Connect with us

California

Sharks are congregating at a California beach. AI is trying to keep swimmers safe | CNN

Published

on

Sharks are congregating at a California beach. AI is trying to keep swimmers safe | CNN




CNN
 — 

On summer mornings, local kids like to gather at Padaro Beach in California to learn to surf in gentle whitewater waves. A few years ago, the beach also became a popular hangout for juvenile great white sharks.

That led to the launch of SharkEye, an initiative at the University of California Santa Barbara’s Benioff Ocean Science Laboratory (BOSL), which uses drones to monitor what’s happening beneath the waves.

If a shark is spotted, SharkEye sends a text to the 80-or-so people who have signed up for alerts, including local lifeguards, surf shop owners, and the parents of children who take lessons.

Advertisement

In recent years, other initiatives have seen officials and lifeguards from New York to Sydney using drones to keep beachgoers safe, monitoring video streamed from a camera. That requires a pilot to stay focused on a screen, contending with choppy water and glare from the sun, to differentiate sharks from paddleboarders, seals, and undulating kelp strands. One study found that human-monitored drones only detect sharks about 60% of the time.

SharkEye – part research program, part community safety tool – is using the video it collects to analyze shark behavior. It’s also feeding its footage into a computer vision machine learning model – a type of artificial intelligence (AI) technology that enables computers to glean information from images and videos – to train it to detect great white sharks near Padaro Beach, close to the city of Santa Barbara.

“Automating shark detection … can (also) be really helpful for a lot of communities outside of ours here in California,” Neil Nathan, a project scientist with BOSL, who graduated from Stanford University with a master’s degree in environmental studies a few years ago, told CNN.

A rise in the popularity of drones, and the proliferation of social media, may make it seem like sharks are everywhere. It doesn’t help that warming ocean temperatures are pushing sharks into new habitats, and that juvenile great whites, which can grow to about eight to 10 feet long, like to hang out near the shore, making them more visible to beachgoers.

Yet shark attacks are rare. In 2023, 69 people globally were at the receiving end of unprovoked bites – which is in line with the average of 63 annual incidents between 2018 and 2022. Just 10 of them died, according to the Florida Museum of Natural History’s International Shark Attack File.

Advertisement

Although there hasn’t been a fatal attack recorded at Padaro Beach, some community members were concerned when sharks began loitering there.

That’s why SharkEye has been regularly running drone flights to monitor the coastline for about five years, once spotting 15 juvenile great white sharks in a single day.

Early tests indicate that the AI technology is already performing “incredibly well,” detecting most sharks a human can, and sometimes sharks that a human missed, perhaps because it was swimming too deep to spot easily, said Nathan.

This summer, the project began field testing its technology by pitting drone pilots against AI. Its pilot surveys the area and counts the number of sharks she spots. Then SharkEye’s model analyzes the video to see how many sharks it can find.

Today, the community alerts are based on human analysis. If all goes swimmingly, those reports may become AI-assisted – with manual monitoring and checks – by the end of the season, or the start of next summer, said Nathan. In the future, the process may even become totally automated, making it faster and potentially more accurate.

Advertisement

AI and wildlife

AI technologies are being harnessed in myriad ways to mitigate human-wildlife conflict. In India, AI-enabled cameras are alerting villagers when tigers are closing in on their livestock, and in Australia, technology is being used to manage some of its dangerous creatures.

Ripper Corp and academics pioneered what they say are the first shark identification algorithms in the world, which were put to use in drones a few years ago. The latest version of the software is being tested across the Australian state of Queensland, Mexico and the Caribbean to detect sharks and crocodiles.

However, AI is not yet used widely for shark detection. Surf Life Saving New South Wales, which protects dozens of beaches along the state’s coast, including Sydney’s iconic Bondi Beach, uses drones in 50 locations. But a spokesperson told CNN that their drones aren’t currently utilizing AI.

A group from one Australian university that worked on AI-enhanced shark-spotting tools wrote in 2022 that the technology can struggle when encountering conditions that weren’t present in the training data.

SharkEye plans to make its model free and available for researchers to amend or build on, and to create an AI-powered app that’s easy for people like lifeguards and drone hobbyists to run their footage through. That could help keep people safe, but also allow humans to better understand and protect sharks.

Advertisement

Nathan said it remains to be seen how much retraining will be required for SharkEye to expand to other locations. He’s hopeful that if drone pilots fly at the same speed and altitude, they won’t have too many issues elsewhere in California, where the coastline is similar.

Officials in Honolulu said this month that they’re considering launching a drone shark surveillance program, according to local media. If SharkEye’s technology were to be used in places like Hawaii, where tiger sharks are the biggest concern, and the hue of the water differs, more retraining might be necessary. But Nathan said that SharkEye is open to working with other localities to help adapt the model.

“Communities want to have that knowledge and that awareness so it’s easier to more safely share the water with these creatures,” said Nathan. “Sharks are an incredible species that we still are always learning new things about.”



Source link

Advertisement

California

Live Updates: Candidates face off in the CBS News California and San Francisco Examiner Governor’s Debate

Published

on

Live Updates: Candidates face off in the CBS News California and San Francisco Examiner Governor’s Debate


 

Learn more about candidates’ stances on the issues in the California Governor’s Race interactive guide

CBS News California launched an interactive tool to help voters navigate this year’s gubernatorial race. The California Governor’s Race Candidate Guide features 20 hours of interviews with top-polling candidates to provide voters the opportunity to compare each candidate’s responses side-by-side on the issues that matter most to them.

Those running to succeed Gov. Gavin Newsom as California’s next chief executive offered their thoughts on more than a dozen issues, including homelessness, housing affordability, gas prices and environmental policy, immigration, healthcare, crime and public safety funding, and the state’s ongoing insurance crisis.

Advertisement
 

Here’s what to know about the CBS News California/San Francisco Examiner Governor’s Debate format

The format of the CBS News California and San Francisco Examiner Governor’s Debate on Thursday will allow candidates to question each other directly. 

Advertisement

Candidates will also participate in segments in which they address real-world issues California voters may face in their daily lives. The Californians who will be featured include a working single mother pursuing education; a couple struggling to achieve homeownership; and a scientist warning of the long-term consequences of inaction on climate change.

This structure for Thursday’s debate differs from the previous face-off hosted by CBS News California stations, which comprised three segments focused on affordability, accountability and social issues that lasted roughly half an hour each.

 
Advertisement

Becerra, Hilton, Steyer lead field in latest polling on California governor’s race

An Emerson College poll released the day before the CBS News California and San Francisco Examiner Governor’s Debate showed Xavier Becerra leading the field with likely voters surveyed at 19%, followed by Steve Hilton and Tom Steyer both receiving 17%. Chad Bianco came in at 11%, followed by Katie Porter at 10%, Matt Mahan at 8%, Antonio Villaraigosa at 4% and Tony Thurmond at 1%. Twelve percent said they remained undecided.

In a CBS News/YouGov poll last month conducted before the April 28 CBS California Governor’s Debate, Hilton received support from 16% of likely voters polled, with Steyer and Becerra following at 15% and 13% respectively. Bianco came in at 10%, Porter received 9%, Matt Mahan and Antonio Villaraigosa both received 4%, and Tony Thurmond received 1%. The survey also found that a significant 26% of those polled were undecided.

California’s June 2 primary is an open primary where the top two vote-getters, regardless of party affiliation, advance to face off in the November general election. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Opinion | California will make less money from greenhouse gas emission auctions

Published

on

Opinion | California will make less money from greenhouse gas emission auctions


By Dan Walters, CalMatters

The Phillips 66 refinery in Wilmington, on Sept. 30, 2025. Photo by Stella Kalinina for CalMatters

This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

Two decades ago, when California got serious about reducing or even eliminating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, its political leaders weighed two potential tactics about industrial emissions.

Advertisement

The state could impose direct facility-by-facility limits, generally favored by climate change advocates. Or it could set overall emission reduction goals that would gradually decrease and auction off emission allowances, assuming their costs would encourage reductions.

The latter, known as cap-and-trade, was favored by corporate interests as being less onerous and was adopted, finally taking effect in 2012.

Since then, the California Air Resources Board has conducted quarterly auctions of emission allowances, collecting a total of $35 billion dollars so far, which, in theory, is being spent on projects that would reduce emissions.

The revenues have varied from year to year, but they have generally increased as the emission caps have declined. Since reaching a peak of $8.1 billion in the 2023-24 fiscal year, however, auction proceeds have been declining.

Roughly half of the money has been given to utilities to minimize cap-and-trade’s impact on consumer costs. However, the program has been widely criticized as a de facto tax on gasoline and other fuels, which were already among the most expensive of any state.

Advertisement

The remaining revenues have been deposited into a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund that governors and legislators have tapped for various purposes, not all of them connected to emission reductions. In a sense, it’s been a slush fund.

Last year Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Legislature overhauled the program in two bills, Senate Bill 840 and Assembly Bill 1207. The program was extended, it was renamed as cap-and-invest and new priorities for spending auction proceeds were set.

Notably, the state’s cash-strapped and long-stalled bullet train project would get a flat $1 billion a year, rather than the 25% share it had been getting. Project managers hope that lenders will advance enough money to complete its first leg in the San Joacim Valley; the plan is to repay the loans from the $1 billion annual cap-and-invest allocation.

Early this year, the Air Resources Board released new regulations to implement the legislative changes but faced criticism that they would increase consumer costs. That led to a revision in April that softens the rules’ impact — most obviously on refiners who have been threatening to leave California — but environmental groups are very critical.

The April version would also sharply reduce net revenues from emission auctions, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, providing barely enough for the $1 billion allocation to the bullet train and another $1 billion for the governor and Legislature to spend. Other programs that have been receiving cap-and-invest support, such as wildfire protection and housing, would probably get nothing.

Advertisement

The program has been tapped in recent years to backfill programs that a deficit-ridden state budget could not cover, so the projected revenue drop would exacerbate efforts by Newsom and legislators to close the state budget’s yawning gap.

“The (Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund) is a relatively small portion of the overall state budget, but it has been a noteworthy source of funding for environmental and other programs in recent years,” the state Assembly’s budget advisor, Jason Sisney, says in an email. “Collapse of its revenues would change the state budget process noticeably. The state’s cost-pressured general fund seemingly would be unable to make up much, if any, of a significant (Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund) revenue decline at this time.”

When Newsom presents his revised budget this week, he may reveal how he intends to cover the cap-and-invest program’s shortfall, particularly whether he will maintain the $1 billion bullet train commitment that project leaders say is vital to continuing construction of its Merced-to-Bakersfield segment.

It could boil down to bullet train vs. wildfire protection.

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Trump administration will defer $1.3B in Medicaid funds for CA

Published

on

Trump administration will defer .3B in Medicaid funds for CA


play

Vice President JD Vance announced on Wednesday, May 13 that the Trump administration will be deferring $1.3 billion in Medicaid reimbursements from the state of California, as part of a new initiative to root out fraud in federal health programs.

The topic of California’s hospice care fraud has been a major focus of scrutiny by state leadership, members of President Donald Trump’s administration, and Gov. Gavin Newsom’s critics. In his announcement, Vance claimed that the administration was set on deferring these funds “because the state of California has not taken fraud very seriously.”

Advertisement

“There are California taxpayers and American taxpayers who are being defrauded because California isn’t taking its program seriously,” Vance said during a press conference.

Notably, this decision was part of Vance’s Anti-Fraud Task Force’s plan to implement a six-month nationwide, data-driven moratorium on new Medicare enrollment for hospices and home health agencies.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which is led by Dr. Mehmet Oz, is set to use this six-month moratorium to conduct investigations and review data on Medicare programs, with the hopes of removing hospice and home health agencies that are suspected of committing fraud.

“Today we’re shutting the door on fraud — preventing new bad actors from entering Medicare while we aggressively identify, investigate, and remove those already exploiting them,” Oz said. “This is about protecting patients, restoring integrity, and safeguarding taxpayer dollars.”

Advertisement

California Attorney General Rob Bonta called the administration’s action “unlawful” and noted that his office would be “carefully reviewing all available information” and may challenge the administration’s decision to threaten “Californians’ rights or access to critical services.”

“Once again, California appears to be targeted solely for political reasons,” Bonta said on X.

“The Trump Administration is planning to defer over $1 billion in Medicaid funding for vital programs that help seniors and people with disabilities remain safely in their homes.”

Bonta and his office have attempted to counteract criticism that the state does not take action against hospice fraud.

Advertisement

In April, Bonta announced that the California Department of Justice had arrested five people in connection with a major health care scheme in Southern California that defrauded taxpayers of nearly a quarter of a billion dollars.

“For years, California has led the charge to protect public programs from fraud and abuse,” Newsom said in the press release on April 10. “We hold accountable to the fullest extent of the law anyone who tries to rip off taxpayers and take advantage of public programs, particularly those as sensitive as hospice care.”

Newsom has yet to publicly respond to the administration’s decision to defer California’s Medicaid reimbursement.

However, shortly after Vance made the announcement, Newsom’s press office blasted the decision on X.

Advertisement

“We hate fraud. But that’s NOT what this is,” Newsom’s press office posted on X. “Vance and Oz are attacking programs that keep seniors and people with disabilities OUT of nursing homes. Pretty sick.”

Noe Padilla is a Northern California Reporter for USA Today. Contact him at npadilla@usatodayco.com, follow him on X @1NoePadilla or on Bluesky @noepadilla.bsky.socialSign up for the TODAY Californian newsletter or follow us on Facebook at TODAY Californian.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending