Connect with us

Alaska

Early in-person voting locations in rural Alaska turn away primary voters amid delays in the delivery of election materials

Published

on

Early in-person voting locations in rural Alaska turn away primary voters amid delays in the delivery of election materials


More than a dozen communities in rural Alaska were unable on Wednesday to offer early in-person polling ahead of the state primary as required by law because of delays in the delivery of election materials.

State law requires absentee in-person voting locations to open two weeks prior to Election Day. Polling locations across the state opened Monday ahead of the Aug. 20 primary, when voters will choose between candidates for Alaska’s lone U.S. House seat and 50 legislative seats.

But in at least 14 communities, absentee in-person voting locations were not open as of Wednesday morning, two days after early in-person voting had begun. And in 17 other locations, in-person polling was delayed by at least a day, according to the Division of Elections.

Advertisement

The communities where in-person polling had not begun as of Wednesday include Kokhanok, Nikolski, Akutan, Pedro Bay, Atka, Sand Point, St. George, Stony River, Napaskiak, Deering, Kivalina, Shaktoolik, Koyuk and St. Michael, according to the Division of Elections. The division provided the list in response to questions from a reporter but has not provided any specific details to the public.

[Early voting starts for Alaska’s Aug. 20 primary election]

Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher attributed the delay to the short window between when ballots are printed and delivered to regional offices. In rural Alaska, she said voting materials must be delivered by mail to Nome and then distributed across a vast area “through a variety of mail carriers.”

“Weather and other considerations factor into delivery of the materials,” said Beecher, who was appointed to the role last year and is overseeing a statewide election for the first time this month.

Beecher was appointed by Lt. Gov. Nancy Dahlstrom, a Republican running for Alaska’s lone U.S. House seat. As a candidate, she had used her social media channels to encourage voters to cast their ballots early. In her current role, Dahlstrom oversees Alaska’s elections. She had not publicly acknowledged the delay in the start of in-person early voting in some communities.

Advertisement

The area where the arrival of election materials was delayed falls within the Division of Election’s Region 4, which covers northern and western parts of the state. The area includes four state House districts comprising rural Alaska, where voters are predominantly Alaska Native.

Alaska Natives have faced unequal access to voting in the state, prompting a years-long federal investigation.

Ballots and accompanying materials, including the envelope in which the ballots are delivered to the Division of Elections staff, were mailed from Nome to voting locations in rural Alaska on July 30. Getting election materials to the polling locations within a week “has proven to be ongoing challenging, and this year is nothing new,” Beecher said.

Alaska law requires the director of the Division of Elections to distribute all election materials to election supervisors “not less than 25 days before the date of the election,” which would be July 26 at the latest. Beecher said the division is “fully compliant” with the statute.

Eight polling locations did not receive voting materials until Monday, the day voting was set to begin. Nine other locations did not receive materials until Tuesday, Beecher said in her email. She did not provide the names of those 17 polling locations but said all of those locations had allowed voting to begin as of Wednesday.

Advertisement

“Each bag mailed has a USPS tracking number that allows the division to see where and when it arrived,” Beecher said.

According to information that Beecher said the postal service provided Wednesday afternoon, several of the affected communities had received their election materials on Wednesday. Postal service workers were unable to contact workers in Nikolski or Atka to determine the status of their deliveries, Beecher said.

Robyn Burke, an Utqiagvik Democrat running to represent state House District 40, said she tried to vote absentee in person at the North Slope Borough building on Tuesday, but was told that the envelopes meant for ballot delivery had not yet arrived in Utqiagvik, so voting was not yet possible. On Wednesday, Burke said she again called the Utqiagvik polling location and was told that in-person absentee voting was still not available.

Burke said that after she was turned away from voting in Utqiagvik, she called the Northwest Arctic Borough Building in Kotzebue as well. There too, election materials had not arrived as of Tuesday evening, forcing election workers to turn away voters, Burke said.

Burke said she wondered why the Division of Elections staff did not spread the word on its social media platforms about the delay in the arrival of the election materials, so that voters did not have to find out by going to the polling locations.

Advertisement

“It’s just frustrating,” she said. “With all of the other issues that have to do with voting in rural Alaska — for our polling sites to not even be open and accepting voters — I think that’s just uncalled for.”

“When you’re sending folks away from the poll, what if that discourages them from coming back?” she asked.

This is not the first time the Division of Elections has blamed election problems in rural Alaska on the postal service. In 2022, the division certified election results without fully counting the ballots from several predominantly Alaska Native communities, because mail delivery to the Division of Elections was delayed.

Beecher said that voters seeking to cast their ballots early in communities that still have not opened polling locations can apply for a mail ballot — as long as they do so by Saturday.

• • •

Advertisement





Source link

Alaska

Alaska accuses crowdfunding websites of violating law, using charities’ names without their consent

Published

on

Alaska accuses crowdfunding websites of violating law, using charities’ names without their consent


The home page for the crowdfunding platform GoFundMe is shown on a device in New York, Oct. 16, 2024. (AP Photo/Peter Morgan, File)

The state of Alaska filed civil lawsuits Tuesday against six crowdfunding websites, accusing them of illegally soliciting donations for thousands of Alaska charities without consent.

In complaints filed at Anchorage Superior Court, the consumer protection unit of the Alaska Department of Law said GoFundMe, PayPal, Charity Navigator, Pledgling Technologies, JustGiving and Network For Good each violated the Alaska Charitable Solicitations Act thousands of times.

That act, in place since 1993, requires state registration for anyone who seeks donations on behalf of a charity.

The suits ask a judge to order the sites shut down the pages devoted to Alaska nonprofits and immediately disburse any donations to those nonprofits. It also asks for “separate civil penalties … of not less than $1,000 and not more than $25,000 per violation.”

Advertisement

According to the complaints, the six crowdfunding sites scraped IRS data to obtain the information of thousands of Alaska nonprofits, then set up donation pages for each of those nonprofits without their consent.

That scraping was part of a nationwide campaign that encompassed almost a million and a half federally registered organizations.

In some cases, the sites charged fees or encouraged “tips” to themselves during the donation process. In many cases, they poured donations into a third-party account and only released donations to charities who stepped forward to claim them, according to the complaints.

Attorney General-designee Stephen Cox said the state became aware of the issue after California reporters and state officials began investigating why GoFundMe created donation pages for 1.4 million nonprofits without their consent or knowledge.

GoFundMe later took down pages created without consent, but other crowdfunding websites did not. On Tuesday morning, donation pages were still visible on Charity Navigator, one of the defendants named in the new Alaska lawsuits. GoFundMe has kept some pages created with the consent of charities.

Advertisement

Earlier this week, almost two dozen state attorney generals sent a letter to GoFundMe, demanding answers to questions about its policies.

Alaska did not sign that letter, in part because officials here believed the response was too weak.

In a prepared statement, Cox said, “Alaska law is clear: if you’re going to raise money in a charity’s name, you must first get the charity’s consent. These lawsuits are about protecting donors, protecting nonprofits, and preserving the public trust that makes charitable giving possible.”

Laurie Wolf is President and CEO of the Foraker Group, which advises Alaska nonprofits and provides them with administrative support.

The Foraker Group has been issuing warnings about the issue for months, and Wolf filed an affidavit in support of the lawsuit, as did a representative of the Bethel Community Services Foundation and Bread Line Inc., which operates a food bank in Fairbanks.

Advertisement

By phone on Tuesday, Wolf said the issue is a matter of consent: “They are impersonating 1.2 million nonprofits across this country, they’re impersonating them without their consent or even their knowledge.”

She said the issue became particularly important last fall, when people across the United States and the world became aware of the devastation caused by ex-Typhoon Halong in Western Alaska.

Many people, not knowing local Alaska charities, simply donated via links they found on internet searches. Some of those donations may have never reached their intended recipients.

If a crowdfunding website operates independently of the charity it intends to benefit, it might interfere with the charity’s own fundraising, she explained.

Someone might never be recognized for their gift and become angry, hurting the charity’s long-term relationship with their community.

Advertisement

“They take away the ability for the organization to make choices for itself about how it wants to build trust and relationships with its donors, and how it wants to put its brand and its mission out in the public sphere. They’ve taken away all of our choices about that,” she said.

In addition, donations may be subject to fees or never reach a charity at all, particularly if the charity is unaware that a crowdfunding website is holding money for it to collect.

The Foraker Group went so far as to conduct an experiment and had an employee donate to the group through several of the defendants’ platforms. In multiple cases, it took weeks before the donation reached its intended recipient, and in some cases, the donor’s identity was concealed, making it impossible for the charity to properly thank them.

GoFundMe was the only defendant to respond to emailed inquiries before the Beacon’s reporting deadline on Tuesday.

“GoFundMe’s mission is to help people help each other by making it easier for donors to discover and support the causes they care about. We are committed to helping nonprofits reach new supporters by connecting them with the millions of people on our platform who want to make a difference. Nonprofit Pages were created using publicly available information to help people support nonprofit organizations, with donations going to the intended nonprofit,” said Jeff Platt, communications manager for GoFundMe.

Advertisement

“After hearing feedback from nonprofit leaders in October, we acted quickly to make Nonprofit Pages fully opt-in, removed and de-indexed unclaimed pages, and turned off search engine optimization by default. The immediate changes we made directly addressed the concerns of the nonprofit community, and reflect our continued commitment to transparency, accountability, and partnership with the nonprofit sector,” he said.

This week’s lawsuits in state court rely in large part on the 1993 Alaska Charitable Solicitations Act.

That bill passed the Alaska Legislature amid a surge of concern about telemarketers soliciting donations by phone.

Then-Rep. Ron Larson, a Democrat from the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, sponsored the act and told fellow lawmakers at the time that “lookalike organizations” were “ripping off” legitimate charities.

The act made no mention of donations by internet, and in state law, it’s still labeled as “Telephonic solicitations,” but it goes on to state that under any circumstances it is unlawful to use a charity’s name or symbol without their permission.

Advertisement

“Alaskans are generous people. But generosity depends on trust,” Cox said in his prepared statements. “GoFundMe and similar platforms used nonprofits’ good names to solicit donations without coordinating with the organizations actually doing the charitable work. That means some Alaskans may have donated thinking they were supporting a specific charity, when the charity never authorized the page and may never have received the donation — or may have received less than donors intended because of fees.”

Originally published by the Alaska Beacon, an independent, nonpartisan news organization that covers Alaska state government.





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Jessie Holmes wins Alaska Air Transit Spirit of Iditarod Award

Published

on

Jessie Holmes wins Alaska Air Transit Spirit of Iditarod Award


 

Veteran musher Jessie Holmes (bib # 7 ), of Brushkana, Alaska was the first musher to reach the McGrath checkpoint at  8:03 p.m. today with 16 dogs in harness, winning the Alaska Air Transit Spirit of Iditarod Award. 

First presented in 2019 and given to the first musher to reach the McGrath checkpoint, this award is presented by Lead Dog partner, Alaska Air Transit. First introduced in 2019, this award honors the first musher to arrive at the McGrath Checkpoint. The McGrath community shares deep ties to the Iditarod, and the award reflects that connection, featuring beaver fur mushers mitts with Athabaskan beadwork on moose hide, handcrafted by Loretta Maillelle of McGrath, along with a beaver fur hat made by Rosalie Egrass of McGrath. The award was presented to Holmes by Jessica Beans-Vaeao, Charter Coordinator for Alaska Air Transit

“Our team is excited to present this Spirit of Iditarod award in McGrath again this year. The Beaded Moose Hide and Beaver Mitts were made by Loretta Maillelle of McGrath, and the hand sewn Beaver Hat was made by Rosalie Egrass of McGrath. Rosalie Egrass was able to fly home on our plane that took our crew and the award to McGrath, which made for a pretty special trip! We are proud to be providing service to McGrath, and feel that all local Air Carriers represent the spirit of Iditarod throughout Alaska on a daily basis. It is great to be a part of the air carriers that service the state with essential supplies and transportation, and to be a part of the Iditarod in a meaningful way,” said Josie Owen, owner of Alaska Air Transit. 

 

This is Alaska Air Transit’s eighth year sponsoring the Iditarod and seventh year presenting the Spirit of Iditarod Award. Alaska Air Transit offers crucial flight support statewide via air charter and provides scheduled service to the Upper Kuskokwim communities of Nikolai, McGrath, Takotna and Tatalina as well as the Prince  William Sound communities of Tatitlek and Chenega.  

Advertisement





Source link

Continue Reading

Alaska

Alaska High School Girls Basketball 2026 ASAA State Championship Brackets – March 10

Published

on

Alaska High School Girls Basketball 2026 ASAA State Championship Brackets – March 10


The 2026 Alaska high school girls basketball state championships begin this week, and High School On SI has brackets for all four classifications.

The brackets will be updated with scores and matchups throughout the week.

All four classifications will play their state championship games at Alaska Airlines Center in Anchorage.

Advertisement

The 1A and 2A championships run March 11-14. Classes 3A and 4A play the following week, March 18-21.

Alaska High School Girls Basketball 2026 State Championship Brackets, Matchups, Schedule – March 10

3/11 – Shaktoolik (1) vs. Arlicaq (16)

3/11 – Kake (8) vs. Tri-Valley (9)

Advertisement

3/11 – Fort Yukon (4) vs. Andreafski (13)

Advertisement

3/11 – Sand Point (5) vs. Napaaqutgmiut (12)

3/11 – Scammon Bay (2) vs. Nunamiut (15)

3/11 – Akiuk Memorial (7) vs. Newhalen (10)

3/11 – Davis-Romoth (3) vs. Cook Inlet Academy (14)

Advertisement

3/11 – Hoonah (6) vs. Shishmaref (11)


3/12 – Seward (1) vs. Chevak (8)

3/12 – Metlakatla (4) vs. Cordova (5)

Advertisement

3/12 – Craig (2) vs. Susitna Valley (7)

Advertisement

3/12 – Glennallen (3) vs. Degnan (6)


3/18 – Barrow (1) vs. Kotzebue (8)

Advertisement

3/18 – Grace Christian (4) vs. Galena (5)

Advertisement

3/18 – Monroe Catholic (2) vs. Delta (7)

3/18 – Mt. Edgecumbe (3) vs. Kenai Central (6)

Advertisement

3/18 – Mountain City Christian Academy (1) vs. North Pole (8)

Advertisement

3/18 – Colony (4) vs. West (5)

3/18 – Bartlett (2) vs. Juneau-Douglas (7)

3/18 – Wasilla (3) vs. Service (6)


More Coverage from High School On SI



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending