Montana

I tried asking Sheehy questions. He kicked me to the curb. • Daily Montanan

Published

1 year ago

October 17, 2024

I tried asking Sheehy questions. He kicked me to the curb. • Daily Montanan

In the business world, CEOs have to answer to their shareholders about the successes and failures of their company. You can’t dodge questions you don’t like in the boardroom, and you can’t hide from the people you were hired to serve.

Running for elected office shouldn’t be any different. Any individual seeking to represent Montana has an obligation to, at the very least, show up and answer basic questions from voters about who they are and who they claim to be.

But Tim Sheehy thinks he can play by a different set of rules in his campaign for Montana’s U.S. Senate seat. I’m a Montana voter who recently tried to attend one of Sheehy’s public events to ask him simple questions about his failing business and his financial obligations to Gallatin County. Instead of looking me in the eyes and answering my questions like a man, Sheehy ordered his political attack-dogs to forcibly remove me from the venue.

JUST NOW: Gallatin County-based financial expert Marc Cohodes, who has highlighted the issues with Sheehy’s company in op-eds and interviews, engaged with Tim Sheehy and tries asking questions. Sheehy shouts back at him as Marc gets thrown out #mtpol #mtsen pic.twitter.com/6ZFEB7AEqG
— Hannah Rehm (@HannahRehm_) September 30, 2024
Advertisement

Sheehy’s cowardly move to dodge questions from the Montana constituents he is running to represent is part of a larger, well-documented effort to avoid having to answer for his shady business record and lengthy list of lies. CNN recently reported that Sheehy “rarely grants interviews to local or national press, while his campaign doesn’t discuss his schedule or provide information about his events, which tend to be closed affairs.” Sheehy is running scared from both the press and the people.

This all begs the question: what is Sheehy trying to hide?

Well, as a financial expert who has spent my career taking on scammers and crooks, it is obvious to me that Sheehy is afraid to answer questions because he knows he will be exposed as the fraud that he is. The simple fact is that Sheehy’s company has more than $200 million in debt all because of his failed leadership. So here are three questions that I would have asked Sheehy in person had he given me the chance:

How could Bridger possibly pay back its enormous debt – especially when the company has lost more than $150 million under your leadership in the past four years?
What is the risk to Gallatin County if your company defaults on its bond, and how do we know taxpayers won’t be strapped with the bill?
Why won’t you take accountability for running Bridger into the financial red? If you won’t tell the truth about your failing business, and you won’t answer questions from voters, how can Montanans trust you to represent us in the Senate?

These three questions should be easy for Sheehy to answer. And if we were in the boardroom, he would have nowhere to hide. But Sheehy is trying to run out the clock on the campaign trail and fool Montana voters into buying what he’s selling.

If Montana voters want to vote for a candidate who has run his business straight into the ground, wants to sell off our public lands to his wealthy out-of-state friends, attacks a woman’s right to choose while saying slimy things about crawling out of his “mother’s womb,” and continues to tell lies to the press and the public, that is their choice to make. But until Tim Sheehy answers basic questions from Montana voters, he is not fit to serve our great state.

The simple fact is that just like company shareholders, Montana should be asking about Tim Sheehy’s deeply flawed business record and his refusal to answer questions.

Source link

Click to comment

Montana

Missoula and Western Montana neighbors: Obituaries for March 12

Published

1 hour ago

March 12, 2026

Press Room

Missoula and Western Montana neighbors: Obituaries for March 12

State

Zip Code

Country

Source link

Montana

Wind damage highlights insurance challenges for Montana homeowners

Published

13 hours ago

March 11, 2026

Press Room

Wind damage highlights insurance challenges for Montana homeowners

It’s the talk of the town this week — powerful winds ripped the roof off Lincoln Elementary School on Sunday, leaving students, teachers, and residents in shock.

The incident has sparked concern among homeowners who are now worried about how such weather damage could impact their own homes—and what their insurance would cover.

According to Tauna Locatelli, owner of Advantage Insurance, most insurance policies have a set deductible for things like fire or theft, but wind and hail damage deductibles are often much higher, or even based on a percentage of a property’s value.

Quentin Shores reports – watch the video here:

Wind damage highlights insurance challenges for Montana homeowners

“Right now our industry is going through a really challenging time, especially when it comes to wind and hail in Montana. Several carriers are going to a standard ‘all peril’ deductible for everything other than wind and hail. So, it could be $1,000 for all but wind and hail, $2,500 wind and hail,” Locatelli explained.

A deductible is the amount homeowners must pay before insurance covers the rest. For wind and hail, that deductible can be steep.

“Some companies are going 1 or 2% of a coverage value, so that’s the building value. If it’s insured for $500,000 and you have a 1% deductible, you’re looking at a $5,000 deductible for wind and hail, which is what we get in Montana,” Locatelli said.

It’s important for homeowners to know their deductible—if repairs cost less than the deductible, insurance won’t pay anything.

Filing small claims can also impact your rates; Locatelli said, “Because if you have a $3,000 patch job claim and you have a $5,000 deductible, you really don’t want to file that because you’re not going to get anything in. That claim is going to follow your insurance record for five years.”

Age of property factors in as well. If you have an older roof, insurance may not fully cover its replacement.

“You’ve now lived half the roof life. Well, insurance is about indemnity and putting you back in the same condition you were in before the loss. You can’t put a 16-year-old roof on a home, so at 16 years, they’ll now pay 50% of that roof instead of 100% because it’s already lived half of its life. And then it drops each year as it goes by,” Locatelli added.

The bottom line: Keep your property maintained, review your insurance policy, and think carefully before filing a claim—especially as Montana faces more intense weather.

Source link