Montana
Standout Montana, SDSU Players Repping Home States In FCS Championship
“Why are FCS teams in the Dakotas and Montanas so good?”
That’s been a popular question when HERO Sports does radio hits in SEC areas of the country. These stations spend 99.9% of their college football conversation talking FBS. So it’s an understandable question when they want to get the lowdown on the FCS and how the Midwest has had a stranglehold on it recently.
Only three states have been represented in the last three FCS title games, including this year’s: Montana, North Dakota, and South Dakota.
North Dakota State played Montana State two years ago, NDSU played South Dakota State last year, and SDSU plays Montana this weekend.
In each of the last three playoff brackets, 3/4 of the semifinals have been teams from Montana or the Dakotas. And the national title game has become the Mon-Dak Challenge.
Casual college football fans are generally surprised at the level of play in such rural states. They are even more surprised to learn some of the biggest contributors are from in-state players. This year’s participants, No. 1 seed South Dakota State and No. 2 seed Montana, both have 16 in-state players on their 2-deeps. In total, the Jackrabbits have 28 players from South Dakota. The Grizzlies have 48 players from Montana.
And plenty of them are the star players.
For SDSU…
Its top four pass-catchers are SD natives in wide receivers Jadon and Jaxon Janke (Madison), WR Griffin Wilde (Sioux Falls), and tight end Zach Heins (Sioux Falls). Mason McCormick (Sioux Falls) is a multi-year All-American offensive lineman. Gus Miller (Brookings) won this season’s Rimington Award as the best FCS center. Cade Terveer (Brandon) is a starting defensive end for the No. 1 FCS scoring defense. Tucker Large (Sioux Falls) is a dynamic safety and punt returner
For Montana…
The top five tacklers are Montana natives: LB Braxton Hill (Anaconda), safety Ryder Meyer (Fairfield), LB Tyler Flink (Missoula), LB Ryan Tirrell (Missoula), and LB Levi Janacaro (Missoula). Trevin Gradney (Billings) is a starting cornerback with a team-high five interceptions. Jaxon Lee (Missoula), TJ Rausch (Missoula), and Garrett Graves (Eureka) are part of a deep stable of safeties. Junior Bergen (Billings) is an electric wide receiver and punt returner. Offensive lineman Journey Grimsrud (Huntley) received All-Conference accolades this fall.
Why do these teams dominate a subdivision of 128 members?
Actually, being in such rural states is an advantage. FCS schools in the east and south are surrounded by FBS schools, fighting to sell tickets, keep alumni engaged in their product and not the P5 product down the road, get more media attention, and attract local and regional sponsors.
“I think the best football is played in the Dakotas and the Montanas,” SDSU head coach Jimmy Rogers said. “You look at FCS football, the couple states — well, we don’t have professional sports. We are the professional sport in a sense. That, I think is cool. … I think it’s cool to have a bunch of guys that take pride in playing for their home state. You can see it with the passion on both sides and how we both play. There’s a physicality to it. There’s an effort to it. It’s bigger than just playing college football. It’s representing something that they take pride in, and I think that you could see it.”
Pound for pound, Montana is as fervent of college football fandom in America. You’re either a Grizzly or a Bobcat, and there is a genuine dislike for the other side. NDSU is the lowest-subsidized public FCS-level athletic department, yet its facilities are FBS-level due to external support. And SDSU has more momentum than anyone in the FCS with newer facilities and growing external support after last year’s national championship.
You need to invest for national success, even at the FCS level where there is still a purity aspect of college football that’s been lost in the power conferences. It’s easier to invest deeply in football when you know there will be a return on it with such passionate support from fans and local businesses.
“It’s just a cool experience,” Hill said. “I’m the only one from my town [Anaconda] on the Griz. And then you have guys like Levi Janacaro and Tyler Flink. We go around the state of Montana [for recruits] and everyone kind of meets up and everyone is similar. Once you start developing a relationship with one another and you develop that team goal, it’s just fun. And then the fan base in rural communities is amazing. It’s special. You go to Missoula on Saturdays and half the town of Anaconda or wherever that player may be from is there and supporting you.”
Of course, several power FCS programs in the south and east have moved up to the FBS. That has seen the power shift to the Big Sky and Missouri Valley Football Conference, where before the CAA and SoCon had years of owning the subdivision. However, NDSU’s run of national titles began when teams like App State, Georgia Southern, and Coastal Carolina were still in the FCS. And recent move-ups Sam Houston, Jacksonville State, and Kennesaw State were rarely going toe-to-toe with top FCS teams in the playoffs.
Location also helps in recruiting.
The Dakota and Montana programs recruit regionally. But they also get players from the south or the west. Coaches at these schools will often say they just need to get recruits from out of the region onto campus and at a game. The towns, town support, facilities, investments, and gameday atmospheres can’t be beaten by other FCS schools and plenty of FBS G5 schools.
While the current age of recruiting has seen power programs dip into the Dakotas and Montanas more, there still are hidden gems in the states. Guys who would probably be 3-star recruits if they lived elsewhere are 0-star recruits because they don’t go to the big camps. Offensive linemen who are 6-foot-5 and 250-pound three-sport athletes are overlooked because they’re still developing and play in towns of less than 1,000 people. They’re then 300-pounders as college upperclassmen and NFL prospects.
“I don’t think a lot of people expect that out of us,” Heins said. “I think we’re a bit underrecruited. It goes to show the level of talent that we have here even if we aren’t in major cities. We’re hard-working kids in these states, we’re going to grow and be tough and know how to play football.”
There is also something to be said about playing for their home-state teams.
Related Articles
For Montana kids growing up, sure they’d love to play in the NFL. But their football dreams are to play for the Grizzlies or the Bobcats. The heart and soul of the 2023 Montana team is the defense led by Montana guys, some of them former walk-ons who never faltered in their want to be a part of the team even though it took them four, sometimes five years to become a starter.
Montana star defensive tackle Alex Gubner is from California and said he didn’t know anything about Montana football when recruited. But he quickly learned as a redshirt.
“The moment I went in freshman year with coach Hauck and all the players, the team meetings and in the locker room, you understand that it’s a privilege and an honor to be on this team,” Gubner said. “Kids all over the state dream of putting on the Griz uniform. There are no pro teams here. We’re it. It’s either us or the neighbors. Guys like Braxton and Levi, it’s been their dream since they could walk to play for the Griz. And they’re living it out. It’s special to see so many guys want this for years and it’s finally coming to fruition.”
SDSU doesn’t have the decades-long tradition of Montana. But the Jacks’ rise in the 2010s from a playoff contender to a quarterfinalist to a semifinalist to now the juggernaut of the subdivision has brought new fandom across the state. And with that comes kids who grew up watching those former teams and are now current members. There is something to be said about keeping in-state recruits from getting out and also staving off the transfer portal when the core of your team has a unique sense of pride playing for your program.
“It’s big boy football up here,” Jaxon Janke said. “A lot of us are farm kids growing up. We learned what hard work is. It’s a testament to each school to recruit their areas. If you look at the comparison between SDSU and USD, we have way more dudes on the team from South Dakota and we’re more successful. We like to say that goes hand-in-hand. This team is super-connected, and being from the same state is a part of that.”
Montana
Montana Lottery Powerball, Lotto America results for March 4, 2026
The Montana Lottery offers multiple draw games for those aiming to win big.
Here’s a look at March 4, 2026, results for each game:
Winning Powerball numbers from March 4 drawing
07-14-42-47-56, Powerball: 06, Power Play: 4
Check Powerball payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Lotto America numbers from March 4 drawing
33-38-39-47-51, Star Ball: 07, ASB: 02
Check Lotto America payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Big Sky Bonus numbers from March 4 drawing
01-07-08-27, Bonus: 12
Check Big Sky Bonus payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Powerball Double Play numbers from March 4 drawing
05-10-26-53-59, Powerball: 06
Check Powerball Double Play payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Montana Cash numbers from March 4 drawing
03-04-06-08-10
Check Montana Cash payouts and previous drawings here.
Winning Millionaire for Life numbers from March 4 drawing
12-13-36-39-58, Bonus: 03
Check Millionaire for Life payouts and previous drawings here.
Feeling lucky? Explore the latest lottery news & results
When are the Montana Lottery drawings held?
- Powerball: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Mega Millions: 9 p.m. MT on Tuesday and Friday.
- Lucky For Life: 8:38 p.m. MT daily.
- Lotto America: 9 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday and Saturday.
- Big Sky Bonus: 7:30 p.m. MT daily.
- Powerball Double Play: 8:59 p.m. MT on Monday, Wednesday, and Saturday.
- Montana Cash: 8 p.m. MT on Wednesday and Saturday.
- Millionaire for Life: 9:15 p.m. MT daily.
Missed a draw? Peek at the past week’s winning numbers.
This results page was generated automatically using information from TinBu and a template written and reviewed by a Great Falls Tribune editor. You can send feedback using this form.
Montana
University of Montana president job draws high interest • Daily Montanan
The search for a new University of Montana president has drawn more than 60 applicants, according to a spokesperson for the Office of the Commissioner of Higher Education.
“We do not have an exact count at this time, as several applications are still being completed and additional submissions are expected,” said spokesperson and Deputy Commissioner Galen Hollenbaugh in an email earlier this week.
In January, then-UM-President Seth Bodnar announced his resignation to pursue other public service. Wednesday, the final day of filing, he announced he was running as an independent for the U.S. Senate to try to unseat Republican incumbent Steve Daines.
Commissioner of Higher Education Clayton Christian earlier said that with the advice of AGB Search, a firm that’s helped the Montana University System conduct other executive searches, he would undertake an expedited process to appoint a new president.
Christian has been providing brief updates on a website dedicated to the search. Last week, he said he and AGB Search are reviewing applications, and the pool of candidates was “strong and diverse.”
The commissioner also announced he was convening a small working group to assist in the search, members who “represent a variety of perspectives to assist in vetting and narrowing this field of exceptional candidates.”
In an email this week, Hollenbaugh identified the members of the working group who are assisting Christian with application review as:
- Community member and former Regent Joyce Dombrouski
- Faculty Senate Chairperson Valerie Moody
- Staff Senate President Dominic Beccari
- Administration Representative John DeBoer (Vice President of Academic Affairs)
- ASUM (Associated Students of the University of Montana) President Buddy Wilson
Hollenbaugh declined to comment on the way the rest of the process would unfold or the role the working group members would play.
Christian earlier said he anticipated an appointment within one to three months, or as soon as early this month.
Montana
Montana Supreme Court allows ballot measure on initiative process to move forward
HELENA — The Montana Supreme Court has ruled in favor of a proposed ballot measure intended to simplify the process for introducing ballot measures in the future.
Justices ruled 5-2 that the measure, currently called Ballot Issue #8, did not violate state requirements that a single constitutional amendment can’t make multiple separate changes to the Montana Constitution.
“We’re very grateful to the Montana Supreme Court for agreeing with us that the attorney general’s finding of legal insufficiency for Ballot Issue #8 was incorrect,” said SK Rossi, a spokesperson for Montanans Decide, the group sponsoring the measure.
Montanans Decide argues the Montana Legislature has passed laws making it harder for the public to propose and pass ballot issues. The Montana Constitution already guarantees the people the right to pass laws and amendments through ballot measures, but Ballot Issue #8 would expand that to include a right to “impartial, predictable, transparent, and expeditious processes” for proposing those measures. It would seek to prevent “interference from the government or the use of government resources to support or oppose the ballot issue.”
Attorney General Austin Knudsen’s office argued the measure “implicitly amended” multiple provisions in the state constitution, including by limiting the “power and authority of public officials to speak officially on ballot issues that affect those officials’ public duties” and by putting restrictions on judges and on the Legislature. Montanans Decide, the group sponsoring Ballot Issue #8, disagreed – and the majority of justices sided with them.
“Its provisions operate together to define and protect a single constitutional right—the people’s exercise of initiative and referendum,” wrote Justice Katherine Bidegaray in the majority opinion. “They are closely related components of one constitutional design.”
Bidegaray’s majority opinion was joined by Justices Jim Shea, Laurie McKinnon, Beth Baker and Ingrid Gustafson.
Chief Justice Cory Swanson and Justice Jim Rice each wrote dissenting opinions, saying they would have upheld Knudsen’s decision to disallow Ballot Issue #8. Rice said the language restricting government interference with a ballot issue was not closely related and should have been a separate vote. Swanson agreed with Rice and said the measure’s attempt to fix a timeline for legal cases surrounding ballot measures was also a separate substantial change.
In a statement, Chase Scheuer, a spokesperson for Knudsen’s office, reacted to the decision.
“This decision only further muddies the courts’ jurisprudence on ballot issue questions,” he said. “This initiative would violate the separate vote requirement by amending multiple parts of the Montana Constitution, but the court contradicted its prior rulings. Attorney General Knudsen will continue to neutrally apply the separate vote requirement in his review of ballot initiatives.”
The court’s decision means that Knudsen’s office will now need to approve ballot language for Ballot Issue #8. Once that language is finalized, Montanans Decide could begin gathering signatures to qualify the measure for the November ballot.
However, last year, sponsors of another initiative went to the Supreme Court to argue that the ballot statements Knudsen prepared were misleading. If Montanans Decide object to their ballot statements, that could further delay signature gathering while the case plays out in court.
“Regardless, we’re going to push as hard as we can to get those petitions into the hands of voters and let them sign and support if they so choose,” said Rossi.
Rossi said the legal battle this measure has gone through – and the possibility of more to come – shows why Ballot Issue #8 is needed.
“The state Legislature, and also statewide elected officials, have taken every opportunity to create burdens and hurdles and rigamarole for campaigns to get through in order to just get to the signature gathering phase, and then to get through the signature gathering phase onto the ballot, and then get through the election phase,” said Rossi. “The reason we filed this initiative is just to make sure that the process is simple, that the timeline is clear, and that Montanans can have their will heard when they want to propose and pass laws that they deem worthy.”
-
World1 week agoExclusive: DeepSeek withholds latest AI model from US chipmakers including Nvidia, sources say
-
Massachusetts1 week agoMother and daughter injured in Taunton house explosion
-
Wisconsin3 days agoSetting sail on iceboats across a frozen lake in Wisconsin
-
Maryland4 days agoAM showers Sunday in Maryland
-
Florida4 days agoFlorida man rescued after being stuck in shoulder-deep mud for days
-
Denver, CO1 week ago10 acres charred, 5 injured in Thornton grass fire, evacuation orders lifted
-
Massachusetts2 days agoMassachusetts man awaits word from family in Iran after attacks
-
Oregon6 days ago2026 OSAA Oregon Wrestling State Championship Results And Brackets – FloWrestling