The Islamic Republic of Iran’s state-controlled media is promoting the memorandum of understanding with the U.S. to re-open the Strait of Hormuz and address Tehran’s illicit nuclear weapons program as its triumph over the U.S. and Israel.

The major diplomatic breakthrough, known as by its initials MOU, is slated to be sealed at a signing ceremony on June 19 in Switzerland. Iranian state-controlled TV boasted that the “U.S. is forced to sign agreement to end the war.”

The State Department has classified Iran as the world’s worst state-sponsor of terrorism and its state-controlled media apparatus is notorious, according to Iran experts, for spreading anti-U.S. propoganda.

TRUMP ANNOUNCES PEACE DEAL WITH IRAN, DECLARES STRAIT OF HORMUZ WILL REOPEN: ‘LET THE OIL FLOW!’

Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi said, according to the country’s Tasnim News Agency, “This memorandum does not mean trusting the enemy; it has been written with active distrust. We will monitor the implementation of U.S. commitments.” 

Iran’s Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) reported that the nation’s Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, “emphasized that national cohesion and the active presence of the people serve as important capital and a primary pillar of Iran’s diplomatic authority.”

Araghchi said, according to IRNA,” that the true image of Iran’s power on the global stage stems not only from its military capabilities but also from national cohesion, resilience, and the active involvement of its people.”

Tehran’s top diplomat stated that the,”Iranian nation achieved not only tactical victories during the 12-day imposed war in June last year and the recent war, but also important strategic accomplishments whose impact can be observed in both regional and global equations.”

President Trump announced some of the elements of the MOU on Sunday. He wrote on social media. “The Deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran is now complete.” He noted that “I hereby fully authorize the toll free opening of the Strait of Hormuz, and, simultaneously herewith, authorize the immediate removal of the United States Naval blockade. Ships of the World, start your engines. Let the oil flow!”

IRAN HOLDS FUNERAL FOR TOP COMMANDERS, NUCLEAR SCIENTISTS KILLED IN ISRAELI OPERATION

There are additional components of the MOU that have not been confirmed, including the timetable for sanctions relief and the end of Iran’s enrichment of uranium for the construction of nuclear weapons.

Iran’s Supreme National Security Council said in a Sunday statement that all military operations across multiple fronts, including those in Lebanon, will cease “immediately and permanently” starting Sunday night.

Lisa Daftari, the founder and editor-in-chief of The Foreign Desk told Fox News Digital that, “Inside Iran, state media is selling this as a victory, not a compromise. The message on Iranian television is that a ‘strong and proud’ Islamic Republic has forced Washington to recognize its control over the Strait of Hormuz and to ease military pressure, while Tehran supposedly gives up very little in return.”

Daftari, a leading expert on the Islamic Republic, added “The Islamic Republic’s very DNA is built on delay, deceit and deniability. Every agreement it has signed has been treated as a tactical pause on the way to more missiles, more proxies and more leverage, not a real change in behavior. So while it’s important to read the fine print of this new deal, it’s even more important to remember who is signing it. A system that survives by holding deadly weapons over its neighbors and by lying to its own people is not suddenly going to become a trustworthy partner.”

She concluded, “The Trump administration should assume from day one that Tehran will test every loophole, hide every capability it can, and resume its nuclear program, amass its drones and missiles, fund its deadly proxies while continuing to torture the Iranian people at home.”

Vice President JD Vance told Fox News’ “The Big Weekend Show” Sunday that “I think it’s a big moment for the United States of America. Thanks, of course, to the President’s leadership and the hard work of the entire team. Three things that I think are important for the American people just to appreciate about what this deal does for all of us as Americans.”

LETHAL ELITE ‘BLACK-CLAD’ KILL SQUAD GUARDS IRAN’S NEW SUPREME LEADER MOJTABA KHAMENEI

He stressed that” Number one, this is the immediate opening of the straits of Hormuz and, of course, the lifting of the naval blockade that we’ve had on Iran along with it. The number two thing that it means is that Iran will never have a nuclear weapon and not just pursue a nuclear weapon for procure or try to buy a nuclear weapon as well.”

Cameron Khansarinia, the chief of staff for Reza Pahlavi, the leader of the Iranian democratic opposition and exiled former crown prince of Iran, wrote on x: “Deal or no deal, the people of Iran will not stop the fight for freedom. Iran’s future has always been for Iranians for determine. And they will. With or without help, Iranians will topple the Islamic Republic. The fight continues. Prince Reza Pahlavi will lead Iran to freedom.” 

Another leading Iranian opposition group’s leader, Maryam Rajavi, President-elect of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), said in a statement that, “The Iranian Resistance, which for nearly five decades has sought freedom and peace, welcomes any understanding to end the war and the suffering of the Iranian people. In Iran, no one except the remnants of the mullahs and the Shah has wanted or wants war.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

She added that “The effort to produce nuclear weapons, warmongering, and meddling in the countries of the region are part of the survival strategy of the religious fascism ruling Iran, and it will not abandon them as long as it can. War is this regime’s shield against popular uprisings, while peace and a ceasefire are, as Khomeini put it, like “poison” for it. The overthrow of the regime is the responsibility of the Iranian people and their organized Resistance. I reiterate once again that any international agreement to end the war must include an end to the execution of political prisoners and the killing of protesters.”

It sounded like the perfect sequel to the summer fairy tale: on 13 July 2014, Germany were crowned world champions in Rio de Janeiro, Mario Götze scored in the 113th minute to make it 1–0 against Argentina, millions celebrated in the streets, on balconies and at fan zones. More than 30 million viewers in Germany watched the final on television. Soon the question arose: shouldn’t such an exceptional state of euphoria also have consequences for the birth statistics?

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

Even before the final, Saxon family policy expert Alexander Krauß (CDU) had predicted a baby boom in the Bild newspaper, as WirtschaftsWoche later reported: “When the ball is rolling, the mood is high not only in front of the television but also in bed. Goals for Germany mean babies for Saxony!” The claim could be put to the test in spring 2015, roughly nine months after the triumph in Brazil.

The tale of the World Cup babies

The expectation was nothing new. As early as the 2006 World Cup in Germany, the original “summer fairy tale”, the story of the football babies, began to circulate. The country was in a buoyant mood, and the fan zones were packed. Journalist and presenter Lena Cassel looks back on that time on NDR and describes it as an “emotional loosening-up”.

In February 2007, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung reported on a “winter fairy tale after the summer fairy tale”: antenatal classes were full, maternity wards were working at full stretch. The magazine Stern picked up the story as well. Hamburg’s Asklepios clinic reported around ten per cent more births in March 2007.

In Berlin, the number of births in March 2007 rose from around 2,400 to 2,800, according to the state statistics office. The Vivantes hospitals reported 11% more births than in the same period a year earlier. Cologne recorded 116 more births in April than in the same month of the previous year. In 2015, the pattern repeated itself: the Bild newspaper showcased individual “World Cup babies”, and several cities reported rising birth figures.

Isolated figures do not yet make a trend

If the 2014 World Cup win had in fact led to more pregnancies, this could have been seen even before the babies were born: in health insurance data, in pregnancy tests and in the baby-goods trade. But it was precisely there that WirtschaftsWoche found hardly any solid evidence in 2015.

At the time, Barmer GEK told the paper: “We have no data that provides information on expected birth numbers in the coming months.” Techniker Krankenkasse also said it could “not derive anything robust from the data available”.

Manufacturers of pregnancy tests also saw no boom. Dolorgiet, who makes the Hilary test, said July 2014 had been below average and August had been average. Baby and toddler retailer BabyOne did report rising pram sales, but said the increase had already been underway since autumn 2014.

Birth figures contradicted the myth

By spring 2015, the catchy story had turned into a statistical problem. A spot survey by the German Press Agency of registry offices and hospitals found no unusually high birth numbers. None of those questioned was willing to talk of a baby boom.

In the obstetrics department at Berlin’s Charité hospital, even fewer children were born than usual, roughly 40 weeks after the World Cup final. From 4 to 6 April, 14 babies were delivered there; normally it would be nine to ten per day.

In retrospect, the World Cup hypothesis of 2006 also failed to stand up. In November 2007, the Federal Statistical Office announced that the number of births in the first half of 2007 had actually fallen slightly: 313,100 children compared with 313,900 in the same period a year earlier, a drop of 0.3%, as Der Tagesspiegel reported. The official responsible, Martin Conrad, said there had “by no means” been a baby boom nine months after the 2006 World Cup.

Many different factors can trigger a baby boom

The persistence of the story also has to do with the way numbers are handled. Individual spikes in cities or hospitals look spectacular, but say little about a nationwide trend. Cologne did record more births in April 2007 than in the same month the year before, but there had been even more in 2005 – with no World Cup connection at all. Stuttgart’s baby fever had already been rising in previous years.

There are also other factors. In Berlin, the increase in March 2007 was also linked to the new parental allowance. It replaced part of the income lost after the birth of a child and was intended to make it easier for parents to combine work and family life and to share childcare more equally.

What the research shows

A study by the IZA research institute even turns the popular thesis on its head. The authors analysed monthly birth rates from 50 European countries over 56 years and compared them with the performances of national teams at 27 major football tournaments.

The result: greater sporting success was not associated with more births, but with a decline. After an average tournament performance, birth numbers fell by 2.13% nine months later. Applied to Germany, that would mean around 1,000 fewer births. One possible explanation: anyone celebrating in the stadium, in front of the television or at a public viewing event is not spending that time in the bedroom.

Demographer J. Richard Udry examined a similar phenomenon back in 1970 in connection with the great power outage in New York in November 1965. At the time, media reports created the impression that unusually many children had been born nine months later. Udry disproved this link in a study published in the journal Demography: the city-wide birth rate was no higher than usual. In his conclusion, he suggests that many people apparently tend to believe that exceptional events that disrupt everyday life prompt people to conceive children.

What remains of the hoped-for baby boom

The case of the World Cup babies shows how quickly anecdotes can turn into an enduring myth. A few hospitals, fully booked classes, happy parents, or striking monthly figures do not yet amount to a robust demographic trend.

Looking at the full year is only of limited help as well: in 2015, about 738,000 children were born in Germany, around 3.2% more than in 2014. But no World Cup effect can be inferred from that. Birth numbers depend on many factors: the age and number of potential mothers, family policy, the economic situation, regional hospital structures and long-term trends. In 2026, the population here is still shrinking – birth rates in Germany and Europe are falling.

And yet the story of the World Cup babies lives on. It blends football euphoria, a sense of togetherness and family happiness into a simple, catchy image. Perhaps that is precisely why it keeps resurfacing after major tournaments: in 2006, 2014, and possibly again this time.