Connect with us

Alaska

Former Alaska revenue commissioner Crum defends committing $50M in state savings to digital infrastructure firm

Published

on

Former Alaska revenue commissioner Crum defends committing M in state savings to digital infrastructure firm


Revenue Commissioner Adam Crum gives comments to the House Finance Committee on January 23, 2025. (Marc Lester / ADN)

Former Alaska Revenue Commissioner Adam Crum says he was following state law when he committed $50 million in state funds to invest in a digital infrastructure firm shortly before he departed public office.

Crum’s decision to commit the funds from the Constitutional Budget Reserve — the state’s rainy day fund — later led Gov. Mike Dunleavy to promise a third-party independent review of the investment. It also caused alarm from House Speaker Bryce Edgmon and Senate President Gary Stevens, who in a joint statement said that the investment “raises serious concerns about accountability, transparency, and fiscal responsibility.”

But Crum, who departed the Dunleavy administration in July and days later announced he was running for governor, said Friday that members of Dunleavy’s administration, including the governor himself and top attorneys in the Department of Law, had known about his investment plan for months.

Department of Revenue spokesperson Aimee Bushnell said in an email that Crum had informed the governor’s office of his plan, but Bushnell declined to answer when she was asked when, exactly, Dunleavy was informed. The governor’s office “cautioned that any investments made needed to be in accordance with established investment policies and procedures,” Bushnell said.

Advertisement

The idea for the $50 million investment in private equity, Crum said, was to resume a practice first initiated by lawmakers more than 20 years ago, of investing some funds from Alaska’s Constitutional Budget Reserve in a subaccount with the goal of yielding “higher returns than might be feasible to obtain with other money in the budget reserve fund,” assuming that the funds would not be needed for at least five years, according to state statute.

But lawmakers liquidated the subaccount’s nearly $7 billion in 2015 amid a decline in oil revenue, and hadn’t used it since, though its existence remained prescribed in law. Since 2020, the Department of Revenue’s policy has remained to keep the funds from the Constitutional Budget Reserve — which currently stand at roughly $3 billion — in short-term investments, under the assumption that the funds might be needed in the near term. Indeed, under Dunleavy’s most recent budget proposal, the funds in that account would have been fully spent by 2028, far before the five-year timeline prescribed in the subaccount statute.

Because the funds in the account for years have been invested accessibly and with lower rates of return, “simply leaving all of the money in the Constitutional Budget Reserve was actually irresponsible,” Crum concluded.

Crum said he asked former Alaska Attorney General Treg Taylor if he could revive the subaccount to “invest in alternatives” that would both have a higher rate of return and “help Alaska as a whole.”

“They said, ‘yes you can, make sure that you update the investment policy statement,’ ” Crum said.

Advertisement

The Department of Law did not respond to questions from the Daily News, including whether Taylor — who himself resigned in August to run for governor — reviewed the investment proposal.

Crum said that once he decided to revive the subaccount, he chose to invest in digital infrastructure — a category that includes data centers and cellphone towers — because these are “the things that we’re actually going to need more and more of because we don’t have enough power and we don’t have enough data.” He said he chose the firm DigitalBridge after meeting with members of the firm both in New York and in Alaska.

According to Crum’s public calendar, he met with DigitalBridge executives four times in November 2024, including one meeting to which both Dunleavy and Alaska Gasline Development Corp. President Frank Richards were invited. Dunleavy spokesperson Jeff Turner did not respond Friday when asked whether Dunleavy did, in fact, attend the meeting, and whether the potential investment was discussed.

DigitalBridge, headquartered in Florida with assets estimated at around $106 billion, was founded as Colony Capital by Thomas Barrack, an adviser and fundraiser for President Donald Trump. In 2024, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission charged the firm with breaches of its fiduciary duty.

Crum said DigitalBridge is “interested in Alaska for a lot of things” and “they’ve come up here a lot.” However, he said the $50 million he committed to the firm was not intended for in-state investment.

Advertisement

“It was actually directly written into the documents that this is not for in-state investment,” Crum said. “The idea on that is, you want to actually invest on the merits.”

“Over time, as we look to actually develop infrastructure and have this in Alaska, having a relationship with an investment firm like this actually draws attention from other investment firms,” Crum added.

Crum said he committed $50 million to DigitalBridge with an intention of expanding the subaccount investments up to 10% of the value of the Constitutional Budget Reserve — which would amount to roughly $300 million — but that didn’t happen before he left the department.

On Sept. 30, Acting Revenue Commissioner Janelle Earls wrote to legislative auditor Kris Curtis to inform her of the investment decision, noting the letter was part of the department’s protocol for “non-routine investments.” On the same day, Dunleavy called Edgmon and Stevens to tell them about the investment.

Edgmon said in an interview that his impression from the call was that Dunleavy had not been aware of the $50 million obligation before Crum resigned.

Advertisement

Edgmon, a Dillingham independent, said he’s “confused” about Crum’s assertion that he ran the investment decision by Dunleavy and the Department of Law.

“It’s my understanding that the governor’s office is saying otherwise, and it’s troubling that we don’t know what took place,” said Edgmon.

Edgmon said that Dunleavy promised him and Stevens that an independent third-party review of the investment agreement would be conducted.

The Department of Revenue and the governor’s office did not answer questions on who is conducting that review or when its results were expected.

Crum, meanwhile, said Friday that “the whole claim that no one knew this was coming is a complete and utter lie.”

Advertisement

Crum said that Dunleavy likely reached out to lawmakers to inform them of the investment commitment “as an olive branch.” As for the independent review of the investment decision, Crum said he sees it as Dunleavy ensuring “transparency for the public.”

That’s not how the Department of Revenue portrayed it. In an email, Bushnell said that “after the former Commissioner left state service, the newly appointed Acting Commissioner (Earls) expressed concern over the process utilized for making the investment. After being advised of the acting commissioner’s concerns, the governor apprised legislative leadership of the transaction, forwarded documents to the legislative auditor for review, and directed an outside third-party review be conducted to determine whether there were in fact any violations of policy and make process recommendations as appropriate.”

Bushnell did not answer questions on the specific cause for Earls’ concern.

Edgmon said that lawmakers will review the investment when the Legislature convenes in January.

“The whole situation is eyebrow-raising,” Edgmon said, “and until reasonable answers are provided and we can all get to the bottom of this, I think it’s going to remain an issue of concern.”

Advertisement





Source link

Alaska

Alaska’s voter roll transfer: Republicans bash hearing questioning if lieutenant governor broke the law

Published

on

Alaska’s voter roll transfer: Republicans bash hearing questioning if lieutenant governor broke the law


JUNEAU, Alaska (KTUU) – A legislative hearing into the legality of Alaska’s voter roll transfer to the federal government ended in partisan accusations Monday, with one Republican calling it a “set-up” and others saying it was unnecessary, while Democrats defended it as needed oversight.

“Andrew (Gray) and the committee has a bias. I mean, that much is obvious from watching it,” Rep. Kevin McCabe, R-Big Lake, told Alaska’s News Source walking out of the hearing before it gaveled out. “Most of the testimony was slanted against the state and against the federal government.”

The House State Affairs and Judiciary committees met jointly Monday to hear testimony about whether Dahlstrom violated the law when she transferred the entirety of Alaska’s voter rolls to the federal government.

Rep. Steve St. Clair, R-Wasilla, agreed with his Big Lake counterpart that the hearing was unnecessary.

Advertisement

“I think we’re speculating on what the intent of the DOJ is and I believe we need to wait and see,” he said.

Rep. Andrew Gray, D-Anchorage and chair of the House Judiciary Committee, pushed back when told of his Republican colleagues’ reaction.

“I think that I went above and beyond to try to include everybody,” Gray said as he left the meeting. “If people are saying that if the Obama administration had asked for the unredacted voter rolls from Alaska, that all these Republicans around here would have just been like, ‘oh, take it all. Take all of our information.’

“That is not true. That is absolutely not true,” Gray added.

Rep. Ted Eischeid, D-Anchorage, backed his House majority colleague, questioning whether Republicans would have preferred if the topic not be addressed at all.

Advertisement

“The minority folks on the committee had a chance to ask questions,” he said. “I think this is a meeting we needed to have. Alaskans have asked for it. I think there’s still a lot of unanswered questions. So shedding light on the state’s actions, that’s bias?”

Dahlstrom did not attend the hearing. Gray said she was invited multiple times but cited scheduling conflicts. The lieutenant governor oversees the Alaska Division of Elections under state law.

In her most recent public statement — published Feb. 25 on her gubernatorial campaign website, not through her official office — Dahlstrom defended the voter roll transfer, saying the agreement with the DOJ was “lawful, limited” and that Alaska retains full authority over its voter rolls.

“The DOJ cannot remove a single voter from our rolls,” she wrote. “Its role is limited to identifying potential issues, such as duplicate registrations or individuals who may have moved or passed away.”

Representatives from the state’s Department of Law and Division of Elections both testified in defense of Dahlstrom’s decision. Rachel Witty, the Department of Law’s director of legal services, told the committee the state viewed the DOJ’s purview.

Advertisement

“The DOJ’s enforcement authority is quite broad,” Witty said. “And so, we interpreted their request as being used to evaluate and enforce HAVA compliance.”

HAVA — the Help America Vote Act — is a federal law that sets election administration standards for states.

Lawmakers also heard from an assortment of outside witnesses who largely questioned the legality of Dahlstrom’s actions, including former Lt. Gov. Loren Leman, who served under Republican Gov. Frank Murkowski, and former Attorney General Bruce Botelho, who served under Democratic Gov. Tony Knowles.

The Documents: A Months-Long Timeline

As part of the hearing, the committee released months’ worth of documents between the Department of Justice — led by Attorney General Pam Bondi — and Dahlstrom’s office, detailing the effort to transfer Alaska’s voter rolls over to Washington.

The DOJ first asked Dahlstrom to release the voter rolls in July of last year, citing the 1993 National Voter Registration Act, which requires states to allow federal inspection of “official lists of eligible voters.”

Advertisement

Dahlstrom agreed to release the records in August, providing a list of voters designated as “inactive” and “non-citizens,” along with their voting records and the statewide voter registration list — but it did not include what the DOJ wanted.

“As the Attorney General requested, the electronic copy of the statewide [voter registration list] must contain all fields,” reads an email sent 10 days after Dahlstrom agreed to release the data, “including the registrant’s full name, date of birth, residential address, his or her state driver’s license number or the last four digits of the registrant’s social security number.”

Dahlstrom agreed to provide the full details months later, in December, citing a state statute that permits sharing confidential information with a federal agency if it uses “the information only for governmental purposes authorized under law.” Those purposes, she wrote in the email, are to “test, analyze and assess the State’s compliance with federal laws.”

“I attach some significance to the fact that it took the State … nearly four months to respond to the Department of Justice’s demand,” former AG Botelho told the committee.

That same day, Dahlstrom, Alaska Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher and DOJ Assistant Attorney General Harmeet Dhillon signed a memorandum of understanding governing how the data could be accessed, used, and protected.

Advertisement

Dahlstrom’s office publicly announced the transfer nine days after the MOU was signed — nearly six months after the DOJ first made its request.

“Alaska is committed to the integrity of our elections and to complying with applicable law,” Dahlstrom said in the December statement. “Upon receiving the DOJ’s request, the Division of Elections, in consultation with the Department of Law, provided the voter registration list in accordance with federal requirements and state authority, while ensuring appropriate safeguards for sensitive information.”

A 10-page legal analysis from legislative counsel Andrew Dunmire, requested by House Majority Whip Rep. Zack Fields, D-Anchorage, concluded that the DOJ’s demand defied legal bounds.

“The DOJ’s request for state voter data is unprecedented,” Dunmire’s analysis states, adding that the legal justification the DOJ used to demand access to the data has never been applied this way before.

“Multiple states refused DOJ’s request, which has resulted in litigation that is now working its way through federal courts across the country,” he adds.

Advertisement

The Senate holds an identical hearing Wednesday, when its State Affairs and Judiciary committees take up the same questions.

See a spelling or grammar error? Report it to web@ktuu.com



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska Air National Guard rescues injured snowmachiner near Cooper Landing

Published

on

Alaska Air National Guard rescues injured snowmachiner near Cooper Landing


 

An Alaska Air National Guard HH-60W Jolly Green II helicopter, assigned to the 210th Rescue Squadron, 176th Wing, returns to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska, after conducting a rescue mission for an injured snowmachiner, Feb. 21, 2026. The mission marked the first time the AKANG used the HH-60W for a rescue. (U.S. Air National Guard photo by Staff Sgt. Joseph Moon)

Alaska Air National Guard personnel conducted a rescue mission Saturday, Feb. 21, after receiving a request for assistance from the Alaska State Troopers through the Alaska Rescue Coordination Center.

The mission was initiated to recover an injured snowmachiner in the Cooper Landing area, approximately 60 air miles south of Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. The Alaska Air National Guard accepted the mission, located the individual, and transported them to Providence Alaska Medical Center in Anchorage for further medical care.

The mission marked the first search and rescue operation conducted by the 210th Rescue Squadron using the HH-60W Jolly Green II, the Air Force’s newest combat rescue helicopter, which is replacing the older HH-60G Pave Hawk. Guardian Angels assigned to the 212th Rescue Squadron were also aboard the aircraft and assisted in the recovery of the injured individual.

Advertisement

Good Samaritans, who were on the ground at the accident site, deployed a signal flare, that helped the helicopter crew visually locate the injured individual in the heavily wooded area.
Due to the mountainous terrain, dense tree cover, and deep snow in the area, the helicopter was unable to land near the patient. The aircrew conducted a hoist insertion and extraction of the Guardian Angels and the injured snowmachiner. The patient was extracted using a rescue strop and hoisted into the aircraft.

The Alaska Air National Guard routinely conducts search and rescue operations across the state in support of civil authorities, providing life-saving assistance in some of the most remote and challenging environments in the world.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska House advances bill to boost free legal aid for vulnerable Alaskans

Published

on

Alaska House advances bill to boost free legal aid for vulnerable Alaskans





Advertisement



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending