Connect with us

San Diego, CA

Clairemont residents concerned over 12-unit bonus ADU project

Published

on

Clairemont residents concerned over 12-unit bonus ADU project


SAN DIEGO (FOX 5/KUSI) – Clairemont residents are pushing back against a proposed ADU development that includes a dozen units on one property. Similar projects have popped up across the city under San Diego’s “bonus ADU” program.

Residents on Shoshoni Avenue say the city needs to balance the need for housing with the character and safety of neighborhoods.

This particular development at 4602 Shoshoni Avenue would include the main house, converting the garage into an ADU, and then five two-story structures with 10 ADUs in the backyard.

“If this thing goes up, our neighborhood will completely change forever,” said Michelle Schroeder, a resident on the street of 30 years.

Advertisement

The neighborhood is predominantly one-story single-family homes and the street itself is a narrow cul-de-sac. There would be no requirements to provide parking for the development. Congestion on the street and ability for emergency vehicles to reach houses on the street are some concerns being raised.

“Our safety is big time. The City needs to come out and do some research here,” said Kevin Morefield who lives next door to the property in question.

The large lot lends the space for developers to take advantage of the city’s bonus ADU program. For every one “affordable” ADU, they can build an additional ADU. The maximum amount allowed is determined by zoning and space on the property.

“When they built Genesee Avenue and Chateau Drive, they backfilled my backyard, this backyard, all the way down and if you go look just halfway down Genesee, you’ll see it starting to crumble,” said Morefield.

Morefield’s family has been at the property since 1955 and says the land may not even be safe to build on based on the backfill.

Advertisement

However because housing is so needed, the City of San Diego says as long as these types of projects comply with ADU regulations, state and local law requires approval.

“The inspectors are really going to have to take their care with signing the permit because if something happens there in the future, it’s going to be their problem not just the developer, not just the owner of the land,” said Mike Schroeder.

“We’ve been fighting for four years is to get the council to come back and take a look at what they’ve done,” said Paul Krueger, volunteer with nonprofit Neighbors for a Better San Diego.

The nonprofit has been tracking these projects closely. To date, the City says it’s approved about 130 density bonus projects, creating 255 “affordable” ADUs.

“One of the biggest failures of this program. They wrote the law to allow to qualify as a moderate-income unit, which means a single person with $89,000 a year is who they’re pegging the rent in the affordable unit,” Krueger said.

Advertisement

These neighbors are now calling on Mayor Todd Gloria and councilmembers to take action.

“Start listening to us. I want them to stop this project and come look at it for themselves,” said Michelle Schroeder.

Councilmember Jennifer Campbell represents the Clairemont area. Her office provided a statement that reads:

“I share the concerns that many residents have expressed about whether our communities can support the increased density that these bonus ADU projects may bring. I am apprehensive about how the increase in density could impact our neighborhoods and place strain on our existing infrastructure and services. I have always opposed changes to parking requirements, especially in places where the public transportation infrastructure is not currently able to serve every resident. I will continue to work on ways to mitigate the impacts of increased density on our neighborhoods, while still meeting the community’s need for more housing.”

The City says the project is currently still in review. The mayor’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

Advertisement

A lawyer for developers SDRE Homebuyers said they plan to issue a formal statement in the future, but could not answer questions in time for this report.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

San Diego, CA

One year ago, San Diego State wanted to save the Pac-12, but CEOs said no thanks

Published

on

One year ago, San Diego State wanted to save the Pac-12, but CEOs said no thanks


June 30 is a very important date in college sports history and college sports administration. June 30, 2022, was the date when the USC-UCLA move to the Big Ten became known. June 30, 2023, was the date when the Pac-12 and the Pac-12 CEO Group had one last chance to invite San Diego State at a comparative bargain, help pay for SDSU’s Mountain West exit fee, and stabilize the conference with a Southern California-based member. San Diego State’s arrival in the Pac-12 would have appealed to ESPN, SMU, and various other entities which were monitoring the situation. When we consider why the Pac-12’s existence is ending today — June 30, 2024 — there are so many reasons to mention, but the failure to invite and on-board San Diego State was the last in a series of crucial mistakes which destabilized the conference and left it without a buffer to guard against other members fleeing.

We wrote this on June 20, 2023:

San Diego State University and the Pac-12 Conference want each other. At least, that is and has been the indication for several months.

San Diego State would love to move up from the Mountain West, a Group of Five league, to the Pac-12, a Power Five conference. The Pac-12, for its part, wants to maintain a presence in Southern California. The conference has expressed optimism that it can fetch a competitive price point for its new round of media rights deals based on having the added inventory provided by both San Diego State and SMU, the two schools it has heavily courted.

Now, however, the Mountain West is refusing to give San Diego State an extension on its timeline for leaving the conference without paying added exit fees beyond what it already owes. The current deadline is June 30. San Diego State would pay close to $17 million in additional exit penalties if it doesn’t leave the Mountain West by then.

Advertisement

Why hasn’t SDSU already left? The Pac-12 hasn’t extended an offer to join the conference. Why hasn’t the Pac-12 extended an offer? Because it hasn’t finalized its media rights deal.

If San Diego State wants out of the Mountain West, it shouldn’t feel the need to wait beyond June 30. If the Pac-12 is confident that San Diego State will deliver a good media rights deal, what is the remaining holdup at this point?

San Diego State was right there on a platter as insurance in case Colorado left. SDSU’s arrival probably would have enticed SMU or another Texas-based school, or possibly Fresno State, to join the conference and guard against a mass exodus, thereby keeping the conference intact. Yet, nothing happened. The Pac-12 was amateurish to the end … and the end is now here.

Visit our friends at Fighting Irish Wire, Buffaloes Wire, and Ducks Wire. Follow our newest sites, UW Huskies Wire and UCLA Wire.

Advertisement

Check out more NFL draft coverage with the USA TODAY Sports NFL Draft Hub.



Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

France’s exceptionally high-stakes election has begun. The far right leads polls

Published

on

France’s exceptionally high-stakes election has begun. The far right leads polls


PARIS (AP) — French voters around the world are casting ballots Sunday in the first round of an exceptional parliamentary election that could put France’s government in the hands of nationalist, far-right forces for the first time since the Nazi era.

The outcome of the two-round election, which will wrap up July 7, could impact European financial markets, Western support for Ukraine and how France’s nuclear arsenal and global military force are managed.

Many French voters are frustrated about inflation and economic concerns, as well as President Emmanuel Macron’s leadership, which they see as arrogant and out-of-touch with their lives. Marine Le Pen’s anti-immigration National Rally party has tapped and fueled that discontent, notably via online platforms like TikTok, and dominated all preelection opinion polls.

A new coalition on the left, the New Popular Front, is also posing a challenge to the pro-business Macron and his centrist alliance Together for the Republic.

Advertisement

After a blitz campaign marred by rising hate speech, voting began early in France’s overseas territories, and polling stations open in mainland France at 8 a.m. (0600 GMT) Sunday. The first polling projections are expected at 8 p.m. (1800 GMT), when the final polling stations close, and early official results are expected later Sunday night.

Macron called the early election after his party was trounced in the European Parliament election earlier in June by the National Rally, which has historic ties to racism and antisemitism and is hostile toward France’s Muslim community. It was an audacious gamble that French voters who were complacent about the European Union election would be jolted into turning out for moderate forces in a national election to keep the far right out of power.

Instead, polls suggest that the National Rally is gaining support and has a chance at winning a parliamentary majority. In that scenario, Macron would be expected to name 28-year-old National Rally President Jordan Bardella as prime minister in an awkward power-sharing system known as “cohabitation.”

While Macron has said he won’t step down before his presidential term expires in 2027, cohabitation would weaken him at home and on the world stage.

The results of the first round will give a picture of overall voter sentiment, but not necessarily of the overall makeup of the next National Assembly. Predictions are extremely difficult because of the complicated voting system, and because parties will work between the two rounds to make alliances in some constituencies or pull out of others.

Advertisement

In the past, such tactical maneuvers helped keep far-right candidates from power. But now, support for Le Pen’s party has spread deep and wide.

Bardella, who has no governing experience, says he would use the powers of prime minister to stop Macron from continuing to supply long-range weapons to Ukraine for the war with Russia. His party has historical ties to Russia.

The party has also questioned the right to citizenship for people born in France, and wants to curtail the rights of French citizens with dual nationality. Critics say this undermines fundamental human rights and is a threat to France’s democratic ideals.

Meanwhile, huge public spending promises by the National Rally and especially the left-wing coalition have shaken markets and ignited worries about France’s heavy debt, already criticized by EU watchdogs.

___

Advertisement

Follow AP’s coverage of elections at https://apnews.com/hub/global-elections



Source link

Continue Reading

San Diego, CA

Former Padres Reliever Re-Signs With San Diego

Published

on

Former Padres Reliever Re-Signs With San Diego


The San Diego Padres are bringing back a former reliever on a minor league deal after being released by the Texas Rangers on Tuesday.

Nabil Crismatt began the season with the Los Angeles Dodgers appearing in five games, he announced his return to San Diego with a post on Instagram Friday.

“I’m very happy to announce I’m back with San Diego Padres,” Crismatt wrote. “Looking forward to this new chapter. See you all soon.”

Crismatt spent parts of three seasons with the Padres from 2021-23. During those three seasons, he made 102 appearances, sporting a 3.83 ERA in 159.2 innings. He recorded at least 45 appearances in 2021 and 2022 but struggled in 2023 en route to being DFA’d.

He appeared in one game with the Arizona Diamondbacks last year before signing with the Dodgers on a minor league deal before this season.

Advertisement

The Columbian right-hander sported a 2.57 earned run average with the Dodgers in seven innings before he was designated for assignment. Instead of accepting, he opted for free agency and signed a one-year deal with the Rangers. He didn’t appear in a major league game with Texas.

Perhaps, the Padres will get the 2022 version of Crismatt who had a 2.94 ERA in 50 appearances. He could also face the Dodgers when the two teams clash for a two-game set at the end of July.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending