Connect with us

Oregon

Oregon Ducks, Ohio State Buckeyes Officiating Being Called Into Question

Published

on

Oregon Ducks, Ohio State Buckeyes Officiating Being Called Into Question


The Oregon Ducks beat the Ohio State Buckeyes 32-31 in the first top-three matchup in Autzen Stadium’s history. In such a tight game with such high stakes, every single penalty and decision by the officials is being heavily scrutinized now that the game has ended.

On third down in the third quarter, Ohio State’s defense was flagged for a pass interference penalty that should have given the Ducks offense an automatic first down and pushed them into Buckeyes territory.

However, the officials also penalized the Oregon offense for having an ineligible player downfield, causing the penalties to offset. Upon further review, it appears that the referees misread the Ducks formation.

In fact, the officials announced that the penalty on Oregon wide receiver Tez Johnson, yet Johnson was not even on the field for that play. The incorrect call wiped out an obvious pass interference on Ohio State.

Advertisement

On the Buckeyes’ final drive of the game, wide receiver Jeremiah Smith was flagged for offensive pass interference after pushing off of his defender to create separation. Ohio State coach Ryan Day spoke to reporters about that specific penalty.

“We did a great job of getting down the field and continuing to fight, but the one play there…(defensive back) is grabbing on Jeremiah Smith; Jeremiah is fighting there. They called that flag there and that cost us, but it shouldn’t come down to one play,” Day said. “I’ve said that before. We want to leave no doubt. I felt like we should have done that tonight and we did not. So, then we put it in the hands of a call, and you don’t get it. That’s on us. We should never have let it come down to that.”

The flag on Smith pushed Ohio State out of field goal range, and the clock did not stop after the offensive penalty. With less than 30 seconds left in the game, the Oregon defense only needed a few more stops.

On the final play of the game, Buckeyes quarterback Will Howard scrambled for 12 yards back into field goal range, but he did not slide with enough time to call a timeout.

Online, Buckeyes fans have argued that there was one second remaining when Howard began to slide, and the officials should have granted Ohio State its final timeout of the game. However, Howard failed to pick up a first down which kept the clock running and did not allow enough time for the officials to notice Day signaling for a timeout.

On Ohio State’s first play of the drive, Oregon linebacker Jeffrey Bassa might have intercepted Howard’s pass intended for tight end Will Kacmarek, but the referees did not review the play. The Ohio State tight end never seemed to have control of the ball while going to the ground, and Bassa eventually came up with the ball.

Advertisement

While no officiating crew is ever perfect, Saturday night’s referees seemed to make a few questionable calls that affected both sides. Should Oregon and Ohio State meet for a rematch in the Big Ten Championship Game, a lot of eyes will be on the officiating crew as well as both teams.

MORE: What Ohio State Coach Ryan Day Said After Loss to Oregon Ducks: Officiating ‘Cost Us’

MORE: Did Oregon Ducks’ Dan Lanning Intentionally Commit Penalty During Ohio State Game?

MORE: Oregon Ducks’ Traeshon Holden Apologizes To Ohio State, Teammates, Fans For Ejection

MORE: Oregon Ducks, Ohio State: Deafening Autzen Stadium Breaks Attendance Record

Advertisement

MORE: Oregon Ducks Upset Ohio State Buckeyes: Fans Storm Autzen Stadium

MORE: Oregon Ducks’ Dan Lanning On Jordan Burch Injury After Ohio State Win





Source link

Oregon

Oregon Has Its Own Croissant, and It’s Very Oregon

Published

on

Oregon Has Its Own Croissant, and It’s Very Oregon


My wife and I have lived in Portland some half-dozen times over the past two decades-plus, which also means we’ve left with the same frequency…while always visiting as much as possible. And there’s no better way to welcome ourselves back than with the Oregon Croissant at Ken’s Artisan Bakery in Northwest Portland, especially if it isn’t berry season. With blueberries, marionberries and hazelnut cream, it’s like a visit to the Portland Farmers Market within a world-class pastry.

The Oregon Croissant has been a stalwart item almost since Ken Forkish opened his eponymous bakery on Thanksgiving Day 2001. Once he developed his France-inspired croissant dough and hit the viennoiserie classics (butter, chocolate, almond, and ham and cheese), “I wanted one more that was unique to my bakery and that had local fruit in it,” he says. “And the shape that would hold it would be similar to a Danish.”

Initially, Ken’s made it with the same crème d’amande as an almond croissant. That was followed by the blueberries, and then, after the corners of the pastry are folded, an egg-wash. Individual marionberries are firmly pressed on top, so that they don’t roll off the dough as it expands and browns. There’s also a sprinkling of pearl sugar, adding sweetness—but not too much—and textural pop. The fruit is frozen, which allows it to be local and year-round, and also bakes up better (fresh berries would give off too much moisture and lose more of their shape).

But the Oregon Croissant did not achieve Peak Oregon until 2003, or possibly 2002—Forkish can’t remember exactly. That’s when he encountered Willamette Valley hazelnut growers Freddy Guys at…where else? The Portland Farmers Market.

Advertisement

Twenty-three or 24 years later, Freddy Guys’ hazelnut meal continues to be the basis for Ken’s hazelnut cream. “The result then fit the label Oregon Croissant,” Forkish says. “Oregon berries and hazelnuts into a unique pastry, with plenty of fruit in every bite.”

Forkish retired and moved to Hawaii in 2022, selling the business to longtime employees Randy Dorkin and Theo Taylor (Ken’s Artisan Pizza in Northeast was sold to different owners).

But not too much has changed at Ken’s since then. So it’s probably safe to say the Oregon Croissant will continue to be there for me as long as Ken’s Artisan Bakery is. “I can’t imagine it will ever leave the menu,” Forkish says. “It is unique to this bakery, and exemplifies the kind of place it is.”

Willamette Week’s reporting has concrete impacts that change laws, force action from civic leaders, and drive compromised politicians from public office.

Support WW

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Legislation could impact energy costs, utility operations in Oregon

Published

on

Legislation could impact energy costs, utility operations in Oregon


play

  • The Oregon legislature is considering bills to make renewable energy more accessible and the power grid more resilient.
  • One bill would allow homeowners to finance energy-efficient products through their power companies with no additional cost.

Bills that would make renewable energy technology a cost-neutral option for homeowners, make the electric grid more resilient by turning homes and electric cars into a virtual network of power plants and allow electric companies to self-insure are among those the state Oregon Legislature is considering in the 2026 session.

The slate of bills is nowhere near as transformative as the multiple laws passed in the 2025 legislative session, but this year’s proposed laws have the potential to make an enormous impact.

Advertisement

Investor-owned utilities in Oregon such as Portland General Electric, Pacific Corp and Northwest Natural receive exclusive territories in the state. In exchange, they’re regulated by the Oregon Public Utilities Commission.

These are the bills and how they would impact customers:

Senate Bill 1588 would require power companies to help consumers finance energy-efficient devices

Senate Bill 1588 would require electric companies to allow customers to buy things like electric heat pumps, energy storage systems and solar panels and pay for those items through a monthly charge on their bill. Those purchases would not increase the customer’s total bill.

That way, customers could purchase and use energy-efficient devices in their homes and not bear any additional costs. The mechanism would be similar to the way mobile carriers allow customers to purchase a new phone and pay the device off in installments.

Advertisement

“There’s still a cost gap that remains for too many Oregonians,” Claire Prihoda, policy manager of Climate Solutions, said during a public utilities commission meeting on Feb. 9.

Serena Campas, senior associate for policy at Rewiring America said utilities in other states have been operating similar programs for more than 15 years.

Most homeowners currently take out loans from separate companies to buy a solar power system or battery from a third party. They pay the loan at approximately the same rate they did when they were paying their full electric bill.

PGE opposes the bill and its lobbyist, Chloe Becker, said the utility is concerned about its obligations to set up the financing part of the program because it is not a lender.

Advertisement

Becker said that a $7,500 ductless heat pump could take 30 years for a homeowner to pay off.

“When we run the numbers using those parameters it raises questions for us about this model working in Oregon,” Becker said during a public utilities commission meeting Feb. 9.

Sen. Jeff Golden, D-Ashland, the chief sponsor of the bill, disputed the cost estimates and said it only mandates the power companies to submit proposals.

“Some of what was said is not in fact mandated at all,” Golden said.

Advertisement

Golden said loans for the energy efficient products would stay with the home when it is sold. That means the payment would follow the home and the next owner would still benefit from the energy savings.

“This is not consumer lending. I have heard some confusion about that. It is a utility rate tariff defining the service on terms that are just reasonable and fair determined by the public utility commission,” said Matt Flaherty, director of building decarbonization at Clean Energy Work.

The bill is next scheduled for a work session in the Senate Committee on Energy and Environment at 3 p.m. on Feb. 11.

Senate Bill 1582 would require utilities to develop virtual powerplants

Senate Bill 1582 would require investor-owned power companies to develop distributed power plant programs, also called virtual powerplants, through third-party companies.

Distributed power plants are networks of homes with solar power, batteries and electric cars that can put power back into the grid in times of high need, such as when temperatures are extremely high or low.

Advertisement

The owners of the homes are paid for participating in the programs.

Franco Albi, director of regional integration for Portland General Electric, said the company started developing such a so-called virtual power plant in 1999.

He said PGE has 230,000 customers and that the program produces as much power as the utility’s coal-burning plant in Boardman.

Albi said PGE already works with third-party aggregators in the programs and that the company opposes the bill because it’s essentially doing the same thing already without a law.

Advertisement

“We believe that the PUC is the right place to define the resource requirements,” Albi said. “That happens today and it’s through rulemaking, not statute and especially not statute rushed through a short session.”

Others argued that the pace investorowned companies are establishing virtual power plants isn’t fast enough to meet projected need in Oregon.

“We need these higher adoption rates for economies of scale,” Sen. Courtney Neron Misslin, D-Wilsonville, a sponsor of the bill. “The third-party aggregators are the ones that allow this to build to an economy of scale.”

The Public Utility Commission in a letter warned that the bill could increase costs for customers because utility companies may need to increase their scale so third-party aggregators can participate.

Power companies, including PGE, have invested in building large-scale battery energy storage systems, which do the same thing. They are large scale and the company owns or leases those.

Advertisement

Marion County banned such systems in 2025.

The bill is scheduled for a work session in the Senate Committee on Energy and Environment at 3 p.m. on Feb. 11.

House Bill 4077 would allow public utilities to self-insure

House Bill 4077 would allow public utility companies to issue bonds in order to start a program to insure themselves.

It would require utilities to get approval by the public utility commission to do so.

Advertisement

Self-insurance is essentially a savings account for claims. A captive insurance program is a formal program that essentially does the same.

“This type of insurance can have several benefits,” said Jennifer Hill-Hart, the policy director for the Oregon Citizens Utility Board, a non-profit that advocates for energy affordability.

PacificCorp faces an estimated $8 billion in claims related to the 2020 wildfires in Oregon and California, according to estimates from parent company Berkshire Hathaway.

PGE voiced support for the bill.

“At PGE, we’ve seen our annual insurance premiums increase 180% in the last five years,” said Jay Tinker, a senior manager for the utility. “We are not alone in experiencing these increases and utilities as a sector are at risk of being unable to secure insurance coverage.”

Advertisement

The bill is scheduled for a committee work session at 8 a.m. on Feb. 12.

House Bill 4025 would allow rate increases in the winter

House Bill 4025 allows rate increases for public utilities other than electrical and natural gas companies to increase rates between Nov. 1 and March 31.

A law passed in the 2025 legislative session, House Bill 3179, prevented those companies from increasing rates during the winter months.

“After the bill passed, it was flagged that the way the law was written, it would apply to water utilities as well,” said State Rep. Nathan Sosa, D-Hillsboro, the bill’s sponsor.

The bill passed by a 51-7 vote on Feb. 10 by the House of Representatives and next advances to the Senate.

Advertisement

Bill Poehler covers Marion and Polk County for the Statesman Journal. Contact him at bpoehler@StatesmanJournal.com



Source link

Continue Reading

Oregon

Argyle wines of Oregon to be featured in tasting

Published

on

Argyle wines of Oregon to be featured in tasting


AKRON, Ohio – 750ml Wines is holding a tasting of Argyle wines of Oregon.

The tasting is 6:30 p.m. Wednesday, Feb. 25.

Michael Metzger, key account manager at Distinguished Vineyards & Wine Partners, will present the tasting of eight wines.

Argyle Winery, founded in 1987, is based in Dundee, Oregon, and is known for its drinkable Pinot Noir.

Advertisement

Wines to be served

• Blanc de Blanc

• Vintage Brut Oregon

• Extended Tirage Brut (“tirage” in French means “draw off” and refers to the process that happens after the wine undergoes its initial fermentation)

• Brut Rosé

• Chardonnay

Advertisement

• Pinot Noir Bloomhouse

• Pinot Noir Estate Reserve

• Pinot Noir Nuthouse

Cost is $49 ($39, Club 750 members). RSVP via OpenTable.

750ml Wine Boutique & Wine Bar is at 2287 W. Market St., Akron.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending