Connect with us

Utah

Utah State graduate settles racism lawsuit for $45K after he said professor drew ‘coon caricature’ of him

Published

on

Utah State graduate settles racism lawsuit for K after he said professor drew ‘coon caricature’ of him


A Black graduate sued Utah State University earlier this year after he said his professor drew a racist “coon caricature” of him that was displayed on the screen in front of his entire class.

When he tried to report it, Greg Noel said, he felt the process was “belittling” and the school did little to investigate. His concerns drew statewide attention about discrimination in higher education.

Now, Noel is set to receive $45,000 as a payout for what he went through.

The amount comes as part of a settlement signed by school officials this week that will also effectively end his lawsuit. The Salt Lake Tribune received a copy of the agreement through a public records request.

Advertisement

“With this case resolved, we’ll continue to move forward in creating a culture of belonging at Utah State University,” the school said, in part, in a statement Friday. USU does not admit fault in the case.

Noel’s attorneys didn’t respond to a request for comment from The Tribune.

When he initially filed his case in March, Noel had said: “Enough is enough. I felt betrayed by Utah State University. I felt completely betrayed.”

The case marks at least the fourth major settlement for the northern Utah university since 2018. Combined, the public school in Logan has paid out nearly $1 million for those agreements, which are ultimately funded by taxpayers.

Those other cases involve two lawsuits for sexual assault and one for retaliation, as USU has faced a slew of litigation over the past few years.

Advertisement

In Noel’s case, the school said it has worked over the last year to improve its outreach and support in its office of equity.

“Whenever there are allegations of discrimination, USU strives to address and prevent the behavior and provide a fair and equitable process to resolve grievances,” according to the statement.

In his court documents and in an interview, Noel described feeling targeted by a professor, who he said made off-color comments about his Haitian background and refused to support him, the only Black student in the marriage and family therapy graduate school program.

Noel said he chose not to name the professor in the lawsuit for fear of further retaliation; the professor is involved in the mental health profession in Utah and still works at the school in a leadership position. Noel is currently working at a private practice.

The mistreatment, Noel said, started in October 2018, during his first semester at Utah State.

Advertisement

A computer he was using in a lab shorted out and deleted four pages of his assignment. Frustrated, Noel acknowledged, he shouted a few profanities and pushed a chair. The professor learned of the outburst, Noel said, and emailed Noel to say they needed to meet to talk about it.

At the meeting, the professor allegedly accused Noel of being violent and questioned whether he was abusive to others, including his wife.

Noel said the professor then asked him in a derogatory tone: “Was that you going full Haitian?”

Noel said he was stunned by what he saw a racist comment. But he tried to brush it off, knowing he had to work with the professor going forward.

After that, Noel said he felt like the professor was purposefully ignoring him in class discussions. The professor also continually mentioned how much power he had over graduate students and their future careers, Noel said.

Advertisement

Noel hit the tipping point in 2020, he said, and reported his concerns to the university after the white professor drew a cartoon image that Noel feels was supposed to be an exaggerated depiction of him as “the angry Black man.”

In the drawing, Noel’s tall, groomed afro was depicted even taller and sticking out wildly. His thick eyebrows were thicker and angry and furrowed, along with a huge mustache that took up much of his face. His skin was darker, too.

(Screenshot) A image included in the lawsuit filed by Greg Noel shows his picture next to the drawing that his Utah State University made of him in March 2020.

It reminded Noel, he said, of the racist “coon caricatures” drawn of Black people in the late 1800s and early 1900s in the South — showing them with dramatic and stereotyped features, like big lips and feet, and either an attitude of anger or laziness — that were used to argue for the return of slavery.

The professor didn’t appear to realize others could see the image, as he played a prerecorded training on a screen at the front of the room. But the drawing reflected from his computer onto the screen, where it was visible to the class.

Advertisement

Other students also recognized Noel in it, taking pictures of the display and sending them to Noel, according to his lawsuit. “Hahah! Look what he’s doing,” a classmate texted. “Why is he drawing you?” said another in a text thread. “That’s totally you. So weird.”

Noel filed a report with USU’s Office of Equity in March 2020 about his experiences with the professor — months before he was set to graduate.

The process took two years, ending in May 2022, with no consequences for the professor — despite findings from the equity office that the drawing was inappropriate and a recommendation to place a warning letter in the professor’s file. That suggestion was dismissed by a higher-up administrator at the school, email records confirm.

Noel said he felt the university failed him in that resolution and by doing little to actually look into his allegations. And with so few students of color at USU — 82% of the school is white and less than 1% is Black — he worried the school might not listen to future students of color reporting racism.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Utah

Judge hears arguments in case alleging Utah’s ‘school choice’ program is unconstitutional • Utah News Dispatch

Published

on

Judge hears arguments in case alleging Utah’s ‘school choice’ program is unconstitutional • Utah News Dispatch


Should Utah’s “school choice” program be allowed to stay put — or is it unconstitutional?

That’s the question that a judge is now weighing after spending several hours listening to oral arguments Thursday.

In the hearing, 3rd District Court Judge Laura Scott grilled attorneys for both the state and for Utah’s largest teacher union, the Utah Education Association, on the complex constitutional questions she must now unravel before issuing a ruling in the case — which she said she expects to hand down sometime in mid-to-late January. 

Earlier this year, the Utah Education Association filed a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the Utah Fits All “scholarship program,” which the 2023 Utah Legislature created as an effort to offer “school choice” options by setting up a fund from which eligible K-12 students can receive up to $8,000 for education expenses including private school tuition and fees, homeschooling, tutoring services, testing fees, materials and other expenses. 

Advertisement

Utah’s largest teacher union files lawsuit against Utah Fits All school choice voucher program

In 2023, lawmakers appropriated about $42.5 million in ongoing income tax revenue to the program. Then this year they nearly doubled that ongoing funding by adding an additional $40 million. In total, the program uses about $82.5 million in taxpayer funding a year. 

That is, if the courts allow it to continue to exist. 

In its lawsuit, the Utah Education Association alleges it’s an unconstitutional “voucher” program that diverts money from Utah’s public school system — using income tax dollars that they contend are earmarked under the Utah Constitution for the public education system and should not be funneled to private schools or homeschooling in the form of the Utah Fits All scholarship program.

The Utah Constitution has historically required the state’s income tax revenue be used only for public education, though that constitutional earmark has been loosened twice — once in 1996 to allow income tax revenue to be spent on public higher education, and once in 2020 with voter-approved Amendment G, which opened income tax revenue to be used to “support children and to support individuals with a disability.” 

Advertisement
Scott Ryther during a hearing on Utah Education Association’s lawsuit against the Utah Fits All Scholarship (voucher) program, in Salt Lake City on Dec. 19, 2024. (Pool photo by Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune)

This year the Utah Legislature tried to remove that education earmark completely by putting Amendment A on the Nov. 5 ballot — but that effort failed after a judge voided the question because lawmakers failed to properly publish the proposed constitutional amendment in newspapers across the state. 

Attorneys representing state officials, the Alliance for Choice in Education (a group that the Utah State Board of Education chose to administer the program), and parents of students benefiting from the program urged the judge to dismiss the lawsuit. 

They argued the Utah Legislature acted within its constitutional constraints when it created the program. They contended that when Amendment G added to the Utah Constitution the word “children” as an allowable use for income tax dollars, that created a “broad” yet “not ambiguous” category that allowed Utah lawmakers to use the revenue for the Utah Fits All scholarship fund. 

Attorneys for the Utah Education Association, however, argued that when legislators put Amendment G on the ballot and pitched it to voters, their stated intentions did not include using the funding for private school vouchers. Rather, they argued it was characterized as an effort to narrowly open the revenue up to “social services” for children and people with disabilities. 

Ramya Ravindran during a hearing on Utah Education Association’s lawsuit against the Utah Fits All Scholarship (voucher) program, in Salt Lake City on Dec. 19, 2024. (Pool photo by Trent Nelson/The Salt Lake Tribune)

The judge repeatedly questioned state attorneys about their position, asking for clarity on the state’s interpretation of the Utah Constitution and whether it would allow Utah lawmakers the power to create a “shadow” or “parallel” education system that could funnel public dollars to private schools, which can select students based on religion, political beliefs, family makeup or other criteria. In contrast, Utah’s public school system must be free and open to all. 

Arif Panju, an attorney representing parents who intervened in the case to argue in favor of protecting the Utah Fits All program, argued parents have a “fundamental right” to exercise their “school choice” options. 

Advertisement

“The mere fact that they can use a private scholarship … does not transform those options into a shadow system,” Panju argued. 

But to Scott, that still didn’t answer her question. 

“I’m getting a little frustrated,” Scott said, adding that she wasn’t trying to debate school choice but rather she was trying to conduct a constitutional analysis. 

Ultimately, state attorneys conceded their position could open the door to a “parallel” or “shadow” system — however, they argued that’s not what is being debated in this case. They argued the Utah Fits All program was funded only after the Utah Legislature appropriately funded its education system, as required by the Utah Constitution (which does not set a specific threshold). 

When the hearing’s time ran out at about 4:30 p.m., Scott said she would take the issue under advisement, and she would not be ruling from the bench. 

Advertisement

“I’m hopeful for mid-to-late January,” she said, “but I’m not making any promises I won’t take the entirety of the 60 days” that she has to make a decision. 

YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Green Beret calls for more to be done in search for missing Utah National Guardsman

Published

on

Green Beret calls for more to be done in search for missing Utah National Guardsman


SALT LAKE CITY — There’s frustration in the search to find the body of a missing member of the Utah National Guard, presumed murdered by his wife.

Matthew Johnson has been missing for nearly three months, and one of his fellow Green Berets said more should be done to find him.

“I think more can be done,” said John Hash, Utah Army National Guard 19th Special Forces Group.

Hash served with Johnson for 12 years in the Utah Guard’s 19th Special Forces Group and became friends outside of work. He was stunned to learn Johnson’s wife, Jennifer Gledhill, was arrested and charged for his murder.

Advertisement

Cottonwood Heights police officers escort Jennifer Gledhill into a police car on Wednesday, Oct. 2, 2024. Police say she shot and killed her husband as he slept. (Ed Collins, KSL TV)

“Having had Jen in our home before, you know, breaking bread with them, it turned out she’s responsible for his death; it was shocking, frankly,” Hash said.

That pain made it worse that Johnson’s body is still out there somewhere. Hash would like Utah Gov. Spencer Cox to get the National Guard out looking.

“I’d like to see the Governor commit openly to finding Matt, to bringing him home and giving him a proper burial,” he said.

A photo of Matthew Johnson and John Hash.

A photo of Matthew Johnson and John Hash. (Courtesy John Hash)

Advertisement

While the governor can call them out, the National Guard said that’s not what they do.

“This is a local law enforcement issue and not a National Guard or a state level issue. Human recovery is not a mission that’s specifically a National Guard mission or something that we specifically train for,” said Lt. Col. Chris Kroeber, Public Affairs Officer for the Utah Army National Guard.

It’s not necessarily an answer Hash wants to hear.

“You don’t give up, you leave no one behind, you bring him home, and he’s home, we just can’t find him, let’s find him,” Hash said.

Cottonwood Heights police, the agency in charge of the search for Johnson, said they didn’t have an update and are doing all they can to find him.

Advertisement

KSL TV contacted the Governor’s Office Thursday night but didn’t immediately hear back.



Source link

Continue Reading

Utah

Liquor licenses go to 7 Utah restaurants and 3 bars, including Kiitos’ Sugar House location

Published

on

Liquor licenses go to 7 Utah restaurants and 3 bars, including Kiitos’ Sugar House location


Utah’s liquor commission approved licenses for three bars and and seven restaurants Thursday, including the long-awaited second location of Kiitos Brewing.

The commission for the Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Services’ (DABS) also learned that a program to allow customers to “round up” purchases to the nearest dollar — and donate the difference to help unsheltered Utahns — has been successful in its first weeks.

During the board’s monthly meeting Thursday, Todd Darrington, DABS’ director of finance, said $87,989 had been raised so far for the Pamela Atkinson Homeless Account, to support its homelessness services.

Commissioner Jacquelyn Orton said she found that number to be “extraordinary.”

Advertisement

Through Feb. 28, shoppers at Utah’s state-run liquor stores will also find donation boxes, each supporting a different local charity. With the donation of coats, canned goods, pet food and more, customers can help organizations (see a full list at ABS.utah.gov) that support people and animals across the state.

DABS director Tiffany Clason spoke about the importance of having a plan for a safe ride home when people go out to drink. That’s why DABS has partnered with WCF Insurance and the Utah Department of Public Safety, she said, to have WCF offer $10 rideshare vouchers for bar patrons needing a ride home. People can get the vouchers by scanning a QR code at the door of the bar they’re visiting.

The bars that received their licenses Thursday are:

• SnowmoBAR, 877 S. 200 West, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 1, 2025). This bar will be a rebrand of Snowmobile Pizza, which has been closed since August for a remodel.

• Eleven Nightclub, downtown Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 10, 2025).

Advertisement

• Kiitos Brewing, 1533 S. 1100 East, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 28, 2025). Business manager Jamie Kearns said February is looking more likely for the opening of this second Kiitos location, in Sugar House.

The restaurants that received their licenses are:

• Don Miguel’s, 453 S. Main St., Cedar City.

• The Hub, 1165 S. Main St., Heber City.

• Cody’s Gastro Garage, 2100 S. Main St., Nephi (conditional).

Advertisement

• Back Spin Bistro, St. George (conditional, projected opening Jan. 1, 2025).

• Cosmica, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Jan. 15, 2025).

• Lucky Slice Pizza, 37 W. Center Street, Logan (conditional, projected opening Feb. 1, 2025; this is a new location).

• Hash Kitchen, Salt Lake City (conditional, projected opening Feb. 14, 2025).





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending