Connect with us

Technology

Intel is planning a custom Panther Lake CPU for handheld PCs

Published

on

Intel is planning a custom Panther Lake CPU for handheld PCs

Intel announced yesterday that it’s developing an entire “handheld gaming platform” powered by its new Panther Lake chips, and joining an increasingly competitive field. Qualcomm is hinting about potential Windows gaming handhelds showing up at the Game Developers Conference in March, and AMD’s new Strix Halo chips could lead to more powerful handhelds.

According to IGN and TechCrunch, sources say Intel is going to compete by developing a custom Intel Core G3 “variant or variants” just for handhelds that could outperform the Arc B390 GPU on the chips it just announced. IGN reports that by using the new 18A process, Intel can cut different die slices, and “spec the chips to offer better performance on the GPU where you want it.”

As for concrete details about the gaming platform, we’re going to have to wait. According to Intel’s Dan Rogers yesterday, the company will have “more news to share on that from our hardware and software partners later this year.” The Intel-based MSI Claw saw a marked improvement when it jumped to Lunar Lake, and hopefully the new platform keeps up that positive trend.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Technology

Bose thinks it can be a media company for some reason

Published

on

Bose thinks it can be a media company for some reason

The history books are littered with the corpses of corporate record labels started by companies that had no business being in the music industry. Bose thinks it can be the exception to the rule. It thinks it can be Red Bull. And, while Bose has more of a right to dip its toes into the media world than Build-a-Bear, there’s little reason to believe it can succeed where so many others have failed.

In an interview with Business Insider, Bose CMO Jim Mollica said the company had created Bose Studios as part of a move away from traditional “campaign-driven marketing.” A big element of that is going to be Bose Records, a new label the company has formed to “help break underappreciated or new artists.” The competition isn’t the big three — Sony, UMG, Warner — it’s independent labels already being squeezed in an era of bedroom producers and self-distribution.

Mollica was transparent about the real goal, though: build a library of music that Bose could feature in its commercials without having to pay the licensing rights for. He said that the company wouldn’t own the artists’ masters or take a share of their streaming or sales revenue, and that they’d be free to sign with other labels. That sounds extremely artist-friendly on its face, which is great. But there’s still a lot we don’t know about the new business venture.

Bose is primarily known for making consumer-grade audio gear that tries to put on airs. Most audiophiles will be quick to tell you that Bose products are overpriced and, at best, merely okay. What the company is undeniably great at is marketing. But selling mediocre Bluetooth speakers at inflated prices is very different from discovering talent and promoting artists. Mollica didn’t mention poaching A&R talent from other labels or any splashy celebrity partnerships to launch. Though he did mention that some “legendary Hollywood names” were attached to films and TV series being commissioned by Bose Studios.

Which brings us to another issue: a lack of focus. Simply launching a record label is hard enough. Why does Bose — again, whose primary experience is in manufacturing audio hardware — think that it can also launch a movie studio, a podcast network, and a live event production company? These are all things that Mollica said are in the works, according to Business Insider.

Advertisement

Sure, you could argue that Bose, as an audio company, has more of a right to dive into the music industry than those failed ventures. But they featured celebrity endorsements, partnerships with bigger labels, or, at the very least, some specific cultural hook. Bose Studios just seems desperate and unfocused.

Continue Reading

Technology

Fake AAA email scam targets drivers

Published

on

Fake AAA email scam targets drivers

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A strange email lands in your inbox, and at first, it sounds helpful. It uses a familiar company, leans into family safety and warns that you may need to act before a deadline.

That is what makes this suspicious AAA-themed email we received worth warning you about. It reads like a friendly safety reminder from someone who claims to work in AAA’s member outreach. It isn’t the kind of message most of us would delete right away.

Still, something feels off. Before you click any link or trust the warning, it helps to slow down and look for the signs that this could actually be one big scam.

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

Advertisement
  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

FAKE TRAFFIC VIOLATION TEXT SCAM USES QR CODES TO STEAL PAYMENT INFO

A suspicious AAA-themed email can look harmless at first, especially when it uses a familiar company and a safety warning. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

What this fake AAA email scam is

The email appears to use car safety as bait, then pushes you toward a link that should raise concern.

 

A message built around family safety

The email claims to come from someone named Sloane Garibaldi at AAA. It says the recipient’s household appeared on a member outreach list. Then it asks whether the family is “actually safe” in the car. That wording makes the message feel personal. It also turns a random email into something that sounds urgent.

 

A supposed rule with a deadline

The email says a new federal rule starts on July 1, 2026. It claims every passenger vehicle must carry a certified emergency rescue tool that can cut a seatbelt and break glass. Then it adds a warning about a $200 fine per occurrence. That kind of deadline can make any driver worry. However, the message does not point to a government site or an official AAA page. Instead, it pushes a shared Google link.

 

A fake status check

The email includes a small “compliance check” box. It lists the recipient as a member and says the check has not been completed. That detail makes the message feel like an account notice. It also creates a small task the reader may want to fix. Scammers use that tactic often. They make the action look quick, then hope you click before you question the message.

Advertisement

YOUR EMAIL DIDN’T EXPIRE; IT’S JUST ANOTHER SNEAKY SCAM

The email claims a new car safety rule is coming, but the message pushes the recipient toward a shared link instead of an official AAA website. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

 

Red flags in the fake AAA email

Several clues inside the message suggest this email deserves to be treated as suspicious.

 

1) The real sender address looks suspicious

The display name says Sloane Garibaldi, but the expanded sender address shows pfiz@middlerunred.guru. That domain has no clear connection to AAA. Display names can be faked. The real sender address often tells a very different story.

The sender name looks familiar, but the real email address shown here has no clear connection to AAA. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

Advertisement

 

2) The email does not use official AAA branding

The message uses the AAA name, but it does not include the official AAA logo or the kind of polished branding you would expect from a real member safety notice. That alone does not prove an email is fake. However, it adds to the concern when combined with a strange sender address, a shared link and urgent language. A real company email usually looks consistent with the brand’s website, app and past messages.

 

3) The link goes through a shared URL

The message uses a share. Google link instead of an official AAA website. That should make you pause. Shared links can hide the final destination. They can also lead to fake forms that collect personal details, account information, vehicle data or payment details. A real AAA notice should point to an official AAA domain or tell you to log in through the AAA app.

 

4) The email pushes fear before facts

The message asks whether your family is safe. It mentions a deadline. It warns about fines. Then it says the check only takes 60 seconds. That is a pressure move. The scammer wants clicking to feel easier than checking.

 

5) The rule citation does not match the claim

The email cites NHTSA FMVSS 571.220. That sounds convincing until you check what the rule covers. That federal standard deals with school bus rollover protection. It does not appear to require everyday passenger vehicles to carry an emergency rescue tool. Scammers often use official-sounding language because many people will not look it up.

 

6) The tone feels too casual for a legal warning

The message uses friendly lines like “I promise I’m not being dramatic” and “I’d rather chase you about this twice.” That tone may be meant to lower your guard. It sounds like someone trying to help. Still, a real safety or compliance notice should not arrive from a strange domain with a shared link and casual pressure.

Advertisement

 

7) The fine print repeats the suspicious link

The bottom of the email includes a P.S. that says the link may “wrap oddly” in your mail app. Then it repeats the same shared link so you can click it again. It even adds, “I’ve had people miss it because their inbox cut it in half,” which sounds casual but also gives the sender another excuse to push the link. That may seem helpful, but it keeps steering you toward the same questionable destination. Legitimate companies do not need to explain why a safety link looks strange in your inbox.

The fine print also says the recipient’s email address is tied to a “member household” in an outreach queue for the July 1, 2026, FMVSS §571.220 rollout. That wording sounds official, but it gives no member number, no verified AAA account link and no official AAA contact path. Even the opt-out line deserves caution. Scam emails often include unsubscribe or opt-out links to make the message look legitimate. In this case, “opt out here” could confirm your email address is active or send you to another suspicious page.   

10 WAYS TO PROTECT SENIORS FROM EMAIL SCAMS

The fine print repeats the same questionable link and adds an opt-out line that could be another trap. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

 

AAA says it did not send the email

We reached out to AAA, and the organization confirmed the message did not come from them.

Advertisement

“AAA did not send those emails, and they could potentially be malicious,” an AAA spokesperson told CyberGuy. “We remind members to avoid clicking on suspicious links and contact us directly if they have questions or concerns.”

That confirmation makes the warning even clearer: do not click the link in the email. Go directly to AAA if you have any questions about your membership or a safety notice.

 

Why this fake AAA email could fool drivers

The scam feels believable because it mixes a practical safety concern with a personal tone and an official-sounding reference.

 

Car safety gets attention

Most people want to protect their family on the road. A seatbelt cutter or window breaker can also sound useful in a real emergency. That makes the topic believable. The issue is the email, not necessarily the idea of keeping an emergency tool in your vehicle.

 

Personal details can lower your guard

The email uses the recipient’s actual first and last name. Scammers often use personal details to make messages feel legitimate. A name, city, phone number or family reference can make someone hesitate before deleting an email.

Advertisement

 

Official names add fake credibility

The email mentions NHTSA and a federal motor vehicle safety standard. Those details make the message look researched. However, one official name does not make the claim true. Scammers count on people trusting the reference without checking it.

SSA IMPERSONATION SCAMS ARE GETTING MORE PERSONAL

The fake AAA-themed email uses a familiar name and safety language to make a suspicious message look trustworthy. (Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto)

 

How to stay safe from fake AAA emails

A few quick checks can help you avoid bad links, fake forms and phishing attempts that pretend to come from trusted brands.

 

1) Check the sender address

Do not rely on the display name. Click or tap the sender to see the full address. If the domain does not match the company, treat the message as suspicious.

Advertisement

 

2) Look for missing or sloppy branding

Pay attention to the overall look of the email. Missing logos, odd spacing, plain formatting or generic design can be warning signs. Also, compare the message with past emails from the same company. If the style looks off, do not click.

 

3) Skip links in urgent emails

Avoid clicking links in surprise emails that mention deadlines, penalties or account problems. Instead, open your browser and go directly to the company’s official website. You can also use the company’s app.

 

4) Use strong antivirus software

Strong antivirus software can help block malicious links, phishing pages and dangerous downloads. It can also warn you before you land on a risky site. That extra alert can stop a quick mistake from becoming a bigger problem. Get my picks for the best 2026 antivirus protection winners for your Windows, Mac, Android & iOS devices at Cyberguy.com

 

5) Do not fill out surprise forms

A fake “readiness check” can collect more than you realize. Do not enter your name, address, phone number, vehicle details, payment information or account login through an unexpected email link.

 

6) Verify legal claims on your own

If an email cites a rule, law or government agency, search for it separately. Use official government websites or trusted legal sources. Do not use the link inside the message to verify the message.

Advertisement

 

7) Use a data removal service

Scam emails become more convincing when criminals know personal details about you. Data brokers and people-search sites can expose names, addresses, phone numbers and relatives. A data removal service can help reduce that exposure. It will not remove everything, but it can make you a harder target. Check out my top picks for data removal services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already out on the web by visiting Cyberguy.com

 

8) Report and block the sender

Mark the message as phishing or junk. Then block the sender and delete the email. If the message claims to come from AAA, contact AAA through its official website or app to report it.

 

9) Warn someone who may click quickly

This kind of scam can fool anyone. It may be especially risky for older relatives, new drivers or anyone who takes safety notices seriously. A quick warning could help them avoid a bad link and major headaches down the road.

 

Kurt’s key takeaways

This fake AAA email works because it feels personal and practical. It talks about family safety. It uses a deadline. It cites a federal rule. Then it pushes a link that does not belong in a legitimate AAA notice. That is the real lesson here. When an email makes you feel rushed, slow down. Check the sender address. Look at the link. Notice the branding. Verify the claim somewhere else. You may still decide to keep an emergency tool in your car. Just do not buy one, register one or share personal information because a suspicious email told you to act fast.

Should companies and email providers be doing more to stop scam messages like this before they ever hit your inbox? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy Report

  • Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox.
  • For simple, real-world ways to spot scams early and stay protected, visit CyberGuy.com trusted by millions who watch CyberGuy on TV daily.
  • Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide free when you join.

Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved. 

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Technology

Sony’s Xperia 1 VIII is still a phone for the fans

Published

on

Sony’s Xperia 1 VIII is still a phone for the fans

The Xperia 1 VIII marks an attempt at a step change for Sony’s flagship phone line. Not only has it had an aesthetic overhaul, but Sony has also revamped the camera system, dropping the continuous optical zoom telephoto that’s defined the last four generations of Xperia phone.

It’s not all different. Sony staples like a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD card slot remain, and a few specific design touches, like a thick front bezel that fits stereo speakers, have stayed intact. Sony’s ambitious pricing hasn’t changed either: The Xperia 1 VIII isn’t launching in the US, but in the UK and Europe, it starts from £1,399 / €1,499 (about $1,850), rising to £1,849 / €1,999 ($2,450) if you want 1TB of storage.

For Sony diehards, this delivers the flagship essentials, including a capable camera, and looks good doing it. For everyone else, you can find better Android phones at this price, like Xiaomi’s 17 Ultra or the Vivo X300 Ultra.

Photo of the Sony Xperia 1 VIII sitting on a windowsill in front of flowers, showing the home screen

$1850

The Good

  • Stark, striking design
  • Headphone jack and microSD card slot
  • Capable cameras

The Bad

  • Middling battery life
  • Uneven performance
  • Only four years of Android updates
  • Dreadful AI Camera Assistant

Sony’s Xperia 1 phones have looked almost identical to one another since 2020. It was a pretty handsome design, to be fair, but probably overdue sprucing up. The 1 VIII does just that, moving to a blocky new camera island and an unusual textured finish that make the phone feel very different to every previous Xperia.

I’m a big fan of the design, which has a stark, brutalist quality. The slightly grippy texture — a bit like an incredibly fine nail file — was designed to vary subtly between the back and frame, which helps prevent the phone from feeling like a monotone slab. The texture helps sell the phone’s high price even better than ultrasmooth glass might (not that this isn’t glass, with Gorilla Glass Victus on the rear and Victus 2 on the front).

Photo of the Sony Xperia 1 VIII sitting on a brick ledge in front of flowers, showing the rear

I love the stark, straight edges of the design.
Photo of the Sony Xperia 1 VIII in front of flowers, showing the textured frame and buttons

Sony hasn’t yet told me what this odd cutout above the volume button is for.
Photo of the Sony Xperia 1 VIII in front of dirt, showing the headphone jack slot

A headphone jack!
Photo of the Sony Xperia 1 VIII in front of flowers, showing the top bezel and selfie camera

I hope you like big bezels.

I love the details, like how the camera island’s edges drop off steeply on three sides, while on the last it angles down to meet the frame. Sony’s usual knurled two-stage camera shutter button returns, adding another textural element and improved camera controls. Unfortunately, so does the recessed power button and fingerprint sensor, which is less reliable than modern under-display options. It fails about a third of the time I try it. I’m also confused by the odd rectangular patch above the volume button, which has an especially rough texture and looks like it should do something, but doesn’t. Is it some sort of antenna cutout? I’ve asked Sony.

Advertisement

Sony long ago gave up on using its unique 21:9, 4K displays on the Xperia lineup. The 1 VIII uses a less impressive 1080p display in a standard smartphone aspect ratio. The resolution is low for this grade of phone, but otherwise I can’t complain about the panel, which is a 6.5-inch, 120Hz OLED with decent brightness. I do still miss the taller screens Sony phones used to offer, though. Unlike most rivals, the display is also entirely uninterrupted by a camera cutout, notch, or Dynamic Island. The tradeoff is the rather thick bezel above and below the screen, which houses the camera and a pair of stereo speakers (good for phone speakers, but still phone speakers).

Photo of the Sony Xperia 1 VIII in front of a house, showing the homescreen and an app icon folder

The Xperia 1 VIII runs mostly stock Android, but has its quirks — the most annoying is an insistence on overriding my homescreen to create folders I didn’t ask for.

The Xperia 1 VIII’s internals are unremarkable, with the same Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 chipset you’ll find on most comparable handsets. It’s paired with either 12GB of RAM and 256GB of storage — available in black, red, or silver versions of the phone — or 16GB of RAM and 1TB of storage. That model is only available in gold, meaning that anyone tempted by the Trump phone’s lustrous finish and built-in headphone jack can enjoy the same luxuries here for quadruple the price.

What is remarkable is that Sony has managed to make the 8 Elite Gen 5 perform quite poorly. While the phone runs smoothly the majority of the time, I’ve run into repeated stuttering and slowdowns, especially in the camera or while switching between apps. It gets hot, too. Using the phone to record the audio of a recent press event, with real-time AI transcription running, it became worryingly warm after just 30 minutes or so, and as the hourlong call ended, it was hot to the touch.

I don’t love the battery either. Sony claims you’ll get two days of life out of the 5,000mAh cell, but I don’t see how. I’m a light-to-moderate user most of the time, and I’ve dipped into single-digit territory by bedtime more than once. This will last the day unless you push it hard, but expect to charge every 24 hours. That might take some time too, given the 30W max speed, substantially slower than most rivals. Only Google’s Pixel 10 Pro charges quite so slowly.

Photo of the Sony Xperia 1 VIII sitting on a windowsill in front of flowers, showing the rear camera

Zeiss still contributes to the camera lenses.

This is definitely Sony’s best phone camera yet

Advertisement

I have better news on the camera front. After years of carving its own path, Sony has taken the “if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em” approach to its Chinese flagship rivals, abandoning its clever continuous zoom lens and instead packing the 1 VIII with the biggest telephoto sensor it could fit. That Sony dropped continuous zoom in the same year Xiaomi finally copied it and did it better feels like a cruel twist of fate.

Still, what the 2.9x (70mm-equivalent) telephoto lens here loses in versatility by giving up continuous zoom it more than makes up for in quality. That’s driven mostly by the move to a large 48-megapixel, 1/1.56-inch-type sensor — the same size as the ultrawide’s and almost as big as the 1/1.35-inch-type main camera sensor. Those other cameras, along with the 12-megapixel selfie shooter, are unchanged from last year.

1/19

The Xperia 1 VIII’s main camera is unchanged from last year.

The telephoto and the ultrawide are the two standouts, both using relatively large sensors compared to the competition. I’m a fan of Sony’s daytime processing, which leans toward higher contrast and slightly more muted colors than some other phones, and nighttime shots come out sharp and well-exposed too, though still struggle with bright streetlights. This is definitely Sony’s best phone camera yet and holds its own against the competition.

Photo of the Sony Xperia 1 VIII in front of flowers, showing the AI Camera Assistant

The AI Camera Assistant pop-up is distracting and annoying.

That is, except for the egregious new AI Camera Assistant. More often than not, when you’re trying to take a shot with the rear camera (not selfies — don’t ask me why), a pop-up appears with four AI-suggested edits to your photos, before you even take them. The overwhelming majority of these are simply overaggressive filters, either ramping up contrast or dialling back saturation, often to comically bad effect. Occasionally one will include algorithmically generated bokeh, and Sony claims it can also suggest lens swaps for better framing, but this has yet to happen to me. Every single suggestion has been markedly worse than the default camera settings, and the pop-up alone is a distracting annoyance that seems to make the camera app sluggish. Fortunately, you can turn it off, and if I wasn’t reviewing the phone, I would have done so immediately.

Advertisement

1/5

Here’s a photo I took on the Xperia 1 VIII’s main camera.

The AI camera suggestions feel emblematic of Sony’s Xperia line, which always delivers an impressive amount on paper and then contrives to trip itself up. The headphone jack, expandable storage, and stereo speakers are great. The new design language is striking and unique. The camera is the best it’s ever been. Sony’s relatively simple, streamlined take on Android 16 has its appeal too, but a meager promise of four OS updates and six years of security support gives me pause. It has its irritating quirks too: it keeps insisting on creating home screen folders, adding Facebook to my Instagram icon to make a Meta folder, and throwing a whole host of Google apps on top of Google Maps. Throw in the middling battery, performance problems, and high price, and the 1 VIII is hard to recommend to the average flagship buyer.

All of which leaves Sony back where it started. It redesigned the Xperia, rethought its camera, and simplified its software, but this is still what it always was: a phone for the fanboys. The rest of us can do better.

Photography by Dominic Preston / The Verge

Agree to Continue: Sony Xperia 1 VIII

Advertisement

Every smart device now requires you to agree to a series of terms and conditions before you can use it — contracts that no one actually reads. It’s impossible for us to read and analyze every single one of these agreements. But we started counting exactly how many times you have to hit “agree” to use devices when we review them since these are agreements most people don’t read and definitely can’t negotiate.

To use the Xperia 1 VIII, you must agree to:

  • Google Terms of Service
  • Google Play Terms of Service
  • Google Privacy Policy (included in ToS)
  • Install apps and updates: “You agree this device may also automatically download and install updates and apps from Google, your operator, and your device’s manufacturer, possibly using cellular data.”
  • Sony warranty and usage guidelines
  • Sony end user licence agreement

There’s also a variety of optional agreements, including:

  • Provide anonymous location data for Google’s services
  • “Allow apps and services to scan for Wi-Fi networks and nearby devices at any time, even when Wi-Fi or Bluetooth is off.”
  • Google phone number verification
  • Send usage and diagnostic data to Google
  • Let contacts nearby find and share with you
  • Google Gemini Apps Privacy Notice if you opt in to using Gemini Assistant
  • Sony data collection to develop and improve products and services
  • Sony data use for tailored marketing
  • Sony data use for tailored support
  • Sony data use for tailored marketing via the support app

Honor includes several more optional agreements during setup tied to specific features. Other Google features, like Google Wallet, may require additional agreements.

Final tally: six mandatory agreements and more than 12 optional agreements.

Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates.

Continue Reading
Advertisement

Trending