Connect with us

California

American burger giant sends cease and desist to tiny California bar for ‘copying’ its menu

Published

on

American burger giant sends cease and desist to tiny California bar for ‘copying’ its menu


An American burger giant is cracking down on its trademarks as it sends a small San Diego sports bar a cease-and-desist letter for copying its menu items. 

In-N-Out is forcing Fairplay to change the name of their animal fries and double-double burger as it claims it infringes on the chain’s trademarks – a feat the small sports bar rolled its eyes at. 

‘Cease & Desist what you’re doing right now, you’ve gotta see this,’ Fairplay wrote in a social media post on National Cheeseburger Day along with a photo of the redacted letter. ‘We’ve officially been recognized by Big Burger!’ 

In the letter, the chain reminded Fairplay that it owned ‘multiple federal and state registrations’ for the use of the words ‘animal’ and ‘double-double’ in relation to ‘burgers and restaurant services.’ 

Advertisement

Fairplay isn’t new to playing fair, as its namesake would suggest, but that doesn’t mean they don’t play dirty. 

In compliance with the letter, the restaurant did change the name of the menu items, but not before poking fun at In-N-Out’s non-trademarked phrases, including renaming their animal fries to ‘Secret Menu Fries,’ which retail for $12 and $28, depending on size. 

In-N-Out is forcing Fairplay to change the name of their animal fries and double-double burger as it claims it infringes on the chain’s trademarks in a cease-and-desist letter (pictured) – a feat the small sports bar rolled its eyes at

'Cease & Desist what you're doing right now, you've gotta see this,' Fairplay wrote in a social media post on National Cheeseburger Day along with a photo of the redacted letter. 'We’ve officially been recognized by Big Burger!'

‘Cease & Desist what you’re doing right now, you’ve gotta see this,’ Fairplay wrote in a social media post on National Cheeseburger Day along with a photo of the redacted letter. ‘We’ve officially been recognized by Big Burger!’

In the letter, the chain reminded Fairplay that it owned 'multiple federal and state registrations' for the use of the words 'animal' and 'double-double' in relation to 'burgers and restaurant services'

In the letter, the chain reminded Fairplay that it owned ‘multiple federal and state registrations’ for the use of the words ‘animal’ and ‘double-double’ in relation to ‘burgers and restaurant services’

They renamed the sandwich to ‘Burger Burger,’ which costs $16, according to its new menu. 

Despite the name change, the two restaurants’ fry recipe remains the same with cheese, caramelized onions, and 1,000 island-style dressing. In-N-Out’s version retails for around $6. 

However, its burgers are slightly different, with In-N-Out’s coming with more ingredients. 

Advertisement

The California chain’s Double-Double combo – which retails for around $11 – comes with two patties, two slices of American cheese, onions, lettuce, tomato, and its secret sauce on a toasted bun with fries. 

Fairplay’s Burger Burger comes with two patties and two slices of cheese and a side of fries. It does not say if it comes with any vegetables or sauce, although up-charged substitutions like fried pickles and mac and cheese can be made. 

Fairplay shared the cease-and-desist letter with its patrons as a way to ‘announce we’ve made some sudden name changes to our menu.’ 

‘This feels like the perfect time to pop In-N-Grab a Burger Burger & some Secret Menu Fries. Or double up! Sorry, we don’t mean to tell you what to order,’ it joked. 

‘We’re not animals…just not our style.’ 

Advertisement
Fairplay's 'Secret Menu Fries'

In-N-Out's 'Animal-Style' fries, which are available on their secret menu

In compliance with the letter, the restaurant did change the name of the menu items, but not before poking fun at In-N-Out’s non-trademarked phrases, including renaming their animal fries to ‘Secret Menu Fries’ (left). In-N-Out has ‘Animal-Style- fries on their secret menu 

Fairplay's 'Double-Double' was renamed the 'Burger Burger' (pictured)

In-N-Out's Double-Double (pictured)

They renamed the sandwich to ‘Burger Burger’ (left). The California chain’s sandwich (right) comes with two patties, two slices of American cheese, onions, lettuce, tomato, and its secret sauce on a toasted bun, whereas Fairplay’s is two patties and two slices of cheese 

The San Diego restaurant encouraged its patron to order both new renamed items. 'Sorry, we don’t mean to tell you what to order. We’re not animals…just not our style,' it poked fun

The San Diego restaurant encouraged its patron to order both new renamed items. ‘Sorry, we don’t mean to tell you what to order. We’re not animals…just not our style,’ it poked fun 

DailyMail.com has reached out to Fairplay and In-N-Out for comment.  

The legal letter comes as In-N-Out continues to battle copycat restaurants that are popping up in Mexico called In-En-Aut, which have left the chain on high alert for others riding its coattails. 

In order for In-N-Out to maintain its trademarks it has to be used them and enforce them legally. 

The chain has extended its trademark to Mexico, although it does not have any stores outside the US.  



Source link

Advertisement

California

PlayOn Sports fined $1.1 million by California watchdog over student data violations

Published

on

PlayOn Sports fined .1 million by California watchdog over student data violations


California’s privacy watchdog has ordered PlayOn Sports to pay a $1.10 million fine and change how it handles consumer data after finding the company’s practices violated state law in ways that affected students and schools in the state.

The California Privacy Protection Agency Board issued the decision following a settlement reached by CalPrivacy’s Enforcement Division.

The decision is the first by the board to address privacy violations involving students and California schools.

Schools across the country use PlayOn Sports’ GoFan platform to sell digital tickets to high school sporting events, theater performances, and homecoming and prom dances, with attendees presenting tickets at the door on their mobile phones.

Advertisement

Schools also use PlayOn Sports’ platforms for other sports-related activities, including attending games, streaming them online, and looking up statistics about teams and players.

In California, about 1,400 schools contract with PlayOn Sports for these services.

[RELATED] X faces possible fines as EU probes Grok nonconsensual, sexualized deepfakes

GoFan is also the official ticketing platform for the California Interscholastic Federation, the governing body for high school sports.

According to the board’s decision, PlayOn Sports used tracking technologies to collect personal information and deliver targeted advertisements to ticketholders and others using its services.

Advertisement

The company allegedly required Californians to click “agree” to tracking technologies before they could use their tickets or view PlayOn Sports websites, without providing a sufficient opt-out option.

“Students trying to go to prom or a high school football game shouldn’t have to leave their privacy rights at the door,” said Michael Macko, CalPrivacy’s head of enforcement. “You couldn’t attend these events without showing your ticket, and you couldn’t show your ticket without being tracked for advertising. California’s privacy law does not work that way. Businesses must ensure they offer lawful ways for Californians to opt-out, particularly with captive audiences.”

The decision also describes students as a uniquely vulnerable population and warns that targeted advertising systems can subject students to profiling that can follow them for years, expose them to manipulative or harmful content, and develop sensitive inferences about their lives.

Instead of providing its own opt-out method, PlayOn Sports directed students and other users to opt out through the Network Advertising Initiative and the Digital Advertising Alliance, which the decision said violated the company’s responsibility to provide its own way for consumers to opt out. The company also allegedly failed to recognize opt-out preference signals and did not provide Californians with sufficient notice of its privacy practices.

“We are committed to making it as easy as possible for all Californians — from high school students to older adults, and everyone in between — to make the choice of whether they want to be tracked or not,” said Tom Kemp, CalPrivacy’s executive director. “Californians can opt-out with covered businesses, and they can sign up for the newly launched DROP system to request that data brokers delete their personal information.”

Advertisement

Beyond the $1.10 million fine, the board’s order requires PlayOn Sports to conduct risk assessments, provide disclosures that are easy to read and understand, and implement proper opt-out methods.

The order also requires the company to comply with California’s privacy law prohibiting the selling or sharing of personal information of consumers between 13 and 16 without their affirmative opt-in consent.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly

Published

on

California bill to bar police from taking second job with ICE advances in state Assembly


Wednesday, March 4, 2026 4:43AM

CA bill to keep police from moonlighting with ICE advances

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (KABC) — A bill that would prevent police officers from moonlighting with federal immigration enforcement agencies, such as U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, is advancing through the California State Assembly.

AB 1537 passed the State Assembly’s committee on public safety on Tuesday.

The bill also requires that officers report any offers for secondary employment related to immigration enforcement to their place of work.

Those failing to comply could face decertification as a peace officer in California.

Advertisement

The bill was introduced by Assemblymember Isaac Bryan, whose district includes Mar Vista, Ladera Heights, Mid-Wilshire and parts of South Los Angeles.

Copyright © 2026 KABC Television, LLC. All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

California

Can’t win in primary election? Drop out, California Democrats say

Published

on

Can’t win in primary election? Drop out, California Democrats say


play

California Democrats running for governor, your party has a message for you. Think carefully about your candidacy and campaign ahead of the swiftly approaching filing deadline.

California Democratic Party Chair Rusty Hicks urged candidates looking to assume the state’s highest office to “honestly assess the viability of their candidacy and campaign” as March 6, the final day to declare candidacy, nears. Hicks said that concerns about the crowded field of Democrat candidates “persist” in an open letter on Tuesday, March 3.

Advertisement

It comes as five leading candidates, several of which are Democrats — Katie Porter, Eric Swalwell, and Tom Steyer — are in a “virtual tie” per a recent poll, the Desert Sun reported, which is part of the USA TODAY Network.

Two Republican candidates pushing out California democrats in the gubernatorial bid may be “implausible,” but “it is not impossible,” Hicks said of the reasoning behind his latest message. Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, both Republicans, lead in RealClear Polling’s average of various polls.

The party chair spotlighted the need for California Democrats’ leadership, particularly over Proposition 50, the voter-approved measure that will temporarily implement new congressional district maps, paving the way for Democrats to secure more seats in the U.S. House of Representatives.

“If in the unlikely event a Democrat failed to proceed to the general election for governor, there could be the potential for depressed Democratic turnout in California in November,” Hicks said. “The result would present a real risk to winning the congressional seats required and imperil Democrats’ chances to retake the House, cut Donald Trump’s term in half, and spare our nation from the pain many have endured since January 2025.”

Advertisement

During a press conference on March 2, Gov. Gavin Newsom said that when he is out in communities, people aren’t talking about the governor’s race. It’s an observation he called “interesting,” considering voting in the primary election starts in May.

“It’s been hard, I think, to focus on that race,” Newsom said, pointing to the attention on President Donald Trump, redistricting, and other matters.

What exactly is California Democratic Party asking of candidates?

In his open letter, Hicks gave directions to candidates.

First, assess your candidacy and campaign. If you don’t have a viable path to the general election, don’t file to get your name on the ballot for the primary election in June. Also, be prepared to suspend your campaign and endorse another candidate by April 15 if you decide to file but can’t show “meaningful progress towards winning the primary election.”

Advertisement

When is the next California election? Primary election in 2026

California voters will trim the field of candidates for governor on June 2. Only the two candidates who receive the most votes, regardless of party preference, will move on to the November election.  

Paris Barraza is a reporter covering Los Angeles and Southern California for the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at pbarraza@usatodayco.com.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending