Connect with us

World

Apple Pay: EU accuses Apple of abusing dominant position

Published

on

Apple Pay: EU accuses Apple of abusing dominant position

The European Fee has accused Apple of limiting rivals’ entry to the expertise behind its cell cost system Apple Pay, because it steps up its investigations into suspected violations of EU antitrust guidelines.

The EU’s government arm mentioned on Monday it had despatched a cost sheet generally known as a press release of objections to Apple, detailing how the corporate had abused its dominant place in markets for cell wallets on iOS gadgets. 

The antitrust case may end in a hefty high-quality for the iPhone maker and power it to open its contactless cost expertise to opponents.

Cell wallets depend on near-field communication, or NFC, which makes use of a chip within the cell gadget to wirelessly talk with a service provider’s cost terminal.

The fee mentioned Apple Pay is by far the most important NFC-based cell pockets available on the market and accused the corporate of denying others entry to the favored expertise.

Advertisement

It mentioned the follow “has an exclusionary impact on opponents and results in much less innovation and fewer selection for customers for cell wallets on iPhones.”

“We now have indications that Apple restricted third-party entry to key expertise essential to develop rival cell pockets options on Apple’s gadgets,” EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager mentioned.

“In our assertion of objections, we preliminarily discovered that Apple might have restricted competitors, to the advantage of its personal answer Apple Pay,” she mentioned.

In a press release, Apple mentioned it might proceed to have interaction with the Fee “to make sure European customers have entry to the cost choice of their selection in a secure and safe atmosphere”.

“We designed Apple Pay to supply a straightforward and safe manner for customers to digitally current their present cost playing cards and for banks and different monetary establishments to supply contactless funds for his or her prospects,” the corporate mentioned.

Advertisement

“Apple Pay is just one of many choices obtainable to European customers for making funds, and has ensured equal entry to NFC whereas setting industry-leading requirements for privateness and safety”.

Vestager mentioned the EU takes safety points very severely, however insisted that the bloc’s investigation did not reveal proof that safety dangers would enhance if entry had been to be granted to 3rd events.

“Quite the opposite, proof on our file signifies that Apple’s conduct can’t be justified by safety issues,” she mentioned.

Why is the EU criticising Apple Pay?

Apple Pay is Apple’s personal cell pockets answer on iPhones and iPads, used to allow cell funds in bodily shops and on-line. 

Its NFC “faucet and go” expertise is embedded on Apple cell gadgets for funds in shops, permitting communication between a cell phone and funds terminals in shops. 

Advertisement

The Fee accuses Apple of limiting third-party entry to this expertise, to the advantage of its personal answer.

“The Fee’s preliminary view is that Apple’s dominant place out there for cell wallets on its working system iOS, restricts competitors, by reserving entry to NFC expertise to Apple Pay,” it mentioned in a press release.

“If confirmed, such a conduct could be unlawful underneath our competitors guidelines,” Vestager mentioned.

The Fee did not say how large the fines could possibly be if the costs towards Apple had been finally upheld. It added that its assertion of objections doesn’t prejudge the end result of an investigation.

The case is certainly one of a number of investigations opened towards Apple by EU regulators.

Advertisement

They’re additionally wanting into whether or not the corporate has been violating the bloc’s antitrust legal guidelines by distorting competitors for music streaming by imposing unfair guidelines for rival providers in its App Retailer.

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

World

15 years on, the Tamil survivors of Sri Lanka's brutal civil war live in fear — and disempowerment

Published

on

15 years on, the Tamil survivors of Sri Lanka's brutal civil war live in fear — and disempowerment

MULLAITIVU, Sri Lanka (AP) — At the site of a bloody battlefield that marked the end of Sri Lanka’s civil war, Singaram Soosaimuthu fishes every day with his son, casting nets and reeling them in.

It is a skill he has known for much of his life — and one that he had to relearn after a devastating injury. The former Tamil fighter lost both legs in 2009 as the nation’s generation-long civil war drew to a close and the Tamils retreated in defeat.

Making something of himself despite his injuries brought Soosaimuthu success — an achievement in which he finds profound meaning. He sees his fellow ethnic Tamils in the same light: To regain their voice, they must thrive.

But defeat — bloody, protracted and decisive — has brought Sri Lanka’s minority Tamil community to a point of despair.

Some parents have given up hope of ever learning the fate of the thousands of missing children. Parts of the Tamil lands are decimated, with poor infrastructure and fewer economic opportunities. Survivors have lived under surveillance for years, and many now feel that members of the rising generation have grown too fearful and apathetic toward speaking up for their rights.

Advertisement

“There is a clear agenda underway to degenerate a defeated community,” says Selvin Ireneus, a social activist based in Jaffna, the Tamils’ northern cultural heartland.

The government, he says, doesn’t want today’s Tamils to be politically evolved. After fighting ended, he asserts, narcotics and other vices have been systematically introduced into the region. “They only want them to eat, drink and enjoy and not have a political ideology,” Ireneus said. “This has happened with all defeated communities in the world.”

The island nation of 20 million is overwhelmingly ethnically Sinhalese, with the Tamil community making up about 11% of the population. The separatist civil war broke out in 1983 after years of failed attempts to share power within a unified country, with Tamil fighters — known as the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam, or simply the Tamil Tigers — eventually creating a de facto independent homeland in the country’s north.

The group was crushed in a 2009 government offensive. The war killed at least 100,000 on both sides, and left many more missing.

Though not all Tamils were part of or supported the Tamil Tiger rebel group, their defeat has effectively become a political defeat to the community. They have lost their bargaining power.

Advertisement

“What is remaining now is a very small community, and they don’t have the courage … to show dissent,” says K.T. Ganeshalingam, head of political science at the University of Jaffna.

Sri Lanka’s government had promised the United Nations and countries like India and the United States that they would share power with the Tamil-majority areas to resolve the causes that led to the civil war. However, successive governments have not followed up.

Fifteen years on, some in Tamil areas are still in denial that the armed campaign has been defeated and that the rebel leader Velupillai Prabhakaran, who was seen as invincible, has been killed. Sections of the expatriate Tamils in Europe have been claiming that Prabhakaran would return soon to take on the campaign to the next stage, including a woman who claims to be his daughter and is said to be collecting donations in his name.

Prabhakaran’s nephew in Denmark, Karthic Manoharan, says the time has come to put a stop to the rumors and state, emphatically, that the leader is dead.

“We don’t have any doubt regarding (his death) because he loved his country so much. And he’s not a coward to run from the country and live in another country, in a different country to save himself, his wife and his daughter,” Manoharan says.

Advertisement

Such beliefs are more than simply inaccurate, says Ganeshalingam; they’re genuinely harmful to any possible future that the Tamil people are trying to chart. He wonders: “If I have not grasped the fact that I am defeated, how can I rise from that?”

Discussing the Tamil Tigers’ defeat, their past mistakes and even Prabhakaran’s death is discouraged in Tamil society, especially in the diaspora. Ganeshalingam says such attitudes have created a stagnation in Tamil politics.

Political leaders are divided and are in disarray. A political alliance that the Tamil Tigers formed is fragmented with many leaders breaking away to form their own parties. Civil activists are now working to unify them and strengthen their bargaining position ahead of the presidential election later this year.

In the villages of Mullaitivu district, where the final battle between government forces and the Tamil Tigers unfolded, many men are addicted to narcotics and alcohol, forcing women to be the family’s main breadwinners, says Yogeswari Dharmabaskaran, a social worker in the Udaiyarkattu area of Mullaitivu district. School dropouts soar in the villages, she says, as boys find easy money through selling narcotics, illegal tree-felling and the mining of river sand.

In Jaffna, local politician Thiyagaraja Nirosh says family elders discourage young people from discussing political rights. Because of that, it is difficult to find younger candidates to run in local elections.

Advertisement

“There is fear that talking politics is dangerous. Many family elders do not encourage talking politics,” Nirosh says “The reason is that there has been no justice for the past killings. They see no guarantee that such incidents won’t recur.”

Thayalan Kalaipriya, a former rebel, wonders about the future often. She says her many losses have made her deeply desire unity among all Sri Lankans; at the same time, she says it is painful to realize their efforts to win political rights have been wasted.

Former rebels often do not receive adequate support and at times ex-fighters, like those who conscripted children at the height of the war, are treated with resentment, although she says some respect their commitment and sacrifice.

She finds solace by working with her young children, educating them and helping to give them a good life in a land she hopes is free of civil war and the sad echoes it has caused.

“We teach our children about what happened,” she says, “but never to seek revenge.”

Advertisement

___

Associated Press journalist Nat Castañeda in Copenhagen contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

World

Turkish drone strikes in Syria kill 4 U.S.-backed fighters, wound 11 civilians, Kurdish group says

Published

on

Turkish drone strikes in Syria kill 4 U.S.-backed fighters, wound 11 civilians, Kurdish group says

Turkish drone strikes in northeastern Syria on Friday evening killed four U.S.-backed fighters and wounded 11 civilians, the Kurdish-led force said.

The strikes on areas held by the U.S.-backed and Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces came a day after Turkey’s president said his government won’t hesitate to act against Kurdish-led groups in northern Syria if they proceed with plans to hold local elections. It accuses the groups of having links to outlawed Kurdish militants in Turkey.

TURKEY SENTENCES PRO-KURDISH POLITICIANS TO LENGTHY PRISON TERMS OVER DEADLY 2014 RIOTS

The SDF said drone strikes hit its positions eight times as well as civilian homes and vehicles in and near the northern city of Qamishli. Such Turkish strikes are not uncommon in northeastern Syria.

The Kurdish Red Crescent said that as its paramedics were trying to reach the attacked areas, a Turkish strike hit one of its ambulances, putting it out of service. It said the attack occurred near the town of Amouda, west of Qamishli.

Advertisement

A U.S.-backed force in Syria says Turkish drone strikes in northeastern Syria have killed four Kurdish fighters and wounded 11 civilians. (Fox News Digital)

There was no immediate comment from Turkey.

The Kurdish-led autonomous administration that controls northern and eastern parts of Syria has announced plans to hold municipal elections June 11. The vote to choose mayors will be held in the provinces of Hassakeh, Raqqa, Deir el-Zour and the eastern part of Aleppo province.

On Friday, State Department spokesperson Vedant Patel posted on X that “we don’t think that the conditions for such elections are in place in NE Syria in present time.”

The comments appeared to be a message to Kurdish-led authorities not to hold the elections.

Advertisement

Turkey, which has conducted military operations in Syria in the past, considers the move a step by Syrian Kurdish militants toward the creation of an independent Kurdish entity across its border. It has described the planned polls as a threat to the territorial integrity of both Syria and Turkey.

“We are closely following the aggressive actions by the terrorist organization against the territorial integrity of our country and of Syria under the pretext of an election,” President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Thursday.

Turkey considers the Kurdish militia group, known as the People’s Protection Units, as a terrorist group linked to an outlawed Kurdish group that has led an insurgency in Turkey since 1984. That conflict with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party has killed tens of thousands of people.

The People’s Protection Units provide the backbone of the Syrian Democratic Forces, which is a key U.S. ally in the fight against the Islamic State group. American support for the SDF has infuriated Turkey and remains a major source of friction in their relations.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

World

'Fridays for Future' demonstrators march ahead of EU elections

Published

on

'Fridays for Future' demonstrators march ahead of EU elections

The march comes ahead of the European elections next week, with the demonstrators also emphasising the role of the EU.

ADVERTISEMENT

Supporters of the Friday for Future climate movements took to the streets ahead of the European elections. 

Demonstrators emphasised the role of the European Union in climate protection in climate marches in Berlin and Amsterdam.  

It is now about fighting for democracy and for the climate, some of them said. 

According to the ‘Fridays for Future organisation, more than 13,000 people demonstrated in the German capital. 

In Amsterdam, thousands took to the streets to demand large companies stop financing projects that damage nature, people and the environment.  

Advertisement

“I think it’s particularly important that we take a step forward here now, not just across Germany but also across Europe,” said one demonstrator. 

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending