Connect with us

San Francisco, CA

Robots take the wheel as San Francisco opens streets to driverless taxis

Published

on

Robots take the wheel as San Francisco opens streets to driverless taxis


The future of urban transportation is here, and it’s taking the form of sleek, autonomous vehicles traveling through city streets. Across the United States, self-driving car companies are racing to revolutionize how we move, promising safer roads, reduced traffic and a new era of mobility. But it’s in San Francisco that this future is suddenly now a reality for thousands.

Waymo, the Google-owned autonomous vehicle pioneer, is available to everyone in the city by the bay. Imagine cruising through the iconic streets of San Francisco without worrying about parking, navigating steep hills or designating a driver after a night out. 

That’s the promise Waymo is offering. But what does this sudden availability of autonomous rides mean for daily commutes, weekend plans and the very fabric of urban life in one of America’s most dynamic cities?

GET SECURITY ALERTS, EXPERT TIPS – SIGN UP FOR KURT’S NEWSLETTER – THE CYBERGUY REPORT HERE

Advertisement

Waymo autonomous vehicle  (Waymo)

No more waiting in line: Waymo opens its doors to everyone

Remember when you needed an exclusive invite to ride in a Waymo? Well, those days are now in the rearview mirror. Now, anyone in San Francisco can hail a driverless Waymo ride. Just download the app, and you’re good to go. But here’s the thing. Nearly 300,000 people — that’s more than a quarter of San Francisco’s population — had already signed up on Waymo’s waiting list. Talk about pent-up demand. It seems like everyone wanted to try out the self-driving robotaxi service.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Waymo app and autonomous vehicle  (Waymo)

IS THIS PINT-SIZED ELECTRIC VEHICLE ABOUT TO BE A BIG DISRUPTOR IN THE US?

Advertisement

More than just a ride: The impact on San Francisco

Waymo isn’t just changing how people get around. It’s potentially reshaping the city’s social and economic landscape. Did you know that about 30% of Waymo rides in San Francisco are to local businesses? That’s a potential boost for the local economy right there.

And get this. Over half of Waymo riders surveyed said they’ve used the service for medical appointments. Plus, 36% use it to connect to other forms of transit like BART or Muni. It’s not just a taxi service; it’s becoming an integral part of the city’s transportation ecosystem.

Oh, and for the eco-conscious among us, here’s a fun fact. Waymo’s fleet is all-electric and uses 100% renewable energy from the city’s CleanPowerSF program. It claims to have helped curb carbon emissions by an estimated 570,000 kilograms since August 2023.

HOW TO STOP ANNOYING ROBOCALLS

Waymo autonomous vehicle at EV charging station  (Waymo)

Advertisement

CRAZY TWO-IN-ONE ELECTRIC VEHICLE COMES EQUIPPED WITH A TWO-SEAT AIRCRAFT HIDDEN INSIDE 

Not just a San Francisco thing

Waymo isn’t just cruising the famously steep hills of San Francisco. It’s also got wheels on the ground in the sunny streets of Los Angeles and the desert landscapes of Phoenix. And guess what? Austin, Texas, you’re next on the list. Looks like the robotaxi revolution is spreading faster than you can say “autonomous vehicle.”

Waymo autonomous vehicle on the streets of San Francisco  (Waymo)

THE TINY ELECTRIC CAR THAT COMES DISASSEMBLED AND DELIVERED IN BOXES

Safety first: Waymo’s bold claims

Now, I know what you’re thinking. “Is it safe?” Well, Waymo sure thinks so. It boasts about its “unparalleled” safety record, claiming it’s even safer than human drivers. With over 20 million miles logged since 2009, it’s got some serious road cred.

Advertisement

But it’s not just talk. Waymo cites statistics suggesting its driverless cars are safer than human-operated vehicles. It claims to have been involved in 17 fewer crashes with injuries and 12 fewer police-reportable crashes compared to human drivers over 3.8-plus million rider-only miles in San Francisco.

Waymo autonomous vehicle  (Waymo)

But hold on, It’s not all smooth driving

Before you get too excited and toss your driver’s license in the shredder, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has opened an investigation into Waymo. It’s looking into 22 incidents involving the self-driving tech. We’re talking about collisions with objects, parked cars and some traffic control hiccups. Yikes.

The NHTSA’s probe covers 444 of Waymo’s vehicles. That’s a lot of robots under the microscope. It’s a reminder that even as we race toward a driverless future, there are still some speed bumps to overcome.

HOW TO REMOVE YOUR PRIVATE DATA FROM THE INTERNET

Advertisement

Waymo app and autonomous vehicle (Waymo)

The big picture: Robotaxis taking over?

It’s not just Waymo in the spotlight. Other companies like Zoox, owned by Amazon, are also under the NHTSA’s microscope. Even big names like Ford and Tesla are feeling the heat as autonomous technology becomes more widespread. Meanwhile, GM’s Cruise is planning a comeback after suspending its service due to safety concerns.

WHAT IS ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)?

Waymo autonomous vehicle  (Waymo)

Kurt’s key takeaways

On one hand, the idea of hopping into a car without a driver could mean safer roads, less traffic and more accessibility for those who can’t drive. But, on the other hand, are we ready to trust our lives to algorithms and sensors? The NHTSA investigation shows there are still kinks to work out. And let’s not forget the potential impact on jobs in the transportation sector. It’s not just about cool tech; it’s about how it affects real people’s livelihoods. One thing’s for sure. The future of getting from point A to point B is changing rapidly. Whether you’re excited or skeptical, it looks like robotaxis are here to stay.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Would you take a spin in a Waymo, or are you sticking to human-driven rides for now? Let us know by writing us at Cyberguy.com/Contact

For more of my tech tips and security alerts, subscribe to my free CyberGuy Report Newsletter by heading to Cyberguy.com/Newsletter

Ask Kurt a question or let us know what stories you’d like us to cover

Follow Kurt on his social channels

Advertisement

Answers to the most asked CyberGuy questions:

Copyright 2024 CyberGuy.com.  All rights reserved.



Source link

Advertisement

San Francisco, CA

Where to Find Free Street Parking for Shows in San Francisco | KQED

Published

on

Where to Find Free Street Parking for Shows in San Francisco | KQED


Cross that big street
Major arteries like Market Street and Van Ness constitute mental borders for many drivers. If your destination is near a popular street, aim for the other side of it, where there’ll typically be more vacancies.

Stray uphill
Hills, too, create mental obstacles for people looking for parking. If you’re willing to walk up one of San Francisco’s many hills either before or after the show, you’ll find more spots.

Always check signs
Pay attention to posted time restrictions to avoid tickets. Some meters in San Francisco mercilessly run until 10pm. Also, street cleaning hours can start at 12am, before some shows get out.

Know when you’re beaten
Some neighborhoods are hopeless. North Beach, Nob Hill, Divisadero — forget about it. The sooner you accept this, the more inner peace you will find.

Advertisement

Trust your gut
I acknowledge that I am a 6’1” man, and not everyone feels as comfortable as I do walking alone at night. If you’re not a local, and you’re feeling unsure, read up on the neighborhood beforehand.

Realize the ‘right’ way can be painful too
If you’re tempted to suck it up and pay for a parking lot or garage, remember: after the show, you may be stuck for a long time in a parking-lot traffic jam as cars try to get out all at once.

Okay! On with my list, with suggested free parking areas marked red.

Where to find parking for Davies Symphony Hall, War Memorial Opera House, Herbst Theater or Bill Graham Civic Auditorium

East side of Gough Street, between Golden Gate and McAllister
Pro tip: Park on the left side of the street. Quick eats to go are almost nonexistent in the area, so pick up any pre-show provisions you may need at the Super Sam corner store.

Advertisement

Where to find parking for SFJAZZ, Rickshaw Stop or Mr. Tipple’s Jazz Club

North side of Oak Street between Buchanan and Octavia
Pro tip: The right lanes are almost always congested due to the upcoming freeway onramp. Watch for cars speeding down the hill behind you in the left lanes, and nose in rather than backing into the spot, if possible.

Where to find parking for the Castro Theater

Castro Street, between 14th and 16th
Pro tip: Separated from the Castro by Market Street, and up the hill a little, most people don’t think of parking here. I found a cool old metal dustpan on the street here once. Still use it.

Where to find parking for the Chapel

South Van Ness Avenue between 17th and 21st
Pro tip: Parking in the Mission District can be maddening; find solace on either the east or west side of the main artery on the edge of the neighborhood. Say hi to Whiz Burger for me.

Where to find parking for the Great American Music Hall

Franklin Street between Ellis and Geary
Pro tip: I’ve also found Geary Boulevard, between Van Ness and Franklin, to usually have open spots. (Plus, you’re right next to Tommy’s Joynt for post-show eats.)

Where to find parking for the Regency Ballroom

Franklin Street between Post and Bush
Pro tip: Separated from the venue by Van Ness, and up the hill a little, most people don’t think of parking here. Aim for the left side of this one-way thoroughfare, where parking is usually more open. Pour one out for the closed Walgreens.

Advertisement

Where to find parking for Mabuhay Gardens or On Broadway

Leavenworth Street between Francisco and Chestnut
Pro tip: Trying to find parking in North Beach is like repeatedly hitting yourself in the face with a hammer for a half hour. I park an entire mile away, and enjoy the walk along Columbus, which is teeming with action on weekends.

Where to find parking for the Midway

Illinois Street between 23rd and 25th
Pro tip: Do not be seduced by the road leading toward Pier 80; it looks wide open, but is full of private parking, and Pier 80 itself will be closed off.

Where to find parking for Chase Center

16th Street between Carolina and Connecticut
Pro tip: For concert parking, the Chase Center garage currently charges $75. Ahem. I think you’ll agree that a nice 10-minute stroll down 16th Street is a better alternative.

Where to find parking for the Bottom of the Hill

16th Street between Carolina and Connecticut
Pro tip: Parking’s not nearly as plentiful as it used to be here; be aware of the new-ish protected bike lanes on 17th and the many time restrictions. (Also, bring presents for the excellent staff at one of the city’s best clubs before it closes at the end of the year.)

Where to find parking for the Fillmore

Geary Boulevard between Divisadero and Scott
Pro tip: I agonized for years driving in circles on neighborhood streets until finding this wonderful stretch of Geary, down the road and on a slight curve, where no one thinks to park.

Advertisement

Where to find parking for the Warfield

Folsom Street between 7th and 6th
Pro tip: This one’s tough, being close to both Union Square and the Tenderloin. I shoot for the less-populated area south of Market and walk up 6th Street, home of harm-reduction services, pizza-by-the-slice joints, SROs and Tú Lan.

Where to find parking for the Brick and Mortar Music Hall or Public Works

Gough Street between Market and McCoppin
Pro tip: This is on an odd little diagonal block that’s off of most people’s radar, on the other side of a freeway overpass. It’s never let me down.

Where to find parking for Oracle Park

Harrison Street between 3rd and 4th
Pro tip: Optimal ballpark spots used to change each year. In a coincidence that I won’t overanalyze, I’ve had luck parking on this block ever since Buster Posey left the Giants in 2021.

Where to find parking for the Masonic

Van Ness Avenue or Franklin Street between Sacramento and Pine
Pro tip: Sorry, man. You will not find parking on Nob Hill. You can try driving up California while looking for a spot, but likely, you’ll have to head back and make the five-block walk.

Where to find parking for August Hall

Mission or Howard Streets, between 5th and 6th
Pro tip: The “park up the hill” trick doesn’t work here, since the nearby hill is Nob Hill. If you strike out on Mission or Howard, Folsom is often open.

Advertisement

Where to find parking for the DNA Lounge

Treat Street between Florida and Alameda
Pro tip: Luckily the DNA is surrounded by a pretzel of strange, short, wiggly streets, good for finding parking; head south of the freeway overpass to this hidden curve. (It’s where I parked when I saw Prince at the tiny club in 2013; yes of course I am bragging.)

Where to find parking for Golden Gate Park, Outside Lands or Hardly Strictly

Clement Street between 34th and 38th
Pro tip: The best way to get to these festivals is to throw a bike in the trunk, park near Ocean Beach, and ride in past the bison to the free bicycle parking area. Barring that, your other best bet is to park up the (very) steep hill, near the VA hospital.

Where to find parking for the Cow Palace

Geneva Avenue between Stoneridge and Carter
Pro tip: I don’t really have a pro tip for this one. I just want to say that there should be more concerts at the Cow Palace, which is cool as hell.

Where to find parking for Stern Grove

Portola Drive between San Fernando and Santa Clara
Pro tip: Park across the major artery of 19th, and up the hill a little bit. And, since Stern Grove concerts always take place on Sundays, there are no two-hour parking restrictions to contend with.

Where to find parking for the Independent

Divisadero Street between O’Farrell and Turk
Pro tip: You’ll have to go back in time to when you could park at the DMV lot, because this neighborhood is impossible now. I go down the hill a ways, and usually find a spot north of Primo Pizza.

Advertisement

Where to find parking for the Black Cat

East side of Van Ness Avenue, between Turk and Ellis
Pro tip: Aim for Van Ness, the west boundary of the Tenderloin. For a major thoroughfare, Van Ness often surprises me with open spots, especially on the east side heading north.

Where to find parking for Cafe du Nord or Swedish American Hall

16th Street between Guerrero and Sanchez
Pro tip: Once the daycare that’s just east of Dolores on 16th closes for the day, the white curb — which tends to scare off many drivers — is free for you to park at. Bonus points for the view of the Mission Dolores basilica, just a beautiful building.

The SF venues you don’t need my help parking at





Source link

Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Trump derangement syndrome: San Francisco can’t let baseball be baseball

Published

on

Trump derangement syndrome: San Francisco can’t let baseball be baseball


San Francisco is having a civic nervous breakdown because the brother of President Donald Trump’s son-in-law is buying a minority stake in the Giants.

Not Donald Trump. Not Jared Kushner. Joshua Kushner. And not control of the team. A minority stake.

Apparently, that is enough to send parts of San Francisco’s activist and media culture into full panic mode.

One Giants employee posted a video from Oracle Park turning in their uniform and quitting because Kushner was buying into the team.

Advertisement

Social media lit up with complaints about “MAGA ownership” and Trump-world influence invading one of San Francisco’s most beloved civic institutions.

San Francisco is having a civic nervous breakdown because the brother of President Donald Trump’s son-in-law is buying a minority stake in the Giants. Steven Hirsch
One Giants employee posted a video from Oracle Park turning in their uniform and quitting because Kushner was buying into the team. Getty Images

There is just one problem. Joshua Kushner is not exactly Steve Bannon in a Giants cap.

He has historically donated heavily to Democrats and has occupied a very different political lane than his brother Jared and the Trump orbit. But nuance never stood a chance here.

For some in San Francisco, the name “Kushner” was enough. That is the story.

The Giants are not some random expansion franchise nobody cares about. They are one of the oldest and most storied franchises in Major League Baseball history — with eight World Series titles and a lineage that includes Willie Mays, Barry Bonds, Buster Posey, Madison Bumgarner, and Bruce Bochy.

Advertisement
There is just one problem. Joshua Kushner is not exactly Steve Bannon in a Giants cap. Getty Images

Oracle Park is one of the great settings in American sports. Giants-Dodgers is still one of baseball’s defining rivalries. Generations of Northern Californians are emotionally attached to this team.

Which is precisely why the reaction has been so revealing.

Nobody was arguing about payroll. Nobody was debating the farm system. Nobody was asking whether this helps the Giants close the gap with the Dodgers in the NL West.

The panic was political from the first pitch.

That tells you where we are now.

Advertisement

Sports ownership used to be judged mostly by whether owners were competent, stable, and willing to spend money to win. Now it is an ideological background check.

So even indirect association becomes contamination. Joshua Kushner does not have to be Trump. He does not even have to be conservative. He just has to be Kushner. AFP via Getty Images

Who donated to whom? Who attended what fundraiser? Whose brother married whose daughter? Who might show up in the owner’s suite?This is what happens when politics becomes religion. Everything becomes a loyalty test. Even baseball.

The irony is almost too perfect.

San Francisco is not exactly at risk of becoming a MAGA beachhead because a Democratic donor with the wrong last name bought a small piece of the Giants. But symbolic politics runs the city now.

In Democrat circles in San Francisco, politics is not just something people believe. It is something they perform. It is identity. It is status. It is social sorting.

Advertisement

So even indirect association becomes contamination. Joshua Kushner does not have to be Trump. He does not even have to be conservative. He just has to be Kushner.

That is enough.

San Francisco is not exactly at risk of becoming a MAGA beachhead because a Democratic donor with the wrong last name bought a small piece of the Giants. But symbolic politics runs the city now. Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for The Met Museum/Vogue

To be fair, Giants ownership was already politically sensitive. Current owner Charles Johnson has drawn years of criticism for conservative political donations.

So this latest development landed on dry grass.

Still, the reaction says more about San Francisco’s liberal elite than it does about the Giants. The city’s activist class cannot even let baseball remain baseball.

Advertisement

A minority owner becomes a political emergency. A family connection becomes a scandal. A business transaction becomes a moral crisis.

This is not normal.

Fans used to argue about batting orders and pitching rotations. Now they investigate ownership family trees.

And the Giants are not being bought by Donald Trump. They are not being turned into a Trump campaign surrogate. They are not replacing team mascot Lou Seal with a MAGA hat.

A minority stake is changing hands. That’s it.

Advertisement

Yet for the loudest voices in San Francisco, even that apparently requires public anguish.

If this is the reaction to the brother of Trump’s son-in-law buying a minority piece of the Giants, imagine what happens if Donald Trump ever throws out the first pitch at Oracle Park.

Jon Fleischman, a longtime strategist in California politics and a lifelong baseball fan, writes at SoDoesItMatter.com.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

San Francisco, CA

Casting shade on shadows: S.F. supervisor seeks to bar using shadows to block new housing

Published

on

Casting shade on shadows: S.F. supervisor seeks to bar using shadows to block new housing


Shadows cast by tall and not-so-tall buildings alike have long been used to block housing in San Francisco, and Supervisor Bilal Mahmood wants it to end.

The District 5 legislator is announcing a law on Thursday that would eliminate the ability for people to say shadows cast by a building are an “environmental concern” that can be used to delay, and possibly block, new housing. 

“In San Francisco, we’ve literally paid the price of being too afraid of our own shadow,” Mahmood said, pointing to data showing that shadow-based concerns were used to delay or block 2,195 housing units in 11 projects since 2017.

Whenever a new housing project is proposed in the city, its developer must create an environmental impact report on a variety of factors, like toxic waste and seismic hazards. 

Advertisement

San Francisco requires that report to include a shadow analysis noting whether the new building will cast shade on any open space in the city. Mahmood’s legislation would get rid of that requirement; it is not in state guidelines, and most California cities do not consider shadows an environmental factor. 

The environmental impact report is intended to help politicians make an informed decision about whether to approve or deny a development proposal. But any resident can file an appeal if they think environmental impacts were not fully considered, which can delay, block, or alter projects. 

Shadows ultimately led to a delay for the infamous 469 Stevenson St. project from 2021, a 495 unit building on the site of a Nordstrom parking lot in SoMa.

Some SoMa residents were concerned that the project, which contained about 100 affordable housing units, would gentrify the area. 

But gentrification alone is not a legal reason for supervisors to block a project. So residents filed an appeal alleging the project’s environmental impacts were improperly evaluated. The Board of Supervisors ended up siding with them in an 8-3 vote, citing shadows cast on nearby Mint Plaza in their decision. 

Advertisement

The developer was forced back to the drawing board and had to redo his environmental report, delaying the project by several years. 

Even when projects are 100 percent affordable, shadows cast uncertainty: Residents near 16th and Mission’s “La Maravilla” housing project, a 380-unit project next door to Marshall Elementary that broke ground last month, raised concerns that the development would darken the school’s playground. That forced the nonprofit developers to hold meetings and negotiate with residents about the issue.

Mahmood said even if appeals are ultimately rejected, the length and cost of the appeals process makes it difficult to produce housing projects and leads developers to avoid building in San Francisco. 

“The housing problems we’re facing are death by a thousand cuts,” said Witt Turner of the Housing Action Coalition, a proponent of the bill. “We need to start sewing them up one by one.”

San Francisco is required by the state to plan for 36,000 more housing units by 2030, and the city’s best guess is that even under the most favorable scenarios developers will build less than half of that, and in four times as much time.

Advertisement

Mahmood, a YIMBY, has made streamlining housing a focus of his 15 months in office. His new legislation eliminates certain intermediate appeals and hearings and shortens appeal timelines, mostly from 30 days to 15 days. 

The bill will be evaluated by the planning commission and the Board of Supervisors in early summer. 

The bill is no silver bullet, however. Environmental appeals often cite more than just shadows when seeking to change projects. In the case of the Nordstrom parking lot building, for example, a failure to properly consider the seismic impact of a building was also a component of the decision. 

YIMBYs have long pursued reform to CEQA, a California law outlining the environmental appeals process.

“We shouldn’t let outdated laws get in the way of building housing, which is actually important to making progress on our climate goals,” Mahmood said.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending