Denver, CO
Understanding the Denver Broncos' salary cap situation – DNVR Sports
It’s officially the offseason in Denver, and that means it’s time for a salary cap refresher.
Maybe you don’t know how the NFL salary cap works. Maybe you need a refresher. Maybe you already understand the cap and don’t need to read any of this.
Regardless, here are answers to some of the questions Broncos fans might be asking this offseason.
(All of the numbers below come from Spotrac, OverTheCap or the NFLPA.)
How much salary cap space do the Broncos have?
-$30 million.
The number isn’t set in stone quite yet. Sometime in the next two months, the NFL will announce the official salary cap for the 2024 season. Most projections expect the cap to be about $242.5 million, which is up from $224.8 million in 2023.
The Broncos currently have about $273 million in salary cap liabilities for 2024. They’ll roll over their $1 million in unused salary cap space from 2023. That will leave them about $30 million over the expected salary cap, which places them in the bottom five of the NFL in cap space.
In other leagues, going over the salary cap can be allowed. For example, MLB has a luxury tax, or a tax on all spending past the limit.
The NFL has a hard cap, though. There’s no exceeding the limit.
Why don’t the Broncos have salary cap space?
These are the 10 biggest earners for the Broncos in 2024, by salary cap hit:
- Russell Wilson ($35.4 million)
- Garett Bolles ($20 million)
- Zach Allen ($19 million)
- Mike McGlinchey ($18.5 million)
- Justin Simmons ($18.25 million)
- Courtland Sutton ($17.3 million)
- Tim Patrick ($15.57 million)
- Ben Powers ($15.25 million)
- Jerry Jeudy ($12.99 million)
- DJ Jones ($12.96 million)
These 10 players take up $185 million in cap space, or about 76% of the salary cap.
Can NFL teams spend cash instead of salary cap?
No. Every dollar a team spends on players must be accounted for in the salary cap.
However, when teams account for that money is flexible, especially with excess cash.
NFL contracts can provide players money in various ways, but the two most common ways are through salaries and signing bonuses. Salaries must be accounted for in the year the team gives the player the money, but signing bonus money is split evenly across each year of the contract.
For example, imagine the Broncos sign a new player to a five-year contract this offseason. If they give him a $10 million salary in 2024, that will add $10 million to the Broncos’ salary cap spending in 2024.
But if they give him a $10 million signing bonus, the cap hit is split over all five years of the deal. In salary cap dollars, the bonus would cost the Broncos $2 million in 2024, $2 million in 2025, $2 million in 2026, $2 million in 2027 and $2 million in 2028.
By spending cash up front—a signing bonus—the team gets to push some of the salary cap implications down the road.
Every dollar the team spends on players must be accounted for in the salary cap, but cash signing bonuses can push that accounting to future years.
How will the Broncos get under the salary cap?
The Broncos have two primary ways they can reduce their salary cap liabilities.
- Trade or release players.
- Restructure contracts.
The first option is clear. If somebody has a $15 million non-guaranteed salary in 2024 and the Broncos decide to release him, they would gain $15 million in 2024 salary cap space.
The second option is more complicated.
A contract restructure means the team and the player agree to change the contract. This can be adding incentive, reducing pay, or any number of other things.
The most common type of restructure is a “simple restructure.” In this case, the player’s salary is converted to a signing bonus, which (as explained above) spreads his salary cap hit of the remainder of his contract.
Let’s look at Mike McGlinchey’s contract, for example.
McGlinchey has four years remaining on his deal. In 2024, his salary is $15 million. If McGlinchey and the Broncos agree to a simple restructure, they would reduce the salary to the minimum veteran salary (about $1.5 million) and convert the rest ($13.5 million) to a bonus. That bonus would be split over all four remaining seasons for salary cap purposes.
Instead of accounting for the entire $15 million that McGlinchey is due in 2024, the Broncos could reduce his cap hit to $4.875 million (the $1.5 million minimum salary plus one-fourth of the $13.5 million bonus).
The downside is that the Broncos’ salary cap bill for McGlinchey will increase in each of the other three remaining seasons by $3.375 million, one-fourth of the bonus.
For the Broncos, pushing some of the salary cap money down the road could make sense.
For McGlinchey, accepting the restructure makes even more sense. Instead of waiting until football season to get paid his $15 million in weekly installments, he gets the bulk of the money right away.
Who could the Broncos trade to clear salary cap space?
The Broncos could save at least $45 million in salary cap space in 2024 by trading any of these players:
Garett Bolles — $16 million
Justin Simmons — $14.5 million
Jerry Jeudy: $12.99 million
DJ Jones — $9.97 million
Courtland Sutton — $9.65 million
Tim Patrick — $9.5 million
Zach Allen — $7.75 million
Jarrett Stidham — $6 million
Ben Powers — $5.5 million
Alex Singleton — $4.67 million
Mike McGlinchey — $4.5 million
Who could the Broncos release to clear salary cap space?
The Broncos could save at least $5 million in salary cap space in 2024 by releasing any of these players:
Garett Bolles — $16 million
Justin Simmons — $14.5 million
Courtland Sutton — $9.65 million
Tim Patrick — $9.5 million
DJ Jones — $9.97 million
Jarrett Stidham — $4.5 million
What is dead cap?
Dead cap is money that is accounted for in the salary cap for a player that is no longer on the team.
For example, Randy Gregory has a $7.1 million salary cap hit for the Broncos in 2024. That is “dead money” because Gregory is no longer on the team.
Dead cap is the remaining money that has been paid to a player, but hasn’t yet been accounted for in the salary cap. Gregory’s dead money comes from two places:
- His signing bonus.
- A restructure.
Gregory signed a 5-year, $70 million contract with the Broncos. His salaries in the first two years (2022 and 2023) were guaranteed.
Gregory got a $10 million signing bonus. For salary cap purposes, that bonus cost the Broncos $2 million in each of the five seasons. The Broncos traded Gregory in October, during his second season. That left three seasons of signing bonus—$6 million—to be accounted for. That’s $6 million of the $7.1 million of the dead cap hit the Broncos will take in 2024.
Even though the Broncos traded Gregory to the 49ers, Denver is still responsible for that dead cap hit, because they were the ones who gave him the cash. Whoever pays the cash must also pay the cap hit.
The other $1.1 million of Gregory’s dead cap hit for Denver comes from a restructure that was done at the time of the trade to make the deal a little sweeter for the 49ers. We won’t dig into those numbers though. You get the point.
Can the Broncos cut Russell Wilson?
Yes.
The Broncos have two paths to release Russell Wilson:
- Release him in the next two months.
- Release him after two more seasons.
In theory, the Broncos could move on from him at a different time, but that would be financially reckless.
Here’s why: Wilson’s contract includes a guaranteed salary for 2025, but only if Wilson is still on the roster on March 17th, 2024. If the Broncos release Wilson before that date, they won’t owe him any of his $37 million 2025 salary.
So, if the Broncos keep Wilson for the 2024 season, they might as well keep him for the 2025 season, too. They’ll be paying him either way.
If the Broncos move on from Wilson this offseason, his cap hits will look like this:
2024: $35.4 million
2025: $49.6 million
2026+: $0
If the Broncos keep Wilson for the next two seasons, his salary cap hits will look like this:
2024: $35.4 million
2025: $55.4 million
2026: $18.4 million
2027: $12.8 million
2028+: $0
In other words, the Broncos won’t save any salary cap space this season if they move on from Wilson, but they will save $37 million (Wilson’s 2025 salary) over the following three seasons.
Will the Broncos be able to sign free agents?
Yes, but probably not like last year.
The Broncos were one of the NFL’s biggest spenders in free agency in 2023. They brought in Mike McGlinchey, Ben Powers and Zach Allen. All three players earn at least $10 million per year.
Broncos general manager George Paton gave his take on the situation at his end-of-season press conference.
“We won’t be in on the first wave of free agency like we were last year,” Paton said. “You can’t do that every year. We’ll be very strategic and very specific on what positions and what players we try to sign.”
If the Broncos wanted to get aggressive, they could find a way to get a top-10 free agent. But they would need to do some gymnastics to make the numbers work.
Most free-agent contracts include big signing bonuses and smaller first-year salaries. That means cap hits are generally low in Year 1.
For example, Mike McGlinchey’s average cap hit on his five-year deal is $17.5 million. But his Year 1 cap hit was $6 million.
While the Broncos probably won’t make any big moves in free agency, they can probably do more than you’d expect given their current situation. Most of the bills for new players will be paid down the line.
Which Broncos will be free agents?
Eight of Denver’s starters will be unrestricted free agents this offseason.
- ILB Josey Jewell
- C Lloyd Cushenberry III
- CB Fabian Moreau
- TE Adam Trautman
- S PJ Locke
- DT Mike Purcell
- FB Michael Burton
- K Wil Lutz
The following reserves will also be unrestricted free agents:
- CB K’Waun Williams
- T Cameron Fleming
- DT Jonathan Harris
- LB Justin Strnad
Have more questions? Leave them in the comments below.
Rocky Mountain sandhill cranes battle warmer conditions due to drought
Wildlife biologist Jenny Nehring and farmer Rob Jones talk about Sandhill cranes and their impact on the San Luis Valley.
DENVER — Zoos are of necessity big gulpers of water, a fact that has some zookeepers in the drying American West working to rapidly upgrade efficiency and reduce unnecessary irrigation or leaks.
Denver Zoo, formally known as the Denver Zoo Conservation Alliance, has rapidly reduced its demands on threatened and declining water sources, including the Colorado River.
Among the upgrades is a sea lion water filtration system that allows most of the water to be cleaned and reused each time the pool is drained. That’s saving more than 8 million gallons a year, zoo sustainability director Blair Neelands said. “You can get in there, scrub it with a toothbrush and refill it with the same water,” she said.
Similar upgrades to an African penguin showcase reduced its water use by 95% by largely eliminating what’s sent down the drain. (Like a backyard swimming pool, though, these tanks sometimes still need to be drained and refreshed with new water to reduce mineral buildup.)
“The biggest thing for us is swapping from dump-and-fill pools to life-support systems,” Neeland said.
Another biggie is replacement of a 50-year-old water main with funding of about $3 million from the city. There’s no way of knowing how much that pipe had leaked over the years, but Neeland suspected it was more than a million gallons a year. The savings should become apparent as the zoo tracks its water use over the next few years.
Creating hippo-sized water savings
When The Arizona Republic visited in 2025, the zoo was on the cusp of eclipsing a goal to reduce its water use by half of what it had been in 2018. The zoo had used 80 million gallons in 2024, or about 219,000 a day, a 45% reduction in just a handful of years. Much of the savings had come in the form of smarter irrigation practices and use of drought-tolerant native plants where possible. The landscaping also pivoted to recycled “purple pipe” water from the city, which owns the zoo’s land, restricting potable water to areas where animals really need it.
“When people hear ‘recycled water,’ they get worried about cleanliness and hygiene,” zoo spokesman Jake Kubié said. “But it’s safe for the animals, and it’s not their drinking water.”
Getting past the water conservation goal would mean draining the pool where Mahali the hippo spent most hours lurking with just his eyes, ears and snout visible to visitors. Because he spent so much time in the pool, the water needed daily changes. It amounted to 21 million gallons a year, not to mention water heater bills that drove the cost to $200,000 a year, according to zoo officials. They estimated that Mahali used as much water as 350,000 four-person households.
“This facility is outdated,” Kubié said. “Some day this will become a huge saver of water.”
That day came before year’s end, and it indeed brought a tremendous savings. The zoo shipped Mahali to a new home (and a potential mate) at a wildlife preserve in Texas and drained the pool one last time. Ending the daily change-outs shaved more than a quarter of the zoo’s entire water usage from the previous year. It put the zoo significantly beyond its goal.
Denver Zoo’s water savings are part of a broader waste- and pollution-prevention effort aimed at being a good neighbor in uncertain times, Neeland said.
“Water savings and drought is top of mind for anyone who lives in the Western United States,” she said.
In Phoenix, a different mix of animals
That’s true of the Phoenix Zoo, as well, where zookeepers must maintain landscaping and animal exhibits in a city that baked under 100-degree-plus high temperatures for a third of the days last year. The zoo creates a “respite in the desert,” spokeswoman Linda Hardwick said, but has no hippos, penguins, grizzly bears or many of the other species that would require big water investments for outdoor swimming or cooling.
“We really specialize in animals that will thrive in the temperatures here,” Hardwick said.
The Phoenix Zoo uses most of its water on landscaping. After a consultant’s 2023 irrigation assessment, the staff centralized irrigation scheduling under a single trained technician and employed technologies including weather-based controllers and smart meters. Salt River Project awarded $70,000 in grant funds for the upgrades and several thousand more for training.
The zoo uses about 189,000 gallons a day, she said. That represents a 17% reduction from 2023, or 20% when adjusted for the year’s particular weather and evapotranspiration demand.
Brandon Loomis covers environmental and climate issues for The Arizona Republic and azcentral.com. Reach him at brandon.loomis@arizonarepublic.com.
Environmental coverage on azcentral.com and in The Arizona Republic is supported by a grant from the Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust.
Follow The Republic environmental reporting team at environment.azcentral.com and @azcenvironment on Facebook and Instagram.
Watch CBS News
A Frontier Airlines plane has hit and killed a person at Denver’s international airport, prompting the evacuation of passengers. Authorities say the man jumped a perimeter fence and ran in front of the plane as it was taking off to Los Angeles.
Published On 10 May 2026
-
West Virginia38 seconds agoWest Virginia delegate candidates in Wood County split on top issues, from manufacturing to health care rules
-
Wyoming7 minutes ago(LETTER) ‘Wyoming Advantage’ is disappearing for Gillette residents
-
Crypto13 minutes agoBitcoin Holds Above $81,500 as $135M in Leveraged Crypto Positions Get Liquidated
-
Finance19 minutes agoMorgan Stanley sees writing on wall for Citi before major change
-
Fitness25 minutes agoThis simple strength training trick builds more muscle and better technique—here’s how to try tempo training in your next home workout
-
Movie Reviews37 minutes ago‘Given Names’ is a Fascinating Exploration of Who We Are (Berlinale 2026 Film Review)
-
News55 minutes agoVideo: Americans Exposed to Hantavirus on Cruise Ship Arrive in United States
-
Politics1 hour agoTrump Proposes Suspending Federal Gas Tax Until Prices Fall