Connect with us

California

Crime and fentanyl hit California’s king of burgers

Published

on

Crime and fentanyl hit California’s king of burgers


Californians are pretty particular when it comes to their burgers. Whether it is based on the market, internet or random street surveys, the answer from the majority is overwhelming: In-N-Out is their favorite burger joint. A far cry from the household names and numbers of global companies like McDonald’s, Five Guys or Burger King, this chain operates only 400 restaurants in eight of the country’s 50 states, mostly in the West, and only serves a dozen or so regular products. In its 75 years of existence, its success has been slow but steady and, without leaving family hands, it has never closed any restaurants (with one curious exception: the first, the original one, was demolished for the construction of a highway, but was relocated very close by). However, now neither its burgers and shakes nor the handsome profits they generate have managed to stall the closure of one of its establishments for the first time. Crime in Northern California’s Bay Area has forced Oakland’s only restaurant to call it a day.

In-N-Out is so popular in California (also in Texas, Arizona, Nevada and it soon will be in New Mexico and Tennessee) that reports of this first shutdown have made headlines in the local news. Rumors surfaced in late January, but were not confirmed until late March, when their Oakland location bid farewell on the 25th at 1 a.m., after a non-stop day of serving their famous double burgers and Animal Fries, French fries with fried onions, melted cheese and their secret and delicious Animal Sauce. By March 31, the famous yellow sign and decorative elements were gone. Only a white building remained.

The famous hamburger restaurant has been forced to close following a surge in robberies, especially violent ones. Despite its tremendous success, it has not been able to endure the rampant crime in the area. With more than 27,000 employees nationwide — it is believed to be one of the best companies to work for — and around 20% margin on its products (at highly affordable prices, especially as California is one of the most expensive places on the planet), the company had an estimated revenue of $575 million last year. Its stores are not franchised: since being founded by Harry and Esther Snyder in 1948, they have been owned by the Snyder family, whose sole heiress, granddaughter Lynsi Snyder, has amassed a fortune of nearly $7 billion, according to Forbes. The increase in the minimum wage in the restaurant industry in California, which was raised to $20 an hour on April 1, has also not affected the chain’s revenues for the time being.

The Oakland establishment, near San Francisco, was still making a profit and was therefore the first to close (in these 75 years many of them have been relocated, but have never closed). “We feel the frequency and severity of the crimes being encountered by our customers and associates leave us no alternative,” regretted the chain’s chief operating officer, Denny Warnick, in a statement published by Associated Press. “Despite taking repeated steps to create safer conditions, our customers and associates are regularly victimized by car break-ins, property damage, theft, and armed robberies,” bemoaned Warnick, who said they could no longer ask anyone to come to the establishment, not even “to visit or work in an unsafe environment.” Employees have been relocated to nearby establishments or, for those who preferred, have had the opportunity to depart with a severance payment.

Advertisement

Despite the fact that the U.S. has seen violent crime rates falling for more than two years (down more than 8.3% in 2023, according to CNN data, which cites the FBI), Oakland has experienced an uptick in violent crime, up as much as 21% last year over 2022. In addition, fentanyl is on the loose in the area. The terrible opiate, 50 times more powerful than heroin, whose use has now been declared an epidemic, is rampant in the city. The drug is fast acting and cheap, and it is estimated that one person in the country dies every five minutes from its use. It has already killed more Americans than the Vietnam War and Afghanistan combined. In Oakland, news of seizures and overdoses is continuous, and muggings and robberies have been linked to the drug.

This has prompted businesses such as Starbucks and the supermarket Target to close in the area; another fast-food chain, Denny’s, has announced that it will be the next to leave. The mayor of Oakland, Sheng Thao, said on local television that they have placed more police on patrol, but they understand that more needs to be done. In addition to being the only one in the city, this shut-down In-N-Out site was very close to Oakland Airport, a key Bay Area hub, as it is just 20 minutes from downtown San Francisco and has a throughput of about 11 million passengers annually. When landing, visitors will no longer be grabbing burgers on their way in.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter to get more English-language news coverage from EL PAÍS USA Edition



Source link

Advertisement

California

Operation Hands Down disrupts Central California gangs – Inside CDCR

Published

on

Operation Hands Down disrupts Central California gangs – Inside CDCR


CDCR staff assisted local, state and federal law enforcement agencies May 28 for Operation Hands Down, a large-scale gang takedown.

Overall, 43 search warrants were served at different locations throughout the San Joaquin Valley.

This marked the culmination of a two-month undercover operation focusing on Mexican Mafia and Sureño gang members committing various crimes.

Crimes included homicides, firearms trafficking, narcotics trafficking, shootings, robberies, assaults, sex offenses against minors and organized violence within custodial facilities.

Advertisement

Operation Hands Down results in 69 arrests

Results:

  • 69 arrests
  • 73 guns, many high-capacity magazines, rounds of ammunition seized
  • narcotics, cash confiscated
500 pounds of methamphetamine was seized. Photo courtesy Fresno County Sheriff’s Office.

The drugs included 55 pounds of methamphetamine, three pounds of cocaine and a small amount of fentanyl powder. Nearly $165,000 was seized, which derived from narcotics trafficking, firearms sales and organized street gang taxes.

The arrests of these men, women and children are expected to have an immediate impact on lowering violence across California’s Central Valley.

“By disrupting these criminal organizations, we are confident our hard work will deliver a sense of peace to residents who deserve to feel safe in their communities,” according to the agencies.

The Fresno County Sheriff’s Office and the Multi-Agency Gang Enforcement Consortium (MAGEC) thanked the numerous law enforcement agencies for their assistance throughout this investigation.


Multiple agencies focus on disrupting gangs

In total, more than 500 law enforcement members participated.

Advertisement

Some of their specialized assignments are: Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT), Crisis Negotiation Team (CNT), Air Support Unit, K-9 Unit, Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD), Incident Management Team (IMT), Dispatch Unit, Crime Analyst Unit and Fresno County Jail Correctional Officers.

Participating agencies / task forces included:

  • California Department of Justice Special Operations Unit
  • Federal Bureau of Investigations
  • Fresno County District Attorney’s Office
  • Homeland Security Investigations
  • CHP
  • CDCR
  • California Department of Fish and Wildlife
  • U.S. Marshals Service
  • Police departments from Clovis, Coalinga, Fresno, Kingsburg, Madera, Reedley, Sanger, Selma and Visalia
  • Tulare County Sheriff’s Regional Gun Violence Enforcement Team (TARGET)
  • Kings County Sheriff’s Major Crimes Task Force (MCTF)
  • Madera County Sheriff’s Office
  • Merced County Sheriff’s Gang and Narcotic Enforcement Team (MAGNET)

This remains an ongoing investigation. Anyone with information that can help detectives, report it by contacting the Fresno County Sheriff’s Office at 559-600-3111. You may also contact Valley Crime Stoppers at 559-498-7867 or www.valleycrimestoppers.org. You will remain anonymous and may be eligible for a cash reward.


Follow CDCR on YouTube, Facebook, X (formerly Twitter). Listen to the CDCR Unlocked podcast.

See more stories on joint operations.

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

California

The US$4.25 trillion question: who will face off for California governor?

Published

on

The US.25 trillion question: who will face off for California governor?


The race for California governor in November will be a battle between a Democrat promising to cement the state’s status as a stronghold of liberal policies and a Republican pledging to dramatically reverse course in America’s most populous state.

Republican Steve Hilton, a former Fox News commentator backed by President Donald Trump, has won enough votes to advance to the general election, Associated Press determined on Tuesday. He will face Democrat Xavier Becerra, a former state attorney general and health secretary under President Joe Biden.

The winner will succeed Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom to lead the state that is home to roughly 39 million people, Hollywood, a booming tech industry and a vast farming region that helps feed the nation. By itself, California represents one of the largest economies in the world at US$4.25 trillion.

Newsom, one of his party’s top foils against the Trump administration, was widely seen as eyeing a run for president himself in 2028.

Advertisement

The next governor will have to take on stubborn issues including a high cost of living, housing shortages and homelessness.

Hilton is banking his campaign on voters being frustrated enough to do something they have not done in two decades: elect a Republican to statewide office. The last time that happened was when Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger won a second term in 2006. Hilton has campaigned as an outsider who would bring change after more than 15 years of one-party rule.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California insurance commissioner race is set: Kim vs. Allen

Published

on

California insurance commissioner race is set: Kim vs. Allen


By Levi Sumagaysay, CalMatters

This story was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

For the first time since California insurance commissioner became an elected position, two Democrats will vie for the job in November.

Advertisement

The top two vote-getters in the June primary were former San Francisco Board of Supervisors member Jane Kim and state Sen. Ben Allen, who received about 27% and 20% of the vote, respectively. One of them will succeed Ricardo Lara, the former Democratic lawmaker who has served two terms as insurance commissioner. Lara has presided over the Insurance Department in the past eight years, during which the state saw its deadliest and most devastating fires. 

Kim or Allen will be taking on complicated, enormous challenges that have implications for local communities, people’s ability to buy homes and start businesses, and the state’s economy. 

In the past few years, insurance companies stopped writing new policies or renewing old ones, especially in high-risk areas, citing increasing wildfire risk from climate change and inflation that followed the COVID-19 pandemic. This caused homeowners to turn to the last-resort FAIR Plan, which is mandated by law to provide fire insurance. The plan, run by an alliance of insurers, has grown to more than 684,000 policies in force as of March, an increase of 152% since September 2022. It has warned about its ability to keep paying claims after major disasters.

Proposition 103, a law approved by voters in 1988, means that among many other things, the elected commissioner has the power to approve rate increases. It has kept the state’s rates from rising too much over the years — Californians’ homeowners insurance premiums have hovered around the middle of the pack nationwide — but that could change. Last year, the commissioner put in place regulations that include new factors insurers can use when setting their premiums, such as catastrophe modeling and reinsurance costs. Some companies have applied for and received approval to raise their rates, so they’re starting to write policies again.

Keeping insurance available but affordable will be the most pressing issue for either Kim or Allen, whose responsibilities will also include regulating auto, pet and some aspects of health insurance, plus workers’ compensation. 

Advertisement

Another problem that will need plenty of attention: making sure insurance companies pay their claims in a timely manner that helps communities to rebuild. The L.A.-area fires shed a light on insurer practices that delay and deny claims, as well as underinsurance and the lack of standards for smoke damage, which have held up recovery. Pending legislation — such as those authored by Allen, whose district was hit by the fires last year — and lawsuits will address some of those issues. Well-organized fire survivors who called for Lara’s resignation over his department’s response to their concerns will surely keep up the pressure on his successor.

Here’s a look at each candidate’s record and how she or he would approach the job, based on their interviews with CalMatters and what they have said publicly, including at candidate forums.

Jane Kim

Kim’s proposal to create “natural disaster insurance for all,” inspired by a program in New Zealand, has gotten a lot of attention. She plans to fund such a system with a portion of policyholder premiums that insurance companies would collect and divert to the state. The state would then guarantee fire and flood coverage, while insurance companies would continue to cover other risks.

Naysayers, including consumer advocates, wonder why she hasn’t released any specifics about how much capital such a fund would require. Kim told CalMatters that it would need to be studied, but that at its core her proposal would generate revenue. 

Opponents of her proposal also say it’s a bad idea to shift catastrophic burden onto the state, pointing to what they say is the failure of splitting off earthquake insurance from homeowner insurance — most California homeowners now have no insurance coverage.

Advertisement

“We (taxpayers) already are on the hook,” Kim said. “When insurers and utilities refuse to pay, they just pass it on to us anyway. Sharing the risk is important.” 

Kim also told CalMatters that an idea Merritt Farren, a Republican candidate for commissioner, proposed — that the state create a reinsurance authority to encourage insurers to write policies in the state — “may turn out to be a more efficient model.” 

Among Kim’s shorter-term priorities if she wins: 

  • Create public dashboards to show how insurance companies are spending policyholder premiums, and that show their record on claims.
  • Expand eligibility for a program that provides low-cost insurance to drivers who make less than $38,000 a year. 
  • Tie a company’s ability to sell auto insurance in the state to its willingness to write homeowner policies.
  • Make the FAIR Plan more transparent by requiring that its list of board members be public, and that its board meetings be public.
  • Freeze rates when policyholders file claims.

The former San Francisco elected official, an attorney, touts among her accomplishments free community college for the city’s residents; the first $15 minimum wage ordinance in the state; and a tenant-protection ordinance to avoid unjust evictions. She worked as the California director for Sen. Bernie Sanders’ 2020 U.S. presidential campaign and most recently as California Director for the Working Families Party.

Kim has a long list of endorsers, including many unions such as SEIU California. Besides Sanders, another U.S. lawmaker, Rep. Ro Khanna of Silicon Valley, has also endorsed her.

Ben Allen

The state senator, who will be termed out of the Legislature, wants to bring together the state, insurers, builders, local governments and firefighters to work on risk-reduction strategies.

Advertisement

“I think that’s ultimately going to be the way that we get ourselves out of this mess,” he told CalMatters.

What he calls a comprehensive approach includes thinking about where people live and build: “We shouldn’t be building new construction that is irresponsible in high-risk areas. We should be looking for ways to carefully and sensitively encourage people to pull back from high-risk areas.”

If he wins, Allen’s other plans include:

  • Create a consumer advocate position within the insurance department, and increase staff to handle customer service. 
  • Require insurers to explain claim denials and provide real-time reports of delays and outstanding claims after a disaster.
  • Increase oversight of the FAIR Plan and make sure it complies with commissioner orders.
  • Ban the insurance commissioner and staff from working for the industry immediately after they leave the department.

Allen has played up his experience as a legislator, including writing and passing bills related to holding insurance companies accountable. For example, a law he wrote now requires insurers to pay 60% of policyholders’ contents coverage without a detailed inventory, and gives consumers more time to provide that inventory. He also touts writing Proposition 4, the bond measure approved by the state’s voters in 2024 “for safe drinking water, wildfire prevention and protecting communities and natural lands from climate risks.”

Other pending bills authored by him include one that would require insurers to give homeowners 90 days notice before they intend not to renew their policies, along with a clear explanation. Another would penalize insurance companies that fail to correct their practices after the insurance department finds that they have violated laws and regulations.

Allen also has many endorsements, including the two leaders of the state Legislature, Senate Pro Tem Monique Limon and Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas. U.S. Sens. Adam Schiff and Alex Padilla, both from California, unions and the Consumer Federation of California also endorse him.

Advertisement

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending