion measure began Monday, when the Kansas secretary of state’s workplace concluded Gietzen and Leavitt may cowl the prices.

Advertisement

All 9 counties anticipated to complete by Saturday. 4 began recounting by Tuesday, and a type of, Lyon County, deliberate to complete by day’s finish. The opposite 5 deliberate to start out Wednesday.

WHERE IS THE MONEY COMING FROM?

Leavitt and Gietzen offered bank cards to pay for the practically $120,000 value, in response to the secretary of state’s workplace. Leavitt has a web-based fundraising web page that had raised greater than $47,000 as of Tuesday afternoon. Gietzen additionally mentioned he’s getting donations from a community constructed over three many years within the anti-abortion motion, however he declined to be extra particular.

The 2 initially needed the vote recounted in all 105 Kansas counties, however they couldn’t elevate the required $229,000. Gietzen mentioned the 9 counties have been chosen based mostly partially on their inhabitants and value.

Votes are being recounted in Douglas County, residence to the College of Kansas’ primary campus; Johnson County, in suburban Kansas Metropolis; Sedgwick County, residence to Wichita, Shawnee County, residence to Topeka; and Crawford, Harvey, Jefferson, Lyon and Thomas counties. Abortion opponents misplaced all of these counties besides Thomas.

Advertisement

WHO IS BEHIND THIS?

Gietzen has been lively within the anti-abortion motion and incessantly protests outdoors a clinic offering abortions in Wichita. He leads his personal group, the Kansas Coalition for Life, which is separate from the bigger and extra influential Kansans for Life that wields vital energy on the Statehouse. He has pushed laws to ban most abortions at in regards to the sixth week of being pregnant. Kansas regulation doesn’t do this till the twenty second week.

He additionally leads the Kansas Republican Meeting, which had some clout among the many GOP’s conservative activists greater than a decade in the past earlier than they solidified their maintain over the state get together group. He’s retired from plane producer Boeing.

He’s run repeatedly and unsuccessfully for the Legislature, and he has been an activist towards cities including fluoride to their consuming water, one thing Wichita rejected in 2012.

“He’s to this point, proper, he’s coming across the different facet,” mentioned former Republican state Rep. John Whitmer, host of a Wichita radio speak present. “There’s simply not a number of wiggle room with Mark.”

Advertisement

Leavitt owns a interest and craft retailer in Colby. She has questioned how Thomas County is dealing with its elections. She served on an area election advisory group.

WHY IS THE RESULT NOT GOING TO CHANGE?

Voters within the 9 counties forged roughly 59% of the greater than 922,000 ballots on the Aug. 2 poll query. They rejected the abortion opponents’ measure by 31 proportion factors — considerably bigger than the statewide complete.

Recounts virtually by no means reverse the result of elections, even within the closest races. Because the Florida recount for the 2000 presidential race, greater than 30 statewide elections throughout the U.S. have been the topic of recounts. The three that have been overturned have been determined by a whole bunch of votes — not 1000’s.

The most important lead erased by a statewide recount was 261 votes in Washington state’s 2004 election for governor. There isn’t a precedent in U.S. historical past of a recount reversing the result of an election determined by greater than 165,000 votes.

Advertisement

Even some sturdy abortion opponents see the recount as a waste of money and time. Whitmer mentioned the cash might be a lot better spent on GOP efforts to unseat Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly or on aggressive legislative seats.

___

Hollingsworth reported from Kansas Metropolis, Missouri, and Riccardi, from Denver. Additionally contributing was Margaret Stafford in Kansas Metropolis, Missouri and Stephen Ohlemacher in Washington, D.C.

___

Comply with John Hanna on Twitter: https://twitter.com/apjdhanna

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Wrong Claims by Musk on US Election Got 2 Billion Views on X in 2024, Report Says

Published

on

Wrong Claims by Musk on US Election Got 2 Billion Views on X in 2024, Report Says
By Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON (Reuters) – False or misleading claims by billionaire Elon Musk about the U.S. election have amassed 2 billion views on social media platform X this year, according to a report by non-profit group Center for Countering Digital Hate. WHY IT’S IMPORTANT Government officials …
Continue Reading

World

North Korea launches short-range ballistic missile hours before US election

Published

on

North Korea launches short-range ballistic missile hours before US election

Just hours before the U.S. election, North Korea was reported to have fired at least one ballistic missile into its eastern sea. 

It remains unclear whether North Korea fired only one missile or multiple. It is also unclear what type of missile it was or how far it flew. 

The launch came days after North Korean leader Kim Jong Un supervised a flight test of the country’s newest intercontinental ballistic missile designed to reach the U.S. mainland. In response to that launch, the United States flew a long-range B-1B bomber in a trilateral drill with South Korea and Japan on Sunday in a show of force. 

North Korea claimed last week that the Hwasong-19 it tested last Thursday was “the world’s strongest” ICBM, but experts say the solid-fuel missile was too big to be useful in a war situation. Experts say the North has yet to acquire some critical technologies to build a functioning ICBM, such as ensuring that the warhead survives the harsh conditions of atmospheric re-entry.

DOCUMENTS REVEAL RUSSIA’S INITIAL ‘PEACE DEAL’ EQUATED TO THE SURRENDER OF UKRAINE: REPORT

Advertisement

A soldier stands at a North Korean military guard post seen from Paju, South Korea, June 26, 2024. (AP Photo/Lee Jin-man)

South Korean officials have warned that the North was likely to ratchet up military displays around the U.S. presidential elections to command the attention of Washington. 

South Korea’s military intelligence agency said last week that North Korea has also likely completed preparations for its seventh nuclear test.

North Korea leader in a leather jacket

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un, left, supervises artillery firing drills on March 7, 2024. (Korean Central News Agency/Korea News Service via AP)

Tensions between North and South Korea have been at all-time highs in recent months as Kim has repeatedly flaunted his expanding nuclear weapons and missile programs while providing Russia with munitions and troops to support President Vladimir Putin’s war in Ukraine.

Advertisement

In response to North Korea’s growing nuclear threats, South Korea, the United States and Japan have been expanding their combined military exercises and updating their nuclear deterrence plans built around U.S. strategic assets.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

World

Musk’s $1m US voter giveaway can continue, Pennsylvania judge rules

Published

on

Musk’s m US voter giveaway can continue, Pennsylvania judge rules

The state’s top Democratic legal official says the giveaway in states likely to decide the US election is a ‘scam’.

A $1m-a-day voter sweepstakes operated by a political group established by billionaire Elon Musk can continue, a judge in the state of Pennsylvania has ruled.

Last month, the world’s richest man announced he would start the giveaway in seven battleground states likely to decide the outcome of the United States 2024 election.

Musk’s giveaway has widely been seen by many as an unsubtle attempt to secure extra votes for Republican candidate Donald Trump, who Musk has thrown his vocal and financial support behind.

Musk has given $75m to America PAC, a political action committee that has been funding various Republican candidates, including former President Trump.

Advertisement

Winners ‘not chosen  by chance’

The Tesla CEO has already gifted $16m to registered swing-state voters who qualified for the giveaway by signing his political petition.

Pennsylvania‘s Common Pleas Court Judge Angelo Foglietta’s decision on Monday came after a surprising day of testimony in a state court in which Musk’s aides acknowledged hand-picking the winners of the contest based on who would be the best spokespeople for his super PAC’s agenda.

Previously, the 53-year-old billionaire had claimed the winners would be chosen at random.

District Attorney Larry Krasner, a Democrat, called the process a scam “designed to actually influence a national election” and asked that it be shut down.

As it was, the judge ruled in favour of Musk and his America PAC.

Advertisement

Musk’s lawyer, Chris Gober, said the final two recipients before the presidential election would be announced in Arizona on Monday and Michigan on Tuesday.

“The $1 million recipients are not chosen by chance,” said Gober.

“We know exactly who will be announced as the $1 million recipient today and tomorrow.”

‘They were scammed’

Chris Young, the director and treasurer of America PAC, testified that the recipients were vetted ahead of time, to “feel out their personality, [and] make sure they were someone whose values aligned” with the group.

Musk’s lawyers, defending the effort, called it “core political speech” given that participants were asked to sign a petition endorsing the US Constitution.

Advertisement

More than 1 million people from the seven battleground states – Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Nevada, Arizona, Georgia, North Carolina and Michigan – have registered for the sweepstakes by signing a petition saying they support the right to free speech and to bear arms, the first two amendments to the US Constitution.

District Attorney Krasner has questioned how the PAC might use their data, which it will have on hand well past the election.

“They were scammed for their information,” Krasner said. “It has almost unlimited use.”

Continue Reading

Trending