Connect with us

California

Luxury hotel bans children at some California locations

Published

on

Luxury hotel bans children at some California locations


Alila Marea Beach Resort in Encinitas, California.  (Hyatt Hotels Corporation)

An upscale luxury hotel brand has made some of its California locations kid-free. Alila Hotels is part of the Hyatt family and has three locations in California, including one in the Bay Area in St. Helena.

What we know:

Advertisement

The Napa Valley site has in place an adult-only policy, banning anyone under the age of 18 from staying at the resort. 

The hotel boasts being in the heart of Wine Country, offering the best of the region. 

Advertisement

“Alila Napa Valley is a journey of epicurean discovery in a scenic landscape rich with culture and history. Here, expansive vineyard views and golden sunsets showcase the region’s unspoiled beauty,” the hotel’s website said.

The hotel also notes, “Alila Napa Valley is an adult-only hotel (18+).” 

It’s unclear how long the no-children policy has been in place. 

Advertisement

But the Alila’s Marea Beach location in Encinitas, in San Diego County, recently adopted the rule, making the change to becoming an “adult-only” resort last month.

On its website, the hotel wrote, “This transition allows us to provide a serene and tranquil environment tailored to adult travelers seeking relaxation, exploration and a peaceful stay by the beach .”

Advertisement

SEE ALSO: Man claims airline forced him to sit next to dead woman for hours on flight

Policy shift 

Alila also has a third California location in Big Sur. The resort, which previously had an adult-only policy in place, said it recently made a shift in its rule, to allow children at its site, accommodating families with suites set aside that are more kid-friendly.

Advertisement

But Alila Ventana Big Sur also noted it does make sure guests know that the site may not be suited for children, explaining it has a clothing optional area that parents may not be comfortable with. 

The property is situated on the rugged Pacific Coast, surrounded by nature and wildlife, which can also be a deterrent for families with young kids, Alila Ventana Big Sur said. 

The hotel explained that for its guests considering bringing their children, it offers information about its nearby sister property, Carmel Valley Ranch, which has kids’ activities on site and a property geared toward a family atmosphere. 

Advertisement

Pets allowed

At both the Encinitas and Big Sur properties, Alila does allow pets for a fee of $150 per dog.

The Napa Valley hotel does not allow pets.

Advertisement

Dig deeper:

There are questions about whether the adult-only rule violates any discrimination laws.

Advertisement

KTVU reached out to the California Civil Rights Department and asked about the lawfulness of Alila’s policy.

In an email, a spokesperson responded, “We’re generally unable to provide legal advice or analysis regarding specific applications of California’s civil rights laws,” but the agency went on to share a fact sheet on California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act which seeks to provide consumer discrimination protections by businesses.

Under the Unruh Act, California businesses, including hotels, are required to provide “full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges or services” without discriminating based on more than a dozen criteria, including sex, race, disability, and immigration status.

Advertisement

The list did not include age as a “protected characteristic.”

An example of a violation of the Unruh Act would be if a hotel charged an extra service fee only to guests of a certain racial group, but not to other guests.

Advertisement

‘Reasonable’ service restrictions allowed  

The law also noted that businesses are allowed to limit access to who can receive services, but there has to be a rational reason behind the restriction. 

“A business may establish reasonable policies that are ‘rationally related to the services performed and the facilities provided,’” the Unruh Act fact sheet stated. 

Advertisement

The example used is a rental car agency that refuses to rent vehicles to drivers under the age of 25.

KTVU reached out to Hyatt and Alila for an official response as to whether there were any concerns about violations stemming from the adult-only policy but had not heard back in time for the publication of this story. 

Front desk representatives, who were not speaking in an official capacity, noted that from their experience, they had not heard of any complaints about the kid-free rule.   

Advertisement

TravelFamilySt. HelenaCaliforniaNews



Source link

Advertisement

California

PlayOn Sports fined $1.1 million by California watchdog over student data violations

Published

on

PlayOn Sports fined .1 million by California watchdog over student data violations


California’s privacy watchdog has ordered PlayOn Sports to pay a $1.10 million fine and change how it handles consumer data after finding the company’s practices violated state law in ways that affected students and schools in the state.

The California Privacy Protection Agency Board issued the decision following a settlement reached by CalPrivacy’s Enforcement Division.

The decision is the first by the board to address privacy violations involving students and California schools.

Schools across the country use PlayOn Sports’ GoFan platform to sell digital tickets to high school sporting events, theater performances, and homecoming and prom dances, with attendees presenting tickets at the door on their mobile phones.

Advertisement

Schools also use PlayOn Sports’ platforms for other sports-related activities, including attending games, streaming them online, and looking up statistics about teams and players.

In California, about 1,400 schools contract with PlayOn Sports for these services.

[RELATED] X faces possible fines as EU probes Grok nonconsensual, sexualized deepfakes

GoFan is also the official ticketing platform for the California Interscholastic Federation, the governing body for high school sports.

According to the board’s decision, PlayOn Sports used tracking technologies to collect personal information and deliver targeted advertisements to ticketholders and others using its services.

Advertisement

The company allegedly required Californians to click “agree” to tracking technologies before they could use their tickets or view PlayOn Sports websites, without providing a sufficient opt-out option.

“Students trying to go to prom or a high school football game shouldn’t have to leave their privacy rights at the door,” said Michael Macko, CalPrivacy’s head of enforcement. “You couldn’t attend these events without showing your ticket, and you couldn’t show your ticket without being tracked for advertising. California’s privacy law does not work that way. Businesses must ensure they offer lawful ways for Californians to opt-out, particularly with captive audiences.”

The decision also describes students as a uniquely vulnerable population and warns that targeted advertising systems can subject students to profiling that can follow them for years, expose them to manipulative or harmful content, and develop sensitive inferences about their lives.

Instead of providing its own opt-out method, PlayOn Sports directed students and other users to opt out through the Network Advertising Initiative and the Digital Advertising Alliance, which the decision said violated the company’s responsibility to provide its own way for consumers to opt out. The company also allegedly failed to recognize opt-out preference signals and did not provide Californians with sufficient notice of its privacy practices.

“We are committed to making it as easy as possible for all Californians — from high school students to older adults, and everyone in between — to make the choice of whether they want to be tracked or not,” said Tom Kemp, CalPrivacy’s executive director. “Californians can opt-out with covered businesses, and they can sign up for the newly launched DROP system to request that data brokers delete their personal information.”

Advertisement

Beyond the $1.10 million fine, the board’s order requires PlayOn Sports to conduct risk assessments, provide disclosures that are easy to read and understand, and implement proper opt-out methods.

The order also requires the company to comply with California’s privacy law prohibiting the selling or sharing of personal information of consumers between 13 and 16 without their affirmative opt-in consent.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly

Published

on

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly


Wednesday, March 4, 2026 4:43AM

CA bill to keep police from moonlighting with ICE advances

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KABC) — A bill that would prevent police officers from moonlighting with federal immigration enforcement agencies, such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is advancing through the California State Assembly.

AB 1537 passed the State Assembly’s committee on public safety on Tuesday.

The bill also requires that officers report any offers for secondary employment related to immigration enforcement to their place of work.

Those failing to comply could face decertification as a peace officer in California.

Advertisement

The bill was introduced by Assemblymember Isaac Bryan, whose district includes Mar Vista, Ladera Heights, Mid-Wilshire and parts of South Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Can’t win in primary election? Drop out, California Democrats say

Published

on

Can’t win in primary election? Drop out, California Democrats say


play

California Democrats running for governor, your party has a message for you. Think carefully about your candidacy and campaign ahead of the swiftly approaching filing deadline.

California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks urged candidates looking to assume the state’s highest office to “honestly assess the viability of their candidacy and campaign” as March 6, the final day to declare candidacy, nears. Hicks said that concerns about the crowded field of Democrat candidates “persist” in an open letter on Tuesday, March 3.

Advertisement

It comes as five leading candidates, several of which are Democrats — Katie Porter, Eric Swalwell, and Tom Steyer — are in a “virtual tie” per a recent poll, the Desert Sun reported, which is part of the USA TODAY Network.

Two Republican candidates pushing out California democrats in the gubernatorial bid may be “implausible,” but “it is not impossible,” Hicks said of the reasoning behind his latest message. Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, both Republicans, lead in RealClear Polling’s average of various polls.

The party chair spotlighted the need for California Democrats’ leadership, particularly over Proposition 50, the voter-approved measure that will temporarily implement new congressional district maps, paving the way for Democrats to secure more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

“If in the unlikely event a Democrat failed to proceed to the general election for governor, there could be the potential for depressed Democratic turnout in California in November,” Hicks said. “The result would present a real risk to winning the congressional seats required and imperil Democrats’ chances to retake the House, cut Donald Trump’s term in half, and spare our nation from the pain many have endured since January 2025.”

Advertisement

During a press conference on March 2, Gov. Gavin Newsom said that when he is out in communities, people aren’t talking about the governor’s race. It’s an observation he called “interesting,” considering voting in the primary election starts in May.

“It’s been hard, I think, to focus on that race,” Newsom said, pointing to the attention on President Donald Trump, redistricting, and other matters.

What exactly is California Democratic Party asking of candidates?

In his open letter, Hicks gave directions to candidates.

First, assess your candidacy and campaign. If you don’t have a viable path to the general election, don’t file to get your name on the ballot for the primary election in June. Also, be prepared to suspend your campaign and endorse another candidate by April 15 if you decide to file but can’t show “meaningful progress towards winning the primary election.”

Advertisement

When is the next California election? Primary election in 2026

California voters will trim the field of candidates for governor on June 2. Only the two candidates who receive the most votes, regardless of party preference, will move on to the November election.  

Paris Barraza is a reporter covering Los Angeles and Southern California for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at pbarraza@usatodayco.com.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending