California
Court Ruling a Setback for California’s ‘Builder’s Remedy’
California is within the midst of a singularly consequential experiment with state preemption and native management. Planetizen has been monitoring the so-called “builder’s treatment,” which is designed to carry native governments accountable for failing to plan for sufficient housing growth to accommodate the state’s inhabitants.
The latest mainstream media consideration to the builder’s treatment, an article by Liam Dillon revealed by the Los Angeles Instances on the finish of October, famous that the legality of the state’s new housing coverage regime had but to be contested in court docket.
Quick ahead a couple of weeks and Chris Elmendorf, a regulation professor on the College of California, Davis who has positioned himself on the forefront of the event debate in California, writes {that a} state court docket just lately delivered a blow to the state’s hopes of forcing native governments to plan for extra growth.
In a paywalled article for the San Francisco Chronicle, Elmendorf explains the court docket ruling concerning the “notorious 469 Stevenson venture in San Francisco,” a venture described in a current paywalled article by J.Ok. Dineen as a “poster little one for the madness” of San Francisco housing politics.
“The developer seeks to switch a valet car parking zone with 500 properties, many reasonably priced, only one block from a BART station and in a precedence growth space as recognized by the area’s local weather plan,” writes Elmendorf.
A “neighborhood gadfly” satisfied the San Francisco Board of Supervisors to reverse the approval for the venture, in line with Elmendorf’s telling of the episode, and demanded a growth deal that would come with evaluation of potential gentrification results of the venture, whereas downsizing the venture and donating a few of the land on the parcel to town.
“In response, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s housing enforcement crew launched an investigation. It referred to as the supes’ choice an ‘efficient denial’ and warned that they could have violated the Housing Accountability Act, which says that cities typically can’t deny or downsize housing initiatives that adjust to no matter guidelines are in place on the time the venture software was submitted,” explains Elmendorf.
A current ruling by a state court docket, nonetheless, throws out the state’s intervention.
“State housing legal guidelines, she dominated, don’t apply to a venture till after a metropolis ‘certifies’ the venture’s environmental evaluate. Underneath the logic of this ruling, years could cross — or a long time — and nonetheless the venture proponents don’t have any authorized recourse — even when town’s calls for for added examine are frivolous, don’t have anything to do with the surroundings or represent a clear ruse to strain the developer,” in line with Elmendorf. “Though CEQA places a one-year restrict on environmental evaluate, the court docket held that this deadline is simply advisory and that courts don’t have any authority to order a metropolis to take any motion on a venture — and even to evaluate town’s calls for — whereas the environmental evaluate is ongoing.”
California State Senator Scott Wiener is quoted within the article evaluating the “outrageous” choice to the ruling that just about compelled the College of California, Berkeley to cut back enrollment by 1000’s resulting from a CEQA ruling by a state court docket. Based on Elmemdorf, there’s nonetheless a means ahead for this growth proposal, specifically an enchantment of the ruling. The builder’s treatment may require a brand new state regulation, modeled on AB 2656, written by planning assume tank SPUR and Assembleymember Phil Ting, to inoculate itself from related state rulings sooner or later.
California
Caitlyn Jenner says she'd 'destroy' Kamala Harris in hypothetical race to be CA gov
SAN FRANCISCO – Caitlyn Jenner, the gold-medal Olympian-turned reality TV personality, is considering another run for Governor of California. This time, she says, if she were to go up against Vice President Kamala Harris, she would “destroy her.”
Jenner, who publicly came out as transgender nearly 10 years ago, made a foray into politics when she ran as a Republican during the recall election that attempted to unseat Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2021. Jenner only received one percent of the vote and was not considered a serious candidate.
Jenner posted this week on social media that she’s having conversations with “many people” and hopes to have an announcement soon about whether she will run.
Caitlyn Jenner speaks at the 4th annual Womens March LA: Women Rising at Pershing Square on January 18, 2020 in Los Angeles, California. (Photo by Chelsea Guglielmino/Getty Images)
She has also posted in Trumpian-style all caps: “MAKE CA GREAT AGAIN!”
As for VP Harris, she has not indicated any future plans for when she leaves office. However, a recent poll suggests Harris would have a sizable advantage should she decide to run in 2026. At that point, Newsom cannot run again because of term limits.
If Jenner decides to run and wins, it would mark the nation and state’s first transgender governor.
California
Northern California 6-year-old, parents hailed as heroes for saving woman who crashed into canal
LIVE OAK — A six-year-old and her parents are being called heroes by a Northern California community for jumping into a canal to save a 75-year-old woman who drove off the road.
It happened on Larkin Road near Paseo Avenue in the Sutter County community of Live Oak on Monday.
“I just about lost her, but I didn’t,” said Terry Carpenter, husband of the woman who was rescued. “We got more chances.”
Terry said his wife of 33 years, Robin Carpenter, is the love of his life and soulmate. He is grateful he has been granted more time to spend with her after she survived her car crashing off a two-lane road and overturning into a canal.
“She’s doing really well,” Terry said. “No broken bones, praise the Lord.”
It is what some call a miracle that could have had a much different outcome without a family of good Samaritans.
“Her lips were purple,” said Ashley Martin, who helped rescue the woman. “There wasn’t a breath at all. I was scared.”
Martin and her husband, Cyle Johnson, are being hailed heroes by the Live Oak community for jumping into the canal, cutting Robin out of her seat belt and pulling her head above water until first responders arrived.
“She was literally submerged underwater,” Martin said. “She had a back brace on. Apparently, she just had back surgery. So, I grabbed her brace from down below and I flipped her upward just in a quick motion to get her out of that water.”
The couple said the real hero was their six-year-old daughter, Cayleigh Johnson.
“It was scary,” Cayleigh said. “So the car was going like this, and it just went boom, right into the ditch.”
Cayleigh was playing outside and screamed for her parents who were inside the house near the canal.
I spoke with Robin from her hospital bed over the phone who told us she is in a lot of pain but grateful.
“The thing I can remember is I started falling asleep and then I was going over the bump and I went into the ditch and that’s all I remember,” Robin said.
It was a split-second decision for a family who firefighters said helped save a stranger’s life.
“It’s pretty unique that someone would jump in and help somebody that they don’t even know,” said Battalion Chief for Sutter County Fire Richard Epperson.
Robin is hopeful that she will be released from the hospital on Wednesday in time to be home for Thanksgiving.
“She gets Thanksgiving and Christmas now with her family and grandkids,” Martin said.
Terry and Robin are looking forward to eventually meeting the family who helped save Robin’s life. The family expressed the same feelings about meeting the woman they helped when she is out of the hospital.
“I can’t wait for my baby to get home,” Terry said.
California
California may exclude Tesla from EV rebate program
California Gov. Gavin Newsom may exclude Tesla and other automakers from an electric vehicle (EV) rebate program if the incoming Trump administration scraps a federal tax credit for electric car purchases.
Newsom proposed creating a new version of the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program, which was phased out in 2023 after funding more than 594,000 vehicles and saving more than 456 million gallons of fuel, the governor’s office said in a news release on Monday.
“Consumers continue to prove the skeptics wrong – zero-emission vehicles are here to stay,” Newsom said in a statement. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future – we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”
The proposed rebates would be funded with money from the state’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, which is funded by polluters under the state’s cap-and-trade program, the governor’s office said. Officials did not say how much the program would cost or save consumers.
NEBRASKA AG LAUNCHES ASSAULT AGAINST CALIFORNIA’S ELECTRIC VEHICLE PUSH
They would also include changes to promote innovation and competition in the zero-emission vehicles market – changes that could prevent automakers like Tesla from qualifying for the rebates.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who relocated Tesla’s corporate headquarters from California to Texas in 2021, responded to the possibility of having Tesla EVs left out of the program.
“Even though Tesla is the only company who manufactures their EVs in California! This is insane,” Musk wrote on X, which he also owns.
BENTLEY PUSHES BACK ALL-EV LINEUP TIMELINE TO 2035
Those buying or leasing Tesla vehicles accounted for about 42% of the state’s rebates, The Associated Press reported, citing data from the California Air Resources Board.
Newsom’s office told Fox Business Digital that the proposal is intended to foster market competition, and any potential market cap is subject to negotiation with the state Legislature.
Ticker | Security | Last | Change | Change % |
---|---|---|---|---|
TSLA | TESLA INC. | 338.59 | -13.97 | -3.96% |
“Under a potential market cap, and depending on what the cap is, there’s a possibility that Tesla and other automakers could be excluded,” the governor’s office said. “But that’s again subject to negotiations with the legislature.”
Newsom’s office noted that such market caps have been part of rebate programs since George W. Bush’s administration in 2005.
Federal tax credits for EVs are currently worth up to $7,500 for new zero-emission vehicles. President-elect Trump has previously vowed to end the credit.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
California has surpassed 2 million zero-emission vehicles sold, according to the governor’s office. The state, however, could face a $2 billion budget deficit next year, Reuters reported, citing a non-partisan legislative estimate released last week.
-
Science1 week ago
Trump nominates Dr. Oz to head Medicare and Medicaid and help take on 'illness industrial complex'
-
Politics1 week ago
Trump taps FCC member Brendan Carr to lead agency: 'Warrior for Free Speech'
-
Technology1 week ago
Inside Elon Musk’s messy breakup with OpenAI
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Some in the U.S. farm industry are alarmed by Trump's embrace of RFK Jr. and tariffs
-
World1 week ago
Protesters in Slovakia rally against Robert Fico’s populist government
-
Health4 days ago
Holiday gatherings can lead to stress eating: Try these 5 tips to control it
-
News1 week ago
They disagree about a lot, but these singers figure out how to stay in harmony
-
Health2 days ago
CheekyMD Offers Needle-Free GLP-1s | Woman's World