DALLAS — Alexandar Georgiev has earned a lot of deserved praise for his mental toughness and resilience after a tough Game 1 to start the 2024 Stanley Cup Playoffs.

Josh Manson knows that process of rebounding and redeeming himself as well. Manson made a pair of high-profile mistakes for the Avalanche in Game 1 against Winnipeg that led to Jets goals. Flash forward to Game 1 of this series against the Dallas Stars, and Manson made an incredible goal-saving play that turned out to be a huge moment in a 4-3 comeback victory.

“I mean, obviously after the first game in Winnipeg, it was tough. I was pretty down,” Manson said ahead of Game 2 here at American Airlines Center. “So I feel better now. The team winning too makes things easier.”

Dallas forged a 3-0 lead in the first period of Game 1. The Stars nearly made it 4-0 in the final minute. Jamie Benn cut to the net from the right corner with the puck, skated across the front of the crease and waited out Georgiev before sliding the puck past him.

Manson was there behind his goaltender. His touch of the puck popped it into the air, and then his second swatted it out of the air and out of danger.

“Once I saw him kind of get underneath, I figured he was going to try and take it wide. The only place that maybe he was gonna be able to beat him was to slide it back across, so I just kind of came up to the goal line just in case,” Manson said.

“I watched the video and I think it was going to miss the net anyway – if anything, maybe at the post. I was there just in case. I got lucky that I didn’t hit it in the net and hit it in the other direction.”

Maybe it would have gone wide, but had Benn’s shot hit the post there was still a chance it would have banked in off Georgiev or another Stars player would have had the opportunity to pounce. It was a huge play that loomed even larger as the Avalanche mounted a comeback over the final two periods before winning in overtime.

It’s a fun juxtaposition narrative: Manson goes from Game 1 goat in Winnipeg to Game 1 hero in Dallas. But the truth is Manson bounced back well before this. He had a great series against the Jets.

“We really liked his series,” Avs coach Jared Bednar said. “He was an impactful player on the defending side, the physicality he brings, and as you’ve seen throughout the season, he’s been making a lot of offensive plays, too.”

Colorado added Manson just ahead of the 2022 trade deadline in large part to give this talented defense corps another defense-first physical presence. But Manson has proven to be more than that, particularly this season.

He had some strong offensive years in his younger days with Anaheim, but his 2023-24 campaign (eight goals, 25 points) was his best in six years.

“I think I’m kind of a byproduct of the team for myself,” Manson said. “I’m not a guy that goes out there and just creates offense by himself. My game will thrive a bit more as the team finds success. That’s kind of how I like to look at myself.”

He noted that playing with so many high-end scorers can lead to more points for a player like him. But Manson is a defense-first player with underrated offensive skills. That makes him a great fit next to Samuel Girard, an offense-first player with underrated defensive acumen.

Together, they’re the second pairing on arguably the best defense corps in the NHL. While Cale Makar and Devon Toews deservedly get loads of credit as two of the best defensemen in the world, the Girard-Manson combo has thrived.

Bednar admitted that those two playing so well together made it easier to move Bo Byram in a trade that returned Casey Mittelstadt (along with a corresponding move to land Sean Walker as a Byram replacement).

Manson made a habit of collecting the puck at the right point and making a move to get around his defender this season.

He was second during the regular season among the team’s defensemen behind Makar with 86 scoring chances — more than Toews and Girard — and tops with 18 high-danger chances, per Natural Stat Trick. Manson has proven to be more than just a guy who’s going to let it rip from the point.

“I don’t know if I do that a lot,” Manson said. “I think it’s dependent on the game and even in situations like that, so much of it is created from guys like (Andrew Cogliano) controlling the cycle, forcing wingers to come down and beating them with that pass.

“… Our forwards are giving us time at the point to make plays and to have that confidence to do things because they’re making plays.”

Want more Avalanche news? Sign up for the Avalanche Insider to get all our NHL analysis.

Former Oregon football quarterback Bo Nix will wear jersey No. 10 for the Denver Broncos.

Fellow Bronco quarterback Zach Wilson did have the No. 10 jersey for Denver but switched to No. 4. Wilson, the No. 2 overall selection in the 2021 draft who wore No. 2 during his three years as quarterback for the New York Jets.

Coming off arguably the greatest season ever by a Duck quarterback, Nix was drafted No. 12 overall in the 2024 NFL Draft to Denver. The Broncos rookie mini camp begins May 10th.

Nix has worn No. 10 all his life. He wore No. 10 at Pinson Valley (Alabama) High School and No. 10 at both Auburn and Oregon. It is also a family number, his dad Pat Nix wore No. 10 as Auburn’s starting quarterback in the mid-1990s.

The Heisman Trophy finalist is also the most experienced quarterback prospect in the 2024 draft. His 61 career starts broke the NCAA record for most all-time by a FBS quarterback. The 23-year-old also broke the NCAA single-season record for completion percentage in 2023 at 77.45, completing a whopping 364 of 470 passes. 

Nix received a pro comparison to former Dallas Cowboys star Tony Romo from NFL.com. Another comparison Nix has often received is to retired New Orleans Saints star Drew Brees, which he has previously said he’d gladly accept.

READ MORE: Oregon Football Dan Lanning Sets Record Straight About Alabama Job

READ MORE: Oregon Football 2024 Schedule: Toughest Stretch Climaxes vs. Ohio State

READ MORE: Snoop Dogg Changing Future Of College Football Bowl Games?

Unlike last year, the end of the Colorado legislative session Wednesday came with no fireworks — no protest walkouts, no intracaucus tensions boiling over into public, no last-minute implosions of keystone policy bills.

The final day of lawmakers’ nearly four-month session instead was dominated by noticeably brighter spirits as the General Assembly put the finishing touches on a slew of legislation that had dominated the final weeks. Notable bills touched on tax credits, property tax reform, gun restrictions and major land use changes that will shape the state for years and, supporters hope, decades to come.

Contentious housing bills that died or were vetoed last year were brought back, in varying forms, and passed. Lawmakers and the governor struck grand bargains to defuse ballot measures. And Democrats have settled into a now-familiar — if not consistently united — seat at the head of the legislative table.

Some of the last proposals to cross the finish line on the final day — which ended with the Senate’s adjournment just before 8 p.m., before dark — included an income tax credit for Colorado families with household incomes under $90,000, to cover up to two years of tuition and fees at in-state public universities, colleges and technical schools; a bipartisan bill to remake the public school finance system; a series of tax reforms that include a tax credit of up to $3,200 for dependent children, scaling down as family income increases, as children age and if state revenue growth slows down; and an income tax reduction of $450 million this year.

When the legislature convened in January, it was with a palpable sense of dread. Lawmakers, lobbyists and observers feared the session would reflect the angst and tension that marred last year’s regular and special meetings of the General Assembly.

Instead, the session unfolded largely as a casual observer would’ve expected.

Where tensions did rise, they did so mostly within standard — though at times still pointed — etiquette under the Gold Dome, even if public exchanges between lawmakers outside the building’s marble halls sometimes descended into personal attacks.

Sen. Dylan Roberts, speaking Wednesday about a compromise on a bill penalizing gun owners who don’t secure handguns left in vehicles, lamented “disrespectful” comments made in the House about an amendment from his chamber. But the Frisco Democrat ended on a simple request to “disagree better.”

Flare-ups still emerged. The House’s Democratic leadership implemented new protocols to limit what they considered offensive speech on the floor. Some House Republicans repeatedly castigated their Democratic colleagues on social media as supporting pedophiles and criminals, based on votes opposing various GOP-backed bills.

Those comments contributed to a tense meeting between Democratic lawmakers and their leadership last week, with legislators demanding that leaders do more to address attacks online.

But by the last day of the session on Wednesday, most of the session-defining measures had already been resolved — with largely perfunctory agreements and votes remaining.

The Senate and House had already hammered out differences on a bill supported by Gov. Jared Polis that, once signed, will promote denser development along transit corridors. They avoided the last-day drama of last year, when an omnibus land use bill died at the 11th hour because of irreconcilable differences between the chambers, both led by large Democratic majorities.

A proposal to ban the sale and transfer of certain high-powered, semiautomatic firearms — which had hung heavy over the final weeks amid Democratic division over how much to embrace the policy — was tabled peacefully on the penultimate day. Backers pledged to continue that fight in future years.

Meanwhile, a slew of other gun bills, some intended to improve enforcement of existing laws, passed against strong Republican opposition, but without extraordinary incidents.

Most of Wednesday was dominated by tributes to departing members, a steak cook-off in the House and the Capitol’s version of spring cleaning. A Colorado Politics reporter played the harp on the House floor. Lawmakers showed parody videos on the projector screens on the House’s walls.

Perhaps the highest point of drama wasn’t focused inside the Capitol at all.

A bipartisan bill to reshape state property tax policy was subject to months of wrangling before being introduced the Monday before the session’s end — this week. Shortly after the bill was unveiled, lawmakers were taken by surprise when a prominent business group, Colorado Concern, announced its opposition and refused to pull back from its support for two tax-related ballot initiatives that Republicans and Democrats alike warn would devastate the state budget if voters approve them this fall.

Sponsors of the proposal, Senate Bill 233, said they had been trying to find a middle ground with Colorado Concern, in exchange for the group dropping its support for the ballot initiatives. The bill, now heading to Polis for his signature, would make adjustments in property tax calculations to save homeowners potentially a few hundred dollars compared to projected increases under current law, while also reducing tax rates for commercial properties. But the ballot measures are aimed at more drastic changes.

By mid-afternoon Wednesday, sponsors said those negotiations had broken down. It also didn’t escape notice that representatives of Colorado Concern had not shown up to testify publicly on the measure.

“I will note there are some organizations conspicuously absent today who did not choose to come to testify and share their opinion about the bill — and what they would like to see or not see changed,” said Rep. Emily Sirota, a Denver Democrat, as a public hearing on the bill wrapped up Tuesday. “That, to me, is pretty disappointing, because that is how the work is done. It is done in the light of day, in front of everyone.”

Senate President Steve Fenberg, a Boulder Democrat, said to reporters Tuesday morning, about Colorado Concern: “To me, they are not taking actions that would increase their relevance in this building.”

The ballot measures, one of which has been approved for the ballot already, still threaten to complicate state lawmakers’ work in coming months.

But as the session wound down on its final day, geniality underscored the often-contentious atmosphere inside the building. The House had finished with the bulk of its work, and, as the Senate entered its seventh hour of tributes for departing members, a pack of restless representatives wandered over with handwritten signs to send their colleagues a final message:

Get back to work.

Sen. Rachel Zenzinger, herself a term-limited Democrat, and Sen. Barbara Kirkmeyer, a Republican, waved them off so that the goodbyes could continue at their own pace.

Stay up-to-date with Colorado Politics by signing up for our weekly newsletter, The Spot.