Santiago, Chile – Gaspar Dominguez briskly walked down the steps of Santiago’s majestic former Congress constructing into the cruel brightness of the winter solar in downtown Santiago. The 33-year-old medic has spent the previous yr within the constructing – now a nationwide monument – writing Chile’s new structure as a part of a 154-strong meeting.

He hugged and congratulated his colleagues who gathered exterior; they’d simply completed drafting the textual content that would change the course of the nation’s historical past and set precedents for equal rights worldwide.

“On high of social rights, housing rights and training rights, the structure innovates on issues of equality,” Dominguez informed Al Jazeera.

He mentions equal participation quotas for girls in public establishments and guaranteeing LGBTQ+ inclusion in political areas.

“It’s not sufficient to only say we’re all equal, now we have to take affirmative motion,” he added.

On Monday, the meeting will hand over the completed draft textual content to President Gabriel Boric earlier than it’s made out there to the general public. Chileans can have two months to evaluate the doc and resolve its destiny in an compulsory referendum on September 4.

Dominguez, who’s the meeting’s vice chairman, hailed the structure as a democratic victory and is assured with the ultimate consequence: “We’re very enthusiastic about it,” he mentioned.

Requires a brand new structure arose following protests in the course of the Chilean spring of 2019 when hundreds of thousands took to the streets demanding social reform regardless of heavy-handed repression from state forces.

Hundreds have been injured and dozens have been killed, fuelling discontent and exacerbating mistrust of political actors, particularly in direction of the conservative Pinera authorities which held energy on the time.

‘Chained to Pinochet’

The nation’s present structure was singled out as the foundation explanation for staggering inequality and excessive prices of dwelling as a result of it advocated unregulated privatisation and favoured neoliberal insurance policies.

Protesters deemed the doc illegitimate because it was written in 1980 in the course of the Pinochet dictatorship. In October 2020, an amazing majority of 79 % of Chileans voted to draft a brand new constitution.

“We’ll nonetheless be chained to Pinochet so long as we’re dominated below his structure,” mentioned Erika Gonzalez, voluntarily handing out summarised, illustrated editions of the brand new textual content in downtown Santiago.

Gonzalez was an lively member of the socialist social gathering in the course of the 17-year-long Pinochet dictatorship, which led to 1990. Underneath Pinochet’s navy rule, socialists have been compelled to flee the nation or function underground. Many have been tortured and murdered.

“It’s time to be achieved with Pinochet for as soon as and for all,” she mentioned, with tears in her eyes.

She believes the brand new structure may also help rework Chile by making certain equal entry to training, particularly. “A rustic that’s educated is crucial for me.”

However not everybody shares her enthusiasm for the textual content. “It’s only a e-book with foolish illustrations,” mentioned one passer-by, aggressively flicking by way of the pages. One other shouted, “Reject it!” One rushed by muttering the phrase, “Lies!”

Conservative response

Chile’s proper wing staunchly opposed the thought of the brand new structure and solely gained a minority of seats within the writing meeting, whose members have been chosen by election in Could 2021.

Conservative constituent Ruggero Cozzi, a 35-year-old lawyer, mentioned he believed the meeting failed in its goal.

“I believed we’d obtain a textual content that may give us unity and social cohesion, however we didn’t,” he informed Al Jazeera. “It’s been a priceless yr, exhausting, however above all, disappointing.”

Cozzi defended the free market system that the structure is undoing, and believed privatisation is the explanation for Chile’s comparatively robust infrastructure in contrast with different Latin American nations.

“Getting the state to organise the whole lot gained’t consequence within the adjustments which are wanted, and has not ended nicely for different Latin American nations” he warned.

Cozzi is lobbying for Chileans to reject the structure within the September referendum – and polls are tipped in his favour. The newest knowledge from pollster Cadem reveals that 51 % of Chileans would reject it.

Nevertheless, latest election outcomes have been troublesome to foretell. In 2021’s presidential election, far-right candidate Jose Antonio Kast claimed the lead within the primaries, solely to be comfortably overwhelmed by left-wing former scholar chief, Gabriel Boric, within the closing vote.

It was the primary time in Chile’s democratic historical past {that a} candidate who didn’t lead in primaries went on to win the presidency.

Boric’s victory additional affirmed Chile’s need to interrupt from its conservative previous and embrace drastic social change. Incumbent since March, Boric has been supportive of the constitutional course of and is rallying for the brand new constitution to go.

‘Lot of aggression’

Claudia Heiss, head of political science of the Institute of Public Affairs, Universidad de Chile, equally defends the textual content and high quality of its content material.

“It might have been higher if the left- and the right-wing constituents discovered extra factors to agree on. The tone was not optimum and there was quite a lot of aggression,” she informed Al Jazeera.

”However if you happen to take a step again and take a look at it from the rebellion and the choice to put in writing a brand new structure, it has typically been a very good course of.”

If the brand new textual content is rejected, the present structure will stay in place. Nevertheless, Heiss believed there was no turning again, no matter September’s final result.

“One might be much less dramatic in regards to the virulence of the general public debate we see immediately. Whether or not accredited or rejected, the Nineteen Eighties structure is not viable,” she affirmed.

“Chile has to advance in a extra social-democratic course, with larger equality, with higher distribution, and that’s inevitable.”