Connect with us

Health

Trump's daylight saving time plan and sleep: What you must know

Published

on

Trump's daylight saving time plan and sleep: What you must know

Join Fox News for access to this content

Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

Please enter a valid email address.

Having trouble? Click here.

President-elect Donald Trump wants to do away with daylight saving time (DST), a move that some experts say could improve health and wellness.

Trump announced the goal in a post on Truth Social last Friday.

Advertisement

“The Republican Party will use its best efforts to eliminate Daylight Saving Time, which has a small but strong constituency, but shouldn’t!” he wrote. “Daylight Saving Time is inconvenient, and very costly to our Nation.”

‘I CAN’T SLEEP BECAUSE OF RACING THOUGHTS AT NIGHT — HOW CAN I STOP THEM?’: ASK A DOCTOR

With rare exceptions, the vast majority of the U.S. follows DST, which mandates adjusting clocks forward one hour in the spring (the second Sunday in March) to extend daylight during summer evenings. 

In the fall (the first Sunday in November), the clocks are turned back to standard time.

President-elect Donald Trump wants to do away with daylight saving time (DST), he announced in a post on Truth Social. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon; iStock)

Advertisement

The practice was first introduced in 1918 with the Standard Time Act, a wartime measure designed to conserve energy during World War I, according to the U.S. Department of Defense.

It was again implemented in 1942 during World War II to conserve fuel and “promote national security and defense.”

For two decades, the rule was not enforced, until Congress passed the Uniform Time Act in 1966, a federal mandate that established daylight saving time.

Doing away with disruption

Dr. Earnest Lee Murray, a board-certified neurologist at Jackson-Madison County General Hospital in Jackson, Tennessee, supports Trump’s aim to do away with DST.

“Honestly, it’s about time, no pun intended,” he told Fox News Digital. “The historical reason for DST doesn’t really matter anymore.”

Advertisement

“Honestly, it’s about time, no pun intended.”

Changing the clocks twice a year can cause disruptions in sleep patterns, which have been known to cause various health-related issues, according to Murray. 

“Most of the issues occur in the springtime when transitioning to daylight saving time (losing an hour of sleep),” he said.

Changing the clocks twice a year can cause disruptions in sleep patterns, which have been known to cause various health-related issues. (iStock)

Several studies have shown that this change results in decreased sleep duration and increased fatigue during daytime hours, the doctor noted.  

Advertisement

“This often affects cognitive performance and seems to slow thought processing,” Murray added. 

Mood issues, particularly depression, have been shown to increase during time changes.

Several studies have shown that the time change results in decreased sleep duration and increased fatigue during daytime hours. (iStock)

“Several studies have also shown an increased risk of stroke during the first two to three days from the time switch,” Murray said.

“This correlates to the disruption in the circadian rhythm — and likely the overall stress it causes on the body.”

Advertisement

SLEEPY DURING THE DAY? IT COULD BE AN EARLY WARNING SIGN OF DEMENTIA, STUDY SUGGESTS

Jonathan Alpert, a psychotherapist in Manhattan and Washington, D.C., agreed that sleep quality might improve if daylight saving time is eliminated.

“The abrupt shift in time can disrupt sleep patterns, leading to poor sleep quality and fatigue,” he told Fox News Digital. 

“If daylight saving time is eliminated, it would help maintain a consistent sleep schedule, thereby reducing some of the issues stemming from poor sleep quality.”

One psychotherapist said his patients are more tired and less focused following the time change. (iStock)

Advertisement

Alpert said he notices the effects of the time change on his own patients each spring and fall.

“My patients are more tired and less focused, and often complain about an increase in stress,” he noted. “A stable time system could mitigate these effects.”

“The abrupt shift in time can disrupt sleep patterns, leading to poor sleep quality and fatigue.”

“Ultimately, having a consistent time system would allow people to stay more alert, and we might see an increase in productivity.”

Consistent light and dark cycles are also critical for regulating the body’s circadian rhythm, Alpert pointed out.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“Disruptions caused by daylight saving have been linked to an increase in mood disorders, which is consistent with what I see in my practice,” he said.

There could also be a decrease in accidents and workplace injuries, as studies show these often increase following the time change, according to the psychotherapist. 

‘A seasonal shift’? 

Despite the likely benefits, there could be a downside to eliminating DST, Alpert said.

“Shorter evening daylight hours could potentially affect people’s motivation to be active or social after work,” one expert said, noting that seasonal affective disorder (SAD) isn’t just a winter phenomenon. (iStock)

Advertisement

“Without daylight saving time, there would be fewer hours of sunlight in the evening during spring and summer. This could reduce opportunities for outdoor activities after work, which many people find enjoyable and beneficial for mental health,” he told Fox News Digital. 

“I’d have real concerns about how this might impact people, especially people who have been prone to mood issues.”

 

Seasonal affective disorder (SAD) isn’t just a winter phenomenon, the expert noted.  

“Shorter evening daylight hours could potentially affect people’s motivation to be active or social after work.”

Advertisement

“People will adapt and adjust if a change is made — and will ultimately thrive.”

Also, given how long most Americans have been adjusting their clocks, it could be “difficult or even disorienting” for people to adjust to not having DST, said Alpert — “as for many people, it signifies a seasonal shift.”

For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health

“My guess is that if a change is made, there will be backlash, as the arguments for eliminating it are as compelling as those for keeping it,” Alpert predicted.  

He added, “That said, over time, people will adapt and adjust if a change is made — and will ultimately thrive.”

Advertisement

Health

New cancer vaccine delivers stunning result against one of the deadliest skin cancers

Published

on

New cancer vaccine delivers stunning result against one of the deadliest skin cancers

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A new injectable therapy is showing positive results in reducing melanoma throughout a five-year period.

The personalized mRNA cancer therapy, called intismeran autogene, combined with the cancer immunotherapy drug KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), is a collaboration between Merck and Moderna.

The results from the phase 2b KEYNOTE-942 study were presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting in Chicago on May 27.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

Advertisement

After about a five-year follow-up, the combo drug was found to reduce the risk of melanoma recurrence or death by 49% compared to pembrolizumab alone.

The researchers analyzed data from 157 patients with high-risk stage 3 and 4 melanoma whose cancer had been removed via surgery. The participants were split into two groups — one received the combo therapy and the other only received pembrolizumab, according to a press release.

The therapy was found to reduce the risk of melanoma recurrence or death by 49% compared to pembrolizumab alone after a five-year follow-up. (iStock)

The findings revealed that the combination group saw benefits that were “sustained and durable over time.”

Intismeran autogene is designed using mutations identified in a patient’s own tumor, with the intention of teaching the immune system what the cancer looks like so that it can recognize and attack it.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

According to the researchers, intismeran is “well-tolerated” with a “manageable” safety profile. 

The most commonly cited side effects of the personalized mRNA vaccine plus KEYTRUDA were fatigue, injection-site pain, chills, fever and headache. The researchers reported no new long-term safety concerns and no severe vaccine-related adverse events.

The combination therapy is currently being evaluated in a phase 3 study — the final confirmation stage.

Patients with late-stage melanoma have a “significant risk” of cancer recurrence, according to an expert. (iStock)

Advertisement

In a Merck press release from January, Kyle Holen, MD, Moderna’s senior vice president and head of development, oncology and therapeutics, noted that this data highlights the “potential of a prolonged benefit … in patients with resected high-risk melanoma.”

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

“We continue to invest in our platform in oncology because of encouraging outcomes like these, which illustrate mRNA’s potential in cancer care,” he said.  

Dr. Marjorie Green, senior vice president and head of oncology, global clinical development at Merck Research Laboratories, also commented that for many patients with stage 3 or 4 melanoma, there is a “significant risk of recurrence following surgery.”

Researchers confirmed that the combination therapy is currently being evaluated in a phase 3 study. (iStock)

Advertisement

“As such, demonstrating the longer-term potential of intismeran autogene and KEYTRUDA to reduce the risk of recurrence for certain patients with melanoma is a meaningful milestone,” she said.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

The company cited encouraging five-year follow-up data and pointed to upcoming late-stage INTerpath trial results with Moderna in several hard-to-treat cancers.

Continue Reading

Health

New ways to prevent flu revealed in ‘accidental’ lab breakthrough, study finds

Published

on

New ways to prevent flu revealed in ‘accidental’ lab breakthrough, study finds

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

An accidental lab discovery has opened the door to entirely new ways of preventing the flu.

While investigating how influenza replicates, researchers discovered that different flu strains use completely different strategies to infiltrate human cells, SWNS reported.

By targeting the specific molecules the viruses rely on, scientists found that they could block them from entering new cells and halt their replication altogether.

5 THINGS YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE GETTING YOUR FLU SHOT, ACCORDING TO DOCTORS

Advertisement

Researchers say these “fundamental insights” into seasonal influenza highlight a clear path toward developing better preventive medications.

“The hope is that fundamental, curiosity-based research like this helps to pave the way for novel strategies to treat and prevent influenza infections,” principal investigator Dr. Emily Bruce, from the University of Vermont’s Larner College of Medicine, said in the SWNS report.

While investigating how influenza replicates, researchers discovered that different flu strains use completely different strategies to infiltrate human cells. (iStock)

While several flu strains cause illness, H1N1 and H3N2 influenza A viruses are the most common. However, current flu tests cannot differentiate between them, and clinical treatments are identical for both.

Although vaccines and antivirals are available, Bruce noted a “dire” need for better medications to stop the virus from spreading cell to xxcell.

Advertisement

“You don’t get sick when a virus is in one cell,” he noted. “You get sick because a virus replicates itself and goes into many more cells.”

HOW LONG YOU’RE CONTAGIOUS WITH THE FLU — AND WHEN IT’S SAFE TO GO OUT

The study, which was published in The Journal of Virology, originally aimed to map how viral RNA segments are transported within cells to create new viral particles.

The team used H1N1 and H3N2 viruses isolated from the nasal passages of positive patients in 2022.

Clinical treatments remain identical for both primary strains of the flu virus. (iStock)

Advertisement

During the investigation, the team unexpectedly stumbled upon a cellular pathway that blocked the virus from entering lung cells, SWNS reported.

RESEARCHERS LOCKED FLU PATIENTS IN A HOTEL WITH HEALTHY ADULTS — NO ONE GOT SICK

The data revealed that when a specific human protein called Rab11B was depleted, H3N2 viruses failed to enter human lung cells. H1N1 viruses were completely unaffected.

Using reverse genetics, the team mapped this defect and uncovered a brand-new, H3N2-specific role for Rab11B during viral entry.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

Advertisement

This discovery challenged the scientific assumption that all flu viruses enter cells the same way.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

“Viruses are like pirates from different countries hijacking someone’s ship,” Bruce said. “Different viruses, like different types of pirates, use different methods to get onboard.”

This discovery challenged the scientific assumption that all flu viruses enter cells the same way. (iStock)

“We had previously thought that all flu viruses used the same way to get into a cell, but we discovered that this is not true,” she went on. “H1N1 and H3N2 need different proteins to get in, and if you get rid of the right protein, a specific virus can’t get in.”

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

While these findings identify a critical cellular pathway for viral entry, the study was conducted using isolated cells, the researchers acknowledged.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

Further research is needed to determine whether blocking the protein is safe and effective within a live, complex human respiratory system.

Bruce and the team hope to conduct further research to determine whether this Rab11B-dependency is a fundamental property of H3N2, or if it’s a trait unique to currently circulating flu strains.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Health

One extra serving of processed meat a day linked to higher cancer risk

Published

on

One extra serving of processed meat a day linked to higher cancer risk

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Eating processed meat like ham, sausage and bacon may be linked to a higher risk of certain types of cancer, according to new research.

While health organizations have already confirmed that processed meat can contribute to colon cancer, this study looked closer at cancers in the upper digestive tract, where the link has historically been less clear.

To understand these connections, researchers from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC), one of the world’s largest long-term nutrition and cancer cohorts, tracked the health and diets of 450,112 people across Europe for an average of 14 years. 

FREQUENT HEARTBURN MAY BE A WARNING SIGN OF A MORE DANGEROUS CONDITION, DOCTOR SAYS

Advertisement

The study group included 131,426 men and 318,686 women, according to the study’s press release.

During the follow-up period, 876 people developed stomach cancer and 215 people developed esophageal adenocarcinoma, which is cancer of the tube connecting the mouth to the stomach.

For female participants, eating both processed meat and white meat was linked to an increased risk of developing the disease. (iStock)

Researchers tracked where the stomach cancers grew, separating them into the upper part of the stomach near the throat and the lower part of the stomach.

The researchers also sorted the tumors into two categories based on how the cancer cells appeared under a microscope: intestinal, which forms more organized structures, and diffuse, in which the cells are more scattered throughout the tissue.

Advertisement

BACTERIA IN YOUR MOUTH MAY TRAVEL TO THE GUT AND TRIGGER STOMACH CANCER, RESEARCH FINDS

After adjusting for other lifestyle factors, the researchers found that for every extra 30 grams of processed meat a person ate per day, their overall risk of stomach cancer went up by 9%. Eating that same extra 30 grams a day was also linked to a 13% higher risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma.

A standard single slice of regular deli-sliced ham or lunch meat averages around 28 grams, according to USDA data and nutritional tracking databases.

An extra 20 grams of white meat, such as chicken and turkey, was linked to a 12% higher risk of cancer in the main body of the stomach. (iStock)

An extra 20 grams of white meat, such as chicken or turkey, was linked to a 12% higher risk of cancer in the main body of the stomach, the researchers noted.

Advertisement

The study also revealed differences between men and women. For male participants, only processed meat showed a clear, statistically significant link to a higher risk of stomach cancer. For female participants, however, eating both processed meat and white meat was linked to an increased risk.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE HEALTH STORIES

These findings align with global health benchmarks, particularly those established by the World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer.

The agency has long classified processed meat as a known human carcinogen, primarily due to its strong, well-documented links to colorectal cancer.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR HEALTH NEWSLETTER

Advertisement

However, health organizations have also consistently pointed to a potential, yet less definitive, relationship between these meats and cancers of the stomach.

Eating 30 grams of processed meat a day, or the equivalent to one slice of ham, was linked to a 13% higher risk of esophageal adenocarcinoma. (iStock)

Further scientific investigation is needed to confirm the findings and to account for other underlying risk factors, such as certain stomach infections, which could interact with dietary habits.

TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ

A key limitation of the study is its reliance on self-reported diets, which can sometimes lead to inaccuracies in how participants recall their meat consumption over time, the researchers noted.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

The findings were published in the International Journal of Cancer.

Fox News Digital reached out to the researchers requesting comment.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending