California
California gas prices could rise with toughened climate regulations
California air quality regulators late Friday approved a plan to strengthen limits on the planet-warming emissions from gasoline and diesel fuels, a move expected to raise gas prices while bringing public health benefits.
Members of the California Air Resources Board approved amendments to the state low carbon fuel standard during a meeting in Riverside that stretched 11 hours and featured scores of public speakers. Twelve of the appointed board members voted for the changes and two voted against. The new standard will carry lower limits for the carbon intensity of transportation fuels that can be sold in the state without penalty.
The tougher regulations will reduce asthma symptoms for more than 70,000 Californians, according to the board’s estimate, and pump $100 billion of private investment into clean energy infrastructure over the next two decades. Board chair Liane Randolph said that will help protect residents from air pollution and climate-fueled natural disasters — as well as price hikes by gas companies.
“We cannot afford to continue with the status quo,” Randolph said.
But the change is controversial. State Republicans have pilloried the board and Gov. Gavin Newsom, whose appointees dominate the board, for driving up gas prices, a hot-button issue throughout the state, which currently has the country’s second-highest price per gallon, behind only Hawaii, according to AAA.
The vote came amid a moment of intense political debate about inflation. That helped fuel the walloping Democrats received locally and nationally in Tuesday’s election, observers say.
It also comes a month after a special legislative session that saw Democrats pass a plan to create a state fuel reserve. The board decides air pollution and climate policy for California, which is often followed by other states. Of its 16 members, 12 were appointed by Newsom and confirmed by the state Senate. The other members are appointed by state lawmakers.
Last year, the board estimated that the proposed change could drive a 47-cent price increase in 2025 that could reach 79 cents in 2035, as refineries pass costs to customers. The board’s’s executive officer, Steven Cliff, and board staff now say it’s impossible to know if the changes will raise gas prices.
Currently, the fuel standard adds about 8 cents per gallon of gas, said Aaron Smith, an economics professor at University of California, Davis. He estimates that the toughened regulations could add between 20 cents and 84 cents per gallon by 2030, depending on the regulatory market.
“We do not need lower CARB emissions — good grief!” said California resident Melanie Arace in a public comment. “If this is all about the air quality, one sliver of our country isn’t going to clean the air of the entire planet. Quit taxing us to death!”
Environmentalists and economists contended the program is flawed in its design during the marathon meeting on Friday, when more than 100 people spoke to the board. Many were parents of children with lung diseases and environmental justice activists who said the standard doesn’t go far enough to reduce air pollution and climate change.
Although California prioritizes the adoption of electric vehicles, the lion’s share of the $22 billion of private investment generated by the fuel standard has largely benefited biofuels companies. That’s helping fund deforestation and large-scale dairy farms, the critics said.
“We need clean air,” Jose Avalos, a San Bernardino resident and member of the People’s Collective for Environmental Justice, told the board. “Both you and I know that these fuels are generating polluting emissions that lead to more people suffering from asthma and cancer.”
Biofuels companies, including Nebraska ag-tech giant Green Plains and Brazil-based Raízen, urged the board to approve the new standard.
The fuel standard sets a limit for the carbon intensity of fuels. Companies that abide by the limits earn credits, and companies that don’t — like oil refineries — must buy credits from those that do. Over time, the limit decreases.
The new standard lowers carbon intensity limits and accelerates those limits into the 2040s. The limit will increase by 10% in 2030 and decline to 90% in 2045.
The board says the standard has driven major changes in the state’s fuel market — in particular, the rapid adoption of renewable diesel made from vegetable oil. Two Bay Area petroleum refineries are currently being converted to produce renewable diesel.
The rapid adoption of renewable diesel produced a glut of credits, which reduced the incentives under the program, experts told Bay Area News Group. That’s one reason why the board lowered the standard.
Renewable diesel is considered lower-carbon than traditional diesel and has come to dominate the state’s market for heavy truck fuels. However, it’s increasingly made from palm oil and soybean oil produced abroad in deforested areas. Loss of forest globally is a critical threat to biodiversity and climate change.
In response, the board is implementing “guardrails” that limit the use of these oils in renewable diesel produced through the standard. But the rule is unlikely to prevent deforestation abroad because this international market is booming, Colin Murphy, co-director of the UC Davis Low Carbon Fuel Policy Research Initiative, said in a public comment.
On Thursday, the board delayed a planned hearing on fuel standards for gas-powered motorcycles and what would be the nation’s first requirements for the sale of electric motorcycles.
Originally Published:
California
California 2026 4-star DE Simote Katoanga breaks down recruiting plans
One of the easiest recruiting tools ever – dominate against Trinity League competition = college glory awaits. Year after year the Southern California high school football conference produces some of the nation’s best talent. At JSerra Catholic, the Lions have a torchbearer in defensive end Simote Katoanga.
There’s no hyperbole when running down the long list of what Katoanga (6-5, 255) brings to the field. Twitchy with a great first step, Katoanga puts offensive linemen on roller skates pushing them into the lap of the quarterback. Even on plays where Katoanga doesn’t get the stat credit he has created chaos allowing his teammates to reap the rewards.
College scouts agree that Katoanga is a difference maker with 24 offers extended.
“They love that I can play off the edge and inside, like a hybrid,” Katoanga said. “They love my get off and my physicality. They love my speed and power.”
Bad news for California squads, Katoanga is adding more tools to the skill belt.
“I want to get better with my run fits, going to the side, and I am working on my pass rush moves,” Katoanga stated. “I want to be more fluid with my moves and not always relying on speed and power, but also my quickness.”
With Michigan showing interest, teams like Notre Dame, Georgia, Nebraska, Miami, Clemson, Cal, Oregon, Tennessee UCLA, Texas A&M, USC, Washington, and Arizona State have dropped offers.
“Most of the schools that have offered reach out,” Katoanga shared. “I talk to most schools on a daily basis; each week I talk to them.”
Katoanga added which teams are communicating how the four-star would fit nicely into their scheme.
“Most of them are talking about how they’d use me; Notre Dame, Oregon, Clemson, Tennessee, and UDUB (Washington) tell me what they see me as. I talk to most of the schools about how they see me.”
USC, Clemson, Washington, Notre Dame, Ohio State, and UCLA hosted Katoanga for regular season games. The Class of 2026 talent broke down visits with the Bruins, Fighting Irish, and Buckeyes.
UCLA: “It was great. I definitely see them, since their head coach (Chip Kelly) left, I see their potential. I love seeing what they are building at UCLA. I love their potential for next season.”
Notre Dame: “Man, it was a great experience. One of the highlights was the player walk. They have a long line with fans on both sides; we walked after the players. The fans were cheering, even for the recruits. Watching their d-line dominate against Florida State was also very cool. It gave me a vision where I could see myself playing for them.”
Ohio State: “I had a great time there too. I had a great time talking to coach Larry Johnson (DL). I liked watching their defense and how they dominated against Indiana.”
The 2025 visit schedule is wide open for Katoanga.
“There is nothing set right now,” Katoanga stated. “I have not checked out Tennessee. I want to check them out before I start eliminating schools.”
Katoanga expanded on his future recruiting plans, “I will probably take spring visits; go to some practices and Junior Days. I will narrow it down from there. When I take my official visits, that will probably be my top schools.”
California
Can new state regulations resolve California's home insurance crisis? | Opinion
There’s no law requiring California property owners to carry insurance, but the vast majority buy it to protect themselves from fire and other perils, or are required to do so by their mortgage lenders.
There’s also no law requiring insurance companies to offer coverage in California, but most would prefer to do so in the nation’s most immense concentration of property needing protection.
For decades, insuring California’s homes, farms and commercial properties was a hum-drum business of willing sellers and willing buyers. However, the former have become less willing as the state experiences an ever-increasing number of wildfires — even during winter months — that devastate homes and businesses in fire-prone areas.
Last Friday, as the latest of those fires was driving people from their homes in the quaint seaside village of Malibu, Ricardo Lara, the state’s elected insurance commissioner, formally unveiled a large chunk of his plan to stem the exodus of insurers from California.
It would allow insurers to use computer modeling of future exposure to set premiums, while requiring them to offer coverage in risky communities roughly in line with their shares of the market. Until now, insurers set rates based on past losses.
“Giving people more choices to protect themselves is how we will solve California’s insurance crisis,” Lara said in a statement as he released details of the modeling plan. “For the first time in history we are requiring insurance companies to expand where people need help the most. With our changing climate we can no longer look to the past. We are being innovative and forward-looking to protect Californians’ access to insurance.”
He also noted that in setting rates, insurers will be required to consider hardening efforts by threatened communities and property owners to reduce potential losses.
Lara claims support from environmental groups, farmers and other stakeholders, in addition to insurers. But he’s drawing sharp criticism from Consumer Watchdog, an organization that has sponsored landmark changes in insurance regulation. The group has also received millions of dollars in fees from intervening in insurance rates cases, and has been a harsh critic of Lara throughout his time in office.
“Full transparency is what keeps insurance rates honest but Commissioner Lara’s rule does away with that protection,” Consumer Watchdog executive director Carmen Balber said in a statement. “The rule will let insurance companies raise rates based on secret algorithms but not expand coverage as promised.”
The new rules take effect in January. Farmers Insurance, California’s second-largest property insurer, has already pledged to expand its coverage in response to Lara’s actions. The American Property Casualty Association, a trade group, also reacted positively.
“California will continue to have a robust regulatory and rate approval process that guarantees that rates reflect the actual cost of covering claims,” the association said.
While the rules unveiled last week are central to Lara’s plans, there are other elements that remain: shoring up the FAIR Plan, California’s last ditch insurer for property owners who cannot obtain coverage elsewhere, speeding up insurance rate case approvals, and allowing insurers to include costs of reinsurance — coverage of their potential losses — in setting rates.
Adoption of Lara’s plans may result in premium increases, but maintaining a viable insurance market is a vital factor in the state’s economy. The inability to buy insurance would devastate the residential and commercial real estate market and require property owners to pay for fire losses out of their own pockets.
Lara’s plans may not be perfect, but nobody — including Consumer Watchdog — has offered a better alternative. He should be credited with at least attempting to deal with one of California’s existential crises.
Source link
California
California bill would make schools off limits to all federal immigration agents
Be the first to know
Get browser notifications for breaking news, live events, and exclusive reporting.
-
Business1 week ago
OpenAI's controversial Sora is finally launching today. Will it truly disrupt Hollywood?
-
Politics4 days ago
Canadian premier threatens to cut off energy imports to US if Trump imposes tariff on country
-
Technology5 days ago
Inside the launch — and future — of ChatGPT
-
Technology3 days ago
OpenAI cofounder Ilya Sutskever says the way AI is built is about to change
-
Politics3 days ago
U.S. Supreme Court will decide if oil industry may sue to block California's zero-emissions goal
-
Technology4 days ago
Meta asks the US government to block OpenAI’s switch to a for-profit
-
Politics5 days ago
Conservative group debuts major ad buy in key senators' states as 'soft appeal' for Hegseth, Gabbard, Patel
-
Business2 days ago
Freddie Freeman's World Series walk-off grand slam baseball sells at auction for $1.56 million