Connect with us

World

Critics slam Turkey’s draft law on criminalising ‘disinformation’

Published

on

Critics slam Turkey’s draft law on criminalising ‘disinformation’

Journalists’ associations and unions have slammed a brand new draft regulation in Turkey that will criminalise the unfold of “disinformation”.

Reporters say the invoice is an try by the federal government to censor freedom of expression and prohibit unbiased media.

Below the regulation, residents can face between one and three years in jail if they’re deemed to have deliberately unfold “deceptive data”.

Social networks may even be compelled to take away “false” content material beneath the regulation and share account particulars with the authorities.

Platforms should already take away content material that is reported as offensive by people or the Turkish authorities.

Advertisement

The brand new invoice was tabled by the AK get together of President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan in Might and has already been accredited by two parliamentary committees.

The Turkish parliament is because of start debating the controversial new laws on Tuesday.

Dozens of journalists gathered exterior the parliament constructing in Ankara, holding placards that learn “No to the regulation of censorship” and “Free press is a situation for democracy”.

“If this regulation is carried out on this kind, there shall be no freedom of press, expression and communication in our nation,” stated Kemal Aktas, chairman of the Turkish parliamentary reporters.

Critics say the wording of the brand new regulation is ambiguous and may very well be used to focus on authorities critics.

Advertisement

“The regulation would grow to be one other instrument for harassing journalists and activists and should trigger blanket self-censorship throughout the Web,” the NGO Article 19 stated in a assertion in Might.

In response to the draft invoice, prosecutors will search for “deliberate” makes an attempt to unfold “deceptive data” to instigate concern or endanger “safety, public order and the overall well being of the nation”.

Journalists shall be disadvantaged of their press playing cards if they’re convicted beneath the regulation.

The invoice would additionally improve any sentence by half if “deceptive data” is revealed by an nameless consumer or a part of an orgnisation.

“This … additional intimidates these desirous to publish proof of corruption and wrongdoing however are afraid of the results of being publicly recognized,” stated Article 19.

Advertisement

Opposition events have tried to dam the invoice however are prone to fail, on condition that the AKP holds a majority of 334 seats within the 581-seat Turkish parliament.

In March, Russia handed an identical “faux information” regulation cracking down on unbiased information retailers amid the struggle in Ukraine.

Analysts say Erdoğan is making an attempt to exert extra management over Turkey’s web and media earlier than presidential and parliamentary elections in June 2023.

In response to Reporters With out Borders (RSF), Turkey presently ranks 149th out of 180 nations for press freedom.

“Disinformation is a crucial situation and must be combatted however not on the worth of proscribing journalists’ rights and the general public’s rights of freedom of expression,” stated Article 19.

Advertisement

“Any such initiatives needs to be developed in shut session with media and different stakeholders and embrace enough safeguards without spending a dime speech and unbiased journalism that may stop their abuse by the federal government to impose arbitrary censorship.”

“We, due to this fact, name on all of Turkey’s parliamentarians who imagine within the parliamentary course of and the free move of concepts and data as central to a democratic society, to vote down this invoice.”

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

Viggo Mortensen Asked Peter Jackson if He Could Use Aragorn’s Sword in a New Movie, Says He’d Star in New ‘Lord of the Rings’ Movie Only ‘If I Was Right for the Character’

Published

on

Viggo Mortensen Asked Peter Jackson if He Could Use Aragorn’s Sword in a New Movie, Says He’d Star in New ‘Lord of the Rings’ Movie Only ‘If I Was Right for the Character’

Viggo Mortensen revealed in an interview with GQ UK magazine that he used Aragorn’s iconic sword Andúril from “Lord of the Rings” in his latest movie, “The Dead Don’t Hurt.” Mortensen wrote and directed the 19th century Western, in which he stars as a Danish immigrant separated from his love (Vicky Krieps) during the Civil War.

For one fantasy sequence in the film, Mortensen asked his “Lord of the Rings” director Peter Jackson if he had his permission to use Aragorn’s sword again on screen. Mortensen played the character in Jackson’s original “Rings” trilogy and kept the sword after production wrapped.

“We had everything for this sequence with a knight. We had found this great, spirited horse, the right kind of saddle, and we made a medieval kind of blanket, and we had the costume for the knight,” Mortensen explained. “Everything was right, and then I said, well, we should have a sword. And I did look and there were some good ones and I thought, well, it might be kind of good to use [Aragorn’s sword] that I had because it’s really good. But I knew I would have to ask permission because I’m sure somebody would notice it, even if you only see it for a few seconds, it’s not really essential to the scene and certainly not to the movie, it’s just something in passing that you either see or you don’t.”

“I did ask Peter Jackson if he’d be all right with it, and he said, ‘Well, is it very important in the story?’ I said, no, it’s not, actually,” Mortensen continued. “You hardly notice it, but somebody will, probably. He said it was okay with him but that I should ask the movie company. So I contacted them and they were fine with it. They realized it wasn’t essential, it wasn’t going to draw a lot of attention to itself. And they were very nice about it, and they gave us permission. That’s why we did it, just because it seemed right. It was kind of a last-minute accident.”

Jackson is returning to Middle-Earth as the producer of a new “Lord of the Rings” movie that is going to be directed by Gollum actor Andy Serkis. The movie, “The Lord of the Rings: The Hunt for Gollum,” is being eyed for a 2026 theatrical release. Would Mortensen return as Aragorn? He doesn’t seem opposed, but the story would have to make sense.

Advertisement

“I don’t know exactly what the story is, I haven’t heard,” he said. “Maybe I’ll hear about it eventually. I like playing that character. I learned a lot playing the character. I enjoyed it a lot. I would only do it if I was right for it in terms of, you know, the age I am now and so forth. I would only do it if I was right for the character. It would be silly to do it otherwise.”

“The Dead Don’t Hurt” premiered at the Toronto International Film Festival last year. The film is opening in theaters May 31. Head over to GQ UK’s website to read Mortensen’s interview in its entirety.

Continue Reading

World

Nigeria's new anthem, written by a Briton, sparks criticism after a contentious law is passed

Published

on

Nigeria's new anthem, written by a Briton, sparks criticism after a contentious law is passed

Nigeria adopted a new national anthem on Wednesday after lawmakers passed a law that replaced the current one with a version dropped nearly a half-century ago, sparking widespread criticism about how the law was hastily passed without much public input.

President Bola Tinubu’s assent to the law comes a day after it was approved by both chambers of Nigeria’s National Assembly, which is dominated by the governing party. The federal lawmakers introduced and passed the bill in less than a week, an unusually fast process for important bills that usually take weeks or months to be considered.

MEGHAN MARKLE STIRS CONTROVERSY DURING NIGERIA TRIP BY WEARING DRESS CALLED ‘WINDSOR’

The “Arise, O Compatriots” anthem being replaced had been in use since 1978, when it was introduced by the military government. The anthem was composed at a time when the country was reeling from a deadly civil war and calls on Nigerians to “serve our fatherland with love and strength” and not to let “the labor of our heroes past (to be) in vain.”

Nigeria’s new President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, inspects honor guards after taking an oath of office at a ceremony in Abuja, Nigeria, on May 29, 2023. Nigeria adopted a new national anthem on Wednesday, May 29, 2024, after lawmakers passed a law that replaced the current one with a version dropped nearly 50 years ago, sparking widespread criticism about how the law was hastily passed without much public input. (AP Photo/Olamikan Gbemiga)

Advertisement

The new version that takes immediate effect was first introduced in 1960 when Nigeria gained independence from Britain before it was dropped by the military. Titled “Nigeria We Hail Thee,” it was written by Lillian Jean Williams, a British expatriate who was living in Nigeria at the time.

The new anthem was played publicly for the first time at a legislative session attended by Tinubu, who marked his one year in office as president on Wednesday.

Many Nigerians, however, took to social media to say they won’t be singing the new national anthem, among them Oby Ezekwesili, a former education minister and presidential aspirant who said that the new law shows that the country’s political class doesn’t care about the public interest.

“In a 21st Century Nigeria, the country’s political class found a colonial National Anthem that has pejorative words like “Native Land” and “Tribes” to be admirable enough to foist on our Citizens without their consent,” Ezekwesili posted on X.

Advertisement

Supporters of the new anthem, however, argued it was wrong for the country to have adopted an anthem introduced by the military.

“Anthems are ideological recitations that help the people to be more focused. It was a very sad development for the military to have changed the anthem,” public affairs analyst Frank Tietie said.

Continue Reading

World

Could a left-nationalist party emerge in the next EU parliament?

Published

on

Could a left-nationalist party emerge in the next EU parliament?

Radio Schuman is your new go-to podcast to spice up your weekday mornings with relevant news, insights, and behind-the-scenes stories from Brussels and beyond.

ADVERTISEMENT

It’s May 30 and it’s a week to go before the European elections. Across Europe, people are bracing for a surge of support for the far-right in the European Parliament. But what of the far left? It’s a small but loud faction, drawing the support of many young voters. It’s also the only group on the left of the political spectrum that is expected to gain seats. 

We also discussed the global race for AI and the European Commission’s attempts to remain competitive. 

This podcast is also produced by the journalist Eleonora Vasques and the sound engineer Zacharia Vigneron. Music by Alexandre Jas.

Additional sources • Zacharia Vigneron

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending