Connect with us

News

Conservatives battered in local elections as losses mount

Published

on

Conservatives battered in local elections as losses mount

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Rishi Sunak’s Conservatives have suffered heavy defeats in elections across England and Wales, leaving the prime minister struggling to avert a general election rout but safe in office for now.

The results confirmed Tory MPs’ fears and the UK prime minister described the loss of Conservative councillors as “disappointing”, with Labour gaining seats in electoral battlegrounds across the country.

In the last big test of public opinion ahead of the general election expected this year, and with most of the council results declared, the Tories had lost almost half of the seats they were defending.

Advertisement

They were also trounced in the Blackpool South parliamentary by-election, with a 26 per cent swing from Conservatives to Labour — the third-biggest since the second world war.

By Friday night the Tories had suffered a net loss of 371 council seats while retaining 468, according to PA data. Labour had made 204 gains, securing 1026 seats overall.

Sir Keir Starmer, Labour leader, said it had been “a very good day” for his party, as he paid a celebratory visit to Rishi Sunak’s Richmond constituency, part of the new York and North Yorkshire mayoralty won by Labour.

The results suggested that Starmer was on course for a general election victory, but not a landslide. “This is clearly a bad result for the Conservatives,” said James Johnson, pollster and co-founder of JL Partners. But he added that Labour would have to do better at the general election to achieve a sizeable majority.

The BBC’s projection of an equivalent national vote share put Labour on 34 per cent, Conservatives on 25, Liberal Democrats on 17 and Others on 24, but pollsters note that people often vote differently in general elections. Most national polls give Labour a 20-point lead.

Advertisement

Johnson said the BBC projection mirrored the nine-point lead Labour enjoyed in last year’s local elections, which was widely seen as enough for a bare majority, and well below the 17-point projected national vote lead enjoyed by Tony Blair in 1996, ahead of Labour’s landslide in 1997.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Sunak appeared to gain some breathing space after the threat of a Conservative mutiny against his leadership receded. A victory by Lord Ben Houchen, the high-profile Tory mayor of Tees Valley, calmed nerves among Conservative MPs.

Houchen, a popular local figure who had distanced himself from Sunak and the Conservatives in the campaign, obtained a reduced majority of 18,789. He did not wear a blue rosette at his count.

The Conservatives also hope that Andy Street, the West Midlands mayor, who preferred an endorsement from former prime minister Boris Johnson to one from Sunak, will win a third term when votes are counted on Saturday. Labour insiders said Starmer’s position on the Gaza war may have cost the party Muslim votes in the region.

Advertisement

On Saturday focus will be intense on the London mayoral contest, with rumours swirling that Tory candidate Susan Hall may have defied opinion polls and run Labour incumbent Sadiq Khan close.

Rightwing Conservative critics of Sunak on Friday pulled back from trying to topple him but urged him to tack to the right. One rebel source said that some Tory MPs were looking for an “off ramp” and that the Tees Valley result provided them with an excuse not to challenge the prime minister.

Dame Andrea Jenkyns, a Johnson supporter who submitted a no-confidence letter in Sunak last November, told the BBC: “It’s looking unlikely that the MPs are going to put the letters in. So we’ve got to pull together.”

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Projections that the Conservatives could lose half the council seats they held were based on results in 71 of the 107 councils being contested. Some voters in England and Wales were also electing mayors as well as police and crime commissioners.

Sir John Curtice, the veteran elections expert, said the results were “not far short” of catastrophic for the Conservatives and “one of the worst, if not the worst” result for the party in local elections for 40 years.

Advertisement

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Starmer’s focus on Friday was on Labour’s Blackpool South by-election victory, where the new MP Chris Webb beat the Conservatives’ David Jones with a 26 per cent swing. Reform UK came a narrow third, just 117 votes behind the Conservatives.

Labour overturned a Tory majority of 3,690 votes to take the parliamentary seat with a 7,607 majority. The seat was formerly held by Scott Benton, who was forced to quit in a lobbying scandal.

Reform UK, formerly the Brexit party and founded by Nigel Farage, secured 17 per cent of the vote in Blackpool South, one of the races it focused on, after standing candidates for only 12 per cent of contested council seats.

Reform UK is splitting the vote on the right, a threat that could intensify at the general election when it will field candidates across the country.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Advertisement

It was not all good news for Labour. The party lost control of Oldham council in Greater Manchester, after ceding several seats to independents who stood on a pro-Palestine platform. It also lost seats in Newcastle.

Pat McFadden, Labour’s elections co-ordinator, admitted that the Gaza war was costing the party votes. “There’s no denying this is a factor in some parts of the country,” he said.

You are seeing a snapshot of an interactive graphic. This is most likely due to being offline or JavaScript being disabled in your browser.

Put your questions to George Parker and colleagues at a webinar for FT subscribers on Wednesday 8 May 1300-1400 UK (GMT+1). Register at ft.com/ukwebinar

Video: Sketchy Politics: can anything save Sunak?

News

Rep. Tom Kean returns to Congress, says depression is why he went missing for months

Published

on

Rep. Tom Kean returns to Congress, says depression is why he went missing for months

Rep. Thomas Kean Jr., R-N.J., arrives at the U.S. Capitol with his wife Rhonda Kean on June 30.

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images

New Jersey Republican Thomas Kean Jr. said it was struggles with depression that kept him away from Congress for nearly four months with no explanation to his constituents.

Kean last voted on March 5th, missing numerous votes and other appearances on Capitol Hill since. In April, House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters he had spoken to Kean and that he was dealing with an undisclosed medical issue. Kean was not spotted until recently at his New Jersey home.

Speaking from the House floor on Tuesday, the second term lawmaker said he had checked into a hospital for testing several months ago after health concerns, and was subsequently diagnosed with depression.

Advertisement

“Talking about myself has never come naturally,” Kean said. “But I believe that I owe an explanation to the people of New Jersey’s seventh district, to my colleagues in this chamber and to the American people for my absence.”

Kean said he originally did not think his diagnosis would result in a long-term absence. Doctors recommended he remain in the hospital to address the illness, and it was his fastest route to recovery, he said.

“It is physical. It is emotional,” he said. “And until you experience it yourself, it is difficult to fully understand how powerful this illness could be.”

Kean said he miscalculated how long he would be away, estimating it would be a matter of weeks. However, he said like the roughly 48 million Americans who have battled the illness, he learned there is no timeline for recovery.

“I am grateful that I accepted help,” Kean said. “Today I stand before you healthier, stronger and excited to return to the work that I love.”

Advertisement

Kean’s absence proved a struggle for House Republicans, who contend with a razor thin majority to pass party priorities. For weeks, Kean and his office declined to share additional details on why he was away, feeding rumors and speculation and raising interest in a member known for his privacy.

Continue Reading

News

Michigan governor threatens to pull troops from D.C. if used for Trump task force

Published

on

Michigan governor threatens to pull troops from D.C. if used for Trump task force

Members of the National Guard stand in front of a large image of U.S. President Donald Trump that hangs from the the Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building on May 18, 2026 in Washington, D.C.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images North America


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images North America

WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a strongly worded letter to the head of Michigan’s National Guard, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer reiterated troops from her state are only to be used for operations surrounding America 250 celebrations in Washington, D.C., and not for President Trump’s long-running — and controversial — joint task force to fight crime. She said that she would pull her troops from the city if that is not the case, in the letter obtained by NPR.

“Please take all necessary measures to ensure the Michigan National Guard is only supporting the narrow and limited America 250 Mission and is in no way supporting the D.C. Safe and Beautiful Mission,” wrote Gov. Whitmer, referencing the official name for the federal task force.

Trump deployed hundreds of troops to Washington, D.C., in August of 2025, in what experts said was a stunning departure from governing norms. He said he did so to address rampant crime, despite declining crime rates at the time. The number of troops in the city has increased over time to more than 4,800 from Washington, D.C. and almost two dozen states, which until recently were exclusively Republican-led.

Advertisement

Michigan — which has 161 guard members currently in the city — is one of four Democratic-led states that sent members of their National Guard to D.C. in recent weeks, ahead of an influx of tourists for America 250 celebrations. North Carolina and Kentucky each sent one member of their guard, while Minnesota sent more than a hundred last week.

Kentucky confirmed to NPR Monday that it had recalled its one guard member over the weekend, after that member was “diverted to the task force by the federal government without the knowledge or consent of Gov. Beshear of the Kentucky Guard,” Scottie Ellis, a spokesperson for Gov. Beshear, wrote to NPR in an email.

When contacted by NPR, spokespeople for each respective Democratic governor’s office made it clear that their guard members were sent to help specifically with America 250, not for law enforcement purposes as part of the larger ongoing federal joint task force operation. All four states have been clear about their opposition to the Trump administration’s ongoing deployment of National Guard troops to D.C., filing an amicus brief in support of litigation challenging it as recently as May.

Continue Reading

News

Senate Ethics Committee dismisses complaint against Sen. Ruben Gallego

Published

on

Senate Ethics Committee dismisses complaint against Sen. Ruben Gallego

Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Ariz., walks out of the Senate chamber on Oct. 1, 2025.

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images


hide caption

toggle caption

Advertisement

Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

The Senate Ethics Committee has dismissed a complaint brought against Sen. Ruben Gallego involving allegations of campaign finance violations and potential sexual misconduct.

The allegations against the Arizona Democrat were brought to the committee in April by a fellow member of Congress, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla. But in a letter to Gallego dated June 26, the committee said it had uncovered no wrongdoing.

“Based on the investigation of the Committee, the Committee did not find evidence that your actions violated Federal law, Senate rules, or related standards of conduct,” the panel wrote.

Advertisement

The panel also said it appreciated Gallego’s “full cooperation” throughout the investigation.

Gallego welcomed the findings, saying in a statement that the dismissal “reaffirms what I have said about these accusations from the beginning: they were right-wing conspiracies peddled by far-right activists like Anna Paulina Luna, the White House, and their allies.”

“I look forward to an apology from Rep. Luna for weaponizing the ethics process while refusing to investigate historic corruption that’s making life harder for families,” he continued.

Whispers about potential misconduct by Gallego began to circulate in April following the resignation of Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif. Swalwell stepped down in response to a swell of sexual assault and misconduct allegations. NPR has not independently verified the allegations against Swalwell, but he has adamantly denied them.

Swalwell and Gallego were close friends, and during Swalwell’s short-lived 2020 presidential campaign, it was Gallego who served as campaign chair.

Advertisement

In the immediate aftermath of Swalwell’s resignation, Gallego denied knowledge of any alleged history of sexual misconduct, though he acknowledged to reporters that their close friendship may have made it difficult for him to accept rumors about Swalwell and his behavior toward women.

“My friendship with him, our family’s friendship together with him, clouded my judgment, and I was wrong — I deeply, deeply regret that,” Gallego said.

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending