Oregon
Legislation could impact energy costs, utility operations in Oregon
What to know about the Oregon Legislative Assembly
The Oregon Legislature meets annually either in a short of long legislative session. Here’s what to know.
Bills that would make renewable energy technology a cost-neutral option for homeowners, make the electric grid more resilient by turning homes and electric cars into a virtual network of power plants and allow electric companies to self-insure are among those the state Oregon Legislature is considering in the 2026 session.
The slate of bills is nowhere near as transformative as the multiple laws passed in the 2025 legislative session, but this year’s proposed laws have the potential to make an enormous impact.
Investor-owned utilities in Oregon such as Portland General Electric, Pacific Corp and Northwest Natural receive exclusive territories in the state. In exchange, they’re regulated by the Oregon Public Utilities Commission.
These are the bills and how they would impact customers:
Senate Bill 1588 would require power companies to help consumers finance energy-efficient devices
Senate Bill 1588 would require electric companies to allow customers to buy things like electric heat pumps, energy storage systems and solar panels and pay for those items through a monthly charge on their bill. Those purchases would not increase the customer’s total bill.
That way, customers could purchase and use energy-efficient devices in their homes and not bear any additional costs. The mechanism would be similar to the way mobile carriers allow customers to purchase a new phone and pay the device off in installments.
“There’s still a cost gap that remains for too many Oregonians,” Claire Prihoda, policy manager of Climate Solutions, said during a public utilities commission meeting on Feb. 9.
Serena Campas, senior associate for policy at Rewiring America said utilities in other states have been operating similar programs for more than 15 years.
Most homeowners currently take out loans from separate companies to buy a solar power system or battery from a third party. They pay the loan at approximately the same rate they did when they were paying their full electric bill.
PGE opposes the bill and its lobbyist, Chloe Becker, said the utility is concerned about its obligations to set up the financing part of the program because it is not a lender.
Becker said that a $7,500 ductless heat pump could take 30 years for a homeowner to pay off.
“When we run the numbers using those parameters it raises questions for us about this model working in Oregon,” Becker said during a public utilities commission meeting Feb. 9.
Sen. Jeff Golden, D-Ashland, the chief sponsor of the bill, disputed the cost estimates and said it only mandates the power companies to submit proposals.
“Some of what was said is not in fact mandated at all,” Golden said.
Golden said loans for the energy efficient products would stay with the home when it is sold. That means the payment would follow the home and the next owner would still benefit from the energy savings.
“This is not consumer lending. I have heard some confusion about that. It is a utility rate tariff defining the service on terms that are just reasonable and fair determined by the public utility commission,” said Matt Flaherty, director of building decarbonization at Clean Energy Work.
The bill is next scheduled for a work session in the Senate Committee on Energy and Environment at 3 p.m. on Feb. 11.
Senate Bill 1582 would require utilities to develop virtual powerplants
Senate Bill 1582 would require investor-owned power companies to develop distributed power plant programs, also called virtual powerplants, through third-party companies.
Distributed power plants are networks of homes with solar power, batteries and electric cars that can put power back into the grid in times of high need, such as when temperatures are extremely high or low.
The owners of the homes are paid for participating in the programs.
Franco Albi, director of regional integration for Portland General Electric, said the company started developing such a so-called virtual power plant in 1999.
He said PGE has 230,000 customers and that the program produces as much power as the utility’s coal-burning plant in Boardman.
Albi said PGE already works with third-party aggregators in the programs and that the company opposes the bill because it’s essentially doing the same thing already without a law.
“We believe that the PUC is the right place to define the resource requirements,” Albi said. “That happens today and it’s through rulemaking, not statute and especially not statute rushed through a short session.”
Others argued that the pace investor–owned companies are establishing virtual power plants isn’t fast enough to meet projected need in Oregon.
“We need these higher adoption rates for economies of scale,” Sen. Courtney Neron Misslin, D-Wilsonville, a sponsor of the bill. “The third-party aggregators are the ones that allow this to build to an economy of scale.”
The Public Utility Commission in a letter warned that the bill could increase costs for customers because utility companies may need to increase their scale so third-party aggregators can participate.
Power companies, including PGE, have invested in building large-scale battery energy storage systems, which do the same thing. They are large scale and the company owns or leases those.
Marion County banned such systems in 2025.
The bill is scheduled for a work session in the Senate Committee on Energy and Environment at 3 p.m. on Feb. 11.
House Bill 4077 would allow public utilities to self-insure
House Bill 4077 would allow public utility companies to issue bonds in order to start a program to insure themselves.
It would require utilities to get approval by the public utility commission to do so.
Self-insurance is essentially a savings account for claims. A captive insurance program is a formal program that essentially does the same.
“This type of insurance can have several benefits,” said Jennifer Hill-Hart, the policy director for the Oregon Citizens Utility Board, a non-profit that advocates for energy affordability.
PacificCorp faces an estimated $8 billion in claims related to the 2020 wildfires in Oregon and California, according to estimates from parent company Berkshire Hathaway.
PGE voiced support for the bill.
“At PGE, we’ve seen our annual insurance premiums increase 180% in the last five years,” said Jay Tinker, a senior manager for the utility. “We are not alone in experiencing these increases and utilities as a sector are at risk of being unable to secure insurance coverage.”
The bill is scheduled for a committee work session at 8 a.m. on Feb. 12.
House Bill 4025 would allow rate increases in the winter
House Bill 4025 allows rate increases for public utilities other than electrical and natural gas companies to increase rates between Nov. 1 and March 31.
A law passed in the 2025 legislative session, House Bill 3179, prevented those companies from increasing rates during the winter months.
“After the bill passed, it was flagged that the way the law was written, it would apply to water utilities as well,” said State Rep. Nathan Sosa, D-Hillsboro, the bill’s sponsor.
The bill passed by a 51-7 vote on Feb. 10 by the House of Representatives and next advances to the Senate.
Bill Poehler covers Marion and Polk County for the Statesman Journal. Contact him at bpoehler@StatesmanJournal.com
Oregon
Former Oregon corrections officer receives lifetime hunting ban, fined over $114K
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — A former Oregon corrections officer received a lifetime hunting ban on Wednesday after pleading guilty to several poaching-related charges.
Christopher Mason, 49, of Umatilla, was sentenced in two separate court cases to 24 months of probation and 300 hours of community service. He was also fined over $114,000 and was required to forfeit his firearms.
Oregon State Police said they began investigating Mason in 2024 after receiving information that he had been poaching big game animals.
“In February 2025, OSP served a search warrant, and multiple big game animals and firearms were seized as evidence. Sixty-seven criminal charges were referred for prosecution,” officials said. “The charges spanned multiple counties.”
Mason pleaded guilty to four counts of unlawful take of buck deer and three counts of unlawful take of black bear on June 18. In a separate case on June 26, he pleaded guilty to unlawful possession of a short-barreled rifle, unlawful possession of a silencer, unlawful possession of multiple wildlife and unlawful take of mule deer.
“This is another example of serial poaching which rises to the level of felony conduct based solely on the repeated poaching conduct and impact of one individual on Oregon’s game mammals,” prosecutor Jay Hall said. “The conduct across the several counties amounts to one of the highest damage amounts done to Oregon wildlife by any singular actor.”
Oregon
Strict fire restrictions in effect on BLM lands in Washington, Oregon ahead of July 4
SEATTLE — With national firefighting resources already stretched to their limits, statewide fire restrictions remain in effect for all Bureau of Land Management public lands throughout Washington and Oregon, with some local regions also implementing additional emergency closures.
As the Independence Day holiday weekend approaches, officials warned that people responsible for starting wildfires could face up to $100,000 in fines, 12 months in prison, and liability for all firefighting suppression costs.
SEE ALSO | Washington braces for earlier wildfire season due to low snowpack: ‘Worse than normal’
“There are serious consequences for starting a wildfire, including fines and possibly imprisonment, which we hope everyone can avoid through careful choices,” said Josh O’Connor, Northwest Geographic Area Fire Chief for the U.S. Wildland Fire Service. “We have already experienced excruciating loss this season. I cannot stress the gravity of the situation enough. Please help protect our firefighters and communities.”
Officials urged visitors to research their destinations in advance, noting that local restrictions can determine when power tools may be used, what kinds of stoves or campfires are allowed, and what safety equipment is required.
The BLM said the following items remain strictly prohibited on all BLM lands in Oregon and Washington: fireworks and sky lanterns; exploding or metallic targets; tracer or incendiary devices; and steel component ammunition, including core or jacket.
“Lighting a firework or leaving a smoldering campfire creates significant wildland fire risk. Under the right conditions, they easily start wildfires,” said Kim Prill, BLM Oregon/Washington acting state director. “Don’t risk it. Let’s work together to prevent every wildfire possible.”
More information on seasonal fire restrictions and fire closures is available HERE.
Oregon
What the Supreme Court’s transgender sports ruling means for Oregon
SALEM, Ore. (KATU) — The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that bar transgender girls and women from competing on girls’ and women’s school sports teams.
The decision could influence future policy debates in Oregon, but does not immediately change the state’s rules.
Oregon continues to allow students to participate in school sports, physical education, and other school activities in accordance with their gender identity.
The Oregon School Activities Association, which oversees high school sports statewide, said it is reviewing the ruling with legal counsel.
“The Oregon School Activities Association is reviewing today’s Supreme Court ruling with our legal counsel. The association will work with the Oregon Department of Education on the ruling’s impacts on state law and OSAA policy in order to provide updated guidance to member schools as needed. The OSAA remains committed to ensuring interscholastic activities remain a safe and welcoming environment for all student-athletes,” a spokesperson said in a statement.
While Tuesday’s ruling leaves Oregon’s current policy in place, political scientists say it could reshape the legal landscape surrounding future proposals.
“This particular decision, coupled with a federal push, may end up altering the landscape of opportunities in states that affirm trans athletic participation,” said Allison Gash, chair of the Department of Political Science at the University of Oregon.
SEE ALSO | Supreme Court ruling preserves Oregon law protecting late-arriving mail ballots
Gash said the Supreme Court’s decision itself does not require Oregon to change its policies.
Instead, she said the more immediate question is how the Trump administration chooses to respond.
“Where we could see some required movement on the part of Oregon or where it may impact Oregon directly is how the federal government determines what it wants to do in light of today’s ruling,” said Gash.
According to Gash, the administration has argued that schools should separate sports teams based on biological sex under its interpretation of Title IX.
“One of the several efforts that the federal government is taking to ensure that all states bar trans female athletes in particular from participating in women’s sports is to tie the provision of federal funding to essentially a ban,” she said.
She added that the Supreme Court’s ruling could make the administration “more muscular in those efforts because now the court has essentially upheld that interpretation.”
Oregon leaders respond
House Republicans unsuccessfully pushed legislation during the 2025 legislative session that would have required school sports teams to be separated based on biological sex, but the bill failed in the Democratic-controlled House.
The bill was sponsored by then state representative Christine Drazan, the 2026 Republican candidate for Governor.
In a news release Tuesday, Drazan welcomed the ruling, calling it “a victory for fairness, for common sense, and for progress.”
“Girls and young women across Oregon are still competing on an unfair and unsafe playing field. I have always supported women’s right to compete, and as Governor, I will do everything in my power to make sure that women’s sports are protected and girls across our state get their shot to compete and win,” said Drazan.
KATU asked Governor Tina Kotek whether she supports legislative or executive action to maintain Oregon’s current policy following the ruling.
The governor’s office had not responded by publication.
Meanwhile, Oregon Senate Democrats said in a news release that the decision does not change students’ rights in Oregon, and they vowed to continue to protect the policy in effect today.
“Nobody wins when states deny children the right to play sports. Sports have the power to unify, but today’s SCOTUS decision will lead to dangerous gender harassment of athletic girls. States banning access to sports are feeding the same regime that is trying to divide and control,” said State Senator Courtney Neron-Misslin.
She continued, “Oregonians must keep our eye on the ball. We must stay focused on addressing actual problems, protecting rights, addressing affordability, and investing in education. Today’s decision erodes LGBTQ+ rights and the rights of women across our country. Here in Oregon, we will continue to stand up to injustices and defend our most vulnerable from Trump-style attacks.”
-
Denver, CO5 minutes agoNuggets Sign Marvin Bagley to 1-Year Deal: What It Means
-
Seattle, WA7 minutes agoFOURTH OF JULY 2026: Here’s where Seattle Parks will leave the lights on longer
-
San Diego, CA13 minutes agoUSA fans pack San Diego bar to cheer on USMNT’s dominant World Cup knockout win
-
Milwaukee, WI20 minutes agoHundreds rally on Milwaukee’s South Side against ICE arrests and in solidarity with immigrants
-
Atlanta, GA23 minutes agoBraves News: Tarik Skubal rumor, Cam Caminiti to the Futures Game, more
-
Minneapolis, MN28 minutes agoIn the 70s
-
Indianapolis, IN35 minutes agoBC39 Results: July 1, 2026 (Indianapolis Dirt Track) – Racing News
-
Pittsburg, PA38 minutes agoWhat was happening in Pittsburgh in 1776?