Connect with us

California

Burned and uninsured: Wildfires are leaving California’s housing market in trouble | CNN Business

Published

on

Burned and uninsured: Wildfires are leaving California’s housing market in trouble | CNN Business



Los Angeles
CNN
 — 

After the 2018 Camp Fire – the deadliest wildfire in California’s history – engulfed Michael and Kristy Daneau’s Paradise home, the couple and their four daughters were forced to move 30 miles away to find a home they could afford.

They moved to Cohasset to buy a home with money they received through their insurance claim and their portion of an $11 billion Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) settlement with insurance companies for the blazes linked to its equipment failure.

Six years later, the family’s experiencing déjà vu: Their new home in the rocky region of northern California recently burned down to the studs in the 2024 Park Fire, the fourth largest fire in the state’s history.

Advertisement

But this time the Daneaus don’t have the safety net of insurance to help them rebuild their lives.

When they moved to Cohasset, they were denied homeowners insurance from every company they contacted, citing wildfire concerns, and when they finally found an insurer that would offer them a plan, they couldn’t afford it.  They were priced out – uninsured in a state prone to natural disasters. And now they are left with, essentially, nothing.

The climate crisis, acutely felt in California, is driving a rapid increase in the intensity and frequency of wildfires and the number of homes lost in them. That’s made home insurance increasingly unaffordable or even inaccessible – and that’s leaving more people in the same position as the Daneaus.

“We’re literally back to square one, as if we’re starting over in life again. It’s numbing, to be honest,” Michael said. He and his family are relying on what little they have saved and are hoping to secure $30,000 through donations on their GoFundMe page to “find a place, even if it’s to rent,” he said.

 Last year alone, the Insurance Information Institute tracked $80 billion in insured losses caused by natural catastrophes across the US. The Daneaus’ home was one of approximately 19,000 structures that were destroyed in the 2018 Camp Fire. Consequently, insurers are rushing to leave states like California to stop incurring such costs.

Advertisement

Since 2015, the California Department of Insurance has kept a record of the number of renewed and canceled policies in the state’s high fire-risk areas, which make up more than a quarter of the state. They recorded an increase in canceled policies until the most recent report published in 2022, with the sharpest increase being 10% in 2019.

When policies aren’t being canceled altogether, insurance rates sometimes rise by exorbitant amounts. California’s largest insurer, State Farm, requested a 30% rate increase for its homeowner’s line last month. This came a year after State Farm completely stopped selling insurance for new homes, citing wildfire risks. State Farm did not respond to a request for comment from CNN.

With the combination of rate increases, non-renewals and plan cancellations, many California homeowners have been pushed to the state’s temporary solution: the California FAIR Plan, a private association created by the state as a last-resort insurer for those being denied plans.

The California FAIR Plan was established in 1968 to provide an insurance option for those who are unable to procure insurance through the traditional market. However, what was established as a temporary solution has now become the only solution for many.

After every insurance company denied the Daneaus coverage for the home they moved to in Cohasset, the couple explored their insurance options through the California FAIR Plan. What was first an affordable solution became far too expensive by 2022, when they told CNN the plan would have cost them $12,000 with a $7,000 down payment and a $4,000 payment in the next month.

Advertisement

“The first year, it seemed okay … the second year it went up to where it stung a bit. The last few years, it’s been so unattainable, we would practically have to have a mortgage payment to be able to afford the California FAIR Plan, plus the secondary insurance that you would need to go along with it,” Michael Daneau said.

Since 2019, the California FAIR Plan has seen a 164% increase in policies, with a 27% jump just this past year, an indication of how many residents across the state are unable to access private insurance.

Last year, California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara reached an agreement with insurers with an aim to cover approximately 85% of properties in high-risk areas. However, the commissioner does not have the authority to force insurance companies to increase coverage.

As homeowners continue grappling for insurance options, the question of what’s next has become important for homeowners and insurers alike. Across the Golden State, both groups are exploring ways for California to become wildfire resilient.

The Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety (IBHS), a non-profit research organization backed by insurers, has spearheaded both an advocacy and research effort in making infrastructure more resilient.

Advertisement

One result has been the Wildfire Prepared program, which designates homes as wildfire resilient after an evaluation of both retrofitted and newly built homes.

The IBHS evaluation standards include components such as wildfire-resistant decks, upgraded windows and doors, and removal of back-to-back fencing, according to Steve Hawks, senior director for wildfire at IBHS.

After the 2018 Woolsey fire, which destroyed 1,643 structures in the Santa Monica mountains, the Los Angeles Emergency Preparedness Foundation (LAEPF), a local non-profit, was mobilized to educate homeowners about the need to harden their homes.

In a door-to-door effort, they reached Angela Wilson, a Malibu homeowner of 37 years, who has taken various steps in the past year while collaborating with LAEPF to make her home wildfire resilient.

Beyond structural changes such as shuttering her doors and adding metal mesh to vents, the avid gardener has made the tough decision to part with her flower beds and lush gardens.

Advertisement

“[My insurance plan] wasn’t canceled but my insurance company increased the rates quite a bit,” she said. Wilson has not yet completed the program, but hopes it will help bring her insurance costs down eventually.

“Some insurers have started giving a list of changes homeowners need to make to keep their insurance or maybe even get a discount of rates,” said Brent Woodworth, chairman & CEO of LAEPF. But he cautioned there’s no guarantee of that, leaving homeowners like the Daneaus grappling with uncertainty.

“I’m personally so numb that I just can’t wrap my head around where we’re going to go, what we’re going to do. How do we go from here knowing that we’ve built a beautiful life for us and our kids, and now we have literally nothing,” Michael Daneau said.

CNN’s Camila Bernal and Sarah Moon contributed reporting.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

California

JD Vance accuses California of letting Medicaid fraudsters cash in at taxpayer expense | Fox Business Video

Published

on

JD Vance accuses California of letting Medicaid fraudsters cash in at taxpayer expense | Fox Business Video




Source link

Continue Reading

California

Live Updates: Candidates face off in the CBS News California and San Francisco Examiner Governor’s Debate

Published

on

Live Updates: Candidates face off in the CBS News California and San Francisco Examiner Governor’s Debate


 

Learn more about candidates’ stances on the issues in the California Governor’s Race interactive guide

CBS News California launched an interactive tool to help voters navigate this year’s gubernatorial race. The California Governor’s Race Candidate Guide features 20 hours of interviews with top-polling candidates to provide voters the opportunity to compare each candidate’s responses side-by-side on the issues that matter most to them.

Those running to succeed Gov. Gavin Newsom as California’s next chief executive offered their thoughts on more than a dozen issues, including homelessness, housing affordability, gas prices and environmental policy, immigration, healthcare, crime and public safety funding, and the state’s ongoing insurance crisis.

Advertisement
 

Here’s what to know about the CBS News California/San Francisco Examiner Governor’s Debate format

The format of the CBS News California and San Francisco Examiner Governor’s Debate on Thursday will allow candidates to question each other directly. 

Advertisement

Candidates will also participate in segments in which they address real-world issues California voters may face in their daily lives. The Californians who will be featured include a working single mother pursuing education; a couple struggling to achieve homeownership; and a scientist warning of the long-term consequences of inaction on climate change.

This structure for Thursday’s debate differs from the previous face-off hosted by CBS News California stations, which comprised three segments focused on affordability, accountability and social issues that lasted roughly half an hour each.

 
Advertisement

Becerra, Hilton, Steyer lead field in latest polling on California governor’s race

An Emerson College poll released the day before the CBS News California and San Francisco Examiner Governor’s Debate showed Xavier Becerra leading the field with likely voters surveyed at 19%, followed by Steve Hilton and Tom Steyer both receiving 17%. Chad Bianco came in at 11%, followed by Katie Porter at 10%, Matt Mahan at 8%, Antonio Villaraigosa at 4% and Tony Thurmond at 1%. Twelve percent said they remained undecided.

In a CBS News/YouGov poll last month conducted before the April 28 CBS California Governor’s Debate, Hilton received support from 16% of likely voters polled, with Steyer and Becerra following at 15% and 13% respectively. Bianco came in at 10%, Porter received 9%, Matt Mahan and Antonio Villaraigosa both received 4%, and Tony Thurmond received 1%. The survey also found that a significant 26% of those polled were undecided.

California’s June 2 primary is an open primary where the top two vote-getters, regardless of party affiliation, advance to face off in the November general election. 

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Opinion | California will make less money from greenhouse gas emission auctions

Published

on

Opinion | California will make less money from greenhouse gas emission auctions


By Dan Walters, CalMatters

The Phillips 66 refinery in Wilmington, on Sept. 30, 2025. Photo by Stella Kalinina for CalMatters

This commentary was originally published by CalMatters. Sign up for their newsletters.

Two decades ago, when California got serious about reducing or even eliminating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, its political leaders weighed two potential tactics about industrial emissions.

Advertisement

The state could impose direct facility-by-facility limits, generally favored by climate change advocates. Or it could set overall emission reduction goals that would gradually decrease and auction off emission allowances, assuming their costs would encourage reductions.

The latter, known as cap-and-trade, was favored by corporate interests as being less onerous and was adopted, finally taking effect in 2012.

Since then, the California Air Resources Board has conducted quarterly auctions of emission allowances, collecting a total of $35 billion dollars so far, which, in theory, is being spent on projects that would reduce emissions.

The revenues have varied from year to year, but they have generally increased as the emission caps have declined. Since reaching a peak of $8.1 billion in the 2023-24 fiscal year, however, auction proceeds have been declining.

Roughly half of the money has been given to utilities to minimize cap-and-trade’s impact on consumer costs. However, the program has been widely criticized as a de facto tax on gasoline and other fuels, which were already among the most expensive of any state.

Advertisement

The remaining revenues have been deposited into a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund that governors and legislators have tapped for various purposes, not all of them connected to emission reductions. In a sense, it’s been a slush fund.

Last year Gov. Gavin Newsom and the Legislature overhauled the program in two bills, Senate Bill 840 and Assembly Bill 1207. The program was extended, it was renamed as cap-and-invest and new priorities for spending auction proceeds were set.

Notably, the state’s cash-strapped and long-stalled bullet train project would get a flat $1 billion a year, rather than the 25% share it had been getting. Project managers hope that lenders will advance enough money to complete its first leg in the San Joacim Valley; the plan is to repay the loans from the $1 billion annual cap-and-invest allocation.

Early this year, the Air Resources Board released new regulations to implement the legislative changes but faced criticism that they would increase consumer costs. That led to a revision in April that softens the rules’ impact — most obviously on refiners who have been threatening to leave California — but environmental groups are very critical.

The April version would also sharply reduce net revenues from emission auctions, according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office, providing barely enough for the $1 billion allocation to the bullet train and another $1 billion for the governor and Legislature to spend. Other programs that have been receiving cap-and-invest support, such as wildfire protection and housing, would probably get nothing.

Advertisement

The program has been tapped in recent years to backfill programs that a deficit-ridden state budget could not cover, so the projected revenue drop would exacerbate efforts by Newsom and legislators to close the state budget’s yawning gap.

“The (Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund) is a relatively small portion of the overall state budget, but it has been a noteworthy source of funding for environmental and other programs in recent years,” the state Assembly’s budget advisor, Jason Sisney, says in an email. “Collapse of its revenues would change the state budget process noticeably. The state’s cost-pressured general fund seemingly would be unable to make up much, if any, of a significant (Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund) revenue decline at this time.”

When Newsom presents his revised budget this week, he may reveal how he intends to cover the cap-and-invest program’s shortfall, particularly whether he will maintain the $1 billion bullet train commitment that project leaders say is vital to continuing construction of its Merced-to-Bakersfield segment.

It could boil down to bullet train vs. wildfire protection.

This article was originally published on CalMatters and was republished under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending