Connect with us

New Mexico

N.M. enacted a climate law 3 years ago. Then things got hard.

Published

on

N.M. enacted a climate law 3 years ago. Then things got hard.


New Mexico enacted one of the crucial bold local weather legal guidelines in America in 2019, with plans to part out coal, increase renewables and help displaced coal staff. Three years later, the Land of Enchantment exhibits simply how messy the power transition could be.

Greenhouse gasoline emissions are down and renewable technology is up, however fights proceed to burn over the way forward for displaced staff and the price of the transition. Communities in northwest New Mexico are urgent to reopen a just lately shuttered coal plant with carbon seize and sequestration. Renewable tasks meant to fill the hole left by dwindling coal have been delayed by a world provide chain crunch. And a authorized struggle over the best way to pay for the power shift, which pits the state’s largest energy firm in opposition to utility regulators, is now earlier than the state Supreme Courtroom.

The try to inexperienced New Mexico’s financial system will even be on the poll subsequent month, when Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, a Democrat who has championed the transition, faces Mark Ronchetti, a Republican who has attacked the governor for pursuing a “California power coverage.”

The result might reverberate nationally. Not like Washington and New York, each of which additionally enacted main local weather legal guidelines three years in the past, New Mexico is a fossil gas state. Oil and gasoline recurrently accounts for greater than 1 / 4 of its common fund revenues. Coal, in the meantime, was answerable for greater than half the state’s electrical energy technology as just lately as 2017.

Advertisement

However by 2019 it was clear that the state’s power system was altering. Public Service Firm of New Mexico (PNM), the state’s largest utility, introduced in 2017 it will shut a big coal plant within the northwestern nook of the state. That plant, the San Juan Producing Station, extinguished its boilers final month.

“The transition is occurring,” mentioned Sarah Propst, New Mexico secretary of power, minerals and pure sources. “The way you construction it and react to it, that’s the place New Mexico is attempting to be forward of the curve.”

The legislation was meant to place some guardrails on the transition, she mentioned. It required half the state’s electrical energy to return from renewables by 2030 and all of its energy to return from zero-carbon sources by 2045. It additionally earmarked $40 million to be cut up between coal staff and neighborhood growth tasks to melt the affect of coal closures (Climatewire, Jan. 3, 2020).

Three years later, New Mexico is making progress regardless of the difficulties it has confronted, Propst mentioned. Utilities are on observe to fulfill the state’s renewable portfolio commonplace, regardless of provide chain delays that prevented renewable tasks from coming on-line as deliberate. Wind and photo voltaic account for 38 p.c of energy this 12 months within the balancing authority run by PNM, up from 23 p.c in 2019, U.S. Vitality Info Administration figures present. Energy plant emissions additionally fell from 23 million tons in 2019 to 19 million tons final 12 months, in line with EPA information.

Even so, the utility was compelled to maintain one coal unit operating at San Juan by the summer season to maintain the lights on as tasks slated to return on-line this 12 months have been delayed. The utility reported on the time that its reserve margin for energy was 0.9 p.c, far lower than the 18 p.c it shoots for (Climatewire, Feb. 1).

Advertisement

“The utilities have been in a position to handle for it,” Propst mentioned. “It’s been troublesome; they’ve needed to work actually onerous. It simply speaks to why it’s essential to work on this and to maintain at it.”

‘Assault in opposition to fossil fuels’

New Mexico Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D) is in a good reelection race. Her Republican opponent, Mark Ronchetti, has attacked her local weather insurance policies. (Jim Weber/Santa Fe New Mexican through AP, Pool, File) | AP

The legislation nonetheless stays controversial, significantly in San Juan County, a sliver of northwestern New Mexico abutting Arizona and Colorado that’s dwelling to San Juan and the 4 Corners Producing Station, one other massive coal plant.

Some native leaders say the Vitality Transition Act has harmed their neighborhood, and so they have as a substitute endorsed a plan by Enchant Vitality Corp. to reopen San Juan and set up carbon seize. The plan has drawn criticism from environmentalists, who notice Enchant has not accomplished designs for the ability and lacks an settlement to promote the ability or entry transmission (Energywire, Sept. 30).

However native leaders see the plan as a technique to protect jobs and stabilize energy provides. The town of Farmington owns a 5 p.c stake in San Juan Producing Station by its municipal utility and has been negotiating with PNM about taking up the plant. No deal has been agreed to.

“Like most energy-rich communities throughout the globe, we’re confronted with an assault in opposition to fossil fuels,” mentioned Farmington Mayor Nate Duckett. “That’s impacting us proper now.”

Advertisement

San Juan Producing Station progressively phased down its operations. Two of its 4 models closed in 2017. The ultimate two have been closed this 12 months. Employment has been declining together with the plant’s output, Duckett mentioned. PNM reported that 44 staff have been laid off when the ability shut down final month, and one other 41 will lose their jobs this month.

Duckett mentioned he had heard tales of some staff discovering jobs within the area’s gasoline fields, the place manufacturing has picked up amid an upswing in costs. However the mayor mentioned he was involved about households leaving the realm on account of San Juan’s closure. In the meantime, he mentioned, the renewable tasks constructed within the area have but to return on-line and cash meant to assist the realm has not appeared.

“That’s the reason we’ve got to get some change in Santa Fe with cheap thought processes that you’ve got megawatt-hours within the floor earlier than you are taking them offline,” he mentioned.

‘Gone too far’

Maybe the largest struggle has been over the best way to pay for the closure of San Juan. When the Vitality Transition Act was enacted, PNM and environmentalists argued the legislation would save shoppers cash by taking an previous, inefficient plant offline. San Juan’s oldest unit started working in 1973.

The Vitality Transition Act relied on a monetary instrument referred to as securitization to cushion the affect of San Juan’s closure. Understanding how securitization works requires some understanding of utility ratemaking. Utilities that function as regulated monopolies, like PNM, get better the price of their investments in energy crops and transmission strains from ratepayers over the course of a long time.

Advertisement

The utility had an impressive funding of $283 million in San Juan on the time of the plant’s closure. As an alternative of forcing ratepayers to proceed paying for a closed plant or forcing the utility to put in writing off its funding, the Vitality Transition Act referred to as on the utility to promote bonds so it might recoup its remaining funding. The bond funds could be made by ratepayers however would price lower than if shoppers stumped up the cash by their common month-to-month payments.

The thought represented one thing of a compromise, mentioned Cydney Beadles, New Mexico clear power program supervisor at Western Useful resource Advocates and a former state utility regulator. Underneath the deal, PNM could be paid in full for its excellent funding in San Juan. That was enticing to the utility as a result of New Mexico regulators seemingly would have made the corporate write off a portion of its funding, Beadles mentioned. In change, PNM agreed to the state’s renewable and emission targets.

“The [Energy Transition Act] was a carrot for PNM,” Beadles mentioned. “You conform to renewable commonplace portfolio will increase, and we’ll make it so that you don’t should struggle for full capital restoration. And to guard ratepayers, we’ll do it with securitization.”

The one downside: PNM has up to now declined to difficulty the bonds for San Juan’s closure. The utility has mentioned it plans to take action after New Mexico regulators decide on new charges for the corporate.

The utility appealed an order from the state Public Regulatory Fee, which is required to difficulty the bonds referred to as for by the Vitality Transition Act, to the state’s Supreme Courtroom. The order would have resulted in a financial savings of $8.19 per thirty days for shoppers.

Advertisement

The utility argued that the fee erred, saying the transfer would lead to misplaced revenues of $128 million. PNM mentioned the fee’s order didn’t account for renewable investments made to compensate for San Juan’s closure and for rising prices throughout its enterprise.

The corporate, in an announcement, referred to as the Vitality Transition Act “an efficient mannequin for executing the power transition.” In a follow-up interview, PNM spokesperson Ray Sandoval mentioned a lot of the disagreement round securitization stemmed from the pandemic. The corporate all the time supposed to difficulty the bonds upon completion of a charge case in 2020, but it surely determined to carry off on submitting for larger charges on account of the pandemic, Sandoval mentioned.

“In the end prospects are nonetheless going to see these financial savings,” he mentioned. “However the funding that must be made to the grid to deal with renewables are prices of this power transition.”

That stance has drawn criticism from greens and shopper teams. They contend the utility is double-dipping by in search of to have shoppers pay for San Juan at a charge that assumes it’s nonetheless working after which once more by compensation of its bonds. In a short filed with the state Supreme Courtroom, Western Useful resource Advocates mentioned the shutdown of San Juan would lead to losses of $100 million yearly from charges.

“I believe they actually have an obligation to hold out the cut price that accommodates advantages for them, and so they want to verify ratepayers get the advantages they have been promised,” Beadles mentioned. “For me, they’ve gone too far.”

Advertisement

Within the large image, the Vitality Transition Act has succeeded at boosting renewables and supplied help to former coal staff, Beadles mentioned, noting that $20 million earmarked for former workers of San Juan and the coal mine that served it has been paid out. However she remains to be anxious concerning the affect on ratepayers. One lesson of the Vitality Transition Act is that lawmakers have to be particular on how a instrument like securitization is employed.

“You possibly can’t go a legislation and be performed,” she mentioned. “Implementation is essential. When there may be some huge cash concerned, there’ll all the time be litigation.”

For now, the legislation has taken a again seat to points like abortion and crime within the gubernatorial race between Lujan Grisham and Ronchetti. However it did obtain transient point out at a latest debate. Ronchetti accused Lujan Grisham of forcing New Mexicans to pay $300 million to close down San Juan, and he argued it must be saved open.

Lujan Grisham responded by noting the plant was set to shut earlier than the Vitality Transition Act was enacted, and she or he framed the legislation as an try to spice up renewable power funding and support displaced staff.

The governor had a 16-point lead in a latest ballot carried out for an Albuquerque TV station and an 8-point lead in a ballot performed for the NM Political Report.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

New Mexico

NM neurosurgeon Mark Erasmus deemed unfit for duty after claims more than two dozen patients, some partially paralyzed,

Published

on

NM neurosurgeon Mark Erasmus deemed unfit for duty after claims more than two dozen patients, some partially paralyzed,


Jan. 12—After $19 million in medical malpractice payouts to settle 26 patient claims, Albuquerque neurosurgeon Mark Erasmus has lost his license to practice medicine in New Mexico.

It didn’t come soon enough for Diane Jennifer Gutierrez, a 52-year-old single mother who is now partially paralyzed.

The New Mexico Medical Board concluded last April that Erasmus exhibited “manifest incapacity or incompetence,” making him unfit to continue working as a doctor. A state district judge on Dec. 30 upheld the board’s decision to revoke Erasmus’ medical license, but he intends to appeal.

Erasmus, who was first licensed as a physician in New Mexico in 1979, is also fighting a malpractice lawsuit filed by Gutierrez against him and Lovelace Medical Center in Albuquerque, where she underwent spinal fusion in February 2022 to relieve upper back and shoulder pain that radiated down her left arm, her lawsuit stated.

Advertisement

“She literally walked in there and never walked again,” said her attorney Lisa Curtis of Albuquerque last week. Deposition testimony in the case shows that a month before the surgery, Erasmus had some kind of medical event that forced him to stop operating on a different patient. Another surgeon had to finish the procedure.

Curtis contends he passed out, but Erasmus said he never lost consciousness and was later cleared by a cardiologist.

Gutierrez is one of four of Erasmus’ former patients currently suing him for medical negligence in New Mexico state district court. Three of the four are now wheelchair users or are quadriplegic.

Since 2021, the 73-year-old physician has been sued for medical malpractice nine times — a factor cited in the license revocation order by the state medical board, which oversees licensing and discipline of physicians and physician assistants in the state.

The board also contended there was credible evidence that from 2001 to the present, more than $19 million has been paid out by insurance carriers to settle 26 malpractice claims involving Erasmus.

Advertisement

The board also cited the fact that Erasmus agreed to undergo a “fitness for duty evaluation and a neuropsychological evaluation to determine safety to practice.” The evaluations began in December 2022, 10 months after Gutierrez’s surgery.

“The results of those evaluations show respondent is not fit to practice medicine,” stated a notice of contemplated action the medical board sent to Erasmus in September 2023.

His attorney, Bryan Davis, in an appeal of the board’s decision, contended his client had been deemed unfit for duty specifically as a neurosurgeon but wasn’t considered unfit to practice medicine generally.

Davis also contended that the $19 million in payouts was “unsubstantiated” and contended the allegation “ignored the reality that insurance companies settle medical malpractice cases that are defensible and winnable for many reasons besides whether the physician actually committed malpractice.” There were also defendants other than Erasmus who were named in the lawsuits, Davis wrote.

Davis, in a phone interview on Friday, said his client didn’t want to settle some of the claims but was overruled by other defendants, such as the hospitals that were sued.

Advertisement

In recent years, Davis said, Erasmus had some health conditions, including long COVID. At the time of Gutierrez’s surgery he also was going through a bad divorce, according to board documents.

Erasmus would like to be able to teach, do insurance reviews and independent medical exams, stated the board in recounting his testimony during a 2023 hearing on his license.

“He’s not intending to set foot in an operating room again,” Davis told the Journal.

Several of the lawsuits fault Lovelace for permitting Erasmus to work as a neurosurgeon in its facilities despite his history of malpractice payouts.

“It can be only for monetary profit that Lovelace Medical Center and its owners and operators would hire, retain, credential and privilege such a well-known incompetent surgeon as Dr. Erasmus,” stated Gutierrez’s lawsuit. Erasmus was employed as a staff neurosurgeon by Southwest Medical Group at Lovelace Medical Center from 2020 to February 2023. Previously, he was affiliated with Presbyterian Hospital.

Advertisement

Holly Armstrong, an Albuquerque attorney representing Erasmus and Lovelace in the Gutierrez case, wrote in one court filing that the defendants “deny they provided negligent care to Ms. Gutierrez, deny they breached the appropriate standard of care, and deny there were any improper omissions in the care provided.” Armstrong couldn’t be reached for comment late last week.

Erasmus has blamed Gutierrez’s injuries on a stroke, but her lawsuit disputes that as the cause of her permanent weakness in her arms and legs and paralysis. It alleges Erasmus permanently damaged her spinal cord and later wrote in her medical record that there were no complications in surgery.

State records show it’s rare for the New Mexico Medical Board to revoke a physician’s license, and even more unusual for the board to cite malpractice settlements as among the reasons to open an inquiry. Typically, revocations have occurred when physicians have sexual relations with patients, are criminally charged with crimes like drunken driving, or overprescribe opioids.

Interim Medical Board executive director Monique Parks told the Journal in an email last week that details about the board’s investigations are confidential.

Asked why the board decided to take action on Erasmus’ license after 26 malpractice claims, Parks said, “It is common practice for state medical boards to use malpractice data as a tool to detect unprofessional conduct that may violate the Medical Practice Act. Some boards have built-in levels of malpractice that trigger investigations, such as a certain number of malpractice settlements in a certain span of time.”

Advertisement

Parks wouldn’t say whether the New Mexico Medical Board has adopted such a “built-in level” for malpractice claims, saying only, “medical malpractice settlements and claims may be an important consideration in deciding the scope of a complaint and investigation by the board.”

“The NMMB staff exercises broad discretion,” she added, “depending on the facts and circumstances, when opening an investigation and an administrative proceeding, with the oversight and expertise of our board members as mandated by the Medical Practice Act.”

The Gutierrez lawsuit faulted Lovelace officials for failing to warn Gutierrez before her surgery about the multiple other prior malpractice claims naming Erasmus.

“She’s a smart lady and she couldn’t have known this,” said Curtis. At the time of the surgery, she added, Gutierrez had been taking care of her son, now 11, after receiving a buyout from Verizon, where she had been a manager.

Curtis lauded the board’s decision.

Advertisement

“I think the board was trying to send a message: We’re not going to tolerate this quality of physicians for patients anymore.”



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

New Mexico routs San Diego State, and it’s The Pits

Published

on

New Mexico routs San Diego State, and it’s The Pits


ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. – Remember the San Diego State basketball team that couldn’t rebound?

It’s back.

The Aztecs struggled mightily in that department earlier this season despite a roster with six players at 6-foot-9 or taller, then seemed to solve the issue during the endless stream of practices over the semester break with an endless stream of rebounding drills. And then Saturday at The Pit happened.

New Mexico wasn’t shooting particularly well, but you don’t need to when you attempt 19 more shots than your opponent because you keep rebounding your misses. The result: a 62-48 New Mexico win on national TV that puts the Aztecs 2½ games behind the Lobos (14-3, 6-0) in the Mountain West race.

Advertisement

There’s still a long way to go, and the schedule softens considerably for the Aztecs over the next month. But they won’t compete for the conference title if they can’t play better a mile above sea level or rebound better (or shoot or take care of the ball) at any elevation.

“We had to beat them at their own game,” Lobos coach Richard Pitino said. “We knew we had to defend and rebound to win the game, because offense was going to be hard to come by. That’s what San Diego State has done for so long, and they’ve obviously won a lot of games.

“It wasn’t going to be a masterpiece, and that’s fine. To me, it was a beautiful win.”

And an equally ugly loss.

Last year’s Aztecs team struggled in the six games at 4,500 feet or above, losing five of them.

Advertisement

This edition didn’t look much better, quickly trailing by double digits coming off a pair of impressive wins at lower elevations – 76-68 at Boise State last Saturday and 67-38 at home against Air Force on Wednesday despite trailing by 12 early.

The “OR” (for offensive rebounds) column on the stat sheet told you all you needed to know: 18-3, Lobos.Second-chance points: 14-1, Lobos.

First-half points: 20, the fewest by the Aztecs in 93 games.

Or look at it this way: Both teams shot 35%, but New Mexico had 67 attempts to SDSU’s 48.

“It’s a recipe for a loss on the road,” coach Brian Dutcher said, “which it was.”

Advertisement

The Aztecs (10-4, 3-2) briefly pulled within five points in the opening moments of the second half, then surrendered two offensive boards on the next possession that the Lobos converted into a wide-open corner 3-pointer.

Soon, SDSU was down 20 and that was pretty much that.

As the final seconds ticked off, New Mexico students chanted, “Who’s your daddy?”

“The special thing about basketball is that basketball is just like life,” said Jared Coleman-Jones, who had 10 points and four rebounds. “Some days you don’t have the best day, and today we didn’t have the best day on the glass.

“We’ve got to take that as grown men and we have to get back in the lab. … That’s one thing we’re going to have to emphasize – a lot – for the whole season: the glass, offensively and defensively. Because that wins us games.”

Advertisement

Part of the issue was scheme. If you take one thing away on defense, you expose yourself in other areas and the question becomes whether your opponent can exploit them.

The Aztecs, as they often do, opted to switch all ball screens in an effort to prevent New Mexico point guard Donovan Dent – the front-runner for Mountain West player of the year averaging 19.3 points and 6.9 assists – from turning the corner and getting straight-line drives to the basket. That much worked, at least in the first half, holding Dent to four points.

But that meant an Aztecs guard was now switched onto a Lobos big. And to do that, the guard defends in front to deter the easy post entry and invite the far more difficult over-the-top pass.

The problem: The 6-10, 240-pound Nigerian center now has inside position under the basket for the rebound on a missed shot against your 6-3, 175-pound guard.

New Mexico’s Mustapha Amzil had 11 rebounds. Nelly Junior Joseph and Filip Boronvicanin had nine each. Guard Tru Washington had five. No SDSU player had more than four.

Advertisement

“For the most part, I thought we did a good job taking Dent out of the game in the halfcourt,” Dutcher said. “He’s a dynamic player. But you give and take with some of these defensive game plans. At the end of the day, it’s a team that’s averaging close to 85 points per game. We hold them to 62 in their building and they shoot 36%, but then they get 18 offensive rebounds and second-chance opportunities.”

Second-chance scoring: 14-1, Lobos.

“We did talk about it,” said Pitino, whose team has won seven straight since a Dec. 7 overtime loss against New Mexico State. “They were switching. We felt like that would be an advantage, and our guys really took advantage of it.”

Of course, the Aztecs weren’t much better at the other end, either, in what was statistically their worst offensive performance of the season.

They didn’t make a perimeter shot until 3:43 left in the first half. They had nine first-half turnovers. They shot five air balls. They missed 13 layups. They were 9 of 17 at the line. Miles Byrd had 14 points but needed 13 shots. Fellow starting guards Nick Boyd and BJ Davis were a combined 2 of 14. And when they did miss, they couldn’t chase down the rebound.

Advertisement

“We’re going to miss shots, but we have to get second-chance opportunities,” said Dutcher, whose team had 15 and 24 offensive boards in the previous two games, both wins.

Of their three Saturday, two were “team rebounds” off a foul or out of bounds. They had only one player actually grab an offensive board, and that was by Byrd after Boyd missed a fast-break layup. And then he missed the follow.

The only difference from last year’s 88-70 spanking on national TV at The Pit was that they didn’t blow a 12-point lead.

They led 2-0 and 4-2 this year before the Lobos erupted for a 12-0 run and never really looked back.

It was always going to be big ask, though, taking such a young team (without injured senior guard Reese Waters) into The Pit and mile-high elevation for the first time. Seven members of the nine-man rotation had never experienced the crazed Lobos fans, and four had never played at altitude (and only two had ever played extended minutes above 4,500 feet).

Advertisement

They looked the part: sluggish, discombobulated, out of rhythm, out of sorts.

“You get that first wind, you get that second wind, it’s that third wind that you start feeling it,” said Coleman-Jones, whose previous stops were in the lowlands at Northwestern and Middle Tennessee. “You start feeling the air get a little thin in your lungs. When you try to sprint back, you’ve got a piano on your back.”

Notable

Next up: a pair of home games against Colorado State (Tuesday) and UNLV (Saturday) … The team flew commercial to Albuquerque and, for the first time this season, took a charter flight home given the quick turnaround before Colorado State … Byrd tweaked an ankle with 8:49 to go when he crashed into the courtside advertising boards. He returned but did not score again … Miles Heide played after sitting out Wednesday’s game with the flu but only for seven minutes. Demarshay Johnson Jr., also out Wednesday with the flu, was on the trip but did not suit up …

Dent had a more productive second half thanks to some fast-break baskets and free throws, finishing with 16 points and five assists. The Lobos, though, were only plus-seven points with him on the floor … New Mexico shot only 6 of 28 (21.4%) on 3s … The Lobos also had big advantages in fast-break scoring (13-2), points off turnovers (9-1) and points in the paint (32-20) … After last year’s highly criticized officiating performance from a crew with little or no experience at The Pit, a veteran crew was assigned Saturday: Kelly Pfeiffer, Larry Scirotto and Deldre Carr.

Originally Published:

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

New Mexico

Rep. Hembree resigns of New Mexico Legislature

Published

on

Rep. Hembree resigns of New Mexico Legislature


SANTA FE, N.M. (KRQE) – The New Mexico State Legislature announced the resignation of Representative Jared Hembree on Saturday. A press release states the Chaves County lawmaker is stepping down due to unforeseen health-related circumstances that need immediate attention.

“It is with a heavy heart that I step down from the State Legislature,” Rep. Hembree said in a statement. “Serving the people of my district has been a profound honor. My family and I believe in Chaves County, and we must prioritize my health to ensure that we can serve in good faith in the future.”

Opening day for the 2025 New Mexico Legislative Session is January 21.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending