Connect with us

Nevada

Proposed bill would end citizenship requirement for police officers

Published

on

Proposed bill would end citizenship requirement for police officers


Noe Diaz, a North Las Vegas nursing pupil, would have been delighted to pursue a profession in legislation enforcement.

However Diaz — a Mexican-born immigrant dropped at america at age 1 — instantly confronted a vital roadblock: he’s not a U.S. citizen, which is a requirement to turn out to be a police officer in Nevada.

This upcoming legislative session, town of North Las Vegas goals to alter that with its proposed Meeting Invoice 30.

If handed and signed by Gov. Joe Lombardo, the invoice would take away the citizenship requirement, permitting any resident legally licensed to work within the U.S. to start the method to hitch a police academy.

Advertisement

Neighboring statehouses in historically liberal California and conservative Utah have not too long ago handed comparable laws.

Whereas police departments battle to recruit officers, AB 30 would develop the variety of potential candidates in Nevada.

“There’s a disaster proper now occurring nationally,” stated Jared Luke, North Las Vegas’ director of presidency affairs and financial improvement. “It’s not only a Nevada factor, it’s not only a North Las Vegas factor, the place recruiting numbers for cops and police departments nationally have fallen.”

Huge recruitment pool

If the legislation passes, about 140,000 inexperienced card holders and between 12,000 to fifteen,000 Deferred Motion for Childhood Arrivals recipients like Diaz can be eligible to hitch police forces within the state. The U.S. navy, for instance, already permits everlasting residents to enlist.

Advertisement

“That’s a serious pool of doubtless certified candidates that wish to serve in the neighborhood, the place they dwell and who need a greater neighborhood,” Luke stated. “However they’re prohibited to take action despite the fact that legally they’ve the authority to work in america, so, that’s actually the genesis of AB 30.”

Lifting the citizenship requirement wouldn’t supersede the opposite strict restrictions, equivalent to background checks and bodily {qualifications} wanted earlier than starting coaching in a police academy, Luke stated.

“All we’re doing is saying that we want for the state to acknowledge that that is a further pool from which to attract,” he stated.

Precedent in schooling

Luke famous that eliminating citizenship necessities will not be unprecedented in Nevada.

Advertisement

State lawmakers in 2015 did so to deal with the instructor scarcity. And police departments in North Las Vegas and Las Vegas did so for his or her “explorer” applications, which permits youngsters to get a style of what it’s wish to be in legislation enforcement.

“We’re bringing children in and younger individuals into an explorer program, the place there’s no citizenship requirement, however then in the event that they actually fall in love with policing after which we inform them, ‘you realize what, you may’t really be an actual police officer,’” Luke stated.

An “immense quantity of labor” has gone into the proposed laws, which features a plethora of conversations with police departments, police unions, legislators and immigrant teams, Luke stated.

They mentioned “who was affected, who wouldn’t be affected an what’s the general profit to one thing like this, and actually, what it boils right down to is public security,” Luke stated. “And on high of that, equal alternative.”

AB 30, sponsored by the Meeting Committee on Authorities Affairs, was first filed in November.

Advertisement

Police departments noncommittal

Metro stated it’s “conscious” of AB 30, and that the division is reviewing the laws.

“This invoice is considered one of many the Metropolis of Henderson is reviewing previous to the beginning of the legislative session,” a metropolis spokesperson wrote in a press release. “Like different native legislation enforcement businesses, the Metropolis is open to discussing methods we will enhance the pool of certified police officer candidates.”

A spokesperson for Lombardo didn’t handle AB 30, however wrote, “We’ll monitor all payments as they work by way of the legislative course of and interact once we really feel mandatory.”

Lombardo, a legislation enforcement veteran, has persistently advocated for the hiring of extra officers.

Advertisement

Nevada State Police and the Las Vegas Police Protecting Affiliation, the rank-and-file union for Metro, didn’t reply to messages from the Overview-Journal looking for remark.

Political limbo

For many everlasting residents, turning into a U.S. citizen takes a number of years. However DACA recipients, also known as “Dreamers,” have been in political limbo since former President Barack Obama issued the designation by way of government order in 2012. They need to renew their residency and work permits each two years and don’t have any path to everlasting resident standing, a lot much less citizenship.

“I’d have beloved the chance to turn out to be a police officer,” stated Diaz, who beforehand was a DACA recipient.

Rising up, that standing introduced the 24-year-old uncertainty and a scarcity safety and a way of belonging, he stated. You’re “dwelling on the sting, and don’t know what’s going to occur tomorrow with legislators.”

Advertisement

He added: “You don’t actually really feel such as you belong again in your nation — in Mexico — and you’re feeling like they don’t need you right here in america.”

There have been different limitations, too.

A pupil with good grades, Diaz was accepted into San Diego State College, however couldn’t apply for monetary help. He finally moved to Southern Nevada about three years in the past. Not each employer hires DACA candidates, he stated.

Diaz earned everlasting residency across the time he was accepted right into a nursing program in Las Vegas final yr, which was a requirement. He graduates in 2024.

Diaz stated he hopes the elimination of citizenship necessities are expanded nationally.

Advertisement

“I really feel as Dreamers, we sort of embody the American dream,” he stated. “We’re right here to turn out to be higher individuals for our neighborhood, and I simply really feel like this could open up an entire bunch of alternatives.”

Contact Ricardo Torres-Cortez at rtorres@reviewjournal.com. Observe him on Twitter @rickytwrites.





Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Nevada

Port of Nevada adds rail service

Published

on

Port of Nevada adds rail service


The Port of Nevada™, a 224-acre, inland port operation and intermodal ramp in Northern Nevada, owned and developed by Industrial Realty Group, LLC (IRG), will offer intermodal service for imports and exports between Fernley and the Port of Oakland, US. This venture was the result of their collaboration with Union Pacific Railroad, the CMA CGM Group, and the Port of Oakland.

“Direct rail access between Reno and the West Coast significantly increases the amount of cargo freight that can be shipped,” said Stuart Lichter, President of the Port of Nevada and IRG. “This collaborative venture will provide our clients with a more efficient, reliable, and environmentally sensitive way to transport goods.”

The Port of Nevada offers a full-service rail facility on the property which is connected to Union Pacific’s network. Rail operations include bulk commodity and intermodal transloading, and storage of multiple commodities. In addition, there are multiple opportunities for building suits and on-site storage.

Advertisement

The direct rail access to the port will create many opportunities for savings, efficiencies, supply chain options, and sustainability for Port of Nevada customers.

The CMA CGM Group, a global provider of sea, land, air, and logistics solutions, was Port of Nevada’s exclusive ocean carrier partner through 2024. This collaboration will provide worldwide connectivity to Asia and Europe.

With the businesses experiencing the impact of supply chain challenges in recent years and consistently with traversing the frequently weather or traffic impacted Interstate 80 corridor, the draw to rail becomes more attractive.

Clients utilising rail can expect to decrease their carbon footprint and become less impacted by road conditions, trucking regulations, and carbon emissions. According to Union Pacific, transporting by rail is also very efficient and cost-effective; approximately one ton of rail cargo can be transported nearly 400 miles on just one gallon of diesel fuel. In addition, trains account for only 2% of all transportation-relation greenhouse gas emissions, while medium-duty and heavy-duty trucks account for nearly 25%.

Further support from Reno’s local economic development experts at Northern Nevada Development Authority (NNDA) and the Economic Development Authority of Western Nevada (EDAWN), provide companies with the tools they need to thrive.

Advertisement

“This project is a very unique opportunity for those looking to expand in the Reno market,” said Taylor Adams, EDAWN CEO. “The coastal connectivity IRG is providing is something companies need in Western Nevada, and we will do all we can to support the project’s continued growth throughout the region.”

“We are very excited to support the IRG inland port project,” said Jeff Sutich, Executive Director of the NNDA. “As a federally designated Tech Hub, focused on onshoring businesses to Nevada, this site is in a prime position to support advanced manufacturing companies that will be expanding to the State.”

Click here for free registration to Dry Bulk

Read the article online at: https://www.drybulkmagazine.com/ports-terminals/18062024/port-of-nevada-adds-rail-service/

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Nevada

'Those families are dead': Nevada senator tears into Sen. JD Vance's bump stock remarks

Published

on

'Those families are dead': Nevada senator tears into Sen. JD Vance's bump stock remarks


WASHINGTON — Sen. Jacky Rosen, D-Nev., tore into Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, on Monday over remarks he made about bump stocks as the Senate grapples with whether to ban them.

Vance, who is widely considered a vice presidential contender on the GOP ticket with former President Donald Trump, called efforts by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York and other Democrats to ban the devices “a huge distraction.”

“I think that we have to ask ourselves: What is the real gun violence problem in this country, and are we legislating in a way that solves fake problems? Or solves real problems?” Vance told reporters. “And my very strong suspicion is that the Schumer legislation is aimed at a PR problem, not something that’s going to meaningfully reduce gun violence in this country.”

Vance also said he was concerned the bill could “end up just inhibiting the rights of law-abiding Americans.” Pressed about the 58 people who were killed in a mass shooting in Las Vegas in 2017, he said: “The question is: How many people would have been shot alternatively? And you have to ask yourself the question: Will anyone actually not choose a bump stock because Chuck Schumer passes a piece of legislation?”

Advertisement

His comments drew a fiery response from Rosen, who faces re-election this year. The Las Vegas gunman used firearms equipped with bump stocks.

“This is not a fake problem,” she told reporters. “Let him come to Las Vegas. Let him see the memorial for those people who died. Let him talk to those families. It’s not a fake problem. Those families are dead.”

“Las Vegas was changed forever because of what the shooter did, and the bump stocks helped him. And let JD Vance come — and I’m going to take him to the memorials. We’re going to talk to — talk about our first responders, our ambulance drivers, our police, our firefighters, people at the blood bank, regular people. Shame on him. Shame on him for disrespecting the dead,” the normally mild-mannered Rosen said in a rare flash of anger.

The Supreme Court ruled last week that the executive branch cannot use an existing law to prohibit bump stocks, which modify semi-automatic weapons to fire bullets more quickly.

The 6-3 ruling, however, kept the door open for Congress to pass legislation banning the firearm accessories, and Schumer said Democrats plan to take up a measure as early as Tuesday.The war of words between Rosen and Vance pits two senators against each other over a hot-button issue that has galvanized many voters as mass shootings become commonplace in the U.S. Vance is courting a conservative base that is resistant to firearm limits, while Rosen’s stance appeals to a growing share of voters who have moved in favor of tougher gun laws.

Advertisement

Schumer also responded to Vance’s comments, telling NBC News: “Talk to the people in Las Vegas who lost loved ones.”

He said Democrats will ask the Senate for unanimous consent for legislation by Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M., called the BUMP Act, which would revise the U.S. criminal code to prohibit bump stocks.

The Trump administration initially put the regulation in place with the support of many Republicans. But Trump and some of the GOP lawmakers who backed it have now expressed less interest taking legislative steps to prohibit the accessories.

Any senator can deny a unanimous consent request. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told NBC News he will block the measure, meaning it would not be able to move forward under the expedited process.

“I will oppose any legislative fix,” Graham said Monday.

Advertisement

Vance, for his part, said his concerns were about Schumer’s legislative priorities.

“This is week three of Chuck Schumer focusing on fake problems instead of real problems,” he said. “We have real legislation. I have a rail safety bill that he promised he would bring up to the floor for a vote. Let’s do the things that actually have a chance of passing and actually making the country a better place.”

Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., an outspoken proponent of tougher gun laws, said senators should support the measure banning bump stocks, calling it a “moderate proposal” that Republicans should have no problem voting for.

“Is it good politics to make it easier for potential mass killers to get their hands on machine guns? Probably not,” he said. “The idea is to try to make this attractive to Republicans. And we would be a lot better off if psychopaths couldn’t get their hands on machine guns. Let’s see if we can get a consensus this week. So I’ll be talking to Republicans all week to see if we can scrounge it up.”

At least some Republicans favor the bump stock ban, including Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, who suggested the measure could come up through the normal process, requiring 60 votes to advance.

Advertisement

“I do support banning bump stocks,” he said. “I hope we can get a chance to vote on that.”

Rosen said Monday that she supports the Second Amendment, but she argued there is plenty Congress can still do to keep people safe.

“Thoughts and prayers don’t bring back anybody you love,” she said. “And it’s up to us to legislate. It’s up to us to keep people safe.”



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Nevada

Nevada troopers honored with memorial signs on Southern Nevada roadways

Published

on

Nevada troopers honored with memorial signs on Southern Nevada roadways


LAS VEGAS, Nev. (FOX5) – Nevada State Police and NDOT are honoring the lives of two of their own after they were tragically killed in a DUI crash late last year.

Sgt. Michael Abbate and Trooper Alberto Felix will now be recognized on our state roadways. The agency unveiled two memorial signs in honor of the fallen heroes.

The destinations serve as special places for both men. Trooper Felix’s sign is located near Craig Road and Nellis Air Force Base representing his time serving in the US Air Force. Sgt. Abbate’s sign is near the Las Vegas Motor Speedway, recognizing his racing days and contributions as the department’s leading emergency vehicle driver instructor.

Just last week, a judge sentenced the man who pleaded guilty to driving under the influence and killing the troopers. He will face 16-40 years in prison.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending