Tailored from The Midnight Solar Memo, a publication undertaking out of your humble Midnight Solar editor. For everybody who’s been asking about maintaining through electronic mail or tips on how to help the work we’ve been doing right here, we lastly have a solution on this nifty publication… which comes with two free editions per week and extras for subscribers (although, as you might need realized from following this weblog, the schedule can’t be fully assured). Join now!
On the eve of the Alaska Redistricting Board’s date again in court docket over accusations that its conservative majority basically repeated the identical gerrymander to spice up Republican illustration within the state Senate that invalidated the unique plan, a brand new group of plaintiffs has come to the desk.
Three Girdwood residents—Louis Theiss, Ken Waugh and Jennifer Wingard—at the moment filed a brand new lawsuit difficult the Alaska Redistricting Board’s determination to create a Senate district from the state Home district that accommodates Girdwood, South Anchorage and Whittier (9-E) and one of many deeply conservative Eagle River’s two state Home seats that was instantly concerned within the final spherical of litigation (now 10-E).
“They’re searching for to intervene within the swimsuit to say a constitutional problem to the brand new Anchorage Senate pairings,” defined the Girdwood Plaintiffs’ lawyer Eva Gardner in an electronic mail with me, “which put Girdwood in a district with Eagle River—a pairing that is mindless and can deprive Girdwood, and others inside its district, of a significant vote.”
Advertisement
The Alaska Supreme Courtroom and Superior Courtroom Decide Thomas Matthews struck down the Alaska Redistricting Board’s determination to create a Senate district from home districts in East Anchorage and Eagle River earlier this yr, discovering it constituted a political gerrymander geared toward boosting the conservative Eagle River’s illustration on the expense of the swingier East Anchorage district. Despatched again to the drafting board, the Alaska Redistricting Board’s conservatives opted to create the brand new Eagle River/South Anchorage state Senate seat fairly than a unified Eagle River senate seat. Although supporters cited a number of superficial connections between Eagle River and South Anchorage, the board zeroed in on the obvious navy connection between the opposite Eagle River Home district (24-L) with the JBER/Downtown district (23-L) as justification for sticking with the cut up Eagle River.
Critics, together with impartial board members Nicole Borromeo and Melanie Bahnke, argued the brand new plan repeated the identical ploy of placing conservative Eagle River voters on the wheel of two Senate districts on the expense of others. They identified that the navy is not an outlined neighborhood of curiosity whereas the court docket rulings had clearly discovered that Eagle River was its personal neighborhood of curiosity.
“I consider that the court docket despatched this again to us to appropriate it,” Bahnke mentioned through the hearings, “to not discover a new method to proceed to attempt to give Eagle River extra illustration.”
The East Anchorage plaintiffs are difficult the brand new maps, but it surely’s clear that they’re working out of steam and cash to proceed this lawsuit. In one of many filings main as much as tomorrow’s oral arguments—that are scheduled for 3 p.m. and can be streamed right here—the group wrote it doesn’t plan on pursuing the case for much longer: “East Anchorage plaintiffs haven’t, nor do they intend to, file a brand new problem or set off a renewed Civil Rule 90.8 utility course of, nor do East Anchorage plaintiffs have the monetary capacity to fund such an effort.”
The entry of residents from Girdwood is a giant deal not simply because it’s selecting up the torch from East Anchorage within the occasion East Anchorage’s street ends tomorrow, however as a result of the Alaska Redistricting Board’s lawyer Matt Singer’s most important argument in opposition to the East Anchorage plaintiffs’ attraction is that they shouldn’t be allowed to sue over a pairing that doesn’t instantly contain them. The Girdwood Plaintiffs are, after all, within the proposed district and their submitting argues they’ll be irreparably harmed if this yr’s elections are held below the present maps.
Advertisement
“The Girdwood Plaintiffs can be irreparably harmed if the 2022 proclamation stays in place,” the movement, which might enable them to intervene within the attraction raised by East Anchorage, explains. “They reside in Home District 9 and are entitled to truthful and efficient illustration within the Alaska Senate for the following decade, together with this yr’s legislative elections.”
The group’s arguments largely mirror these made in profitable problem from the East Anchorage plaintiffs: That the board is working to spice up Eagle River’s conservatives on the expense of others. As an alternative of it being the swingy South Muldoon district it’s now the leans-conservative South Anchorage district (which got here near electing an impartial within the 2020 elections).
Key filings: Movement to intervene, grievance
What’s subsequent
The trail forward is just not fully clear at this second. The East Anchorage plaintiffs are set to have their oral arguments in entrance of Decide Matthews on Tuesday afternoon, but it surely may go a lot of completely different instructions. Decide Matthews may agree that the board’s actions are a repeat and should be despatched again with one other set of directions (or, as board member Borromeo has requested, simply have the court docket determine it). He may discover the Alaska Redistricting Board’s arguments that East Anchorage has no floor to sue are convincing, which might make for a brief listening to. The Girdwood Plaintiffs are hoping that they’ll intervene with East Anchorage’s case, basically piggybacking into the case with the aim of a sooner decision. In the event that they’re barred from intervening, they’d possible be caught ranging from sq. one on a timeline that wouldn’t assure modifications earlier than the June 1 submitting deadline for candidates.
Delay is the important thing goal for the Alaska Redistricting Board, which not solely means we would get a repeat of the final redistricting course of the place we had one map for ‘12 and one other for ‘14, however as now we have seen with the East Anchorage plaintiffs there’s additionally a sensible restrict on how far and the way lengthy somebody can pursue litigation.
Advertisement
It’s value noting that the Girdwood Plaintiffs’ authorized workforce is just not coming to this chilly. Attorneys Eva Gardner and Mike Schechter had been concerned with the Calista, Company challenges to the redistricting plan. These challenges have already been resolved and they’re presently solely working with the Girdwood Plaintiffs.
I’ll be masking the oral arguments within the East Anchorage tomorrow on Twitter.
(Photo Credit: Ian Dewar Photography/Shutterstock)
Boeing lawsuit overview:
Who: A group of passengers on a Jan. 5 Alaska Airlines flight refiled a lawsuit against Alaska Airlines Inc. and The Boeing Company.
Why: They claim Boeing has a culture of “cutting corners” and failed to detect the missing bolts that caused a door plug to detach during their flight.
Where: The Boeing lawsuit was filed in Washington federal court.
Alaska Airlines passengers traveling on Jan. 5 when the door plug blew out during their flight have refiled their Boeing lawsuit claiming the company’s culture of “cutting corners” put their safety at risk.
Cuong Tran, Huy Tran, Ket Tran and Tram Vo filed the Boeing lawsuit against The Boeing Company, Spirit Aerosystems Inc., Alaska Airlines Inc. and 10 unnamed defendants a few days after voluntarily dismissing their earlier lawsuit filed in state court. Three minor children, listed only by their initials, are also included as plaintiffs.
During their flight from Portland, Oregon, to Ontario, California, the left mid-exit door plug separated from the 737 Max 9 aircraft, “leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage,” the Alaska Airlines lawsuit says.
Rapid decompression of the passenger compartment caused phones, seatbacks and passengers’ clothing to be sucked out of the plane, the plaintiffs allege.
“As a result of this violent and terrifying event the passengers and crew suffered harm including physical injuries and serious emotional distress, fear and anxiety,” according to the Boeing lawsuit.
Advertisement
Boeing lawsuit says company has culture of ‘cutting corners’
The plaintiffs allege the door plug separated from the plane because arrestor bolts meant to prevent the plug from sliding had never been installed and suggest the oversight was part of a pattern of lax safety protocols within the company.
Within the last decade, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) reportedly found Boeing failed to follow important safety protocols, such as marking assembly tasks as “complete” even though they were not completed. Boeing entered into a settlement over these issues in 2015 requiring the airplane manufacturer to implement mandatory safety improvements and regular auditing of its systems, the Boeing lawsuit explains.
The U.S. Department of Justice reportedly filed a criminal complaint against Boeing in 2021, and Boeing subsequently admitted to a count of conspiracy to defraud the United States. As part of a deferred prosecution agreement, Boeing again was supposed to strengthen its compliance programs and bolster its safety procedures.
However, the Alaska Airlines lawsuit asserts Boeing’s implementation of safety measures was inadequate and the plaintiffs blame the incident on Boeing’s “practice and culture … of cutting corners.”
They claim the disaster would have been prevented with reasonable quality control measures that would have detected the missing bolts and other potential problems with the door plug.
Advertisement
Another Alaska Airlines lawsuit was filed in January in King County Superior Court in Washington.
What do you think about the allegations in the Alaska Airlines lawsuit? Join the discussion in the comments.
The plaintiffs are represented by Brian D. Weinstein, Alexandra B. Caggiano and Dylan J. Johnson of Weinstein Caggiano PLLC and Ari Friedman and Timothy Loranger of Wisner Baum.
The Boeing lawsuit is Cuong Tran, et al. v. The Boeing Company, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-00791-JNW, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington.
Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:
Advertisement
We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.
Home › AK Fire Info ›Warmer, dryer weather predicted as work continues on the McDonald Fire
By Terry Solomon, PIOon
Size: 30,022 acres
Personnel: 57
Start Date: June 8, 2024
Cause: Lightning
FAIRBANKS, Alaska – Sunny skies have contributed to warming and drying across the McDonald Fire. On Saturday afternoon, a fly over of the McDonald Fire showed mostly smoldering fire behavior with some single tree torching on the north side of the fire. A satellite image from Saturday night revealed an acreage decrease providing more accurate mapping.
Saturday, June 15th flyover shows smoldering fire behavior with minimal smoke. Photo BLM-AFS
Saturday, firefighters fine-tuned the sprinkler systems strategically placed around the structures and continued to increase the defensible space in that area. Two helicopter landing areas were identified and improved as part of the incident’s contingency plan in the case that other landing areas are not available due to smoke or increased fire behavior.
Advertisement
Sunday, firefighters will continue to increase the defensible space and open up established trails. The southeast corner of the fireline will be scouted looking for more opportunities to prevent fire spread toward the cabins during the current and future high fire danger weather. Fire specialists are clarifying and improving fire plans for Military infrastucture and identified archeological sites in the area.
The Alaska Division of Forestry and Fire Protection’s personnel staged near the McDonald Fire at Harding Lake continue fuels mitigation work at the Harding Lake State Park. These crews, Pioneer Peak and Gannett Glacier are prepared to quickly respond to any new starts in the Interior.
Weather Forecast: Sunny skies will contribute to dry, hot conditions over the fire area. Sunday afternoon the high temperatures will near 80 degrees and humidity will be dropping to mid 20s. Scattered showers and isolated thunderstorms will be limited to higher terrain. Westerly winds will remain light except when storms produce stronger gusts.
Burn Permits: The Division of Forestry and Fire Protection (DOF) has issued Burn Permit Suspensions for Fairbanks, Salcha and Railbelt areas. The fire danger in these areas remains HIGH.Please check https://dnr.alaska.gov/burn/fireareas or call the burn permit hotline for the Fairbanks Area Forestry at (907) 451-2631 for the most current updates.
Air Quality: No active advisories are currently in effect. Find information on how to protect yourself from wildfire smoke at the Smoke Management page on akfireinfo.com.
Advertisement
Evacuation notices: The Fairbanks North Star Borough (FNSB) issued a Level 2: SET evacuation notice for the approximately 20 cabins that are near the fire’s southern edge. The FNSB also put areas along the lower Salcha River, Harding Lake, Hollies Acres, and Canaday neighborhoods in a READY status. Find more information and an interactive map of these areas on the Fairbanks North Star Borough Emergency Services website.
‹ Burn Permits Suspended for Fairbanks, Salcha and Railbelt areas
Categories: AK Fire Info, BLM Alaska Fire Service
Tags: 2024 Alaska Fire Season, BLM Alaska Fire Service, McDonald Fire
A 1978 advertisement for Taco Bell in the Anchorage Times.
Part of a continuing weekly series on Alaska history by Anchorage historian David Reamer. Have a question about Anchorage or Alaska history or an idea for a future article? Go to the form at the bottom of this story.
This column began with a simple question: When did Taco Bell open in Anchorage? These types of questions are common and understandable. People give their money and time to stores and restaurants for years, even decades. The memories accumulate into a reassuring presence. Given enough time, people can become nostalgic for almost anything.
This relationship is more complicated with national chains than locally-owned shops. Everyone in Anchorage has a story of a favorite little restaurant or café or shop that could not compete with the deep pockets of Outside companies and have long since disappeared. Yet, people also love chains, for their prices or consistency. Their seeming omnipresence can be comforting. As in, a given chain might not offer the best product, but it is accessible and predictable. What follows is the first of a two-part history on when some of the more major fast food, casual dining, big box stores, and other national chains arrived in Anchorage.
Advertisement
The first Anchorage establishment that might, while stretching the definition, be considered a chain store is K.A. Kyvig’s City Drug. Later called Anchorage Drug, it opened in 1915 as a licensed Rexall franchise, meaning it had purchased the right to sell and advertise Rexall-branded products. A better answer for the first chain store in Anchorage is the Piggly Wiggly grocery store that opened in 1929. This was the fifth Alaska location for the grocery chain, after Ketchikan, Juneau, Petersburg and Cordova, which perfectly illustrates Anchorage’s relative stature before World War II.
A Sears catalog store opened in 1938, followed by other relatively early chains in Anchorage, such as a Singer Sewing Center in 1947, Dairy Queen in 1952, an A&W drive-in in 1952, a Ben Franklin five-and-dime in 1953, and Tastee Freeze in 1957. The Anchorage A&W was rather unique given the lions it used as attractions.
The 1960s were marked by the arrival of larger retailers. In 1959, one of the older significant buildings in town, the original Masonic building constructed in 1917, was torn down in favor of a Woolworth’s that opened in 1960. Woolworth’s closed in 1997. The building now houses Polar Bear Gifts, though its door handles still say Woolworth’s. The downtown J.C. Penney department store opened on March 21, 1963, replacing local mainstay Hoyt Motor Co. Nearby property values increased several-fold. Though the 1964 earthquake demolished the store, a larger building was quickly built on the same site. Other major retailers that reached Anchorage in the 1960s included Safeway in 1960 and Montgomery Wards in 1966.
The 1970s saw the breakthrough of national chains into Anchorage, headlined by the arrival of McDonald’s on July 2, 1970, at the intersection of Arctic and Northern Lights boulevards. Five months later, a second location opened on DeBarr Road near Boniface Parkway. The DeBarr location was then the largest McDonald’s in the country. The downtown location that opened in 1976 was larger still.
Kentucky Fried Chicken requires more explanation than most chains. The first store in Anchorage to sell KFC-branded chicken was Jan’s Drive-In, which opened at Fourth Avenue and Gambell Street in late 1959 or early 1960. Restaurants then bought a license for KFC products. These eateries maintained all their other quirks, selling KFC products without becoming a KFC franchise, though many locals called them KFC. A standalone, fully KFC-branded Kentucky Fried Chicken opened on Muldoon Road in 1973.
Advertisement
In September 1970, Church’s Chicken opened a store at East 10th Avenue and Gambell Street. Mayor George Sullivan took part in the opening ceremony, even working the fryer for a time. It is difficult to imagine any recent Anchorage mayor working a fry station for some public relations glory. My deepest apologies if any future mayor wants to garner attention by fixing the eternally broken McDonald’s ice cream machines.
The first Taco Bell in Anchorage opened in January 1978 on Northern Lights Boulevard. Their advertisements then offered several long-since-canceled products like the Bellbeefer. Discontinued in the 1990s, apart from some testing at select locations, the Bellbeefer was just taco fixings tossed between hamburger buns. Yet, Taco Bell is a lifestyle, a nexus of bad decisions, a salve for late-night cravings. So, the aficionados still advocate for the return of the beefer.
The Ballbeefer from Taco Bell
An advertisement for a Pizza Hut grand opening in the Oct. 2 1969
edition of the Anchorage Daily Times.
The first national pizza chain to reach Anchorage was Pizza Hut, which opened a store on Spenard Road in 1969. Shakey’s Pizza came next in 1971, eventually followed by three more Anchorage locations, plus one in Eagle River. The last of these closed in 1990. Then there was Godfather’s Pizza in 1981; Chuck E. Cheese in 1982, in the former Gary King Sporting Goods building; Dominos in 1985; Little Caesars in 1987; Papa John’s in 2000; and Papa Murphy’s also in 2000.
A Dunkin’ Donuts advertisement in the Anchorage Daily News from 1978.
In January 1978, the first Dunkin’ Donuts in Anchorage opened on Northern Lights Boulevard, in what is now the Panda Chinese Restaurant. At their peak, there were four Anchorage Dunkin’ Donuts locations, the last closing in 1990. Other notable sweet treat chains that reached Anchorage include Baskin-Robbins in 1977, TCBY in 1985, and Krispy Kreme in 2016.
Advertisement
An advertisement for Rax Roast Beef in the June 4, 1987 edition of the Anchorage Daily News.
For some more forgotten chains, Rax opened in 1983 on Old Seward Highway. The restaurant, which specialized in roast beef, struggled to differentiate itself in the fast-food wars of the 1980s, and the Anchorage location closed around 1987 amid a steep national decline. The building has since housed Yen King, Sushi Yako and Sushi Ya. Kenny Rogers Roasters opened on Dimond Boulevard in December 1995 and closed in the early 2000s. It was less famous for its food than the time its landlord parked a semi-truck blocking the entrance during an eviction battle with the franchise owner. The site is now a Sicily’s Buffet. Skippers Seafood ‘n Chowder lasted longer but left little cultural impact. The first Skippers here opened in 1979. By 2006, there were two Skippers in Anchorage, one on Dimond Boulevard and another on Minnesota Drive. That year, the latter location closed after a fire and did not reopen. The last Skippers here closed in 2007 as the chain fought to reorganize during bankruptcy proceedings.
Other fast food arrivals in Anchorage include Burger King in 1975, Wendy’s in 1977, Arby’s in 1981, Popeye’s Chicken in 1987, Subway in 1988, Schlotzsky’s in 2000, Quiznos in 2001, Carl’s Jr. in 2002, Pita Pit in 2013, Panda Express 2015, and Sonic in 2022.
One of the more significant subsets of chains is the casual dining, family-friendly restaurants. Most are defined by their wall décor or food specialization. Each is as unique as a restaurant identical to locations in several other states can be. For example, no one could mistake a Clinkerdagger, Bickerstaff, and Pett’s Public House, open in Anchorage from 1977 to 1987, for anything else. A Red Robin, which opened in Anchorage in 1985, is similar but not identical to an Applebee’s, which opened in Anchorage in 1999. Other notable casual dining franchises to open in Anchorage include Denny’s in 1977; Village Inn in 1979; Sea Galley — “We’ve got crab legs!” — in 1981, closed in 2018; Benihana in 1999; International House of Pancakes in 2002; Golden Corral in 2006; Olive Garden in 2012; Buffalo Wild Wings in 2013; Hard Rock Café in 2014, closed in 2020; and Texas Roadhouse in 2014.
A postcard from the 1970s for Clinkerdagger, Bickerstaff, and Pett’s Public House in Anchorage. (Provided by David Reamer)
The first Chili’s Grill & Bar in Anchorage opened in 2002. But the first Chilly’s restaurant opened in 1992, on Old Seward Highway between Huffman and O’Malley Roads. When Chili’s learned about Chilly’s, the national chain threatened a lawsuit. Rather than fight an expensive battle, Chilly’s owner Eric Harstad renamed his place Eric’s.
Advertisement
A common Anchorage misconception is that the Spenard Roadhouse on Northern Lights Boulevard and the Castle Megastore on Fifth Avenue buildings used to be Pizza Huts. The roofs, in particular, are somewhat Pizza Hut-shaped, but they were previously Sizzler steakhouses. At their peak, there were three Sizzlers in Anchorage, the previously mentioned two plus one on Dimond Boulevard. The Northern Lights location opened first in 1977. It closed around 1993. Hogg Brothers moved there in 1994 and closed in 2008. And then the Spenard Roadhouse opened in 2009.
Then there are the breastaurants, so named for their emphasis on waitress appearance over food quality. No thorough list of retail openings and failures in Anchorage is complete without their tawdry inclusion. Hooters, the exemplar of the type, opened in December 1995 on Tudor Road at the old Pierce Street Annex site. Amid some small public outcry, the Anchorage Assembly hesitated to approve the restaurant’s liquor license before relenting and canceling a planned public hearing. It closed in early 2008 without warning. The Tilted Kilt opened in the fall of 2014 with the chain’s largest location but closed in early 2016. Internet detectives fond of schadenfreude might enjoy their online reviews.
Next week’s second part opens with the forgotten store that foretold the future of shopping, plus the arrivals of such key retailers as Costco, Walmart, and Sephora.
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/adn/NDKUZFHDRVHIXFTVLSLFOZKGEQ.jpg)
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/adn/RI77UFGQCNHMTFLFUC2UIRE7GM.png)
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/adn/QE3EJOSWCZBSRADX3DP4UAACSY.jpg)
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/adn/2ZHFRGT3JBDS5NRXIKSX65NJWM.png)
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/adn/2EZJR5ZRKVCZXNR7QXX6VQFOTU.jpg)
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/adn/M5UHO3NBEZBJXCACQNNT52XTAI.jpg)
