Connect with us

News

Graham Platner’s wife says she’s ‘deeply hurt’ by public revelations of her husband’s extramarital sexts | CNN Politics

Published

on

Graham Platner’s wife says she’s ‘deeply hurt’ by public revelations of her husband’s extramarital sexts | CNN Politics

The wife of Maine Democratic Senate candidate Graham Platner said she was “deeply hurt” after details of her husband’s extramarital sexting became public Saturday, accusing a former campaign official and confidante of betraying her trust.

The statement from Platner’s wife, Amy Gertner, came after both The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal reported that shortly after Platner announced his Senate campaign last year, Gertner flagged to campaign staff sexual text messages her husband had with other women.

“I know who Graham is,” Gertner said in a statement delivered through Platner’s campaign. “I know the man I married and the husband he has been to me on the best and the worst days of my life. That hasn’t changed, and it won’t.”

Advertisement

Genevieve McDonald, the former political director for Platner’s campaign, confirmed to CNN on Saturday that Gertner disclosed to her last year that Platner had been sexting multiple women and that the campaign evaluated the matter as a potential political liability.

According to both The Times and The Journal, Gertner told Platner’s campaign last August about text messages she had found in spring 2025 between her husband and other women early in their marriage. The publications reported that she flagged the messages as Platner’s campaign internally vetted the candidate.

CNN has not independently confirmed the existence of the text messages. CNN did verify that an account on the messaging app Kik appears to belong to Platner. The account, under the username “phustle0331,” features a profile photo showing Platner shirtless in a bathroom with a towel on his waist and uses a handle similar to ones on his since-deleted Reddit account and a now-deleted Instagram account.

According to The Times, Gertner reported her husband’s messages to other women to his campaign’s then-political director, McDonald — whom Gertner appeared to refer in Saturday’s statement.

“I confided deeply personal details about my marriage to someone I considered a friend,” Gertner’s statement said.

Advertisement

“I trusted this person with the most private chapter of our lives — the early days of our marriage before any campaign was on our mind — and I am deeply hurt by her betrayal and the invasion of our privacy,” she said.

Platner, a Marine Corps veteran with no prior political experience, has become a lightning rod since announcing his upstart campaign to challenge incumbent Republican Sen. Susan Collins.

He received fierce blowback early in his campaign after it was revealed that he had a tattoo resembling a Nazi symbol on his chest. Platner said he got the tattoo when he was in his 20s and in the military and did not realize its significance until recently. He has since said he has covered the tattoo.

But reporting by CNN’s KFile later undercut his claim of ignorance over the tattoo’s symbolism. In a social media thread from 2019, Platner discussed the emblem — a skull-and-crossbones “Totenkopf” — while noting that many US service members had adopted the imagery.

CNN and other outlets have also reported on other statements Platner made before he was a Senate candidate. He once called himself a “communist” and dismissed police as “bastards.” He disavowed those comments during a previous interview with CNN.

Advertisement

News

Video: The Rise of Deadly Trucks and S.U.V.s

Published

on

Video: The Rise of Deadly Trucks and S.U.V.s

new video loaded: The Rise of Deadly Trucks and S.U.V.s

A once-steady decline in pedestrian deaths in the United States has reversed, even as other countries have grown safer. Michael Keller, a New York Times investigative reporter, used crash test results, 3-D visibility scans and real-world reconstructions to explore how the boom in taller, heavier trucks and S.U.V.s has changed what happens when a person is struck.

By Michael H. Keller, Danielle Ivory, Irineo Cabreros, Eli Murray, Gabriel Blanco and Joey Sendaydiego

June 22, 2026

Continue Reading

News

Supreme Court allows a ruling that ends a tool to protect minority voters in 7 states

Published

on

Supreme Court allows a ruling that ends a tool to protect minority voters in 7 states

Demonstrators hold a sign saying “PROTECT MINORITY VOTING RIGHTS” outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., in 2025.

Jemal Countess/Getty Images for Legal Defense Fund


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Jemal Countess/Getty Images for Legal Defense Fund

By declining to take up a lower court ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has dealt another blow to the Voting Rights Act.

The court announced Monday that it will not review an Arkansas-based lawsuit, leaving in place a 2025 appeals panel ruling that ends a long-used tool for protecting minority voters from discrimination under the landmark law in seven mainly Midwestern states.

That ruling found that in the states covered by the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals — Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota — private individuals and groups do not have the right to sue to enforce what’s known as Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act, which generally allows voters with a disability or inability to read or write to get help with voting from a person of their choice.

Advertisement

The Supreme Court’s move comes almost two months after its conservative supermajority issued a major ruling that further weakened the Voting Rights Act, setting off a groundswell in redistricting across the country.

In May, shortly after that undermining of Section 2 protections against racial discrimination in redistricting, the high court decided not to weigh in on what the legal world calls a “private right of action,” sending back to lower courts two cases brought by Black voters in Mississippi and Native American voters in North Dakota.

For decades, enforcement of these sections of the Voting Rights Act has mainly been driven by lawsuits by private individuals and groups.

But after conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch issued a single-paragraph opinion in 2021 questioning a private right of action, Republican officials in multiple states have raised a novel legal argument: Only the U.S. attorney general, they contend, has the right to bring lawsuits under these parts of the Voting Rights Act.

Such an interpretation of the law is likely to lead to a dramatic decline in voting rights lawsuits because of the Justice Department’s limited resources and shifting priorities under different presidential administrations.

Advertisement

The case that the justices decided not to take up was brought by the immigrant advocacy group Arkansas United, which has provided Spanish-language interpreters at polling sites to assist voters with limited English proficiency. The group challenged an Arkansas law that bans a person who is not a poll worker from helping more than six voters cast ballots. In 2022, a federal judge ruled that the state law violates Section 208 of the Voting Rights Act. But after GOP state officials appealed, an 8th Circuit panel found last year that private groups, like Arkansas United, do not have the right to bring this kind of lawsuit.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Video: California Governor Declares State of Emergency for L.A. Warehouse Fire

Published

on

Video: California Governor Declares State of Emergency for L.A. Warehouse Fire

new video loaded: California Governor Declares State of Emergency for L.A. Warehouse Fire

transcript

transcript

California Governor Declares State of Emergency for L.A. Warehouse Fire

A fire that broke out on Wednesday at a cold storage facility in Los Angeles continued to burn on Sunday. Gov. Gavin Newsom declared an emergency.

We do realize that at times there are large amounts of smoke coming off this building, and that is to be expected. Now, the good news is, all of our air monitoring has shown that there are no additional toxic chemicals or hazards within that smoke other than normal structure fire smoke. That said, no smoke is good smoke. There are smoke advisories and particulate matter advisories out there around the community, spanning for several miles around this incident. We are going to continue to aggressively fight this fire and minimize the impact to the community as much as possible.

Advertisement
A fire that broke out on Wednesday at a cold storage facility in Los Angeles continued to burn on Sunday. Gov. Gavin Newsom declared an emergency.

By Cynthia Silva

June 21, 2026

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending