The federal government has failed to give adequate information on deaths of killer whales and other marine mammals that become entangled in commercial trawling gear in Alaska waters, claims a lawsuit filed on Thursday in U.S. District Court in Anchorage.

The lawsuit, filed by the environmental group Oceana, targets the National Marine Fisheries Service, an agency of the National Oceanic and atmospheric Administration.

The whales and other marine mammals killed in fishing gear are subjects of what is known as bycatch, the unintended, incidental catch of species that are not the harvest target.

The lawsuit focuses on three Freedom of Information Act requests filed by Oceana from 2021 to 2023. Oceana asked for records, photographs and videos of animals that have been killed as bycatch in Alaska fisheries. The agency denied some requests and provided information in response to others, but that information was heavily redacted, with photographs blurred and made unrecognizable through a pixelation technique and text blacked out, the lawsuit said.

Distorted photos sent to Oceana included images of whales, Steller sea lions, a walrus, and bearded, fur and ribbon seals, according to the complaint, which seeks to compel the agency to provide more complete information.

NMFS justified the redactions and image distortions as necessary to protect confidentiality, according to the lawsuit. But Oceana, in its lawsuit, said those redactions “are not based on any valid legal requirement to protect confidential information and are not consistent” with applicable laws: the Freedom of Information Act, the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act and the Marine Mammal Protection Act.

“Public access to information is essential to hold the government accountable and ensure U.S. fisheries are managed sustainably,” Tara Brock, Oceana’s Pacific legal director and senior counsel, said in a statement issued by the organization. “The unlawful withholding of information by the Fisheries Service related to the deaths of whales, fish, and other ocean life is unacceptable. People have the right to know how commercial fisheries impact marine wildlife.”

Oceana filed a related lawsuit on Thursday in the U.S. District Court of Central California over bycatch of various species of mammals and fish by the halibut trawl fishery that operates off that state’s coast.

An altered photo of a killer whale that died as bycatch in Alaska trawl gear is part of the evidence presented by Oceana in a lawsuit against the National Marine Fisheries Service. The lawsuit, filed onThursday, cites this an other photos provided by NMFS as evidence that the agency is withholding important information about marine mammal deaths in the Alaska trawl fisheries. (Photo provided by Oceana)

That halibut harvest “catches enormous quantities of marine species as bycatch,” which “results in the injury and death of thousands of fish and other animals,” including Dungeness crab, giant sea bass, elephant seals, harbor porpoises and cormorants, among other species. That halibut fishery “has the highest bycatch rate in the nation,” and it discards about 77% of the fish it catches, the lawsuit said.

The National Marine Fisheries Service declined to comment on the lawsuits filed Thursday.

The legal actions follow a period with an unusually high number of killer whales ensnared in trawl gear used to harvest Bering Sea fish. Nearly a dozen killer whales were found dead in 2023, compared to 37 cases of killer whale deaths in fishing gear that were recorded in Alaska from 1991 to 2022.

A different environmental organization, the Center for Biological Diversity, last year filed a notice of intent to sue NMFS over the trawl bycatch of whales and other marine mammals.

So far, no such lawsuit has been filed, said Cooper Freeman, the center’s Alaska director. Instead, his organization has been meeting with NMFS to try to find ways to reduce the dangers to marine mammals from trawling, he said.

“At this point we have not decided to bring a lawsuit although we continue to have very, very serious concerns about the fisheries and are tracking the harms,” Freeman said.

The agency has pledged some corrective action, Freeman said. It has committed to reassess harms to endangered species and it has promised to analyze Alaska’s killer whales as separate populations, one in the Bering Sea and the other in the Gulf of Alaska, he said. Lumping the two populations as one can understate the impacts of bycatch deaths, he said.

Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.

After months of store closures and filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, Big Lots is preparing to close all of its locations, according to a news release issued by the company on Thursday.

More than 400 stores have already been closed by the retailer in 2024 with the remaining ones set to hold “going out of business” sales. The company said it would continue to serve customers in-store and online and did not specify how long the sales would last.

“The Company is preparing to commence going out of business sales at all remaining Big Lots store locations in the coming days to protect the value of its estate,” Big Lots said in the news release.

CEO Bruce Thorn said the closures could be reversed if a company sale is completed.

The announcement comes as the company has already announced the closures of 24 locations in Arizona since July. Here’s the remaining Big Lots that are now closing.

Which Big Lots in Arizona are closing?

• Bullhead City: 2350 Miracle Mile
• Casa Grande: 1346 E. Florence Blvd.
• Glendale: 6660 W. Cactus Road
• Kingman: 3320 N. Stockton Hills Road
• Lake Havasu City: 1799 Kiowa Ave.
• Mesa: 1110 W. Southern Ave.
• Show Low: 4421 S. White Mountain Road
• Sierra Vista: 135 S. Highway 92
• Surprise: 14537 W. Grand Ave.
• Yuma: 1625 S. Fourth Ave.

More store closings: Macy’s to close 65 stores. Here’s how Arizona locations could be affected

Reach the reporter at reia.li@gannett.com. Follow @Reialirui on X, formerly Twitter.

What’s New

More Americans left California between 2023 and 2024 than any other state across the country, according to new data released by the Census Bureau.

The Golden State lost a total of 239,575 residents to other states, the largest net domestic migration loss in the country over the past year. New York, another blue bastion in the country, saw the second-highest loss, losing a total of 120,917 residents between 2023 and 2024.

Why It Matters

The findings confirm an ongoing trend in the Western U.S. and specifically the Golden State, which has lost thousands of residents to the South in recent years, especially during the pandemic.

The California population drain, according to research compiled by the Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), is mainly due to people’s desire to live in more affordable places: several studies have found that the cost of housing alone is a key reason for people to leave the Golden State.

California is among the top five states with the highest overall cost of living in the country, SIEPR reported. The median sale price of a home in the state, according to Redfin’s latest data, is $831,300, up 4.7 percent compared to a year earlier. That was nearly double the nationwide median sale price of a home at $430,010.

Most of those who’ve left California in recent years have gone to states like Texas and Arizona—a red state and a swing state, respectively. President-elect Donald Trump won both in November. Two-thirds of those who moved out of California told SIEPR that they didn’t do so because of politics, but the political impact of their decision is undeniable. One quarter told the institute that they had moved explicitly for political reasons.

What To Know

Where California is losing, Texas is gaining. The Lone Star State continues to welcome new residents and lead the country with the largest net domestic migration gain between 2023 and 2024, totaling 85,267 new residents over the past year. Texas has several benefits attracting people that California doesn’t offer: the state has no income tax, it’s cut off from the Western Interconnection electric system and has been building more new homes, whereas the Golden State is still going through a homelessness crisis and a housing shortage.

Overall, the U.S. population grew by nearly 1.0 percent between 2023 and 2024, surpassing 340 million in total. This population growth, the fastest the country has seen in a year since 2001, was mainly due to rising net international migration, the bureau reported. Net international migration refers to any change of residence across U.S. borders.

Newsweek contacted the Census Bureau for comment by email on Friday morning.

What People Are Saying

“California is no longer the preferred destination it used to be,” Hans Johnson, a demographer at the nonpartisan Public Policy Institute of California, told the Los Angeles Times in April, discussing the issue of people moving out of the Golden State.

What’s Next

It’s not all gloom and doom for California. The state was among 47 including the District of Columbia which experienced population gains of over 100,000 people between 2023 and 2024, adding a total of 232,570 residents in the past year. Despite the fact the state is trailing Texas and Florida, it still reported the third-highest numeric increase in the nation.

The Golden State had the second-highest increase in births outnumbering deaths (what’s known as natural increase) after Texas, at 110,466.

Together with Florida (411,322) and Texas (319,569), California saw one of the largest gains from international migration, at 361,057. Net international migration refers to any change of residence across U.S. borders.

The Golden State was also the most populous in the country, with an estimated population of 39,431,263 residents as of July 1, followed by Texas with 31,290,831 and Florida with 23,372,215.

Overall, the U.S. population grew by nearly 1.0 percent between 2023 and 2024, surpassing 340 million in total. This population growth, the fastest the country has seen in a year since 2001, was mainly due to rising net international migration, the bureau reported.

Should it continue, California’s population drain could drastically change the state’s job market and fiscal outlook, as well as cause the state to lose further congressional seats.

Have you left California for another state in the past few years? We’d love to hear your story. Contact g.carbonaro@newsweek.com